Management of flood catastrophes: An emerging paradigm shift?

Water Policy in the Netherlands: Integrated Management in a Densely Populated Delta

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 70-90

  Bocčkarjova, Marija ^a   Steenge, Albert E ^b   Hoekstra, Arjen Y ^c  

^a VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84920771547     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781936331413     Document Type: Chapter

References (76)

1. Alexander, D. 1997.The study of natural disasters, 1977-97: Some reflections on a changing field of knowledge. Disasters 21:284-304.
2. Allenby, B., and J. Fink. 2005.Toward inherently secure and resilient societies. Science Journal 309 (5737): 1034-36.
3. Arnold, M. 2006. Overview of 5 ProVention recovery case studies. The 6th IIASA-DPRI Forum Integrated Disaster Risk Management. Istanbul,Turkey.
4. Benson, C. 1997. The economic impact of disasters: Current assessmentpractices.Assessment of the economic impact of natural and man-made disasters: Expert consultation on methodologies. Brussels: Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters (CRED).
5. Bockarjova, M., A.E. Steenge, and A. van der Veen. 2004. On direct estimation of initial damage in the case of a major catastrophe:Derivation of the “basic equation.” Disaster Prevention and Management 13 (4): 330-36.
6. Bockarjova, M., A.E. Steenge, and A. van der Veen, A. 2007. Flooding and consequent structural economic effects:A methodology. In Flood risk management in Europe: Innovation in policy and practice, ed. S. Begum, M.J.F. Stive, and J.W. Hall, 131-54. New York: Springer.
7. Booysen, H.J., M.F. Viljoen, and G.T. de Villiers. 1999. Methodology for the calculation of industrial flood damage and its application to an industry in Vereeniging. Water 25:41-46.
8. Briene, M., S. Koppert, A. Koopman, and A.Verkennis. 2003. Financial foundations for indicators of flood damage: Final report. Rotterdam: NEI.
9. BRTE (Bureau ofTransport and Regional Economics). 2001. Economic costs of natural disasters in Australia. Disaster Mitigation Research Working Group. Canberra,Australia: Paragon Printers.
10. Chang, S.E. 1998. Direct Economic Impacts. In Engineering and socioeconomic impacts of earthquakes: An analysis of electricity lifeline disruptions in the New Madrid area, ed. M. Shinozuka,A. Rose, and R.T. Eguchi, 75-94. Buffalo, NY: Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research.
11. Cochrane, H.C. 1997a. Economic impact of a Midwest earthquake. NCEER Bulletin 11:1-15.
12. Cochrane, H.C. 1997b. Forecasting the economic impact of a Midwest earthquake. In Economic consequences of earthquakes: Preparing for the unexpected, ed. B.G.Jones, 223-48. Buffalo, NY: National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research.
13. Cochrane, H.C. 2003. Economic Loss: Myth and Measurement. In In search of a common methodology for damage estimation:Joint NEDIES and University of Twente Workshop Proceeding, ed.A. van der Veen,A.L.Vetere Arellano, and J.-P. Nordvik, 11-19. Delft, Netherlands: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
14. Cole, S. 1998. Decision support for calamity preparedness: Socioeconomic and interregional impacts. In Engineering and socioeconomic impacts of earthquakes: An analysis of electricity lifeline disruptions in the New Madrid area, ed. M. Shinozuka,A.Z. Rose, and R.T. Eguchi, 125-53. Buffalo, NY: Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research.
15. Cole, S., E. Pantoja, and V. Razak. 1993. Social accounting for disaster preparedness and recovery planning. Technical report. Buffalo, NY: National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research.
16. COMEST (World Commission on the Ethics of Scientific Knowledge and Technology).2005. The precautionary principle. Paris: UNESCO.
17. Commissie WB21 (Commissie Waterbeheer 21e eeuw). 2000. Waterbeleid voor de 21e eeuw; Geef water de ruimte en de aandacht die het verdient [Water policy for the 21st century; Give water the space and attention it deserves].The Hague:WB21.
18. CPB (Centraal Planbureau). 2000. Ruimte voor water; kosten en baten van zes projecten en enige alter-natieven [Giving room for water: Costs and benefits of six projects and some alternatives].Werkdocu-ment 130.The Hague: CPB.
19. de Bruijn, K.M. 2004. Resilience and flood risk management. Water Policy, 6 (1): 53-66.
20. Deltawerken.2006. Deltaworks.www.deltawerken.com (accessed October 30, 2008).
21. Ebregt, J., C.J.J. Eijgenraam, and H.J.J. Stolwijk. 2005. Kosteneffectiviteit van maatregelen en pakketten: Kosten-batenanalyse voor Ruimte voor de Rivier, deel 2 [Cost efficiency of measures and policies: Cost-benefit analysis for giving room for the river]. CPB Document 83.The Hague: CPB.
22. ECLAC (UN Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean). 2003. Handbook for estimating the socio-economic and environmental effects of disasters. Santiago, Chile: ECLAC.
23. Eijgenraam, C.J.J. 2005. Veiligheid tegen overstromen: Kosten-batenanalyse voor Ruimte voor de Rivier, deel 1 [Cost-benefit analysis for giving room for the river flooding safety]. CPB Document 82.The Hague: CPB.
24. Freeman, P., L. Martin, R. Mechler, and K. Warner. 2004.A methodology for incorporating natural catastrophes into macroeconomic projections. Disaster Prevention and Management 13(4): 337-342.
25. Gunderson, L.H., and C.S. Holling. 2001. Panarch. Washington, DC: Island Press.
26. Hoekstra, A.Y. 2005.Generalism as specialism:Water management in the context of sustainable development, globalisation, uncertainties and risks. Inaugural address. Enschede, Netherlands: University of Twente.
27. ICPR (International Commission for the Protection of the Rhine). 2002. Non-structuralflood plain management: Measures and their effectiveness. Bern, Switzerland: ICPR.
28. Jaffee, D.M., and T. Russell. 2006. Should governments provide catastrophe insurance? Economists’ Voice 3 (5),article 6. www.bepress.com/ev/vol3/iss5/art6.
29. Jonkman, S.N., P.H.A.J.M. van Gelder, and J.K. Vrijling. 2002. Loss of life models for sea and river floods. Flood Defence 1:196-206.
30. Kendra, J.M., and T. Wachtendorf. 2003. Elements of resilience after the World Trade Center disaster: Reconstituting New York City’s Emergency Operations Center. Disasters 27:37-53.
31. Kok, M. 2005. Insurance in the Netherlands: Possible and desirable? Lelystad, Netherlands: HKV Consultants.
32. Linnerooth-Bayer, J., R. Mechler, and G. P. flug. 2005. Refocusing disaster aid. Science Journal 309 (5737): 1044-46.
33. Maris, A.G. 1954. Het waterstaatkundig aspect van het Deltaplan [Water management perspective on the Delta Plan]. In Het Deltaplan, afdamming zee-armen [The Delta Plan: Closing the sea arms with the dike]. The Hague: Nederlandse Maatschappij voor Nijverheid en Handel.
34. Mechler, R. 2004. Natural disaster risk management and financing disaster losses in developing countries. Karlsruhe, Germany:VVW GmbH.
35. Messner, F., and V. Meyer. 2006. Flood damage, vulnerability and risk perception: Challenges for flood damage research. In Flood risk management: Hazards, vulnerability and mitigation measures, ed.J. Schanze, E. Zeman, and J. Marsalek, 149-67. New York: Springer.
36. Mitchell, J.K. 2000.What’s in a name? Issues of terminology and language in hazards research. Environmental Hazards 2 (3): 87-88.
37. MNP (Milieu en Natuur Planbureau). 2005. The effects of climate change in the Netherlands. Bilthoven, Netherlands: MNP.
38. Murlidharan, T.L., and H.C. Shah. 2003. Economic consequences of catastrophes triggered by natural hazards. Palo Alto, CA: John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center and Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University.
39. Nieuwenhuizen, W., H.P. Wolfert, L.W.G. Higler, M. Dijkman, H.J. Huizinga, J. Kopinga, A. Makaske, B.S.J. Nijhof, A.F.M. Olsthoorn, and J.H.M. Wösten. 2003. Standaardmethode schade aan LNC-waarden als gevolg van overstromingen; Methode voor het bepalen van de gevolgen van over-stromingen voor de aspecten opgaande begroeiing, vegetatie, aquatische ecosystemen en historische bouwkunde [Standard method for predicting damage to the LNC-values as a result of floods]. Alterra Report 709.Wageningen, Netherlands: Alterra.
40. NRC (National Research Council, Committee on Earthquake Engineering, Division of Natural Hazard Mitigation, Commission on Engineering and Technical Systems). 1992. The economic consequences of a catastrophic earthquake: Proceedings of a forum.Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
41. NRC (National Research Council, Committee on Assessing the Costs of Natural Disasters, Board on Natural Disasters, Commission on Geosciences, Environment, and Resources). 1999. The impacts of natural disasters:A framework for loss estimation. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
42. OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). 2003. Emerging risks in the 21st century:An agenda for action. Paris: OECD.
43. Okuyama, Y. 2004. Modelling spatial economic impacts of an earthquake: Input-output approaches. Disaster Prevention and Management 13 (4): 297-306.
44. Okuyama, Y., G.J.D. Hewings, and M. Sonis. 2004. Measuring economic impacts of disasters: Interregional input-output analysis using sequential interindustry model. In Modelling spatial and economic impacts of disasters: advances in spatial science, ed. Y. Okuyama and S.E. Chang, 77-103. New York: Springer-Verlag.
45. Parker, D.J. 2000. Floods. London and New York: Routledge.
46. Parker, D.J., C.H. Green, and P.M. Thompson. 1987. Urban flood protection benefits:A project appraisal guide. Aldershot, UK: Gower.
47. Pingali, P., L. Alinovi, and J. Sutton. 2005. Food security in complex emergencies: Enhancing food system resilience. Disasters 29:5-24.
48. RA (Resilience Alliance). 2005. Research on resilience in social-ecological systems: A basis for sustainability, www.resalliance.org (accessed October 30, 2008).
49. Riddell, K., and C. Green. 1999. Flood and coastal project appraisal guidance: Economic appraisal. London: Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, Flood and Coastal Defence Emergencies Division (MAFF).
50. RIVM (Rijksinstituut voor Volksgezondheid en Milieu). 2004. Risico’s in bedijkte termen een thematische evaluatie van het Nederlandse veiligheidsbeleid tegen overstromen [Dutch dikes, and risk hikes: A thematic policy evaluation of risks of flooding in the Netherlands]. RIVM Report 500799002. Bilthoven, Netherlands: RIVM.
51. Rose, A.Z. 2004a. Defining and measuring economic resilience to disasters. Disaster Prevention and Management 13 (4): 307-14.
52. Rose, A.Z. 2004b. Economic principles, issues, and research priorities in hazard loss estimation. In Modelling spatial and economic impacts of disaster, ed.Y. Okuyama and S.E.Chang, 13-36. New York: Springer-Verlag.
53. Rose, A.Z., and D. Lim. 2002. Business interruption losses from natural hazards: Conceptual and methodological issues in the case of the Northridge earthquake. Environmental Hazards 4:1-14.
54. Silva, W., F. Klijn, and J. Dijkman. 2001. Room for the Rhine branches in the Netherlands. Lelystad, Netherlands: RIZA.
55. Steenge, A.E., and M. Bockarjova. 2007. Impact and recovery after a big disaster: Input-output methodology revisited. Economic Systems Research 19 (2): 205-23.
56. TAW (Technische Adviescommissie voor de Waterkeringen). 2000. Van overschrijdingskans naar overstromingskans [From overtopping probability to flooding probability]. Delft, Netherlands: Technische Adviescommisie voor de Waterkeringen.
57. Tinbergen, J. 1954. Economisch aspect van het Deltaplan [Economic perspective on the Delta Plan]. In Het Deltaplan, afdamming zee-armen [The Delta Plan: Closing the sea arms with the dikes]. The Hague: Nederlandse Maatschappij voor Nijverheid en Handel.
58. Tobin, G.A. 1999. Sustainability and community resilience:The Holy Grail of hazards planning? Environmental Hazards 1:13-25.
59. V&W (Ministerie van Verkeer en Waterstaat). 2005a. Flood risks and safety in the Netherlands: Full report. Delft, Netherlands:V&W.
60. V&W (Ministerie van Verkeer en Waterstaat). 2005b. HIS Hoogwater Informatie Systeem voor de rampenbestrijding bij overstromingen [HIS: High Water Information System for the prevention of disasters caused by flooding].De\ft, Netherlands:V&W
61. van Ast, J., J.J. Bouma, and D. François. 2004. Final report on the evaluation of risks due to flooding. Rotterdam: Erasmus Centre for Sustainable Development and Management, Erasmus University of Rotterdam.
62. van Dantzig, D. 1956. Economic decision problems for flood prevention. Econometrica 24:276-87.
63. van den Berg, K., L. Sluijs, M. Snuverink, and A. Wiertz. 2000. Damage curves for industry as a consequence of a flooding.The Hague:V&W/Tebodin Consultancy.
64. van der Veen, A., N. Groenendijk, N. Mol, C.J.J. Logtmeijer, and A.J. Wesselink. 2001. Kosten-Baten analyse en evaluatie van maatregelen tegen overstromingen [Cost-benefit analysis and evaluation of flood control measures syllabus]. Delft, Netherlands: Delft Cluster.
65. van der Veen, A., and C.J.J. Logtmeijer. 2005. Economic hotspots:Visualizing vulnerability to flooding. Natural Hazards 36 (1-2): 65-80.
66. Vrijling, J.K. 2001. Probabilistic design of water defence systems in the Netherlands. Reliability Engineering and Systems Safety 74:337-44.
67. Vrisou van Eck, N., and M. Kok. 2001. Standaardmethode Schade en Slachtoffersals gevolg van overstromingen [Standard method for predicting damage and casualties as a result of floods]. Lelystad, Netherlands: HKV Consultants.
68. Williamson, O.E. 2000.The new institutional economics:Taking stock, looking ahead.Journal of Economic Literature 38 (3): 595-613.
69. Zeegers, G.H.L. 1954. Planning and sociological perspectives on the Delta Plan. In Het Deltaplan, afdamming zee-armen [The Delta Plan: Closing the sea arms with the dikes]. The Hague: Ned-erlandse Maatschappij voor Nijverheid en Handel.
70. Besluit tegemoetkoming schade bij rampen en zware ongevallen [Decision on Compensation of Damage in Case of Disasters and Serious Accidents] (1998), Staatsblad 648, Netherlands.
71. Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions Flood Risk Management Flood Prevention, Protection and Mitigation. COM(2004)472, Brussels.
72. Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy. Official Journal of the European Communities L 327:1-72.
73. Directive 2007/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2007 on the assessment and management of flood risks. Official Journal of the European Union L 288:27-34.
74. Wet op de Waterkering [Flood Defence Act] (1996), Netherlands.
75. Wet toegemoetkoming schade bij rampen en zware ongevallen [Law on Compensation of Damage in Case of Disasters and Serious Accidents] (1998), Staatsblad 325, Netherlands.
76. Nationaal Bestuursakkoord Water [National Administrative Agreement on Water] (2003), Netherlands.