A new perspective on the perceptual selectivity of attention under load

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

Volumn 1316, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 71-86

  Giesbrecht, Barry ^a   Sy, Jocelyn ^b   Bundesen, Claus ^c   Kyllingsbæk, Søren ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Distraction; Load theory; Perceptual selectivity; Selective attention; Theory of visual attention; Visual attention

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION CORTEX; BOLD SIGNAL; CLASSIFICATION; COMPETITION; CROWDING (VISION); DICHOTIC LISTENING; DISTRACTIBILITY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LONG TERM MEMORY; MACACA; NERVE CELL; NERVE POTENTIAL; NONHUMAN; PERCEPTION; PULVINAR; RECEPTIVE FIELD; RESOURCE ALLOCATION; SELECTIVE ATTENTION; SHORT TERM MEMORY; STIMULUS; STRENGTH; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL CORTEX; VISUAL FIELD; WEAKNESS;

DISTRACTION; LOAD THEORY; PERCEPTUAL SELECTIVITY; SELECTIVE ATTENTION; THEORY OF VISUAL ATTENTION; VISUAL ATTENTION;

ATTENTION; COGNITION; HUMANS; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; PERCEPTION;

EID: 84901450914     PISSN: 00778923     EISSN: 17496632     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1111/nyas.12404     Document Type: Article

References (103)

1. Allport, A. 1989. Visual attention. In Foundations of Cognitive Science. M.I. Posner Ed.: 631-682. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.
2. Allport, A. 1993. Attention and control: Have we been asking the wrong questions? A critical review of twenty-five years. In Attention and Performance XIV: Synergies in Experimental Psychology, Artificial Intelligence, and Cognitive Neuroscience. D.E. Meyer & S. Kornblum Eds.: 183-218. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.
3. Broadbent, D.E. 1958. Perception and Communication. Pergamon: London.
4. Bundesen, C.A. 1990. Theory of visual attention. Psychol. Rev. 97: 523-547.
5. Corbetta, M., G. Patel & G.L. Shulman 2008. The reorienting system of the human brain: from environment to theory of mind. Neuron 58: 306-324.
6. Duncan, J. 1984. Selective attention and the organization of visual information. J. Exp. Psychol.: Gen. 113: 501-517.
7. Kahneman, D. & A. Treisman 1984. Varieties of Attention. R. Parasuraman & D.R. Davies Eds. Academic Press: New York.
8. Pashler, H. 1998. The Psychology of Attention. MIT Press (A Bradford Book): Cambridge, MA.
9. Desimone, R. & J. Duncan 1995. Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Ann. Rev. Neurosci. 18: 193-222.
10. Broadbent, D.E. 1971. Decision and Stress. Academic Press: London.
11. Cherry, E.C. 1953. Experiments on the recognition of speech with one and two ears. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 25: 975-979.
12. Deutsch, J.A. & D. Deutsch 1963. Attention: some theoretical considerations. Psychol. Rev. 70: 80-90.
13. Moray, N. 1959. Attention in dichotic listening: affective cues and the influence of instructions. Quart. J. Exp. Psychol. 11: 56-60.
14. Treisman, A.M. 1964. Selective attention in man. Br. Med. Bull. 20: 12-16.
15. Lavie, N. & Y. Tsal 1994. Perceptual load as a major determinant of the locus of selection in visual attention. Percept. Psychophys. 56: 183-197.
16. Lavie, N. 1995. Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention. J. Exp. Psychol.: Human Percept. Perform. 23: 451-468.
17. Giesbrecht, B., J.L. Sy & J.E. Elliott 2007. Electrophysiological evidence for both perceptual and post-perceptual selection during the attentional blink. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 19: 2005-2018.
18. Giesbrecht, B., J.L. Sy & M.K. Lewis 2009. Personal names do not always survive the attentional blink: behavioral evidence for a flexible locus of selection. Vision Res. 49: 1378-1388.
19. Kastner, S. & M.A. Pinsk 2004. Visual attention as a multilevel selection process. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 4: 483-500.
20. Vogel, E.K., G.F. Woodman & S.J. Luck 2005. Pushing around the locus of selection: evidence for the flexible-selection hypothesis. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 17: 1907-1922.
21. Cho, K.W., C.-S. Tse & J.H. Neely 2012. Citation rates for experimental psychology articles published between 1950 and 2004: top-cited articles in behavioral cognitive psychology. Memory Cogn. 40: 1132-1161.
22. Lavie, N. 2005. Distracted and confused? Selective attention under load. Trends Cogn. Sci. 9: 75-82.
23. Lavie, N., A. Hirst, J.W. de Fockert & E. Viding 2004. Load theory of selective attention and cognitive control. J. Exp. Psychol.: General 133: 339-354.
24. Lavie, N. 2010. Attention, distraction, and cognitive control under load. Curr. Directions Psychol. Sci. 19: 143-148.
25. Benoni, H. & Y. Tsal 2010. Where have we gone wrong? Perceptual load does not affect selective attention. Vision Res. 50: 1292-1298.
26. Benoni, H. & Y. Tsal 2012. Controlling for dilution effects while manipulating load: perceptual and sensory limitations are just two aspects of task difficulty. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 19: 631-638.
27. Johnson, D.N., A. McGrath & C. McNeil 2002. Cuing interacts with perceptual load in visual search. Psychol. Sci. 13: 284-287.
28. Theeuwes, J., A.F. Kramer & A.V. Belopolsky 2004. Attentional set interacts with perceptual load in visual search. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 11: 697-702.
29. Tsal, Y. & H. Benoni 2010. Diluting the burden of load: perceptual load effects are simply dilution effects. J. Exp. Psychol.: Human Percept. Perform. 36: 1645-1656.
30. Wilson, D.E., M. Muroi & C.M. MacLeod 2011. Dilution, not load, affects distractor processing. J. Exp. Psychol.: Human Percept. Perform. 37: 319-335.
31. Kyllingsbæk, S., J.L. Sy & B. Giesbrecht 2011. Understanding the allocation of attention when faced with varying perceptual load in partial report: a computational approach. Neuropsychologia 49: 1487-1497.
32. Benoni, H. & Y. Tsal 2013. Conceptual and methodological concerns in the theory of perceptual load. Front. Psychol. 4: 522.
33. Bundesen, C., T. Habekost & S. Kyllingsbæk 2005. A neural theory of visual attention: bridging cognition and neurophysiology. Psychol. Rev. 112: 291-328.
34. Eriksen, C.W. 1966. Temporal luminance summation effects in backward and forward masking. Percept. Psychophys. 1: 87-92.
35. Jonides, J. & S. Yantis 1988. Uniqueness of abrupt visual onset in capturing attention. Percept. Psychophys. 43: 346-354.
36. Kahneman, D. 1968. Method, findings, and theory in studies of visual masking. Psychol. Rev. 70: 404-425.
37. Schneider, W. & Shiffrin, R.M. 1977. Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search, and attention. Psychol. Rev. 84: 1-66.
38. Serences, J.T. et al. 2005. Coordination of voluntary and stimulus-driven attentional control in human cortex. Psychol. Sci. 16: 114-122.
39. Serences, J.T. & S. Yantis Spatially selective representations of voluntary and stimulus-driven attentional priority in human occipital, parietal, and frontal cortex. Cereb. Cortex, In press.
40. Wolford, G. & S. Hollingsworth 1974. Retinal location and string position as important variables in visual information processing. Percept. Psychophys. 16: 437-442.
41. Johnston, W.A. & V.J. Dark 1986. Selective attention. Ann. Rev. Psychol. 37: 43-75.
42. Hillyard, S.A., R.F. Hink, V.L. Schwent & T.W. Picton 1973. Electrical signs of selective attention in the human brain. Science 182: 177-180.
43. Luck, S.J. et al. 1994. Effects of spatial cuing on luminance detectability: psychophysical and electrophysiological evidence for early selection. J. Exp. Psychol.: Human Percept. Perform. 20: 887-904.
44. Van Voorhis, S.T. & S.A. Hillyard 1977. Visual evoked potentials and selective attention to points in space. Percept. Psychophys. 22: 54-62.
45. Luck, S.J., E.K. Vogel & K.L. Shapiro 1996. Word meanings can be accessed but not reported during the attentional blink. Nature 383: 616-618.
46. Allport, A. 1987. Selection for action: Some behavioral and neurophysiological considerations of attention and action. In Perspectives on Perception and Action. H. Heuer & A.F. Sanders Eds.: 395-420. Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, Inc.: Hillsdale, NJ.
47. Gatti, S.W. & H.E. Egeth 1978. Failure of spatial selectivity in vision. Bull. Psychon. Soc. 11: 181-184.
48. Dark, V.J., W.A. Johnston, M. Myles-Worsley & M.J. Farah 1985. Levels of selection and capacity limits. J. Exp. Psychol.: General 114: 472-497.
49. Kahneman, D. & D. Chajczyk 1983. Tests of the automaticity of reading: dilution of Stroop effects by color-irrelevant stimuli. J. Exp. Psychol.: Human Percept. Perform. 9: 497-509.
50. Yantis, S. & J.C. Johnston 1990. On the locus of visual selection: evidence from focused attention tasks. J. Exp. Psychol.: Human Percept. Perform. 16: 135-149.
51. Eriksen, C.W. & Y. Yeh 1985. Allocation of attention in the visual field. J. Exp. Psychol.: Human Percept. Perform. 11: 583-597.
52. James, W. 1890. The Principles of Psychology. Henry Holt & Co.: New York.
53. Forster, S. & N. Lavie 2007. High perceptual load makes everybody equal: eliminating individual differences in distractability with load. Psychol. Sci. 18: 377-381.
54. Remington, A.M., J.G. Swettenham & N. Lavie 2012. Lightening the load: perceptual load impairs visual detection in typical adults but not in autism. J. Abnormal Psychol. 121: 544-551.
55. Lavie, N. & I. Robertson 2001. The role of perceptual load in visual neglect: rejection of ipsilesional distractors is facilitated with higher central load. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 13: 867-876.
56. Maylor, E.A. & N. Lavie 1998. The influence of perceptual load on age differences in selective attention. Psychol. Aging 13: 563-573.
57. Forster, S. & N. Lavie 2009. Harnessing the wandering mind: the role of perceptual load. Cognition 111: 345-355.
58. Beck, D.M., G. Rees, C.D. Frith & N. Lavie 2001. Neural correlates of change detection and change blindness. Nature Neurosci. 4: 645-650.
59. Cartwright-Finch, U. & N. Lavie 2007. The role of perceptual load in inattentional blindess. Cognition 102: 321-340.
60. Lavie, N. 2006. The role of perceptual load in visual awareness. Brain Res. 1080: 91-100.
61. Kahneman, D. 1973. Attention and Effort. Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
62. Navon, D. & D. Gopher 1979. On the economy of the human processing system. Psychol. Rev. 80: 214-255.
63. Norman, D.A. & D.G. Bobrow 1975. On data-limited and resource-limited processes. Cogn. Psychol. 7: 44-64.
64. Wickens, C.D. 1980. The structure of attentional resources. In Attention and Performance VIII. R. Nickerson Ed.: 239-257. Erlbaum: Hillsdale, NJ.
65. Treisman, A.M. & G.A. Gelade 1980. Feature-integration theory of attention. Cogn. Psychol. 12: 97-136.
66. Eriksen, B.A. & C.W. Eriksen 1974. Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Percept. Psychophys. 16: 143-149.
67. Lavie, N. & S. Cox 1997. On the efficiency of attentional selection: efficient visual search results in inefficient rejection of distraction. Psychol. Sci. 8: 395-398.
68. Rees, G., C.D. Frith & N. Lavie 1997. Modulating irrelevant motion perception by varying attentional load in an unrelated task. Science 278: 1616-1619.
69. Handy, T.C., M. Soltani & G.R. Mangun 2001. Perceptual load and visuocortical processing: event-related potentials reveal sensory-level selection. Psychol. Sci. 12: 213-218.
70. Pessoa, L., M. McKenna, E. Guitierrez & L.G. Ungerleider 2002. Neural processing of emotional faces requires attention. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 99: 11458-11463.
71. Yi, D.-J., G.F. Woodman, D. Widdlers, et al. 2004. Neural fate of ignored stimuli: dissociable effects of perceptual and working memory load. Nature Neurosci. 7: 992-996.
72. Schwartz, S. et al. 2005. Attentional load and sensory competition in human vision: modulation of fMRI responses by load at fixation during task-irrelevant stimulation in the peripheral visual field. Cereb. Cortex 15: 770-786.
73. Boudreau, C.E., T.H. Williford & J.H.R. Maunsell 2006. Effects of task difficulty and target likelihood in Area V4 of macaque monkeys. J. Neurophysiol. 96: 2377-2387.
74. Chen, Y. et al. 2008. Task difficulty modulates the activity of specific neuronal populations in primary visual cortex. Nature Neurosci. 11: 974-982.
75. Carmel, D., J.D. Thorne, G. Rees & N. Lavie 2011. Perceptual load alters visual excitability. J. Exp. Psychol.: Human Percept. Perform. 37: 1550-1560.
76. Breitmeyer, B.G. 1984. Visual Masking: An Integrative Approach. Oxford University Press: New York.
77. Lavie, N. & J.W. de Fockert 2003. Contrasting effects of sensory limits and capacity limits in visual selective attention. Percept. Psychophys. 65: 202-212.
78. Serences, J.T., S. Yantis, A. Culberson & E. Awh 2004. Preparatory activity in visual cortex indexes distractor suppression during covert spatial orienting. J. Neurophysiol. 92: 3538-3545.
79. Forster, S. & N. Lavie 2011. Entirely irrelevant distractors can capture and captivate attention. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 18: 1064-1070.
80. Desimone, R. 1996. Neural mechanisms for visual memory and their role in attention. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 93: 13494-13499.
81. Desimone, R. 1998. Visual attention mediated by biased competition in extrastriate visual cortex. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci. 353: 1245-1255.
82. Duncan, J. 1996. Cooperating brain systems in selective perception and attention. In Attention and Performance XVI: Information Integration in Perception and Communication. T. Inui & J.L. McClelland Eds.: 549-578. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.
83. Reynolds, J.H. & D.J. Heeger 2009. The normalization model of attention. Neuron 61: 168-185.
84. Bundesen, C., T. Habekost & S. Kyllingsbæk 2011. A neural theory of visual attention and short-term memory (NTVA). Neuropsychologia 49: 1446-1457.
85. Scalf, P.E., A. Torralbo, E. Tapia & D.M. Beck 2013. Competition explains limited attention and perceptual resources: implications for perceptual load and dilution theories. Front. Psychol. 4: 243.
86. Torralbo, A. & D.M. Beck 2008. Perceptual-load-induced selection as a result of local competitive interactions in visual corte. Psychol. Sci. 19: 1045-1050.
87. Nordfang, M., Dyrholm, M., & Bundesen, C. 2013. Identifying bottom-up and top-down components of attentional weight by experimental analysis and computational modeling. J. Exp. Psychol.: Gen. 142: 510-535.
88. Chelazzi, L., J. Duncan, E.K. Miller & R. Desimone 1998. Responses of neurons in inferior temporal cortex during memory-guided visual search. J. Neurophysiol. 80: 2918-2940.
89. Chelazzi, L., E.K. Miller, J. Duncan & R. Desimone 1993. A neural basis for visual search in inferior temporal cortex. Nature 363: 345-347.
90. Moran, J. & R. Desimone 1985. Selective attention gates visual processing in extrastriate cortex. Science 229: 782-783.
91. Reynolds, J.H., L. Chelazzi & R. Desimone 1999. Competitive mechanisms subserve attention in macaque areas V2 and V4. J. Neurosci. 19: 1736-1753.
92. McAdams, C.J. & J.H.R. Maunsell 1999. Effects of attention on orientation-tuning functions of single neurons in macaque cortical area V4. J. Neurosci. 19: 431-441.
93. Martinez-Trujillo, J.C. & S. Treue 2004. Feature-based attention increases the selectivity of population responses in primate visual cortex. Curr. Biol. 14: 744-751.
94. Vangkilde, S., J.T. Coull & C. Bundesen 2012. Great expectations: temporal expectation modulates perceptual processing speed. J. Exp. Psychol.: Human Percept. Perform. 38: 1183-1191.
95. Kyllingsbæk, S., C. Valla, J. Vanrie & C. Bundesen 2007. Effects of spatial separate between stimuli in whole report from brief visual displays. Percept. Psychophys. 69: 1040-1050.
96. Desimone, R. & Ungerleider, L.G. 1989. Neural mechanisms of visual processing in monkeys. Handbook of Neuropsychology. Vol. 2. Boller & J. Grafman Eds.: 267-299. Elsevier Science Publishers: Amsterdam.
97. Desimone, R. & C.G. Gross 1979. Visual areas in the temporal cortex of the macaque. Brain Res. 14: 363-380.
98. Neumann, O. 1984. Automatic processing: A review of recent findings and a plea for an old theory. Cognition and Motor Processes. W. Prinz & A.F. Sanders Eds.: 255-293. Springer: Berlin.
99. Neumann, O. 1987. Beyond capacity: A functional view of attention. Perspectives on Perception and Action. H. Heuer & A.F. Sanders Eds.: 361-394. Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, Inc.: Hillsdale, NJ.
100. Scalf, P.E. & D.M. Beck 2010. Competition in visual cortex impedes attention to multiple items. J. Neurosci. 30: 161-169.
101. Tsotsos, J. et al. 1995. Modelling visual attention via selective tuning. Art. Intell. 78: 507-547.
102. Schneider, W.X. 1995. VAM: a neuro-cognitive model for visual attention control of segmentation, object recognition, and space-based motor action. Vis. Cogn. 2: 331-375.
103. Luck, S.J., M. Girelli, M.T. McDermott & M.A. Ford 1997. Bridging the gap between monkey neurophysiology and human perception: an ambiguity resolution theory of visual selective attention. Cogn. Psychol. 33: 64-87.