Neighbourhood socioeconomic disadvantage and fruit and vegetable consumption: A seven countries comparison

International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2015, Pages

  Ball, Kylie ^a   Lamb, Karen E ^a   Costa, Claudia ^b   Cutumisu, Nicoleta ^c   Ellaway, Anne ^d   Kamphuis, Carlijn B M ^e   Mentz, Graciela ^f   Pearce, Jamie ^g   Santana, Paula ^b,h   Santos, Rita ⁱ   Schulz, Amy J ^f   Spence, John C ^j   Thornton, Lukar E ^a   Lenthe, Frank J van ^e   Zenk, Shannon N ^k  

^a DEAKIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COIMBRA   (Portugal)

^c UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^d UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

^e ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^f UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^h UNIVERSITY OF COIMBRA   (Portugal)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

^j UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^k UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

Diet; Fruit; International; Neighbourhood; Socioeconomic status; Vegetables

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUSTRALIA; CANADA; EATING HABIT; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; FOOD INTAKE; FRUIT; GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NEIGHBORHOOD; NETHERLANDS; NEW ZEALAND; PORTUGAL; RESOURCE ALLOCATION; SCOTLAND; SOCIAL STATUS; UNITED STATES; VEGETABLE; ADOLESCENT; AGED; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; DEMOGRAPHY; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RISK FACTOR; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT; SOCIOECONOMICS; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; AUSTRALIA; CANADA; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; FRUIT; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NETHERLANDS; NEW ZEALAND; PORTUGAL; RESIDENCE CHARACTERISTICS; RISK FACTORS; SCOTLAND; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; UNITED STATES; VEGETABLES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84931072152     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14795868     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s12966-015-0229-x     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. World Health Organization (WHO). Diet, nutrition, and the prevention of mchronic disease. Geneva: WHO Technical Report Series. 916; 2003.
2. Lim SS, Vos T, Flaxman AD, Danaei G, Shibuya K, Adair-Rohani H, et al. A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990-2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2012;380:2224-60.
3. Dubowitz T, Heron M, Bird CE, Lurie N, Finch BK, Basurto-Dávila R, et al.Neighborhood socioeconomic status and fruit and vegetable intake among whites, blacks, and Mexican Americans in the United States. Am J Clin Nutri.2008;87:1883-91.
4. Giskes K, Lenthe Fv F, Brug HJ, Mackenbach J. Dietary intakes of adults in the Netherlands by childhood and adulthood socioeconomic position. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2004;58:871-80.
5. Shohaimi S, Welch A, Bingham S, Luben R, Day N, Wareham N, et al.Residential area deprivation predicts fruit and vegetable consumption independently of individual educational level and occupational social class:a cross sectional population study in the Norfolk cohort of the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer (EPIC-Norfolk). J Epidemiol Community Health. 2004;58:686-91.
6. Block D, Kouba J. A comparison of the availability and affordability of a market basket in two communities in the Chicago area. Public Health Nutr.2006;9:837-45.
7. Moore LV, Diez Roux AV. Associations of neighborhood characteristics with the location and type of food stores. Am J Public Health. 2006;96:325-31.
8. Powell LM, Slater S, Mirtcheva D, Bao Y, Chaloupka FJ. Food store availability and neighborhood characteristics in the United States. Prev Med. 2007;44:189-95.
9. Zenk SN, Schulz AJ, Israel BA, James SA, Bao SM, Wilson ML. Neighborhood racial composition, neighborhood poverty, and the spatial accessibility of supermarkets in metropolitan Detroit. Am J Public Health. 2005;95:660-7.
10. Cummins S, Macintyre S. Food environments and obesity - neighbourhood or nation? Int J Epidemiol. 2006;35:100-4.
11. Black C, Moon G, Baird J. Dietary inequalities: What is the evidence for the effect of the neighbourhood food environment? Health Place.2014;27:229-42.
12. Turrell G, Blakely T, Patterson C, Oldenburg B. A multilevel analysis of socioeconomic (small area) differences in household food purchasing behaviour. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2004;58:208-15.
13. Thornton LE, Crawford DA, Ball K. Neighbourhood socioeconomic variation in women's diet: the role of nutrition environments. Eur J Clin Nutr.2010;64:1423-32.
14. Murakami K, Sasaki S, Okubo H, Takahashi Y, Freshmen in Dietetic Courses Study IIG. Neighborhood socioeconomic status in relation to dietary intake and body mass index in female Japanese dietetic students. Nutrition.2009;25:745-52.
15. Lakshman R, McConville A, How S, Flowers J, Wareham N, Cosford P.Association between area-level socioeconomic deprivation and a cluster of behavioural risk factors: cross-sectional, population-based study. J Public Health. 2011;33:234-45.
16. Giskes K, Turrell G, van Lenthe FJ, Brug J, Mackenbach JP. A multilevel study of socio-economic inequalities in food choice behaviour and dietary intake among the Dutch population: the GLOBE study. Public Health Nutr.2006;9:75-83.
17. Giskes K, van Lenthe FJ, Kamphuis CB, Huisman M, Brug J, Mackenbach JP.Household and food shopping environments: do they play a role in socioeconomic inequalities in fruit and vegetable consumption? A multilevel study among Dutch adults. J Epidemiol Community Health.2009;63:113-20.
18. Santana P, Santos R, Nogueira H. The link between local environment and obesity: A multilevel analysis in the Lisbon Metropolitan Area, Portugal. Soc Sci Med. 2009;68:601-9.
19. Tamers SL, Agurs-Collins T, Dodd KW, Nebeling L. US and France adult fruit and vegetable consumption patterns: an international comparison. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2009;63:11-7.
20. Dowler E. Inequalities in diet and physical activity in Europe. Public Health Nutr. 2001;4:701-9.
21. Thornton LE, Pearce JR, Ball K. Socio-demographic factors associated with healthy eating and food security in socioeconomically disadvantaged groups in the UK and Victoria, Australia. Public Health Nutr. 2014;17:20-30.
22. Brug J, van Stralen MM, Te Velde SJ, Chinapaw MJ, De Bourdeaudhuij I, Lien N, et al. Differences in weight status and energy-balance related behaviors among schoolchildren across Europe: the ENERGY-project. PLoS One.2012;7:e34742.
23. Ball K, Crawford D, Mishra G. Socio-economic inequalities in women's fruit and vegetable intakes: a multilevel study of individual, social and environmental mediators. Public Health Nutr. 2006;9:623-30.
24. Ministry of Health. A portrait of health: key results of the 2002/03 New Zealand Health Survey. Wellington: Ministry of Health; 2004.
25. Marko J, EJ Fraser Lee N, Lightfoot P, Spinola C. Body mass index in the Capital Health region: report from the 2002 Population Health Survey.Edmonton, AB: Capital Health; 2004.
26. van Lenthe FJ, Kamphuis CBM, Beenackers MA, Jansen T, Looman CWN,Nusselder WJ, et al. Cohort Profile: Understanding socioeconomic inequalities in health and health behaviours: The GLOBE study. Int J Epidemiol. 2014;43:721-30.
27. Schulz AJ, Kannan S, Dvonch JT, Israel BA, Allen A, James SA, et al. Social and physical environments and disparities in risk for cardiovascular disease:the healthy environments partnership conceptual model. Environ Health Perspect. 2005;113:1817-25.
28. Jones R, BE Boyd A, Lorenzetti K, Scouller J, Carey L, Tannahill C. The health and well-being of the greater Glasgow population. Glasgow: NHS Greater Glasgow; 2003.
29. Canada H. Eating well wth Canada's food guide. Ottowa: Health Canada; 2011.
30. National Health and Medical Research Council (2013) Australian Dietary Guidelines. Canberra: National Health and Medical Research Council. https://www.nhmrc.gov.au/guidelines-publications/n55.
31. Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO). Fruit and vegetables for health. Report of a joint FAO/WHO workshop. Kobe, Japan: Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO); 2004.
32. Australian Bureau of Statistics. Census of population and housing:Socio-Economic Indexes for Areas (SEIFA); ABS Catalogue No. 2033.0.55.001. Canberra: ABS; 2008.
33. Salmond C, Crampton P. NZDep2001 index of deprivation. Wellington:Department of Public Health, Wellington School of Medicine and Health Sciences; 2002.
34. Demissie K, Hanley JA, Menzies D, Joseph L, Ernst P. Agreement in measuring socio-economic status: area-based versus individual measures.Chronic Dis Can. 2000;21:1-7.
35. United States Census Bureau. Money Income in the United States: 2000 -Median Household Income by State. http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/income/data/incpovhlth/2000/statemhi.html (Last accessed 19th May 2015).
36. Carstairs V, Morris R. Deprivation and health in Scotland. Health Bull(Edinburgh). 1990;48:162-75.
37. Statistics Netherlands. Stat Line Proximity statistics http://statline.cbs.nl/statweb/?LA=nl. Last accessed 12th September 2014.
38. van Lenthe FJ, Brug J, Mackenbach JP. Neighbourhood inequalities in physical inactivity: the role of neighbourhood attractiveness, proximity to local facilities and safety in the Netherlands. Soc Sci Med. 2005;60:763-75.
39. Cummins S, Macintyre S. The location of food stores in urban areas: a case study in Glasgow. Br Food J. 1999;101:545-53.
40. Cameron N, Amrhein CG, Smoyer-Tomic KE, Raine KD, Chong LY. Cornering the market: restriction of retail supermarket locations. Env Plann C-Govern Policy. 2010;28:905-22.
41. Giskes K, Avendano M, Brug J, Kunst AE. A systematic review of studies on socioeconomic inequalities in dietary intakes associated with weight gain and overweight/obesity conducted among European adults. Obes Rev.2010;11:413-29.
42. Kiadaliri AA. Demographic and socioeconomic differences in fruit and vegetables consumption, 2007-2009: a province-level study in Iran. Int J Prevent Med.2013;4:831-40.