Preoperative mp-MRI of the prostate provides little information about staging of prostate carcinoma in daily clinical practice

World Journal of Urology

Volumn 33, Issue 7, 2015, Pages 923-928

  Billing, Andrea ^a   Buchner, Alexander ^a   Stief, Christian ^a   Roosen, Alexander ^a  

^a LUDWIG MAXIMILIANS UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Multiparametric MRI; Prostate cancer; Radical retropubic prostatectomy; Staging accuracy

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; CANCER STAGING; CARCINOMA; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATHOLOGY; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PROSTATECTOMY; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; TUMOR INVASION; VERY ELDERLY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CARCINOMA; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM INVASIVENESS; NEOPLASM STAGING; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROSTATECTOMY; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 84932606025     PISSN: 07244983     EISSN: 14338726     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00345-014-1448-5     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A (2012) Cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin 62(1):10–29. doi:10.3322/caac.20138
2. Walsh PC (1988) Radical retropubic prostatectomy with reduced morbidity: an anatomic approach. NCI Monogr 7:133–137
3. Engelbrecht MR, Jager GJ, Laheij RJ, Verbeek AL, van Lier HJ, Barentsz JO (2002) Local staging of prostate cancer using magnetic resonance imaging: a meta-analysis. Eur Radiol 12(9):2294–2302. doi:10.1007/s00330-002-1389-z
4. Jager GJ, Ruijter ET, van de Kaa CA, de la Rosette JJ, Oosterhof GO, Thornbury JR, Ruijs SH, Barentsz JO (1997) Dynamic TurboFLASH subtraction technique for contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the prostate: correlation with histopathologic results. Radiology 203(3):645–652. doi:10.1148/radiology.203.3.9169683
5. Heidenreich A (2011) Consensus criteria for the use of magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis and staging of prostate cancer: not ready for routine use. Eur Urol 59(4):495–497. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2011.01.013
6. Barentsz JO, Richenberg J, Clements R, Choyke P, Verma S, Villeirs G, Rouviere O, Logager V, Futterer JJ (2012) ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012. Eur Radiol 22(4):746–757. doi:10.1007/s00330-011-2377-y
7. Bartolozzi C, Menchi I, Lencioni R, Serni S, Lapini A, Barbanti G, Bozza A, Amorosi A, Manganelli A, Carini M (1996) Local staging of prostate carcinoma with endorectal coil MRI: correlation with whole-mount radical prostatectomy specimens. Eur Radiol 6(3):339–345
8. Presti JC Jr, Hricak H, Narayan PA, Shinohara K, White S, Carroll PR (1996) Local staging of prostatic carcinoma: comparison of transrectal sonography and endorectal MR imaging. AJR 166(1):103–108. doi:10.2214/ajr.166.1.8571856
9. Wang L, Mullerad M, Chen HN, Eberhardt SC, Kattan MW, Scardino PT, Hricak H (2004) Prostate cancer: incremental value of endorectal MR imaging findings for prediction of extracapsular extension. Radiology 232(1):133–139. doi:10.1148/radiol.2321031086
10. Akin O, Sala E, Moskowitz CS, Kuroiwa K, Ishill NM, Pucar D, Scardino PT, Hricak H (2006) Transition zone prostate cancers: features, detection, localization, and staging at endorectal MR imaging. Radiology 239(3):784–792. doi:10.1148/radiol.2392050949
11. Futterer JJ, Engelbrecht MR, Jager GJ, Hartman RP, King BF, Hulsbergen-Van de Kaa CA, Witjes JA, Barentsz JO (2007) Prostate cancer: comparison of local staging accuracy of pelvic phased-array coil alone versus integrated endorectal-pelvic phased-array coils. Local staging accuracy of prostate cancer using endorectal coil MR imaging. Eur Radiol 17(4):1055–1065. doi:10.1007/s00330-006-0418-8
12. Haider MA, van der Kwast TH, Tanguay J, Evans AJ, Hashmi AT, Lockwood G, Trachtenberg J (2007) Combined T2-weighted and diffusion-weighted MRI for localization of prostate cancer. AJR 189(2):323–328. doi:10.2214/ajr.07.2211
13. Sato C, Naganawa S, Nakamura T, Kumada H, Miura S, Takizawa O, Ishigaki T (2005) Differentiation of noncancerous tissue and cancer lesions by apparent diffusion coefficient values in transition and peripheral zones of the prostate. JMRI 21(3):258–262. doi:10.1002/jmri.20251
14. Engelbrecht MR, Huisman HJ, Laheij RJ, Jager GJ, van Leenders GJ, Van De Hulsbergen Kaa CA, de la Rosette JJ, Blickman JG, Barentsz JO (2003) Discrimination of prostate cancer from normal peripheral zone and central gland tissue by using dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 229(1):248–254. doi:10.1148/radiol.2291020200
15. Costouros NG, Coakley FV, Westphalen AC, Qayyum A, Yeh BM, Joe BN, Kurhanewicz J (2007) Diagnosis of prostate cancer in patients with an elevated prostate-specific antigen level: role of endorectal MRI and MR spectroscopic imaging. AJR 188(3):812–816. doi:10.2214/ajr.06.0165
16. Westphalen AC, Coakley FV, Qayyum A, Swanson M, Simko JP, Lu Y, Zhao S, Carroll PR, Yeh BM, Kurhanewicz J (2008) Peripheral zone prostate cancer: accuracy of different interpretative approaches with MR and MR spectroscopic imaging. Radiology 246(1):177–184. doi:10.1148/radiol.2453062042
17. Pinto F, Totaro A, Calarco A, Sacco E, Volpe A, Racioppi M, D’Addessi A, Gulino G, Bassi P (2011) Imaging in prostate cancer diagnosis: present role and future perspectives. Urol Int 86(4):373–382. doi:10.1159/000324515
18. Yakar D, Debats OA, Bomers JG, Schouten MG, Vos PC, van Lin E, Futterer JJ, Barentsz JO (2012) Predictive value of MRI in the localization, staging, volume estimation, assessment of aggressiveness, and guidance of radiotherapy and biopsies in prostate cancer. JMRI 35(1):20–31. doi:10.1002/jmri.22790
19. Brajtbord JS, Lavery HJ, Nabizada-Pace F, Senaratne P, Samadi DB (2011) Endorectal magnetic resonance imaging has limited clinical ability to preoperatively predict pT3 prostate cancer. BJU Int 107(9):1419–1424. doi:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09599.x
20. Heijmink SW, Futterer JJ, Hambrock T, Takahashi S, Scheenen TW, Huisman HJ, Van de Hulsbergen CA, Knipscheer BC, Witjes JA, Barentsz JO (2007) Prostate cancer: body-array versus endorectal coil MR imaging at 3 T–comparison of image quality, localization, and staging performance. Radiology 244(1):184–195. doi:10.1148/radiol.2441060425
21. Torricelli P, Cinquantini F, Ligabue G, Bianchi G, Sighinolfi P, Romagnoli R (2006) Comparative evaluation between external phased array coil at 3 T and endorectal coil at 1.5 T: preliminary results. J Comput Assist Tomogr 30(3):355–361
22. Beyersdorff D, Taymoorian K, Knosel T, Schnorr D, Felix R, Hamm B, Bruhn H (2005) MRI of prostate cancer at 1.5 and 3.0 T: comparison of image quality in tumor detection and staging. AJR 185(5):1214–1220. doi:10.2214/ajr.04.1584
23. Kim CK, Park BK, Kim B (2010) Diffusion-weighted MRI at 3 T for the evaluation of prostate cancer. AJR 194(6):1461–1469. doi:10.2214/ajr.09.3654
24. Lee SH, Park KK, Choi KH, Lim BJ, Kim JH, Lee SW, Chung BH (2010) Is endorectal coil necessary for the staging of clinically localized prostate cancer? Comparison of non-endorectal versus endorectal MR imaging. World J Urol 28(6):667–672. doi:10.1007/s00345-010-0579-6
25. Chabanova E, Balslev I, Logager V, Hansen A, Jakobsen H, Kromann-Andersen B, Norgaard N, Horn T, Thomsen HS (2011) Prostate cancer: 1.5 T endo-coil dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and MR spectroscopy–correlation with prostate biopsy and prostatectomy histopathological data. Eur J Radiol 80(2):292–296. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.07.004
26. Wang L, Hricak H, Kattan MW, Chen HN, Kuroiwa K, Eisenberg HF, Scardino PT (2007) Prediction of seminal vesicle invasion in prostate cancer: incremental value of adding endorectal MR imaging to the Kattan nomogram. Radiology 242(1):182–188. doi:10.1148/radiol.2421051254