A paradigm shift in biomass technology from complete to partial cellulose hydrolysis: Lessons learned from nature

Bioengineered

Volumn 6, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 69-72

  Chen, Rachel ^a  

^a Georgia Institute of Technology   (United States)

Author keywords

Biofuels; Biomass technology; Cellobiose; Cellobiose phosphorylase; Cellodextrin; Cellodextrin transporter; Cellulose hydrolysis; Metabolic engineering; Synthetic biology

Indexed keywords

CELLOBIOSE PHOSPHORYLASE; CELLODEXTRIN PHOSPHORYLASE; CELLULOSE; GLUCOSE; PHOSPHORYLASE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; XYLOSE; CELLOBIOSE;

ARTICLE; BIOMASS CONVERSION; BIOMASS PRODUCTION; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); COST; ENZYME ACTIVITY; ENZYME METABOLISM; ENZYME PHOSPHORYLATION; ESCHERICHIA COLI; FERMENTATION; HYDROLYSIS; PRODUCTIVITY; METABOLIC ENGINEERING; METABOLISM;

CELLOBIOSE; ESCHERICHIA COLI; METABOLIC ENGINEERING; XYLOSE;

EID: 84934293588     PISSN: 21655979     EISSN: 21655987     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/21655979.2014.1004019     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Rubin EM. Genomics of cellulosic biofuels. Nature 2008; 454(7206): 841-5; PMID: 18704079; http://dx. doi. org/10. 1038/nature07190.
2. Lynd LR, van Zyl WH, McBride JE, Laser M. Consolidated bioprocessing of cellulosic biomass: an update. Curr Opin Biotechnol 2005; 16: 577-83; PMID: 16154338; http://dx. doi. org/10. 1016/j. copbio. 2005. 08. 009.
3. La Grange DC, den Haan R, van ZylWH. Engineering cellulolytic ability into bioprocessing organisms. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2010: 87(4): 1195-208; PMID: 20508932; http://dx. doi. org/10. 1007/s00253-010-2660-x.
4. Carere CR, Sparling R, cieek N, Levin DB. Third generation biofuels via direct cellulose fermentation. Int J Mol Sci 2008; 9: 1342-60; PMID: 19325807; http://dx. doi. org/10. 3390/ijms9071342.
5. Wilson DB. Cellulases and biofuels. Curr Opin Biotechnol 2009; 20: 295-9; PMID: 19502046; http://dx. doi. org/10. 1016/j. copbio. 2009. 05. 007.
6. Olson DG, McBride JE, Shaw AJ, Lynd LR. Recent progress in consolidated bioprocessing. Curr Opin Biotechnol 2011; 23: 1-10; PMID: 22176748; http://dx. doi. org/10. 1016/j. ceb. 2010. 12. 003.
7. Nichlaou SA, Gaida SM, Papoussakis ET. A comparative view of metabolite and substrate stress and tolerance in microbial bioprocessing: from biofuels and chemicals, to biocatalysis and bioremediation. Metab Eng 2010 12: 307-31; PMID: 20346409; http://dx. doi. org/10. 1016/j. ymben. 2010. 03. 004.
8. Kim J-H, Block DE, Millis DA. Simultaneous consumption of pentose and hexose sugars: an optimal microbial phenotypes for efficient fermentation of ligocellulosic biomass. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2010; 88: 1077-85; PMID: 20838789; http://dx. doi. org/10. 1007/s00253-010-2839-1.
9. Agrawal M, Mao Z, Chen RR. Adaptation yields highly efficient xylose-fermenting zymomonas mobilis strain. Biotechnol Bioeng 2011; 108: 777-85; PMID: 21404252; http://dx. doi. org/10. 1002/bit. 23021.
10. Sekar R, Shin H-D, Chen RR. Engineering Escherichia coli cells for celobiose assimilation through a phosphorolytic mechanism. Appl Environ Microbiol 2012; 78 (5): 1611-14; PMID: 22194295; http://dx. doi. org/10. 1128/AEM. 06693-11.
11. Galazka JM, Tian C, Beeson WT, Martinez B, Glass NL, Cate JHD. Cellodextrin transport in yeast for improved biofuel production. Science 2010 (Oct. 1); 330: 84-6; PMID: 20829451; http://dx. doi. org/10. 1126/science. 1192838.
12. Lynd LR, Weimer PJ, van Zyl WH, Pretorius IS. Microbial cellulose utilization: fundamentals and biotechnology. Microbiol Mol BioL Rev 2002; 66(3): 506-77; PMID: 12209002; http://dx. doi. org/10. 1128/MMBR. 66. 3. 506-577. 2002.
13. Shin HD, Wu J, Chen RR. Comparative engineering of E. coli for cellobiose utilization: hydrolysis versus phosphorolysis. Metab Eng 2014; 24: 9-17; PMID: 24769131; http://dx. doi. org/10. 1016/j. ymben. 2014. 04. 002.
14. Lee WH, Nan H, Kin HJ, Jin YS. Simultaneous saccharification and fermentation by engineered Sacchromyces cerevisiae without supplementing extracellular bglucosidse. J Biotech 2013; 167: 316-22; PMID: 23835155; http://dx. doi. org/10. 1016/j. jbiotec. 2013. 06. 016.
15. Yamada R, Nakatani Y, Ogino C, Kondo A. Efficient direct ethnol production form cellulose by cellulaseand cellodextrin transporter-co-expressing Sacchromces cerevisiae. AMB Express 2013; 3: 34; PMID: 23800294; http://dx. doi. org/10. 1186/2191-0855-3-34.
16. Ha S-J, Galazka JM, Kim SR, Choi J-H, Yang X, Seo J-H, Glass NL, Cate JHD, Jin Y-S. Engineered Sacchromyces cerecisiae capable of simultaneous cellobiose and xylose fermentation. PNAS 2011a; 108(2): 504-9; PMID: 21187422; http://dx. doi. org/10. 1073/pnas. 1010456108.
17. Lian J Li Y, HamediRad M, Zhao H. Directed evolution of a cellodextrin transporter for improved biofuel production under anaerobic conditions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol Bioeng 2014; 111(8): 1521-31; PMID: 24519319; http://dx. doi. org/10. 1002/bit. 25214.
18. Li J, Liu G, Chen M, Li Z, Qin Y, Qu Y. Cellodextrin transporters play important roles in cellulase induction in the cellulolytic fungus penicillium oxalicum. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2013; 97(24): 10479-88; PMID: 24132667; http://dx. doi. org/10. 1007/s00253-013-5301-3.
19. Rutter C, Chen R, Improved cellobiose utilization in E. coli by including both hydrolysis and phosphorolysis mechanisms. Biotechnol Lett 2014; 36(2): 301-7; PMID: 24101240; http://dx. doi. org/10. 1007/s10529-013-1365-5.
20. Chomvong K, Kordic V, Li X, Bauer S, Gillespie AE, Ja S-J, OH EJ, Galazka JM, Jin Y-S, Cate JHD. Overcoming inefficient cellobiose fermentation by cellobiose phosphorylase in the presence of xylose. Biotechnol Buifuels 2014; 7(7): 85; PMID: 24944578; http://dx. doi. org/10. 1186/1754-6834-7-85.