Recasting research on 'neighbourhood effects': A collaborative, participatory, trans-national approach

Neighbourhood effects research: New perspectives

Volumn 9789400723092, Issue , 2012, Pages 249-266

  Darcy, Michael ^a   Gwyther, Gabrielle ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84930999499     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-2309-2_11     Document Type: Chapter

References (43)

1. Allen, C. (2008). Housing market renewal and social class. London: Routledge.
2. Allen, C. (2009). The fallacy of "Housing Studies': Philosophical problems of knowledge and understanding in housing research. Housing, Theory and Society, 26(1), 53-79.
3. Arthurson, K. (2002). Creating inclusive communities through balancing social mix: A critical relationship or tenuous link? Urban Policy & Research, 20(3), 245-261.
4. Bauder, H. (2002). Neighbourhood effects and cultural exclusion. Urban Studies, 39(1), 85-93.
5. Bennett, L., Smith, J., & Wright, P. (2006). Where are poor people to live? Transforming public housing communities. New York: M.E. Sharpe.
6. Bryson, L., & Thompson, F. (1972). An Australian Newtown: Life and leadership in a new housing suburb. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
7. Cahill, C. (2004). Defying gravity? Raising consciousness through collective research. Children's Geographies, 2(2), 273-286.
8. Cahill, C. (2007). Doing research with young people: Participatory research and the rituals of collective work. Children's Geographies, 5(3), 297-312.
9. Chaskin, R., & Joseph, M. (2010). Building "community" in mixed-income developments: Assumptions, approaches, and early experiences. Urban Affairs Review, 45(3), 299-335.
10. Darcy, M. (2007). Place and disadvantage: The need for reflexive epistemology in spatial social science. Urban Policy & Research, 25(3), 347-361.
11. Darcy, M. (2010). De-concentration of disadvantage and mixed income housing: A critical discourse approach. Housing, Theory and Society, 27(1), 1-22.
12. Defilippis, J. (2007). Erasing the community in order to save it? Reconstructing community and property in community development. In H. Beider (Ed.), Neighbourhood renewal and housing markets: Community engagement in the US and UK (pp. 271-289). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
13. Galster, G. (2003). Investigating behavioural impacts of poor neighbourhoods: Towards new data and analytic strategies. Housing Studies, 18(6), 893-914.
14. Galster, G. (2011). The mechanism(s) of neighbourhood effects: Theory, evidence, and policy implications. In M. van Ham, D. Manley, N. Bailey, L. Simpson, & D. Maclennan (Eds.), Neighbourhood effects research: New perspectives. Dordrecht: Springer.
15. Goetz, E. G. (2003). Clearing the way. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
16. Gwyther, G., & Possamai-Inesedy, A. (2010). Methodologies a la carte: An examination of emerging qualitative methodologies in social research. In A. Possamai-Inesedy & G. Gwyther (Eds.), New methods in social justice research for the 21st century (pp. 1-17). London: Routledge.
17. Hedman, L., & van Ham, M. (2011). Understanding neighbourhood effects: Selection bias and residential mobility. In M. van Ham, D. Manley, N. Bailey, L. Simpson, & D. Maclennan (Eds.), Neighbourhood effects research: New perspectives. Dordrecht: Springer.
18. Holland, B. (2006). New views of research for the 21st century: The role of engaged scholarship. In L. Silka (Ed.), Scholarship in action: Applied research and community change (pp. 1-10). Washington, DC: Department of Housing and Urban Development.
19. Imbroscio, D. (2008). [U]nited and actuated by some common impulse of passion: Challenging the dispersal consensus in American housing policy research. Journal of Urban Affairs, 30(2), 111-130.
20. Jencks, C., & Mayer, S. E. (1990). The social consequences of growing up in a poor neighborhood. In L. E. Lynn & M. G. H. McGeary (Eds.), Inner-city poverty in the United States (pp. 111-186). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
21. Kesby, M. (2000). Participatory diagramming: Deploying qualitative methods through an action research epistemology. Area, 32(4), 423-435.
22. Levitas, R. (1998). The inclusive society? Social exclusion and new labour. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan Ltd.
23. Lewis, O. (1961). The children of Sanchez. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
24. Lewis, O. (1998). The culture of poverty. Society, 35(1), 7-9.
25. Lupton, R. (2003). Neighbourhood effects: Can we measure them and does it matter? (CASE paper 73). London: Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, London School of Economics.
26. Manley, D., & van Ham, M. (2011). Neighbourhood effects, housing tenure and individual employment outcomes. In M. van Ham, D. Manley, N. Bailey, L. Simpson, & D. Maclennan (Eds.), Neighbourhood effects research: New perspectives. Dordrecht: Springer.
27. Mills, C. W. (1959). The sociological imagination. New York: Oxford University Press.
28. Musterd, S., Ostendorf, W., & de Vos, S. (2003). Neighbourhood effects and social mobility: A longitudinal analysis. Housing Studies, 18(6), 877-892.
29. Nyden, P. (2006). The challenges and opportunities of engaged research. In L. Silka (Ed.), Scholarship in action: Applied research and community change. Washington, DC: US Department of Housing and Urban Development.
30. Ozga, J., & Jones, R. (2006). Travelling and embedded policy: The case of knowledge transfer. Journal of Education Policy, 21(1), 1-17.
31. P. L. A. Notes (1998). Participatory learning and action 33: Understanding market opportunities. PLA Notes. London: International Institute for Environment and Development.
32. Peel, M. (1995). The rise and fall of social mix in an Australian new town. Journal of Urban History, 22(1), 108-139.
33. Phillips, D. C. (1987). Philosophy, science and social enquiry: Contemporary methodological controversies in social science and related applied fields of research. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
34. Pugh, C. (1976). Intergovernmental relations and the development of Australian housing policies (Research monograph, Vol. 15). Canberra: Canberra Centre for Research on Federal Financial Relations, ANU.
35. Randolph, B., & Wood, M. (2004). The benefits of tenure diversification: Final report. Melbourne: Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute.
36. Sassen, S. (2008). Deciphering political possibilities for national states and citizens in a global economy - Plenary address. 1st ISA Forum of Sociology, Barcelona (September).
37. Stubbs, J., Randolph, B., & Judd, B. (2005). The Bonnyrigg living communities baseline study. Sydney: University of New South Wales - City Futures.
38. Subedi, B., & Rhee, J. E. (2008). Negotiating collaboration across differences. Qualitative Inquiry, 14, 1070-1091.
39. Uitermark, J., Duyvendak, J. W., & Kleinhans, R. (2007). Gentrification as a government strategy: Social control and social cohesion in Hoogvliet, Rotterdam. Environment and Planning A, 39(1), 125-141.
40. Vale, L. J. (1997). Empathological places: Residents' ambivalence toward remaining in public housing. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 16(1), 159-175.
41. van Ham, M., & Manley, D. (2010). The effect of neighbourhood housing tenure mix in labour market outcomes: A longitudinal investigation of neighbourhood effects. Journal of Economic Geography, 10(2), 257-282.
42. Warr, D. (2005). There goes the neighbourhood: The malign effects of stigma. State of Australian Cities 2005. Griffith University, Brisbane 30 Nov - 2 Dec.
43. Wilson, W. J. (1987). The truly disadvantaged. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.