Asymmetric damage segregation at cell division via protein aggregate fusion and attachment to organelles

BioEssays

Volumn 37, Issue 7, 2015, Pages 740-747

  Coelho, Miguel ^a   Tolić, Iva M ^b,c  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE OF MOLECULAR CELL BIOLOGY AND GENETICS   (Germany)

^c RUDER BO KOVI INSTITUTE   (Croatia)

Author keywords

Asymmetric segregation; Endoplasmic reticulum; Fusion; Mitochondria; Organelle tethering; Partitioning; Protein aggregates; Retention; Sequestration

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN AGGREGATE; PROTEIN BINDING;

ACTIVE TRANSPORT; ARTICLE; ASYMMETRIC CELL DIVISION; CELL ADHESION; CELL AGGREGATION; CELL COMPONENT; CELL DAMAGE; CELL ORGANELLE; CELLULAR DISTRIBUTION; CYTOPLASM; CYTOSKELETON; DIFFUSION; ENDOPLASMIC RETICULUM STRESS; IN VIVO STUDY; MITOCHONDRION; NONHUMAN; PROTEIN AGGREGATION; ANIMAL; CELL DIVISION; CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION; HUMAN; METABOLISM; PROTEIN TRANSPORT;

SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

ANIMALS; ASYMMETRIC CELL DIVISION; CELL DIVISION; CHROMOSOME SEGREGATION; HUMANS; ORGANELLES; PROTEIN AGGREGATES; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN TRANSPORT;

EID: 84931957433     PISSN: 02659247     EISSN: 15211878     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bies.201400224     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Zhou C, Slaughter BD, Unruh JR, Eldakak A. et al. 2011. Motility and segregation of Hsp104-associated protein aggregates in budding yeast. Cell 147: 1186-1196.
2. Garcia-Mata R, Bebok Z, Sorscher EJ, Sztul ES. 1999. Characterization and dynamics of aggresome formation by a cytosolic GFP-chimera. J Cell Biol 146: 1239-1254.
3. Johnston JA, Ward CL, Kopito RR. 1998. Aggresomes: a cellular response to misfolded proteins. J Cell Biol 143: 1883-1898.
4. Liu B, Larsson L, Caballero A, Hao X. et al. 2010. The polarisome is required for segregation and retrograde transport of protein aggregates. Cell 140: 257-267.
5. Kaganovich D, Kopito R, Frydman J. 2008. Misfolded proteins partition between two distinct quality control compartments. Nature 454: 1088-1095.
6. Liu B, Larsson L, Franssens V, Hao X. et al. 2011. Segregation of protein aggregates involves actin and the polarity machinery. Cell 147: 959-961.
7. Malinovska L, Kroschwald S, Munder MC, Richter D. et al. 2012. Molecular chaperones and stress-inducible protein-sorting factors coordinate the spatiotemporal distribution of protein aggregates. Mol Biol Cell 23: 3041-3056.
8. Ogrodnik M, Salmonowicz H, Brown R, Turkowska J. et al. 2014. Dynamic JUNQ inclusion bodies are asymmetrically inherited in mammalian cell lines through the asymmetric partitioning of vimentin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111: 8049-8054.
9. Specht S, Miller SB, Mogk A, Bukau B. 2011. Hsp42 is required for sequestration of protein aggregates into deposition sites in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Cell Biol 195: 617-629.
10. Spokoini R, Moldavski O, Nahmias Y, England JL. et al. 2012. Confinement to organelle-associated inclusion structures mediates asymmetric inheritance of aggregated protein in budding yeast. Cell Rep 2: 738-747.
11. Weisberg SJ, Lyakhovetsky R, Werdiger AC, Gitler AD. et al. 2012. Compartmentalization of superoxide dismutase 1 (SOD1G93A) aggregates determines their toxicity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109: 15811-15816.
12. Coelho M, Dereli A, Haese A, Kuhn S. et al. 2013. Fission yeast does not age under favorable conditions, but does so after stress. Curr Biol 23: 1844-1852.
13. Coelho M, Lade SJ, Alberti S, Gross T. et al. 2014. Fusion of protein aggregates facilitates asymmetric damage segregation. PLoS Biol 12: e1001886.
14. Coquel AS, Jacob JP, Primet M, Demarez A. et al. 2013. Localization of protein aggregation in Escherichia coli is governed by diffusion and nucleoid macromolecular crowding effect. PLoS Comput Biol 9: e1003038.
15. Escusa-Toret S, Vonk WI, Frydman J. 2013. Spatial sequestration of misfolded proteins by a dynamic chaperone pathway enhances cellular fitness during stress. Nat Cell Biol 15: 1231-1243.
16. Fuentealba LC, Eivers E, Geissert D, Taelman V. et al. 2008. Asymmetric mitosis: Unequal segregation of proteins destined for degradation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105: 7732-7737.
17. Lindner AB, Madden R, Demarez A, Stewart EJ. et al. 2008. Asymmetric segregation of protein aggregates is associated with cellular aging and rejuvenation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105: 3076-3081.
18. Rujano MA, Bosveld F, Salomons FA, Dijk F. et al. 2006. Polarised asymmetric inheritance of accumulated protein damage in higher eukaryotes. PLoS Biol 4: e417.
19. Zhou C, Slaughter Brian D, Unruh Jay R, Guo F, et al. 2014. Organelle-based aggregation and retention of damaged proteins in asymmetrically dividing cells. Cell 159: 530-542.
20. Erjavec N, Cvijovic M, Klipp E, Nystrom T. 2008. Selective benefits of damage partitioning in unicellular systems and its effects on aging. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105: 18764-18769.
21. Erjavec N, Nystrom T. 2007. Sir2p-dependent protein segregation gives rise to a superior reactive oxygen species management in the progeny of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104: 10877-10881.
22. Winkler J, Seybert A, Konig L, Pruggnaller S. et al. 2010. Quantitative and spatio-temporal features of protein aggregation in Escherichia coli and consequences on protein quality control and cellular ageing. EMBO J 29: 910-923.
23. Aguilaniu H, Gustafsson L, Rigoulet M, Nystrom T. 2003. Asymmetric inheritance of oxidatively damaged proteins during cytokinesis. Science 299: 1751-1753.
24. Weids AJ, Grant CM. 2014. The yeast peroxiredoxin Tsa1 protects against protein-aggregate-induced oxidative stress. J Cell Sci 127: 1327-1335.
25. Burkewitz K, Choe KP, Lee EC, Deonarine A. et al. 2012. Characterization of the proteostasis roles of glycerol accumulation, protein degradation and protein synthesis during osmotic stress in C. elegans. PLoS One 7: e34153.
26. Kaniuk NA, Kiraly M, Bates H, Vranic M. et al. 2007. Ubiquitinated-protein aggregates form in pancreatic beta-cells during diabetes-induced oxidative stress and are regulated by autophagy. Diabetes 56: 930-939.
27. Landgraf D, Okumus B, Chien P, Baker TA. et al. 2012. Segregation of molecules at cell division reveals native protein localization. Nat Methods 9: 480-482.
28. Ramdzan YM, Polling S, Chia CP, Ng IH, et al. 2012. Tracking protein aggregation and mislocalization in cells with flow cytometry. Nat Methods 9: 467-470.
29. Bufalino MR, DeVeale B, van der Kooy D. 2013. The asymmetric segregation of damaged proteins is stem cell-type dependent. J Cell Biol 201: 523-530.
30. Hughes AL, Gottschling DE. 2012. An early age increase in vacuolar pH limits mitochondrial function and lifespan in yeast. Nature 492: 261-265.
31. Higuchi R, Vevea JD, Swayne TC, Chojnowski R. et al. 2013. Actin dynamics affect mitochondrial quality control and aging in budding yeast. Curr Biol 23: 2417-2422.
32. Song J, Yang Q, Yang J, Larsson L. et al. 2014. Essential genetic interactors of SIR2 required for spatial sequestration and asymmetrical inheritance of protein aggregates. PLoS Genet 10: e1004539.
33. Scheckhuber CQ, Erjavec N, Tinazli A, Hamann A. et al. 2007. Reducing mitochondrial fission results in increased life span and fitness of two fungal ageing models. Nat Cell Biol 9: 99-105.
34. Jan CH, Williams CC, Weissman JS. 2014. Principles of ER cotranslational translocation revealed by proximity-specific ribosome profiling. Science 346: 1257521.
35. Williams CC, Jan CH, Weissman JS. 2014. Targeting and plasticity of mitochondrial proteins revealed by proximity-specific ribosome profiling. Science 346: 748-751.
36. David DC, Ollikainen N, Trinidad JC, Cary MP. et al. 2010. Widespread protein aggregation as an inherent part of aging in C. elegans. PLoS Biol 8: e1000450.
37. Henderson KA, Hughes AL, Gottschling DE. 2014. Mother-daughter asymmetry of pH underlies aging and rejuvenation in yeast. Elife 3: e03504.