Evaluating the Precision of Preoperative Planning in Patient Specific Instrumentation: Can a Single MRI Yield Different Preoperative Plans?

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 30, Issue 7, 2015, Pages 1250-1253

  Goyal, Nitin ^a   Stulberg, S David ^a,b  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Northshore Orthopaedics   (United States)

Author keywords

Component sizing; Patient specific instrumentation; Precision; Preoperative planning; Total knee arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; AGED; ANATOMIC LANDMARK; ARTICLE; BONE RESECTION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPONENT SIZING; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS SOFTWARE; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE PROCESSING; MALE; MUSCULOSKELETAL SYSTEM PARAMETERS; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATIENT SPECIFIC INSTRUMENTATION; PREOPERATIVE ALIGNMENT DETERMINATION; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; TREATMENT PLANNING; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEMUR; KNEE PROSTHESIS; KNEE REPLACEMENT; MIDDLE AGED; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PROCEDURES; REPRODUCIBILITY; SOFTWARE; SURGERY; TIBIA; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VERY ELDERLY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEMALE; FEMUR; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SOFTWARE; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TIBIA; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84931565961     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: 15328406     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.02.021     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Daniilidis K., Tibesku C.O. A comparison of conventional and patient-specific instruments in total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop 2014, 38(3):503.
2. Ng V.Y., DeClaire J.H., Berend K.R., et al. Improved accuracy of alignment with patient-specific positioning guides compared with manual instrumentation in TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2012, 470(1):99.
3. Ivie C.B., Probst P.J., Bal A.K., et al. Improved radiographic outcomes with patient-specific total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 2014, 29(11):2100.
4. Barrett W., Hoeffel D., Dalury D., et al. In-vivo alignment comparing patient specific instrumentation with both conventional and computer assisted surgery (CAS) instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 2014, 29(2):343.
5. Hamilton W.G., Parks N.L., Saxena A. Patient-specific instrumentation does not shorten surgical time: a prospective, randomized trial. J Arthroplast 2013, 28(8 Suppl):96.
6. Roh Y.W., Kim T.W., Lee S., et al. Is TKA using patient-specific instruments comparable to conventional TKA? A randomized controlled study of one system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2013, 471(12):3988.
7. Victor J., Dujardin J., Vandenneucker H., et al. Patient-specific guides do not improve accuracy in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2014, 472(1):263.
8. Barrack R.L., Ruh E.L., Williams B.M., et al. Patient specific cutting blocks are currently of no proven value. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2012, 94(11 Suppl. A):95.
9. Nunley R.M., Ellison B.S., Ruh E.L., et al. Are patient-specific cutting blocks cost-effective for total knee arthroplasty?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2012, 470(3):889.
10. Nunley R.M., Ellison B.S., Zhu J., et al. Do patient-specific guides improve coronal alignment in total knee arthroplasty?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2012, 470(3):895.
11. Marimuthu K., Chen D.B., Harris I.A., et al. A multi-planar CT-based comparative analysis of patient-specific cutting guides with conventional instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 2014, 29(6):1138.
12. Stronach B.M., Pelt C.E., Erickson J.A., et al. Patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty provides no improvement in component alignment. J Arthroplast 2014, 29(9):1705.
13. Woolson S.T., Harris A.H., Wagner D.W., et al. Component alignment during total knee arthroplasty with use of standard or custom instrumentation: a randomized clinical trial using computed tomography for postoperative alignment measurement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2014, 96(5):366.