Consensus criteria for the use of magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis and staging of prostate cancer: Not ready for routine use

European Urology

Volumn 59, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 495-497

  Heidenreich, Axel ^a  

^a RWTH AACHEN UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AREA UNDER THE CURVE; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER LOCALIZATION; CANCER STAGING; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; EARLY DIAGNOSIS; EUROPE; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HUMAN; MORBIDITY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE CANCER; REVIEW; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STANDARDIZATION; SYMPOSIUM;

CONSENSUS; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; NEOPLASM STAGING; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; UROLOGY;

EID: 79952280878     PISSN: 03022838     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.01.013     Document Type: Editorial

References (23)

1. L. Dickinson, H.U. Ahmed, and C. Allen Magnetic resonance imaging for the detection, localisation, and characterisation of prostate cancer: recommendations from a European Consensus Meeting Eur Urol 59 2011 477 494
2. A. Heidenreich, J. Bellmunt, and M. Bolla EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and treatment of clinically localised disease Eur Urol 59 2011 61 71
3. H.P. Schlemmer Multiparametric MRI of the prostate: method for early detection of prostate cancer? Rofo 182 2010 1067 1075
4. B. Turkbey, P.A. Pinto, and H. Mani Prostate cancer: value of multiparametric MR imaging at 3 T for detection - histopathologic correlation Radiology 255 2010 89 99
5. Delongchamps NB, Rouanne M, Flam T, et al. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for the detection and localization of prostate cancer: combination of T2-weighted, dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted imaging. BJU Int. In press. DOI:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09808.x.
6. H. Xu, A. Lasso, and S. Vikal MRI-guided robotic prostate biopsy: a clinical accuracy validation Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv 13 2010 383 391
7. B. Guillonneau, B. Debras, B. Veillon, J. Bougaran, E. Chambon, and G. Vallancien Indications for preoperative seminal vesicle biopsies in staging of clinically localized prostatic cancer Eur Urol 32 1997 160 165 (Pubitemid 27386954)
8. S.J. Freedland, G.S. Csathy, F. Dorey, and W.J. Aronson Percent prostate needle biopsy tissue with cancer is more predictive of biochemical failure or adverse pathology after radical prostatectomy than prostate specific antigen or Gleason score J Urol 167 2002 516 520 (Pubitemid 34074518)
9. D.I. Quinn, S.M. Henshall, and P.C. Brenner Prognostic significance of preoperative factors in localized prostate carcinoma treated with radical prostatectomy: importance of percentage of biopsies that contain tumor and the presence of biopsy perineural invasion Cancer 97 2003 1884 1893 (Pubitemid 36397262)
10. Heidenreich A, Pfister D, Thüer D, Brehmer B. Percentage of positive biopsies predicts lymph node involvement in men with low-risk prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy and extended pelvic lymphadenectomy. BJU Int. In press.
11. S.P. Elliott, K. Shinohara, S.L. Logan, and P.R. Carroll Sextant prostate biopsies predict side and sextant site of extracapsular extension of prostate cancer J Urol 168 2002 105 109 (Pubitemid 34640792)
12. G.J. Jager, J.L. Severens, J.R. Thornbury, J.J. de la Rosette, S.H. Ruijs, and J.O. Barentsz Prostate cancer staging: should MR imaging be used? A decision analytic approach Radiology 215 2000 445 451 (Pubitemid 30237843)
13. Brajtbord JS, Lavery HJ, Nabizada-Pace F, Senaratne P, Samadi DB. Endorectal magnetic resonance imaging has limited clinical ability to preoperatively predict pT3 prostate cancer. BJU Int. In press.
14. S.H. Lee, K.K. Park, and K.H. Choi Is endorectal coil necessary for the staging of clinically localized prostate cancer? Comparison of non-endorectal versus endorectal MR imaging World J Urol 28 2010 667 672
15. L. Nogueira, L. Wang, and S.W. Fine Focal treatment or observation of prostate cancer: pretreatment accuracy of transrectal ultrasound biopsy and T2-weighted MRI Urology 75 2010 472 477
16. L. Wang, O. Akin, and Y. Mazaheri Are histopathological features of prostate cancer lesions associated with identification of extracapsular extension on magnetic resonance imaging? BJU Int 106 2010 1303 1308
17. L. Wang, H. Hricak, M.W. Kattan, H.N. Chen, P.T. Scardino, and K. Kuroiwa Prediction of organ confined prostate cancer: incremental value of MRI and MRI spectroscopic imaging to staging nomograms Radiology 238 2006 597 603 (Pubitemid 43134372)
18. M. Fuchsjager, A. Shukla-Dave, O. Akin, Barentsz, and H. Hricak Prostate cancer imaging Acta Radiol 49 2008 107 120
19. J. Scheidler, H. Hricak, and D.B. Vigneron Prostate cancer: localization with three-dimensional proton MR spectroscopic imaging - clinicopathologic study Radiology 213 1999 473 480 (Pubitemid 29510595)
20. K.L. Zakian, K. Sircar, H. Hricak, H.N. Chen, A. Shukla-Dave, and S. Eberhardt Correlation of proton MR spectroscopic imaging with Gleason score based on step section pathologic analysis after radical prostatectomy Radiology 234 2005 804 814 (Pubitemid 40250824)
21. E. Sala, O. Akin, and C.S. Moskowitz Endorectal MR imaging in the evaluation of seminal vesicle invasion: diagnostic accuracy and multivariate feature analysis Radiology 238 2006 929 937 (Pubitemid 43289924)
22. M. Mullerad, H. Hricak, L. Wang, H.N. Chen, M.W. Kattan, and P.T. Scardino Prostate cancer: detection of extracapsular extension by genitourinary and general body radiologists at MRI imaging Radiology 232 2004 140 146 (Pubitemid 38787829)
23. L. Wang, M. Mullerad, H.N. Chen, S.C. Eberhardt, M.W. Kattan, and P.T. Scardino Prostate cancer: incremental value of endorectal MRI findings for prediction of extracapsular extension Radiology 232 2004 133 139 (Pubitemid 38787828)