Equivalent Primary Rules and Differential Secondary Rules: Countermeasures in WTO and Investment Protection Law

Multi-Sourced Equivalent Norms in International Law

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 259-288

  Paparinskis, Martins ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84933578600     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (98)

1. Y Shany, The Competing Jurisdiction of International Courts and Tribunals (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2003) 3–10.
2. J Crawford, ‘Multilateral Rights and Obligations in International Law’ (2006) 319 Recueil des Cours de l’Académie de Droit International 325, 349–52.
3. J Crawford, ‘Continuity and Discontinuity in International Dispute Settlement’ in C Binder et al (eds), International Investment Law for the 21st Century: Essays in Honour of Christoph Schreuer (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2009) 817.
4. C Calvo, ‘La non-responsabilité des États a raison des pertes et dommages éprouvés par des étrangers en temps de troubles intérieurs ou de guerres civiles’ (1869) 1 Revue de Droit International 417
5. C Calvo, Le Droit International Théorique et Pratique 6th edn vol III (Paris, A Rousseau, 1888) 137.
6. F Martens, Contemporary International Law of Civilised Nations vol II (St Petersburg, Typography A Benke, 1905) 506–09
7. GS Baker (ed), Halleck’s International Law vol 1 4th edn (London, Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co Ltd, 1908) 505–07
8. AP Higgins (ed), Hall’s Treatise on International Law 8th edn (Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1924) 433–36
9. A Verdross, ‘Règles générales du droit international de la paix’ (1929) 30 Recueil des Cours de l’Académie de Droit International 271, 491–93
10. J Crawford, ‘The ILC’s Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts: A Retrospect’ (2002) 96 American Journal of International Law 874, 882–85
11. ME O’Connell, ‘Controlling Countermeasures’ in M Ragazzi (ed), International Responsibility Today: Essays in Honour of Oscar Schachter (Leiden, Brill, 2005)
12. T Franck, ‘On Proportionality of Countermeasures in International Law’ (2008) 102 American Journal of International Law 715.
13. T Broude and Y Shany, ‘The International Law and Policy of Multi-Sourced Equivalent Norms’ in T Broude and Y Shany (eds), Multi-Sourced Equivalent Norms in International Law (Oxford, Hart Publishing, 2011) p 1.
14. J Pauwelyn, ‘Adding Sweeteners to Softwood Lumber: the WTO-NAFTA “Spaghetti Bowl” is Cooking’ (2006) 9 Journal of International Economic Law 197.
15. N DiMascio and J Pauwelyn, ‘Nondiscrimination in Trade and Investment Treaties: Worlds Apart or Two Sides of the Same Coin?’ (2008) 102 American Journal of International Law 48, 49–50
16. F Weiss, ‘Trade and Investment’ in P Muchlinski, F Ortino and C Schreuer (eds), The Oxford Handbook of International Investment Law (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2008)
17. R Neufeld, ‘Trade and Investment’ in D Bethlehem, D McRae, R Neufeld and I van Damme (eds), The Oxford Handbook of International Trade Law (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2009).
18. G Verhoosel, ‘The Use of Investor-State Arbitration under Bilateral Investment Treaties to Seek Relief for Breaches of WTO Law’ (2003) 6 Journal of International Economic Law 493
19. J Pauwelyn, ‘Trade and Investment Disputes: Complement or Conflict?’ in F Ortino and S Ripinsky (eds), WTO Law and Process (London, BIICL, 2007) 313–19
20. RR Wilson, US Commercial Treaties and International Law (New Orleans, Hauser Press, 1960) 6–7.
21. M Paparinskis, ‘Barcelona Traction: A Friend of Investment Protection Law’ (2008) 8 Baltic Yearbook of International Law 105, 105–33.
22. B Simma and D Pulkowski, ‘Of Planets and the Universe: Self-Contained Regimes in International Law’ (2006) 17 European Journal of International Law 483.
23. JL Brierly, ‘Sanctions’ (1932) 17 Transactions of the Grotius Society 67, 68.
24. DJ Bederman, ‘Counterintuiting Countermeasures’ (2002) 96 American Journal of International Law 817, 819.
25. M Paparinskis, ‘Investment Arbitration and the Law of Countermeasures’ (2008) 79 British Yearbook of International Law 264, 309–17
26. C Schreuer, L Malintoppi, A Reinisch and A Sinclair, The ICSID Convention: A Commentary 2nd edn (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2009) 414–32
27. C Binder, ‘Changed Circumstances in Investment Law: Interfaces between the Law of Treaties and the Law of State Responsibility with a Special Focus on the Argentine Crisis’ in Binder et al (eds), International Investment Law for the 21st Century, above (n 4) 628–30.
28. PM Dupuy, ‘A General Stocktaking of the Connections between the Multilateral Obligations and the Codification of the Law of Responsibility’ (2003) 13 European Journal of International Law 1053, fn 64.
29. O Schachter, ‘Entangled Treaty and Custom’ in Y Dinstein and M Tabory (eds), International Law at a Time of Perplexity – Essays in Honour of Shabtai Rosenne (Dordrecht, Martinus Nijhoff, 1998) 735
30. C Carmody, ‘WTO Obligations as Collective’ (2006) 17 European Journal of International Law 419, 443
31. T Wälde, ‘International Investment Law: An Overview of Key Concepts and Methodologies’ (2007) 4 Transnational Dispute Management 48–49, fn 104.
32. A Broches, ‘Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of Other States’ (1972) 136 Recueil des Cours de l’Académie de Droit International 331, 355
33. Z Douglas, ‘The Hybrid Foundations of Investment Treaty Arbitration’ (2003) 74 British Yearbook of International Law 151, 167–84
34. Z Douglas, The International Law of Investment Claims (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2009) 1–38.
35. E Borchard, Diplomatic Protection of Citizens Abroad (New York, The Banks Law Publishing Co, 1915) 471–75
36. AP Sereni, ‘La represéntation en droit international’ (1948) 73 Recueil des Cours de l’Académie de Droit International 69, 112–17.
37. M Mendelson, ‘Runaway Train: The “Continuous Nationality” Rule from the Panavezys-Saldutiskis Railway case to Loewen’ in T Weiler (ed), International Investment Law and Arbitration: Leading Cases from the ICSID, NAFTA, Bilateral Treaties and Customary International Law (London, Cameron May, 2005) 124–43.
38. AP Sereni, ‘Agency in International Law’ (1940) 34 American Journal of International Law 638, 655
39. Y Guohua, B Mercurio and L Yongjie, WTO Dispute Settlement Understanding: A Detailed Interpretation (The Hague, Kluwer Law International, 2005) 251–79
40. P Eeckhout, ‘Remedies and Compliance’ in D Bethlehem, et al (eds), The Oxford Handbook of International Trade Law, above (n 20) 440–42, 452–54.
41. H Lesaffre, Le règlement des différends au sein de l’OMC et le droit de la responsabilité internationale (Paris, LGDJ, 2007) 454–61.
42. J Pauwelyn, ‘Enforcement and Countermeasures in the WTO: Rules are Rules – Toward a More Collective Approach’ (2000) 94 American Journal of International Law 335, 337, fn 14
43. J Pauwelyn, ‘The Calculation and Design of Trade Retaliation in Context: What is the Goal of Suspending WTO Obligations?’ in CP Bown and J Pauwelyn (eds), The Law, Economics and Politics of Retaliation in WTO Dispute Settlement (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2010).
44. CM Correa, Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights: A Commentary on the TRIPS Agreement (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2007)
45. RC Dreyfuss, ‘Intellectual Property Law and the World Trading System’ in A Lowenfeld, International Economic Law 2nd edn (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2008).
46. CM Correa, ‘Bilateral Investment Agreements: Agents of New International Standards for the Protection of Intellectual Property Rights?’ (2004) 1 (4) Transnational Dispute Management.
47. L Liberti, ‘Intellectual Property Rights in International Investment Agreements: An Overview’ (2009) 6(2) Transnational Dispute Management
48. J Mendenhall, ‘Fair Treatment of Intellectual Property Rights under Bilateral Investment Treaties’ (2009) 6(2) Transnational Dispute Management.
49. HG Ruse-Khan, ‘A Pirate of the Caribbean – The Attractions of Suspending TRIPS Obligations’ (2008) 11 Journal of International Economic Law 313.
50. A Newcombe and L Paradell, Law and Practice of Investment Treaties: Standards of Treatment (The Hague, Kluwer, 2009) chs 4, 6 and 7.
51. RL Okediji, ‘WIPO-WTO Relations and the Future of Global Intellectual Property Norms’ (2008) 39 Netherlands Yearbook of International Law 69, 103.
52. L-A Sicilianos, ‘The Classification of Obligations and the Multilateral Dimension of the Relations of International Responsibility’ (2002) 13 European Journal of International Law 1127, 1127–45
53. J Pauwelyn, ‘A Typology of Multilateral Treaty Obligations: Are WTO Obligations Bilateral or Collective in Nature?’ (2003) 14 European Journal of International Law 907.
54. R Phillimore, Commentaries upon International Law vol 3 3rd edn (London, Butterworths, 1885) 19, 31
55. L Oppenheim, International Law vol 2 (London, Longmans, Green, and Co, 1905) 38
56. P Fauchille, Traité de droit international public (Paris, Librairie Arthur Rouseau, 1926) 692
57. D Bowett, ‘Economic Coercion and Reprisals by States’ (1972) 13 Virginia Journal of International Law 1, 10.
58. CW Jenks, ‘The Conflict of Law-Making Treaties’ (1953) 30 British Yearbook of International Law 401, 451
59. G Marceau, ‘Conflict of Norms and Conflict of Jurisdictions: the Relationship between WTO Law and Agreements and Other Treaties’ (2001) 35 Journal of World Trade 1081, 1082–86
60. G Marceau, ‘WTO Dispute Settlement and Human Rights’ (2002) 13 European Journal of International Law 753, 791–94.
61. J Pauwelyn, Conflict of Norms in Public International Law: How WTO Law Relates to Other Rules of International Law (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2003) 184–87
62. E Vranes, ‘The Definition of “Norm Conflict” in International Law and Legal Theory’ (2006) 17 European Journal of International Law 395
63. E Vranes, Trade and the Environment: Fundamental Issues in International Law, WTO Law, and Legal Theory Pt I (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2009)
64. R Ago, ‘Le délit international’ (1939) 68 Recueil des Cours 419
65. R Ago, ‘Second Report on State Responsibility’ in (1970) II Yearbook of the ILC UN Doc A/CN.4/SER.A/1970/Add.1 177, 179, para 11.
66. H Kelsen, General Theory of Law and State (New York, Russel & Russel, 1961) 357–58.
67. JE Alvarez and K Khamsi, ‘The Argentine Crisis and Foreign Investors: A Glimpse into the Heart of the Investment Regime’ (2008–09) 1 Yearbook of International Investment Law and Policy 379, 427–40
68. RR Baxter, ‘Reflections on Codification in Light of the International Law of State Responsibility for Injuries to Aliens’ (1964–65) 16 Syracuse Law Review 745, 745–61
69. MS McDougal, HD Lasswell and L-C Chen, ‘The Protection of Aliens from Discrimination and World Public Order: Responsibility of States Conjoined with Human Rights’ (1976) 70 American Journal of International Law 432, 454–56.
70. V Lowe, ‘Precluding Wrongfulness or Responsibility: A Plea for Excuses’ (1999) 10 European Journal of International Law 406
71. T Christakis, ‘Les “circonstances excluant l’illicéités”: une illusion optique?’ in Droit du pouvoir, pouvoir du droit: Mélanges offerts à Jean Salmon (Bruxelles, Bruylant, 2007).
72. JHH Weiler, A Cassese and M Spinedi (eds), International Crimes of State: A Critical Analysis of the ILC’s Draft Article 19 on State Responsibility (Berlin, Walter de Gruyter, 1989).
73. MS McDougal, ‘The International Law Commission’s Draft Articles upon Interpretation: Textuality Redivivu’ (1967) 61 American Journal of International Law 992
74. MS McDougal (1968) 62 American Journal of International Law 1021.
75. S Rosenne, ‘Temporal Application of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties’ (1970–71) 4 Cornell International Law Journal 1, 5–12.
76. D Greig, ‘The Time of Conclusion and the Time of Application of Treaties as Points of Reference in the Interpretative Process’ in M Craven, M Fitzmaurice and M Vogiatzi (eds), Time, History and International Law (Leiden, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2007) 207–15.
77. J Pauwelyn, ‘The Role of Public International Law in the WTO: How Far Can We Go?’ (2001) 95 American Journal of International Law 535, 545–47.
78. KJ Vandevelde, United States Investment Treaties: Policy and Practice (Boston, Kluwer 1992) 53, 55–57
79. AC Sinclair, ‘The Substance of Nationality Requirements in Investment Treaty Arbitration’ (2005) 20 ICSID Review – Foreign Investment Law Journal 357, 385–88
80. C McLachlan, L Shore and M Weiniger, International Investment Arbitration: Substantive Principles (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2007) 235–37, 302–04
81. R Dolzer and CH Schreuer, Principles of International Investment Law (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2008) 104–06, 133–40
82. U Kriebaum, ‘Privatizing Human Rights: The Interface between International Investment Protection and Human Rights’ (2006) 3(5) Transnational Dispute Management 8–22
83. B Simma and T Kill, ‘Harmonizing Investment Protection and International Human Rights: First Steps Towards a Methodology’ in Binder et al (eds), International Investment Law for the 21st Century, above (n 4) 705.
84. T Eilmansberger, ‘Bilateral Investment Treaties and EU Law’ (2009) 46 Common Market Law Review 383, 415–18
85. M Burgstaller, ‘European Law and Investment Treaties’ (2009) 26 Journal of International Arbitration 181, 193–96.
86. T Tridimas, The General Principles of EU Law 2nd edn (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2006) 315.
87. F Latty, ‘Arbitrage transnational et droit international général (2008)’ (2008) 54 Annuaire français de droit international 467, 495.
88. R Howse, ‘The Use and Abuse of International Law in WTO Trade/Environment Litigation’ in ME Janow, V Donaldson and A Yanovich (eds), The WTO: Governance, Dispute Settlement, and Developing Countries (New York, Juris Publishing, Inc, 2008) 659–60.
89. J Crawford (ed), The International Law Commission’s Articles on State Responsibility: Introduction, Text and Commentaries (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2002) 10.
90. P-J Kuijper, ‘Does the World Trade Organization Prohibit Retorsions and Reprisals? Legitimate “Contracting Out” or “Clinical Isolation” Again?’ in Janow et al (eds), above (n 142) 707.
91. WJ Davy and A Sapir, ‘The Soft Drinks Case: The WTO and Regional Agreements’ (2009) 8 World Trade Review 5, 18.
92. S Villalpando, L’emergence de la communauté internationale dans la responsabilité des Etats (Paris, Presses Universitaires de France, 2005) 371–78
93. M Dawidowicz, ‘Public Law Enforcement without Public Law Safeguards? An Analysis of State Practice on Third-Party Countermeasures and their Relationship to the UN Security Council’ (2006) 77 British Yearbook of International Law 333.
94. J Fernández Pons, ‘Self-Help and the World Trade Organisation’ in P Mengozzi (ed), International Trade Law on the 50th Anniversary of the Multilateral Trade System (Milano, Dott A Giuffrè Editore, 1999) 99
95. E Katselli, ‘Countermeasures: Concept and Substance in the Protection of Collective Interests’ in KH Kaikobad and M Bohlander (eds), International Law and Power: Perspectives on Legal Order and Justice (Leiden, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2009) 401, 426–27.
96. L Bartels, ‘Article XX of GATT and the Problem of Extraterritorial Jurisdiction: The Case of Trade Measures for the Protection of Human Rights’ (2002) 36 Journal of World Trade 353, 396–402.
97. A Bianchi and L Gradoni, ‘Developing Countries, Countermeasures and WTO Law: Reinterpreting the DSU against the Background of International Law’ (2008) ICSTD Project on Dispute Settlement, Series Issue Paper No 5 28–40: ictsd.net/downloads/2009/02/reinterpreting_dsu1.pdf.
98. FM Abbott, ‘The North American Integration Regime and its Implications for the World Trading System’ in JHH Weiler (ed), The EU, The WTO and the NAFTA (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2000) 177–89