Effects of C-terminal truncation of chaperonin GroEL on the yield of in-cage folding of the green fluorescent protein

Journal of Biological Chemistry

Volumn 290, Issue 24, 2015, Pages 15042-15051

  Ishino, So ^a   Kawata, Yasushi ^b   Taguchi, Hideki ^c   Kajimura, Naoko ^d   Matsuzaki, Katsumi ^a   Hoshino, Masaru ^a  

^a KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b TOTTORI UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^c TOKYO INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Japan)

^d OSAKA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONFORMATIONS; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; ESCHERICHIA COLI; FLUORESCENCE; SUBSTRATES;

C-TERMINAL REGIONS; C-TERMINAL TRUNCATION; CAGE-LIKE STRUCTURES; GREEN FLUORESCENT PROTEIN; NATIVE CONFORMATION; SUBSTRATE PROTEINS; TERMINAL RESIDUES; X RAY CRYSTAL STRUCTURES;

PROTEINS;

CHAPERONIN 60; GREEN FLUORESCENT PROTEIN; EARLY PREGNANCY FACTOR;

ARTICLE; CARBOXY TERMINAL SEQUENCE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENCAPSULATION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN DENATURATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; CHEMISTRY; GENETICS; KINETICS; SITE DIRECTED MUTAGENESIS; SIZE EXCLUSION CHROMATOGRAPHY; SPECTROFLUOROMETRY;

ESCHERICHIA COLI;

CHAPERONIN 10; CHAPERONIN 60; CHROMATOGRAPHY, GEL; GREEN FLUORESCENT PROTEINS; KINETICS; MUTAGENESIS, SITE-DIRECTED; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; SPECTROMETRY, FLUORESCENCE;

EID: 84931281851     PISSN: 00219258     EISSN: 1083351X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M114.633636     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Horwich, A. L., and Low, K. B., Fenton, W. A., Hirshfield, I. N., and Furtak, K. (1993) Folding In vivo of bacterial cytoplasmic proteins: role of GroEL. Cell 74, 909-917
2. Kerner, M. J., and Naylor, D. J., Ishihama, Y., Maier, T., Chang, H. C., and Stines, A. P., Georgopoulos, C., Frishman, D., Hayer-Hartl, M., Mann, M., and Hartl, F. U. (2005) Proteome-wide analysis of chaperonin-dependent protein folding in Escherichia coli. Cell 122, 209-220
3. Fujiwara, K., Ishihama, Y., Nakahigashi, K., Soga, T., and Taguchi H. (2010) A systematic survey of In vivo obligate chaperonin-dependent substrates. EMBO J. 29, 1552-1564
4. Braig, K., Otwinowski, Z., Hegde, R., Boisvert, D. C., Joachimiak, A., and Horwich, A. L., and Sigler, P. B. (1994) The crystal structure of the bacterial chaperonin GroEL at 2.8 Å. Nature 371, 578-586
5. Hunt, J. F., and Weaver, A. J., Landry, S. J., Gierasch, L., and Deisenhofer, J. (1996) The crystal structure of the GroES co-chaperonin at 2.8 Å resolution. Nature 379, 37-45
6. Weissman, J. S., and Rye, H. S., Fenton, W. A., Beechem, J. M., and Horwich, A. L. (1996) Characterization of the active intermediate of a GroEL-GroES-mediated protein folding reaction. Cell 84, 481-490
7. Sigler, P. B., Xu, Z., Rye, H. S., and Burston, S. G., Fenton, W. A., and Horwich, A. L. (1998) Structure and function in GroEL-mediated protein folding. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 67, 581-608
8. Apetri, A. C., and Horwich, A. L. (2008) Chaperonin chamber accelerates protein folding through passive action of preventing aggregation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 105, 17351-17355
9. Horwich, A. L., and Apetri, A. C., and Fenton, W. A. (2009) The GroEL/GroES cis cavity as a passive anti-aggregation device. FEBS Lett. 583, 2654-2662
10. Tang, Y. C., and Chang, H. C., Roeben, A., Wischnewski, D., Wischnewski, N., and Kerner, M. J., Hartl, F. U., and Hayer-Hartl, M. (2006) Structural features of the GroEL-GroES nano-cage required for rapid folding of encapsulated protein. Cell 125, 903-914
11. Gupta, A. J., Haldar, S., Miličić, G., Hartl, F. U., and Hayer-Hartl, M. (2014) Active cage mechanism of chaperonin-assisted protein folding demonstrated at single-molecule level. J. Mol. Biol. 426, 2739-2754
12. Chen, D.-H., Madan, D., Weaver, J., Lin, Z., Schröder, G. F., Chiu, W., and Rye, H. S. (2013) Visualizing GroEL/ES in the act of encapsulating a folding protein. Cell 153, 1354-1365
13. Machida, K., Kono-Okada, A., Hongo, K., Mizobata, T., and Kawata, Y. (2008) Hydrophilic residues 526KNDAAD531 in the flexible C-terminal region of the chaperonin GroEL are critical for substrate protein folding within the central cavity. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 6886-6896
14. Chen, S., and Roseman, A. M., Hunter, A. S., Wood, S. P., and Burston, S. G., Ranson, N. A., Clarke, A. R., and Saibil, H. R. (1994) Location of a folding protein and shape changes in GroEL-GroES complexes imaged by cryo-electron microscopy. Nature 371, 261-264
15. Thiyagarajan, P., and Henderson, S. J., and Joachimiak, A. (1996) Solution structures of GroEL and its complex with rhodanese from small-angle neutron scattering. Structure 4, 79-88
16. Koike-Takeshita, A., Yoshida, M., and Taguchi, H. (2008) Revisiting the GroEL-GroES reaction cycle via the symmetric intermediate implied by novel aspects of the GroEL(D398A) mutant. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 23774-23781
17. Sameshima, T., Ueno, T., Iizuka, R., Ishii, N., Terada, N., Okabe, K., and Funatsu, T. (2008) Football- and bullet-shaped GroEL-GroES complexes coexist during the reaction cycle. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 23765-23773
18. Yang, D., Ye, X., and Lorimer, G. H. (2013) Symmetric GroEL:GroES2 complexes are the protein-folding functional form of the chaperonin nanomachine. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 110, E4298-E4305
19. Kawata, Y., Kawagoe, M., Hongo, K., Miyazaki, T., Higurashi, T., Mizobata, T., and Nagai, J. (1999) Functional communications between the apical and equatorial domains of GroEL through the intermediate domain. Biochemistry 38, 15731-15740
20. Doering, D. S., and Matsudaira, P. (1996) Cysteine scanning mutagenesis at 40 of 76 positions in villin headpiece maps the F-actin binding site and structural features of the domain. Biochemistry 35, 12677-12685
21. Weissman, J. S., and Hohl, C. M., Kovalenko, O., Kashi, Y., Chen, S., Braig, K., Saibil, H. R., Fenton, W. A., and Horwich, A. L. (1995) Mechanism of GroEL action: productive release of polypeptide from a sequestered position under GroES. Cell 83, 577-587
22. Tanaka, S., Kawata, Y., Otting, G., Dixon, N. E., Matsuzaki, K., and Hoshino, M. (2010) Chaperonin-encapsulation of proteins for NMR. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1804, 866-871
23. Ishino, S., Kawata, Y., Ikegami, T., Matsuzaki, K., and Hoshino, M. (2014) Evaluation of the stability of an SR398/GroES chaperonin complex. J. Biochem. 155, 295-300
24. Motojima, F., and Yoshida, M. (2003) Discrimination of ATP, ADP, and AMPPNP by chaperonin GroEL: hexokinase treatment revealed the exclusive role of ATP. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 26648-26654
25. Ueno, T., Taguchi, H., Tadakuma, H., Yoshida, M., and Funatsu, T. (2004) GroEL mediates protein folding with a two successive timer mechanism. Mol. Cell 14, 423-434
26. Suzuki, M., Ueno, T., Iizuka, R., Miura, T., Zako, T., Akahori, R., Miyake, T., Shimamoto, N., Aoki, M., Tanii, T., Ohdomari, I., and Funatsu, T. (2008) Effect of the C-terminal truncation on the functional cycle of chap-eronin GroEL: implication that the C-terminal region facilitates the transition from the folding-arrested to the folding-competent state. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 23931-23939
27. Motojima, F., Makio, T., Aoki, K., Makino, Y., Kuwajima, K., and Yoshida, M. (2000) Hydrophilic residues at the apical domain of GroEL contribute to GroES binding but attenuate polypeptide binding. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 267, 842-849
28. Nojima, T., Murayama, S., Yoshida, M., and Motojima, F. (2008) Determination of the number of active GroES subunits in the fused hep-tamer GroES required for interactions with GroEL. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 18385-18392
29. Koike-Takeshita, A., Mitsuoka, K., and Taguchi, H. (2014) Asp-52 in combination with Asp-398 playsacritical rolein ATP hydrolysisofchaperonin GroEL. J. Biol. Chem. 289, 30005-30011
30. Koike-Takeshita, A., Arakawa, T., Taguchi, H., and Shimamura, T. (2014) Crystal structure of a symmetric football-shaped GroEL:GroES2-ATP14 complex determined at 3.8Å reveals rearrangement between two GroEL rings. J. Mol. Biol. 426, 3634-3641
31. Taguchi, H., Tsukuda, K., Motojima, F., Koike-Takeshita, A., and Yoshida, M. (2004) BeFx stops the chaperonin cycle of GroEL-GroES and generates a complex with double folding chambers. J. Biol. Chem.279, 45737-45743
32. Fei, X., Ye, X., LaRonde, N. A., and Lorimer, G. H. (2014) Formation and structures of GroEL:GroES2 chaperonin footballs, the protein-folding functional form. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 111, 12775-12780
33. Weaver, J., and Rye, H. S. (2014) The C-terminal tails of the bacterial chaperonin GroEL stimulate protein folding by directly altering the conformation of a substrate protein. J. Biol. Chem. 289, 23219-23232
34. Farr, G. W., and Fenton, W. A., and Horwich, A. L. (2007) Perturbed ATPase activity and not "close confinement" of substrate in the cis cavity affects rates of folding by tail-multiplied GroEL. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 104, 5342-5347
35. McLennan, N. F., and Girshovich, A. S., Lissin, N. M., Charters, Y., and Masters, M. (1993) The strongly conserved carboxyl-terminus glycine-methi-onine motif of the Escherichia coli GroEL chaperonin is dispensable. Mol. Microbiol. 7, 49-58
36. McLennan, N. F., McAteer, S., and Masters, M. (1994) The tail of a chap-eronin: the C-terminal region of Escherichia coli GroEL protein. Mol. Microbiol. 14, 309-321
37. Burnett, B. P., and Horwich, A. L., and Low, K. B. (1994) A carboxy-terminal deletion impairs the assembly of GroEL and confers a pleiotropic pheno-type in Escherichia coli K-12. J. Bacteriol. 176, 6980-6985
38. Motojima, F., and Yoshida, M. (2010) Polypeptide in the chaperonin cage partly protrudes out and then folds inside or escapes outside. EMBO J. 29, 4008-4019