Automatic remote monitoring: Is there a need?

Europace

Volumn 15, Issue SUPPL.1, 2013, Pages

  Varma, Niraj ^a   Brugada, Pedro ^b  

^a LERNER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL BRUSSELS   (Belgium)

Author keywords

CIEDs; Early detection; Follow up; Monitoring; Remote Monitoring

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CARDIAC IMPLANT; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FOLLOW UP; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PATIENT MONITORING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION;

CIEDS; EARLY DETECTION; FOLLOW-UP; MONITORING; REMOTE MONITORING;

DIAGNOSIS, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY, AMBULATORY; HEART DISEASES; HUMANS; NEEDS ASSESSMENT; PROSTHESES AND IMPLANTS; TELEMEDICINE; WIRELESS TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 84878909586     PISSN: 10995129     EISSN: 15322092     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/europace/eut117     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Marinskis G, van Erven L, Bongiorni MG, Lip GY, Pison L, Blomstrom-Lundqvist C. Practices of cardiac implantable electronic device follow-up: Results of the European Heart Rhythm Association survey. Europace 2012;14:423-5.
2. Al-Khatib SM, Mi X, Wilkoff BL, Qualls LG, Frazier-Mills C, Setoguchi S et al. Followup of patients with new cardiovascular implantable electronic devices: Are experts? recommendations implemented in routine clinical practice? Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2012;6:108-16.
3. Wilkoff BL, Auricchio A, Brugada J, Cowie M, Ellenbogen KA, Gillis AM et al. HRS/EHRA Expert Consensus on the Monitoring of Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Devices (CIEDs): Description of techniques, indications, personnel, frequency and ethical considerations: Developed in partnership with the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) and the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA); and in collaboration with the American College of Cardiology (ACC), the American Heart Association (AHA), the European Society of Cardiology (ESC), the Heart Failure Association of ESC (HFA), and the Heart Failure Society of America (HFSA). Endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society, the European Heart Rhythm Association (a registered branch of the ESC), the American College of Cardiology, the American Heart Association. Europace 2008;10:707-25.
4. Schoenfeld MH, Compton SJ, Mead RH, Weiss DN, Sherfesee L, Englund J et al. Remote monitoring of implantable cardioverter defibrillators: A prospective analysis. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2004;27:757-63.
5. Joseph GK, Wilkoff BL, Dresing T, Burkhardt J, Khaykin Y. Remote interrogation and monitoring of implantable cardioverter defibrillators. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 2004; 11:161-6.
6. Crossley GH, Chen J, ChoucairW, Cohen TJ, Gohn DC, Johnson WB et al. Clinical benefits of remote versus transtelephonic monitoring of implanted pacemakers. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;54:2012-9.
7. Al-Khatib SM, Piccini JP, Knight D, Stewart M, Clapp-Channing N, Sanders GD. Remote monitoring of implantable cardioverter defibrillators versus quarterly device interrogations in clinic: Results from a randomized pilot clinical trial. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2010;21:545-50.
8. Cronin EM, Ching EA, Varma N, Martin DO, Wilkoff BL, Lindsay BD. Remote monitoring of cardiovascular devices-a time and activity analysis. Heart Rhythm 2012;9: 1947-51.
9. Varma N, Stambler B, Chun S. Detection of atrial fibrillation by implanted devices with wireless data transmission capability. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2005;28(Suppl 1):S133-6.
10. Brugada P. What evidence do we have to replace in-hospital implantable cardioverter defibrillator follow-up? Clin Res Cardiol 2006;95(Suppl 3):III3-9.
11. Varma N, Ricci RP. Telemedicine and cardiac implants: What is the benefit? Eur Heart J 2012; doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs388.