Integrated direct and indirect flood risk modeling: Development and sensitivity analysis

Risk Analysis

Volumn 35, Issue 5, 2015, Pages 882-900

  Koks, E E ^a   Bockarjova M ^b   de Moel, H ^a   Aerts, J C J H ^a  

^a INSTITUTE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES   (Netherlands)

^b VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Flood duration; Flood risk modeling; Indirect losses; Input output model

Indexed keywords

ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; LOSSES; RECOVERY; RISK ASSESSMENT; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

COBB-DOUGLAS PRODUCTION FUNCTION; EXPECTED ANNUAL DAMAGES; FLOOD DURATION; FLOOD RISKS; GLOBAL SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; INPUT OUTPUT MODEL; PARAMETER INFLUENCES; PARAMETER UNCERTAINTY;

FLOODS;

ECONOMIC IMPACT; FLOOD DAMAGE; INPUT-OUTPUT ANALYSIS; INTEGRATED APPROACH; PROBABILITY; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

NETHERLANDS; ROTTERDAM; SOUTH HOLLAND;

EID: 84931564664     PISSN: 02724332     EISSN: 15396924     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/risa.12300     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Kok M, Huizinga HJ, Vrouwenvelder A, Barendregt A. Standaardmethode 2004-Schade En Slachtoffers Als Gevolg van Overstromingen, RWS Dienst Weg-En Waterbouwkunde, 2005.
2. Thieken AH, Olschewski A, Kreibich H, Kobsch S, Merz B. Development and evaluation of FLEMOps-A new flood loss estimation model for the private sector. Pp. 315-324 in 1st International Conference on Flood Recovery, Innovation and Response (FRIAR), July 2-3, London, UK, 2008.
3. Penning-Rowsell E, Viavattene C, Pardoe J, Chatterton J, Parker D, Morris J. The Benefits of Flood and Coastal Risk Management: A Handbook of Assessment Techniques. London: Middlesex University Press, 2010.
4. Kreibich H, Seifert I, Merz B, Thieken AH. Development of FLEMOcs-A new model for the estimation of flood losses in the commercial sector. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 2010; 55(8):1302-1314.
5. Rose A, Liao S-Y. Modeling regional economic resilience to disasters: A computable general equilibrium analysis of water service disruptions. Journal of Regional Science, 2005; 45(1):75-112.
6. Steenge AE, Bočkarjova M. Thinking about imbalances in post-catastrophe economies: An input-output based proposition. Economic Systems Research, 2007; 19(2):205-223.
7. Hallegatte S. An adaptive regional input-output model and its application to the assessment of the economic cost of Katrina. Risk Analysis, 2008; 28(3):779-799.
8. Li J, Crawford-Brown D, Syddall M, Guan D. Modeling imbalanced economic recovery following a natural disaster using input-output analysis. Risk Analysis, 2013; 33(10):1908-1923.
9. Jonkeren O, Giannopoulos G. Analysing critical infrastructure failure with a resilience inoperability input-output model. Economic Systems Research, 2014; 26(1):39-59.
10. Jonkman SN, Bočkarjova M, Kok M, Bernardini P. Integrated hydrodynamic and economic modelling of flood damage in the Netherlands. Ecological Economics, 2008; 66(1):77-90.
11. FEMA. HAZUS-MH MR4 Flood Model Technical Manual. Washington, DC: Federal Emergency Management Agency, Mitigation Division, 2009.
12. Klijn F, van Buuren M, van Rooij SAM. Flood-risk management strategies for an uncertain future: Living with Rhine river floods in the Netherlands? Ambio, 2004; 33(3):141-147.
13. Samuels P, Klijn F, Dijkman J. An analysis of the current practice of policies on river flood risk management in different countries. Irrigation and Drainage, 2006; 150(May 2005):25-27.
14. Grossi P, Kunreuther H. Catastrophe Modeling: A New Approach to Managing Risk. Springer, 2005.
15. Okuyama Y. Disaster and economic structural change: Case study on the 1995 Kobe earthquake. Economic Systems Research, 2014; 26(1):98-117.
16. Rose A. Economic principles, issues, and research priorities in hazard loss estimation. Pp. 13-36 in Modeling Spatial and Economic Impacts of Disasters. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer, 2004.
17. Okuyama Y. Economics of natural disasters: A critical review. Research Paper, 2003; 12:20-22.
18. Bočkarjova M, Steenge AE, Hoekstra AY. Management of flood catastrophes: An emerging paradigm shift. Pp. 70-90 in Reinhard S, Folmer H (eds). Water Policies in the Netherlands: Integrated Management in a Densely Populated Delta. Resources for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank, 2009.
19. Jongman B, Kreibich H, Apel H, Barredo JI, Bates PD, Feyen L, Gericke A, Neal J, Aerts JCJH, Ward PJ. Comparative flood damage model assessment: Towards a European approach. Natural Hazards and Earth System Science, 2012; 12(12):3733-3752.
20. Okuyama Y, Santos JR. Disaster impact and input-output analysis. Economic Systems Research, 2014; 26(1):1-12.
21. Okuyama Y, Hewings GJD, Sonis M. Measuring economic impacts of disasters: Interregional input-output analysis using sequential interindustry model. Pp. 77-101 in Okuyama Y, Chang SE (eds). Modeling Spatial and Economic Impacts of Disasters. New York: Springer, 2004.
22. Rose A, Wei D. Estimating the economic consequences of a port shutdown: The special role of resilience. Economic Systems Research, 2013; 25(2):212-232.
23. Bočkarjova M. Major disasters in modern economies: An input-output based approach at modelling imbalances and disproportions. PhD Dissertation, University of Twente, 2007.
24. Hallegatte S. Modeling the role of inventories and heterogeneity in the assessment of the economic costs of natural disasters. Risk Analysis, 2014; 34(1):152-167.
25. De Moel H, Vliet M, Aerts JCJH. Evaluating the effect of flood damage-reducing measures: A case study of the unembanked area of Rotterdam, the Netherlands. Regional Environmental Change, 2014; 14(3):895-908.
26. Smith DI. Flood damage estimation-A review of urban stage-damage curves and loss functions. Water S.A., 1994; 20(3):231-238.
27. Tebodin. Schade bij inundatie van buitendijkse industrie, 1998.
28. Tebodin. Schadecurves industrie ten gevolge van overstroming, 2000.
29. Cobb CW, Douglas PH. A theory of production. American Economic Review, 1928:139-165.
30. Hallegatte S, Hourcade J-C, Dumas P. Why economic dynamics matter in assessing climate change damages: Illustration on extreme events. Ecological Economics, 2007; 62(2):330-340.
31. Hosoe N, Gasawa K, Hashimoto H. Textbook of Computable General Equilibrium Modeling: Programming and Simulations. Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.
32. Solow RM. A contribution to the theory of economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1956; 70(1):65-94.
33. Barker K, Santos JR. Measuring the efficacy of inventory with a dynamic input-output model. International Journal of Production Economics, 2010; 126(1):130-143.
34. Santos JR, Haimes YY. Modeling the demand reduction input-output (I-O) inoperability due to terrorism of interconnected infrastructures. Risk Analysis, 2004; 24(6):1437-1451.
35. Santos JR, May L, Haimar A El. Risk-based input-output analysis of influenza epidemic consequences on interdependent workforce sectors. Risk Analysis, 2013; 33(9):1620-1635.
36. Barker K, Santos JR. A risk-based approach for identifying key economic and infrastructure systems. Risk Analysis, 2010; 30(6):962-974.
37. Wagenaar D. The significance of flood duration for flood damage assessment. Masters Dissertation, 2012.
38. Leontief WW. Input-output economics. Scientific American, 1951; 185(4):15-21.
39. Merk O, Notteboom T. The competitiveness of global port-cities: The case of Rotterdam, Amsterdam - The Netherlands. OECD Regional Development Working Papers, 2013/08, 2013.
40. Okuyama Y. Modeling spatial economic impacts of an earthquake: Input-output approaches. Disaster Prevention and Management, 2004; 13(4):297-306.
41. Koks EE, De Moel H, Aerts JCJH, Bouwer LM. Effect of spatial adaptation measures on flood risk: Study of coastal floods in Belgium. Regional Environmental Change, 2014; 14(1):413-425.
42. De Moel H, Aerts JCJH. Effect of uncertainty in land use, damage models and inundation depth on flood damage estimates. Natural Hazards, 2011; 58(1):407-425.
43. Helton JC. Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis techniques for use in performance assessment for radioactive waste disposal. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 1993; 42(2):327-367.
44. Crosetto M, Tarantola S, Saltelli A. Sensitivity and uncertainty analysis in spatial modelling based on GIS. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2000; 81(1):71-79.
45. Turányi T. Sensitivity analysis of complex kinetic systems. Tools and applications. Journal of Mathematical Chemistry, 1990; 5(3):203-248.
46. Saltelli A. Sensitivity analysis: Could better methods be used? Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres (1984-2012), 1999; 104(D3):3789-3793.
47. De Moel H, Asselman NEM, Aerts JCJ. Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis of coastal flood damage estimates in the west of the Netherlands. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 2012; 12(4):1045-1058.
48. Saltelli A, Tarantola S, Chan K-S. A quantitative model-independent method for global sensitivity analysis of model output. Technometrics, 1999; 41(1):39-56.
49. Ratto M, Tarantola S, Saltelli A. Sensitivity analysis in model calibration: GSA-GLUE approach. Computer Physics Communications, 2001; 136(3):212-224.
50. Simlab. Software Package for Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analysis. Joint Research Centre of the European Commission, 2011. Available at: http://simlab.jrc.ec.europa.eu, Accessed October 2, 2014.
51. Sobol' IM. Global sensitivity indices for nonlinear mathematical models and their Monte Carlo estimates. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 2001; 55(1-3):271-280.
52. Huizinga HJ. HSRR02: Water Safety: Flood Depth and Extent, 2010.
53. Eding G, Oosterhaven J, de Vet B, Nijmeijer H. Constructing regional supply and use tables: Dutch experiences. Pp. 237-262 in Understanding and Interpreting Economic Structure. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer, 1999.
54. Nijdam M, der Lugt L, De Jong O. Havenmonitor 2012: de economische betekenis Nederlandse zeehavens, 2014.
55. Ward PJJ, De Moel H, Aerts JCJH, Glade T. How are flood risk estimates affected by the choice of return-periods? Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 2011; 11(12):3181-3195.
56. Hallegatte S, Ranger N, Mestre O, Dumas P, Corfee-Morlot J, Herweijer C, Wood RM. Assessing climate change impacts, sea level rise and storm surge risk in port cities: A case study on Copenhagen. Climatic Change, 2011; 104(1):113-137.
57. Ranger N, Hallegatte S, Bhattacharya S, Bachu M, Priya S, Dhore K, Rafique F, Mathur P, Naville N, Henriet F, Herweijer C, Pohit S, Corfee-Morlot J. An assessment of the potential impact of climate change on flood risk in Mumbai. Climatic Change, 2011; 104(1):139-167.
58. Dutta D, Herath S, Musiake K. A mathematical model for flood loss estimation. Journal of Hydrology, 2003; 277(1):24-49.
59. Förster S, Kuhlmann B, Lindenschmidt K-E, Bronstert A. Assessing flood risk for a rural detention area. Natural Hazards and Earth System Science, 2008; 8(2):311-322.