Spatial prediction of landslide hazards in Hoa Binh province (Vietnam): A comparative assessment of the efficacy of evidential belief functions and fuzzy logic models

Catena

Volumn 96, Issue , 2012, Pages 28-40

  Tien Bui, Dieu ^a,b   Pradhan, Biswajeet ^c   Lofman, Owe ^a   Revhaug, Inge ^a   Dick, Oystein B ^a  

^a NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF LIFE SCIENCES   (Norway)

^b HANOI UNIVERSITY OF MINING AND GEOLOGY   (Viet Nam)

^c UNIVERSITY PUTRA MALAYSIA   (Malaysia)

Author keywords

Evidential belief functions; Fuzzy operator; GIS; Landslide; Vietnam

Indexed keywords

ASSESSMENT METHOD; DATA SET; FUZZY MATHEMATICS; GIS; HAZARD ASSESSMENT; LANDSLIDE; NUMERICAL MODEL; PREDICTION; SLOPE; SPATIAL ANALYSIS;

HOA BINH; VIET NAM;

EID: 84860323200     PISSN: 03418162     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.catena.2012.04.001     Document Type: Article

References (93)

1. Akgun A. A comparison of landslide susceptibility maps produced by logistic regression, multi-criteria decision, and likelihood ratio methods: a case study at Izmir, Turkey. Landslides 2012, 9:93-106.
2. Akgun A., Sezer E.A., Nefeslioglu H.A., Gokceoglu C., Pradhan B. An easy-to-use MATLAB program (MamLand) for the assessment of landslide susceptibility using a Mamdani fuzzy algorithm. Computers & Geosciences 2012, 38:23-34.
3. Aleotti P., Chowdhury R. Landslide hazard assessment: summary review and new perspectives. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment 1999, 58:21-44.
4. Alkema D. Geo-information technology for hazard risk assessment. A case study site in Yen Bai (Vietnam), The International Institute for Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation (ITC), University Twente 2010.
5. Althuwaynee O.F., Pradhan B., Lee S. Application of an evidential belief function model in landslide susceptibility mapping. Computers & Geosciences 2012, 10.1016/j.cageo.2012.03.003.
6. An P., Moon W.M., Rencz A. Application of fuzzy set theory to integrated mineral exploration. Canadian Journal of Exploration Geophysics 1991, 27:1-11.
7. An P., Moon W.M., Bonhamcarter G.F. On knowledge-based approach on integrating remote sensing, geophysical and geological information. International Space Year: Space Remote Sensing 1992, 1 and 2:34-38.
8. Arikan F., Ulusay R., Aydin N. Characterization of weathered acidic volcanic rocks and a weathering classification based on a rating system. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment 2007, 66:415-430.
9. Awasthi A., Chauhan S.S. Using AHP and Dempster-Shafer theory for evaluating sustainable transport solutions. Environmental Modelling & Software 2011, 26:787-796.
10. Ballabio C., Sterlacchini S. Support vector machines for landslide susceptibility mapping: The Staffora River Basin case study, Italy. Mathematical Geosciences 2012, 44:47-70.
11. Binaghi E., Luzi L., Madella P., Pergalani F., Rampini A. Slope instability zonation: a comparison between certainty factor and fuzzy Dempster-Shafer approaches. Natural Hazards 1998, 17:77-97.
12. Biswajeet P., Saied P. Comparison between prediction capabilities of neural network and fuzzy logic Techniques for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping. Disaster Advances 2010, 3:26-34.
13. Bonham-Carter G.F. Geographic Information Systems for Geoscientists: Modelling with GIS 1994, Pegamon Press.
14. Brenning A. Spatial prediction models for landslide hazards: review, comparison and evaluation. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 2005, 5:853-862.
15. Caniani D., Pascale S., Sdao F., Sole A. Neural networks and landslide susceptibility: a case study of the urban area of Potenza. Natural Hazards 2007, 45:55-72.
16. Carranza E.J.M. Controls on mineral deposit occurrence inferred from analysis of their spatial pattern and spatial association with geological features. Ore Geology Reviews 2009, 35:383-400.
17. Carranza E.J.M., Castro O. Predicting lahar-inundation zones: case study in West Mount Pinatubo, Philippines. Natural Hazards 2006, 37:331-372.
18. Carranza E.J.M., Hale M. Geologically constrained fuzzy mapping of gold mineralization potential, Baguio District, Philippines. Natural Resources Research 2001, 10:125-136.
19. Carranza E.J.M., Hale M. Evidential belief functions for data-driven geologically constrained mapping of gold potential, Baguio district, Philippines. Ore Geology Reviews 2002, 22:117-132.
20. Carranza E.J.M., Sadeghi M. Predictive mapping of prospectivity and quantitative estimation of undiscovered VMS deposits in Skellefte district (Sweden). Ore Geology Reviews 2010, 38:219-241.
21. Carranza E.J.M., Woldai T., Chikambwe E.M. Application of data-driven evidential belief functions to prospectivity mapping for aquamarine-bearing pegmatites, Lundazi District, Zambia. Natural Resources Research 2005, 14:47-63.
22. Carranza E.J.M., Hale M., Faassen C. Selection of coherent deposit-type locations and their application in data-driven mineral prospectivity mapping. Ore Geology Reviews 2008, 33:536-558.
23. Carranza E.J.M., van Ruitenbeek F.J.A., Hecker C., van der Meijde M., van der Meer F.D. Knowledge-guided data-driven evidential belief modeling of mineral prospectivity in Cabo de Gata, SE Spain. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation 2008, 10:374-387.
24. Carranza E.J.M., Wibowo H., Barritt S.D., Sumintadireja P. Spatial data analysis and integration for regional-scale geothermal potential mapping, West Java, Indonesia. Geothermics 2008, 37:267-299.
25. Carranza E.J.M., Owusu E., Hale M. Mapping of prospectivity and estimation of number of undiscovered prospects for lode gold, southwestern Ashanti Belt, Ghana. Mineralium Deposita 2009, 44:915-938.
26. Carrara A., Pike R.J. GIS technology and models for assessing landslide hazard and risk. Geomorphology 2008, 94:257-260.
27. Chacon J., Irigaray C., Fernandez T., El Hamdouni R. Engineering geology maps: landslides and geographical information systems. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment 2006, 65:341-411.
28. Champati ray P.K.C., Dimri S., Lakhera R.C., Sati S. Fuzzy-based method for landslide hazard assessment in active seismic zone of Himalaya. Landslides 2007, 4:101-111.
29. Cheng Q., Agterberg F.P. Fuzzy weights of evidence method and its application in mineral potential mapping. Natural Resources Research 1999, 8:27-35.
30. Chung C.J.F., Fabbri A.G. Validation of spatial prediction models for landslide hazard mapping. Natural Hazards 2003, 30:451-472.
31. Dempster A.P. Upper and lower probabilities induced by a multi-valued mapping. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 1967, 325-339.
32. Dempster A.P. A generalisation of Bayesian inference. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 1968, 205-247.
33. Ercanoglu M., Gokceoglu C. Use of fuzzy relations to produce landslide susceptibility map of a landslide prone area (West Black Sea Region, Turkey). Engineering Geology 2004, 75:229-250.
34. Ghosh S., Carranza E.J.M. Spatial analysis of mutual fault/fracture and slope controls on rocksliding in Darjeeling Himalaya, India. Geomorphology 2010, 122:1-24.
35. Gorsevski P.V., Gessler P.E., Jankowski P. Integrating a fuzzy k-means classification and a Bayesian approach for spatial prediction of landslide hazard. Journal of Geographical Systems 2003, 5:223-251.
36. Gottwald S. An approach to handle partially sound rules of inference. Advances in Intelligent Computing - IPMU '94 1995, 380-388. Springer, Berlin. B. Bouchon-Meunier, R. Yager, L. Zadeh (Eds.).
37. Guzzetti F., Carrara A., Cardinali M., Reichenbach P. Landslide hazard evaluation: a review of current techniques and their application in a multi-scale study, Central Italy. Geomorphology 1999, 31:181-216.
38. Guzzetti F., Reichenbach P., Cardinali M., Galli M., Ardizzone F. Probabilistic landslide hazard assessment at the basin scale. Geomorphology 2005, 72:272-299.
39. Guzzetti F., Reichenbach P., Ardizzone F., Cardinali M., Galli M. Estimating the quality of landslide susceptibility models. Geomorphology 2006, 81:166-184.
40. Kanungo D., Arora M., Gupta R., Sarkar S. Landslide risk assessment using concepts of danger pixels and fuzzy set theory in Darjeeling Himalayas. Landslides 2008, 5:407-416.
41. Kanungo D.P., Arora M.K., Sarkar S., Gupta R.P. A fuzzy set based approach for integration of thematic maps for landslide susceptibility zonation. Georisk: Assessment and Management of Risk for Engineered Systems and Geohazards 2009, 3:30-43.
42. Lee S. Application and verification of fuzzy algebraic operators to landslide susceptibility mapping. Environmental Geology 2007, 52:615-623.
43. Lee S. Landslide susceptibility mapping using an artificial neural network in the Gangneung area, Korea. International Journal of Remote Sensing 2007, 28:4763-4783.
44. Lee S., Dan N.T. Probabilistic landslide susceptibility mapping on the Lai Chau province of Vietnam: focus on the relationship between tectonic fractures and landslides. Environmental Geology 2005, 48:778-787.
45. Lee S., Sambath T. Landslide susceptibility mapping in the Damrei Romel area, Cambodia using frequency ratio and logistic regression models. Environmental Geology 2006, 50:847-855.
46. Lee S., Ryu J.H., Lee M.J., Won J.S. Use of an artificial neural network for analysis of the susceptibility to landslides at Boun, Korea. Environmental Geology 2003, 44:820-833.
47. Lee S., Ryu J.H., Kim I.S. Landslide susceptibility analysis and its verification using likelihood ratio, logistic regression, and artificial neural network models: case study of Youngin, Korea. Landslides 2007, 4:327-338.
48. Malins D., Metternicht G. Assessing the spatial extent of dryland salinity through fuzzy modeling. Ecological Modelling 2006, 193:387-411.
49. Malpica J.A., Alonso M.C., Sanz M.A. Dempster-Shafer Theory in geographic information systems: A survey. Expert Systems with Applications 2007, 32:47-55.
50. Marjanović M., Kovačević M., Bajat B., Voženílek V. Landslide susceptibility assessment using SVM machine learning algorithm. Engineering Geology 2011, 123:225-234.
51. Melchiorre C., Matteucci M., Azzoni A., Zanchi A. Artificial neural networks and cluster analysis in landslide susceptibility zonation. Geomorphology 2008, 94:379-400.
52. Moon W.M. Integration of remote sensing and geological/geophysical data using Dempster-Shafer approach. Digest-International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS) 1989, 838-841.
53. Nefeslioglu H.A., Sezer E., Gokceoglu C., Bozkir A.S., Duman T.Y. Assessment of Landslide Susceptibility by Decision Trees in the Metropolitan Area of Istanbul, Turkey. Mathematical Problems in Engineering 2010, http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2010/901095.
54. Oh H.-J., Pradhan B. Application of a neuro-fuzzy model to landslide-susceptibility mapping for shallow landslides in a tropical hilly area. Computers & Geosciences 2011, 37:1264-1276.
55. Park N.-W. Application of Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence to GIS-based landslide susceptibility analysis. Environmental Earth Sciences 2011, 62:367-376.
56. Pearl J. Reasoning under uncertainty. Annual Review of Computer Science 1989, 4:37-72.
57. Porwal A., Carranza E.J.M., Hale M. Knowledge-driven and data-driven fuzzy models for predictive mineral potential mapping. Natural Resources Research 2003, 12:1-25.
58. Porwal A., Carranza E.J.M., Hale M. A hybrid fuzzy weights-of-evidence model for mineral potential mapping. Natural Resources Research 2006, 15:1-14.
59. Pradhan B. Application of an advanced fuzzy logic model for landslide susceptibility analysis. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems 2010, 3:370-381.
60. Pradhan B. Landslide Susceptibility mapping of a catchment area using frequency ratio, fuzzy logic and multivariate logistic regression approaches. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing 2010, 38:301-320.
61. Pradhan B. Remote sensing and GIS-based landslide hazard analysis and cross-validation using multivariate logistic regression model on three test areas in Malaysia. Advances in Space Research 2010, 45:1244-1256.
62. Pradhan B. Manifestation of an advanced fuzzy logic model coupled with geo-information techniques to landslide susceptibility mapping and their comparison with logistic regression modelling. Environmental and Ecological Statistics 2011, 18:471-493.
63. Pradhan B. Use of GIS-based fuzzy logic relations and its cross application to produce landslide susceptibility maps in three test areas in Malaysia. Environmental Earth Sciences 2011, 63:329-349.
64. Pradhan B., Lee S. Delineation of landslide hazard areas on Penang Island, Malaysia, by using frequency ratio, logistic regression, and artificial neural network models. Environmental Earth Sciences 2010, 60:1037-1054.
65. Pradhan B., Lee S. Landslide susceptibility assessment and factor effect analysis: backpropagation artificial neural networks and their comparison with frequency ratio and bivariate logistic regression modelling. Environmental Modelling & Software 2010, 25:747-759.
66. Pradhan B., Lee S. Regional landslide susceptibility analysis using back-propagation neural network model at Cameron Highland, Malaysia. Landslides 2010, 7:13-30.
67. Pradhan B., Lee S., Buchroithner M.F. A GIS-based back-propagation neural network model and its cross-application and validation for landslide susceptibility analyses. Computers Environment and Urban Systems 2010, 34:216-235.
68. Pradhan B., Sezer E.A., Gokceoglu C., Buchroithner M.F. Landslide susceptibility mapping by neuro-fuzzy approach in a landslide-prone area (Cameron Highlands, Malaysia). IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 2010, 48:4164-4177.
69. Robinson V.B. A perspective on the fundamentals of fuzzy sets and their use in geographic information systems. Transactions in GIS 2003, 7:3-30.
70. Ross T.J. Fuzzy Logic with Engineering Applications 2004, Wiley.
71. Saito H., Nakayama D., Matsuyama H. Comparison of landslide susceptibility based on a decision-tree model and actual landslide occurrence: The Akaishi Mountains, Japan. Geomorphology 2009, 109:108-121.
72. Sarkar S., Kanungo D.P. An integrated approach for landslide susceptibility mapping using remote sensing and GIS. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 2004, 70:617-625.
73. Sezer E.A., Pradhan B., Gokceoglu C. Manifestation of an adaptive neuro-fuzzy model on landslide susceptibility mapping: Klang valley, Malaysia. Expert Systems with Applications 2011, 38:8208-8219.
74. Shafer G. A Mathematical Theory of Evidence 1976, Princetown University Press, New Jersey.
75. Shujun S., Baolei Z., Wenlan F., Wancun Z. Using fuzzy relations and GIS method to evaluate debris flow hazard. Wuhan University Journal of Natural Sciences 2006, 11:875-881.
76. Singpurwalla N.D., Booker J.M. Membership functions and probability measures of fuzzy sets. Journal of the American Statistical Association 2004, 99:867-877.
77. Srivastava R.P., Mock T.J., Gao L. The Dempster-Shafer theory: an introduction and fraud risk assessment Illustration. Australian Accounting Review 2011, 21:282-291.
78. Tangestani M.H. A comparative study of Dempster-Shafer and fuzzy models for landslide susceptibility mapping using a GIS: An experience from Zagros Mountains, SW Iran. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences 2009, 35:66-73.
79. Thiam A.K. An evidential reasoning approach to land degradation evaluation: Dempster-Shafer Theory of Evidence. Transactions in GIS 2005, 9:507-520.
80. Tien Bui D., Lofman O., Revhaug I., Dick O. Landslide susceptibility analysis in the Hoa Binh province of Vietnam using statistical index and logistic regression. Natural Hazards 2011, 59:1413-1444.
81. Tien Bui D., Pradhan B., Lofman O., Revhaug I., Dick O.B. Landslide susceptibility mapping at Hoa Binh province (Vietnam) using an adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system and GIS. Computers & Geosciences 2011, 10.1016/j.cageo.2011.10.031.
82. Topcu I.B., Saridemir M. Prediction of mechanical properties of recycled aggregate concretes containing silica fume using artificial neural networks and fuzzy logic. Computational Materials Science 2008, 42:74-82.
83. Uzkent B., Barkana B.D., Yang J.D. Automatic environmental noise source classification model using fuzzy logic. Expert Systems with Applications 2011, 38:8751-8755.
84. Van T.T., Anh D.T., Hieu H.H., Giap N.X., Ke T.D., Nam T.D., Ngoc D., Ngoc D.T.Y., Thai T.N., Thang D.V., Tinh N.V., Tuat L.T., Tung N.T., Tuy P.K., Viet H.A. Investigation and Assessment of the Current Status and Potential of Landslides in Some Sections of the Ho Chi Minh Road, National Road 1A and Proposed Remedial Measures to Prevent Landslides from Threat of Safety of People, Property, and Infrastructure 2006, Vietnam Institute of Geosciences and Mineral Resources, Hanoi.
85. Varnes D.J. Landslide Hazard Zonation: A Review of Principles and Practice 1984, UNESCO, Paris.
86. Yao X., Tham L.G., Dai F.C. Landslide susceptibility mapping based on Support Vector Machine: A case study on natural slopes of Hong Kong, China. Geomorphology 2008, 101:572-582.
87. Yeon Y.-K., Han J.-G., Ryu K.H. Landslide susceptibility mapping in Injae, Korea, using a decision tree. Engineering Geology 2010, 116:274-283.
88. Yilmaz I. A case study from Koyulhisar (Sivas-Turkey) for landslide susceptibility mapping by artificial neural networks. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment 2009, 68:297-306.
89. Yilmaz I. Landslide susceptibility mapping using frequency ratio, logistic regression, artificial neural networks and their comparison: A case study from Kat landslides (Tokat-Turkey). Computers & Geosciences 2009, 35:1125-1138.
90. Yilmaz I. Comparison of landslide susceptibility mapping methodologies for Koyulhisar, Turkey: conditional probability, logistic regression, artificial neural networks, and support vector machine. Environmental Earth Sciences 2010, 61:821-836.
91. Yilmaz I. The effect of the sampling strategies on the landslide susceptibility mapping by conditional probability and artificial neural networks. Environmental Earth Sciences 2010, 60:505-519.
92. Zadeh Fuzzy sets. IEEE Information and Control 1965, 338-353.
93. Zimmermann H.J. Fuzzy Set Theory - and Its Applications 1991, Springer.