Remote Monitoring of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Outcomes

Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Volumn 65, Issue 24, 2015, Pages 2591-2600

  Parthiban, Nirmalatiban ^a,b   Esterman, Adrian ^c   Mahajan, Rajiv ^a   Twomey, Darragh J ^a   Pathak, Rajeev K ^a   Lau, Dennis H ^a   Roberts Thomson, Kurt C ^a   Young, Glenn D ^a   Sanders, Prashanthan ^a   Ganesan, Anand N ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE   (Australia)

^b PERDANA UNIVERSITY   (Malaysia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

home monitoring; mortality; shock; sudden cardiac death

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATRIAL FIBRILLATION; CARDIOVASCULAR MORTALITY; CAUSE OF DEATH; CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; DATA ANALYSIS; DEVICE SAFETY; FOLLOW UP; HEALTH IMPACT ASSESSMENT; HOME MONITORING; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; IMPLANTABLE CARDIOVERTER DEFIBRILLATOR; META ANALYSIS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REMOTE SENSING; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TREATMENT RESPONSE; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES; CARDIOVERSION; PROCEDURES; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); STANDARDS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES; DEFIBRILLATORS, IMPLANTABLE; ELECTRIC COUNTERSHOCK; HUMANS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; REMOTE SENSING TECHNOLOGY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84931576487     PISSN: 07351097     EISSN: 15583597     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.04.029     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. A.E. Epstein, J.P. DiMarco, and K.A. Ellenbogen ACC/AHA/HRS 2008 Guidelines for device-based therapy of cardiac rhythm abnormalities J Am Coll Cardiol 51 2008 e1 e62
2. R. Yee, A. Verma, M. Beardsall, J. Fraser, F. Philippon, and D.V. Exner Canadian Cardiovascular Society/Canadian Heart Rhythm Society joint position statement on the use of remote monitoring for cardiovascular implantable electronic device follow-up Can J Cardiol 29 2013 644 651
3. S. Dubner, A. Auricchio, and J.S. Steinberg ISHNE/EHRA expert consensus on remote monitoring of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) Europace 14 2012 278 293
4. B.L. Wilkoff, A. Auricchio, and J. Brugada HRS/EHRA expert consensus on the monitoring of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs): description of techniques, indications, personnel, frequency and ethical considerations Heart Rhythm 5 2008 907 925
5. N. Varma, and P. Brugada Automatic remote monitoring: is there a need? Europace 15 2013 i1 i2
6. G.D. Young Remote monitoring for implantable cardiac electronic devices Heart Lung Circ 21 2012 352 357
7. G. Hindricks, M. Taborsky, and M. Glikson Implant-based multiparameter telemonitoring of patients with heart failure (IN-TIME): a randomised controlled trial Lancet 384 2014 583 590
8. Akar JG, Bao H, Jones PW, et al. Use of remote monitoring is associated with improved outcomes among patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators. Paper presented at: the Heart Rhythm Society Annual Scientific Sessions; May 10, 2014; San Francisco, CA.
9. N. Varma, J.P. Piccini, J. Snell, A. Fischer, N. Dalal, and S. Mittal Relationship between level of adherence to automatic wireless remote monitoring and survival in pacemaker and defibrillator patients J Am Coll Cardiol 65 2015 2601 2610
10. L.A. Saxon, D.L. Hayes, and F.R. Gilliam Long-term outcome after ICD and CRT implantation and influence of remote device follow-up: the ALTITUDE survival study Circulation 122 2010 2359 2367
11. J.P. Higgins, and S.G. Thompson Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis Stat Med 21 2002 1539 1558
12. R. DerSimonian, and N. Laird Meta-analysis in clinical trials Control Clin Trials 7 1986 177 188
13. J.J. Deeks, J.P.T. Higgins, and D.G. Altman Analysing and presenting results: Section 8.5.2.6 J.P.T. Higgins, S. Green, Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions 4.2.6 [updated September 2006] 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Chichester, UK 119
14. P. Mabo, P. Defaye, and N. Sadoul Remote follow-up of patients implanted with an ICD: the prospective randomized Evatel study (abstr) Heart Rhythm 9 Suppl 2012 S226 S227
15. S.M. Al-Khatib, J.P. Piccini, D. Knight, M. Stewart, N. Clapp-Channing, and G.D. Sanders Remote monitoring of implantable cardioverter defibrillators versus quarterly device interrogations in clinic: results from a randomized pilot clinical trial J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 21 2010 545 550
16. N. Varma, A.E. Epstein, A. Irimpen, R. Schweikert, and C. Love Efficacy and safety of automatic remote monitoring for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator follow-up: the Lumos-T Safely Reduces Routine Office Device Follow-up (TRUST) trial Circulation 122 2010 325 332
17. G.H. Crossley, A. Boyle, H. Vitense, Y. Chang, and R.H. Mead The CONNECT (Clinical Evaluation of Remote Notification to Reduce Time to Clinical Decision) trial: the value of wireless remote monitoring with automatic clinician alerts J Am Coll Cardiol 57 2011 1181 1189
18. M. Landolina, G.B. Perego, and M. Lunati Remote monitoring reduces healthcare use and improves quality of care in heart failure patients with implantable defibrillators: the Evolution of Management Strategies of Heart Failure Patients With Implantable Defibrillators (EVOLVO) study Circulation 125 2012 2985 2992
19. S. Perl, P. Stiegler, and B. Rotman Socio-economic effects and cost saving potential of remote patient monitoring (SAVE-HM trial) Int J Cardiol 169 2013 402 407
20. G. Boriani, A. Da Costa, and R.P. Ricci The MOnitoring Resynchronization dEvices and CARdiac patiEnts (MORE-CARE) randomized controlled trial: phase 1 results on dynamics of early intervention with remote monitoring J Med Internet Res 15 2013 e167
21. L. Guedon-Moreau, D. Lacroix, and N. Sadoul A randomized study of remote follow-up of implantable cardioverter defibrillators: safety and efficacy report of the ECOST trial Eur Heart J 34 2013 605 614
22. D. Slotwiner, and B. Wilkoff Cost efficiency and reimbursement of remote monitoring: a US perspective Europace 15 2013 i54 i58
23. J.G. Akar, H. Bao, and P. Jones Use of remote monitoring of newly implanted cardioverter-defibrillators: insights from the patient related determinants of ICD remote monitoring (PREDICT RM) study Circulation 128 2013 2372 2383