Situation models, mental simulations, and abstract concepts in discourse comprehension

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 23, Issue 4, 2016, Pages 1028-1034

  Zwaan, Rolf A ^a  

^a ERASMUS UNIVERSITY ROTTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Abstract concepts; Embodied cognition; Language comprehension; Language memory interactions; Mental models

Indexed keywords

COMPREHENSION; CONCEPT FORMATION; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; LINGUISTICS; MEMORY; THINKING;

COMPREHENSION; CONCEPT FORMATION; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; LINGUISTICS; MEMORY; THINKING;

EID: 84931331925     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: 15315320     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/s13423-015-0864-x     Document Type: Review

References (56)

1. Andrews, M., Frank, S. L., & Vigliocco, G. (2014). Reconciling embodied and distributional accounts of meaning in language. Topics in Cognitive Science, 6, 359–370.
2. Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 577–660.
3. Barsalou, L. W., & Wiemer-Hastings, K. (2005). Situating abstract concepts. In D. Pecher & R. Zwaan (Eds.), Grounding cognition: The role of perception and action in memory, language, and thought (pp. 129–163). New York: Cambridge University Press.
4. Barsalou, L. W., Santos, A., Simmons, W. K., & Wilson, C. D. (2008). Language and simulation in conceptual processing. In M. De Vega, A. M. Glenberg, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Symbols, embodiment, and meaning (pp. 245–283). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5. Boulenger, V., Hauk, O., & Pulvermüller, F. (2009). Grasping ideas with the motor system: Semantic somatotopy in idiom comprehension. Cerebral Cortex, 19, 1905–1914.
6. Bower, G. H., & Morrow, D. G. (1990). Mental Models in Narrative Comprehen- sion. Science, 247, 44–48.
7. Bransford, J. D., Barclay, J. R., & Franks, J. J. (1972). Sentence memory: A constructive versus interpretive approach. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 193–209.
8. Chambers, C. G., Tanenhaus, M. K., & Magnuson, J. S. (2004). Actions and affordances in syntactic ambiguity resolution. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 687–696.
9. Chow, H.M., Mar, R.A., Xu,Y. Liu,S., Wagage, & Braun, A.R. (2015). Personal experience with narrated events modulates functional connectivity within visual and motor systems during story comprehension. Human Brain Mapping.
10. Cooper, R. M. (1974). The control of eye fixation by the meaning of spoken language: A new methodology for the real-time investigation of speech perception, memory, and language processing. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 84–107.
11. Cutting, J. E., & Iricinschi, C. (2015). Re-presentations of space in Hollywood movies: An event indexing analysis. Cognitive Science, 39, 434–456.
12. Desai, R. H., Binder, J. R., Conant, L. L., Mano, Q. R., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2011). The neural career of sensory-motor metaphors. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23, 2376–2386.
13. Dove, G. O. (2011). On the need for embodied and dis-embodied cognition. Frontiers in Cognition, 1, 1–13.
14. Ericsson, K. A., & Kintsch, W. (1995). Long-term working memory. Psychological Review, 102, 211–245.
15. Gernsbacher, M. A., & Shroyer, S. (1989). The cataphoric use of the indefinite this in spoken narratives. Memory & Cognition, 17, 536–540.
16. Glenberg, A. M., Meyer, M., & Lindem, K. (1987). Mental models contribute to foregrounding during text comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 69–83.
17. Graesser, A. C., Millis, K. K., & Zwaan, R. A. (1997). Discourse comprehension. Annual Review of Psychology, 48, 163–189.
18. Harnad, S. (1990). The Symbol Grounding Problem. Physica D, 42, 335–346.
19. Hockett, C. F. (1960). The Origin of Speech. Scientific American, 203, 88–111.
20. Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental Models: Towards a Cognitive Science of Language, Inference, and Consciousness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21. Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95, 163–182.
22. Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
23. Kintsch, W. & Van Dijk, T. A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85, 363–394.
24. Kousta, S.-T., Vigliocco, G., Vinson, D. P., Andrews, M., & Del Campo, E. (2011). The representation of abstract words: Why emotion matters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140, 14–34.
25. Kurby, C. A., & Zacks, J. M. (2013). The activation of modality-specific representations during discourse processing. Brain and Language, 126, 338–349.
26. Lebois, L.A.M., Wilson-Mendenhall, C.D., & Barsalou, L.W. (2015). Are automatic conceptual cores the gold standard of semantic processing? The context-dependence of spatial meaning in grounded congruency effects. Cognitive Science.
27. Louwerse, M. M. (2011). Symbol interdependency in symbolic and embodied cognition. Topics in Cognitive Science (TopiCS), 3, 273–302.
28. Louwerse, M. M., Hutchinson, S., Tillman, R., & Recchia, G. (2015). Effect size matters: The role of language statistics and perceptual simulation in conceptual processing. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 30, 430–447.
29. Magliano, J. P., Miller, J., & Zwaan, R. A. (2001). Indexing space and time in film understanding. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 15, 533–545.
30. Maguire, E. A., Frith, C. D., & Morris, R. G. M. (1999). The functional neuroanatomy of comprehension and memory: The importance of prior knowledge. Brain, 122, 1839–1850.
31. Mahon, B. Z. (2015). What is embodied about cognition? Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 30, 420–429.
32. Meteyard, L., Cuadrado, S. R., Bahrami, B., & Vigliocco, G. (2012). Coming of age: A review of embodiment and the neuroscience of semantics. Cortex, 48(7), 788–804. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2010.11.002
33. Nijhof, A. D., & Willems, R. M. (2015). Simulating Fiction: Individual Differences in Literature Comprehension Revealed with fMRI. PLoS ONE, 10(2), e0116492.
34. Radvansky, G. A. & Zacks, J. M. (2014). Event Cognition. Oxford University Press.
35. Raposo, A., Moss, H. E., Stamatakis, E. A., & Tyler, L. K. (2009). Modulation of motor and premotor cortices by actions, action words and action sentences. Neuropsychologia, 47, 388–396.
36. Sanford, A. J., & Garrod, S. C. (1981). Understanding Written Language. Chichester: Wiley.
37. Schuil, K. D. I., Smits, M., & Zwaan, R. A. (2013). Sentential context modulates the involvement of the motor cortex in action language processing: An fMRI study. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 1–13. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00100
38. Schwanenflugel, P. J. (1991). Why are abstract concepts hard to understand? In P. J. Schwanenflugel (Ed.), The Psychology of Word Meaning (pp. 223–250). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
39. Schwanenflugel, P. J., & Shoben, E. J. (1983). Differential context effects in the comprehension of abstract and concrete verbal materials. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9, 82–102.
40. St. George, M., Kutas, M., Martinez, M. I., & Sereno, A. (1999). Semantic integration in reading: Engagement of the right hemisphere during discourse processing. Brain, 122, 1317–1325.
41. Stanfield, R. A. & Zwaan, R. A. (2001). The effect of implied orientation derived from verbal context on picture recognition. Psychological Science, 12, 153–156.
42. Tanenhaus, M. K., Spivey-Knowlton, M. J., Eberhard, K. M., & Sedivy, J. C. (1995). Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension. Science, 268, 1632–1634.
43. Taylor, L. J., & Zwaan, R. A. (2009). Action in cognition: The case of language. Language and Cognition, 1, 45–58.
44. Therriault, D. J., Rinck, M., & Zwaan, R. A. (2006). Assessing the influence of dimensional focus during situation model construction. Memory & Cognition, 34, 78–89.
45. Van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press.
46. Wilson-Mendenhall, C. D., Simmons, W. K., Martin, A., & Barsalou, L. W. (2013). Contextual processing of abstract concepts reveals neural representations of non-linguistic semantic content. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 25, 920–935.
47. Zacks, J. M., Speer, N. K., Swallow, K. M., & Maley, C. J. (2010). The brain’s cutting-room floor: Segmentation of narrative cinema. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 4, 168. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2010.00168
48. Zwaan, R. A. (2004). The immersed experiencer: toward an embodied theory of language comprehension. In: B.H. Ross (Ed.), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, Vol. 44 (pp. 35–62). New York: Academic Press.
49. Zwaan, R. A. (2008). Experiential traces and mental simulations in language comprehension. In M. DeVega, A. M. Glenberg, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Symbols, embodiment, and meaning (pp. 165–180). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
50. Zwaan, R. A. (2014). Embodiment and language comprehension: Reframing the discussion. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18, 229–234.
51. Zwaan, R. A., Langston, M. C., & Graesser, A. C. (1995) The construction of situation models in narrative comprehension: an event-indexing model. Psychological Science, 6, 292–297.
52. Zwaan, R. A., & Madden, C. J. (2005). Embodied sentence comprehension. In D. Pecher & R. A. Zwaan (Eds.), Grounding cognition: The role of perception and action in memory, language, and thinking (pp. 224–245). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
53. Zwaan, R. A., Magliano, J. P., & Graesser, A. C. (1995). Dimensions of situation-model construction in narrative comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 386–397.
54. Zwaan, R. A., Pecher, D. (2012). Revisiting Mental Simulation in Language Comprehension: six Replication Attempts. PLoS ONE 7(12): e51382. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0051382
55. Zwaan, R. A., Radvansky, G. A., Hilliard, A. E., & Curiel, J. M. (1998). Constructing multidimensional situation models during reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 2, 199–220.
56. Zwaan, R. A., Stanfield, R. A., Yaxley, R. H. (2002). Language comprehenders mentally represent the shapes of objects. Psychological Science, 13, 168-171.