The processing locus of interference from salient singleton distractors

Visual Cognition

Volumn 16, Issue 2-3, 2008, Pages 166-181

  Ester, Edward ^a   Awh, Edward ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OREGON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; COLOR DISCRIMINATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EYE FIXATION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; HYPOTHESIS; INFORMATION PROCESSING; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REACTION TIME; RESPONSE TIME; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL STIMULATION; VOLUNTEER;

EID: 40349113576     PISSN: 13506285     EISSN: 14640716     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13506280701489510     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Awh, E., Vogel, E. and Oh, S. W. (2006) Interactions between attention and working memory. Neuroscience, 139, pp. 201-208.
2. Bacon, W. F. and Egeth, H. E. (1994) Overriding stimulus-driven attentional capture. Perception and Psychophysics, 55, pp. 485-496.
3. Folk, C. L. and Remington, R. W. (1998) Selectivity in distraction by irrelevant featural singletons: Evidence for two forms of attentional capture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, pp. 847-858.
4. Kumada, T. (1999) Limitations in attending to feature value for overriding stimulus-driven interference. Perception and Psychophysics, 61:1, pp. 61-79.
5. Mordkoff, J. T. and Egeth, H. E. (1993) Response time and accuracy revisited: Converging support for the interactive race model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19, pp. 981-991.
6. Posner, M. I. and Cohen, Y. (1984) Components of visual orienting. Attention and performance X, pp. 531-556. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd, Hove, UK
7. Santee, J. L. and Egeth, H. E. (1982) Do reaction time and accuracy measure the same aspects of letter recognition?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8, pp. 489-501.
8. Shiu, L. and Pashler, H. (1994) Negligible effect of spatial precuing on identification of single digits. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, pp. 1037-1054.
9. Theeuwes, J. (1991) Cross-dimensional perceptual selectivity. Perception and Psychophysics, 50, pp. 184-193.
10. Theeuwes, J. (1992) Perceptual selectivity for color and form. Perception and Psychophysics, 51, pp. 599-606.
11. Theeuwes, J. (1996) Perceptual selectivity for color or form: On the nature of the interference effect. Converging operations in the study of visual attention, pp. 297-314. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC
12. Theeuwes, J. and Chen, C. Y. D. (2005) Attentional capture and inhibition (of return): The effect on perceptual sensitivity. Perception and Psychophysics, 8, pp. 1305-1312.
13. Theeuwes, J. and Godijn, R. (2001) Attentional and oculomotor capture. Attraction, distraction, and action: Multiple perspectives on attentional capture, pp. 121-149. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam
14. Theeuwes, J. and Godijn, R. (2002) Irrelevant singletons capture attention: Evidence from inhibition of return. Perception and Psychophysics, 64:5, pp. 764-770.
15. Theeuwes, J., Kramer, A. F., Hahn, S. and Irwin, D. E. (1998) Our eyes do not always go where we want them to go: Capture of the eyes by new objects. Psychological Science, 9, pp. 379-385.
16. Theeuwes, J., Kramer, A. F., Hahn, S., Irwin, D. E. and Zelinsky, G. J. (1999) Influence of attentional capture on oculomotor control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, pp. 1595-1608.
17. Theeuwes, J., Kramer, A. F. and Kingstone, A. (2004) Attentional capture modulates perceptual sensitivity. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 11, pp. 551-554.