EMG Biofeedback for online predictive control of grasping force in a myoelectric prosthesis

Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2015, Pages

  Dosen, Strahinja ^a   Markovic, Marko ^b   Somer, Kelef ^a   Graimann, Bernhard ^b   Farina, Dario ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER GÖTTINGEN   (Germany)

^b Otto Bock HealthCare GmbH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Closed loop prosthesis control; EMG biofeedback; Force steering; Grasping consistency; Myoelectric prosthesis; Routine grasping; Sensory feedback

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARM AMPUTATION; ARTICLE; CASE REPORT; COMPUTER INTERFACE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EMG BIOFEEDBACK; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; GRIP STRENGTH; HUMAN; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; MIDDLE AGED; MUSCLE STRENGTH; MYOELECTRIC CONTROL; MYOELECTRICALLY CONTROLLED PROSTHESIS; ONLINE SYSTEM; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; AMPUTEE; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HAND; HAND STRENGTH; LIMB PROSTHESIS; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; SENSORY FEEDBACK; TOUCH; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; AMPUTEES; ARTIFICIAL LIMBS; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; FEEDBACK, SENSORY; FEMALE; HAND; HAND STRENGTH; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; TOUCH; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84933500843     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17430003     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s12984-015-0047-z     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. MacKenzie C, Iberall T. The Grasping Hand. Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V.; 2010.
2. Parker P, Englehart K, Hudgins B. Myoelectric signal processing for control of powered limb prostheses. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2006;16(6):541-8.
3. Asghari Oskoei M, Hu H. Myoelectric control systems - A survey. Biomed Signal Process Control. 2007;2(4):275-94.
4. "Vincent Evolution 2 Hand." [Online]. Available: http://vincentsystems.de/en/prosthetics/vincent-evolution-2/. [Accessed: 09-Oct-2014].
5. Raspopovic S, Capogrosso M, Petrini FM, Bonizzato M, Rigosa J, Di Pino G, et al. "Restoring natural sensory feedback in real-time bidirectional hand prostheses.,". Sci Transl Med. 2014;6:222. ra19.
6. Szeto AY, Saunders FA. Electrocutaneous stimulation for sensory communication in rehabilitation engineering. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1982;29(4):300-8.
7. Kaczmarek KA, Webster JG, Bach-y-Rita P, Tompkins WJ. "Electrotactile and vibrotactile displays for sensory substitution systems,". IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1991;38:1-16. no. 1. Ieee.
8. Peerdeman B, Boere D, Witteveen H, Huis in 'tVeld R, Hermens H, Stramigioli S, et al. "Myoelectric forearm prostheses: State of the art from a user-centered perspective,". J Rehabil Res Dev. 2011;48(6):719.
9. Antfolk C, D'Alonzo M, Rosén B, Lundborg G, Sebelius F, Cipriani C. Sensory feedback in upper limb prosthetics. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2013;10(1):45-54.
10. Clancy E, Morin E, Merletti R. Sampling, noise-reduction and amplitude estimation issues in surface electromyography. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2002;12(1):1-16.
11. Ninu A, Dosen S, Muceli S, Rattay F, Dietl H, Farina D. Closed loop control of grasping with a myoelectric hand prosthesis: which are the relevant feedback variables for force control? IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2014;22(5):1041-52.
12. Biddiss EA, Chau TT. Upper limb prosthesis use and abandonment: a survey of the last 25 years. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2007;31(3):236-57.
13. Bouwsema H, van der Sluis CK, Bongers RM. "Effect of feedback during virtual training of grip force control with a myoelectric prosthesis.,". PLoS One. 2014;9(5):e98301.
14. Dosen S, Markovic M, Hartmann C, Farina D. Sensory feedback in prosthetics: a standardized test bench for closed-loop control. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2015;23(2):267-76.
15. "Otto Bock Michelangelo Hand," 2014. [Online]. Available: http://www.living-with-michelangelo.com/gb/home/.
16. Giggins OM, Persson UM, Caulfield B. Biofeedback in rehabilitation. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2013;10:60.
17. "Myoboy training system." [Online]. Available: http://professionals.ottobockus.com/cps/rde/xbcr/ob-us-en/ifu-647g265-myoboy-757m11.pdf. [Accessed: 09-Oct-2014].
18. Franklin DW, Wolpert DM. Computational mechanisms of sensorimotor control. Neuron. 2011;72(3):425-42.
19. Wolpert DM, Miall RC. Forward models for physiological motor control. Neural Netw. 1996;9(8):1265-79.
20. Saunders I, Vijayakumar S. "The role of feed-forward and feedback processes for closed-loop prosthesis control.,". J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2011;8(1):60.
21. Østlie K, Lesjø IM, Franklin RJ, Garfelt B, Skjeldal OH, Magnus P. Prosthesis use in adult acquired major upper-limb amputees: patterns of wear, prosthetic skills and the actual use of prostheses in activities of daily life. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2012;7(6):479-93.
22. Hecht D, Reiner M. Sensory dominance in combinations of audio, visual and haptic stimuli. Exp Brain Res. 2009;193(2):307-14.
23. Sanger TD. Bayesian filtering of myoelectric signals. J Neurophysiol. 2007;97(2):1839-45.
24. Pasquina PF, Evangelista M, Carvalho AJ, Lockhart J, Griffin S, Nanos G, et al. "First-in-man demonstration of a fully implanted myoelectric sensors system to control an advanced electromechanical prosthetic hand". J Neurosci Methods. 2015;244:85-93.