Negotiating collaboration across differences

Qualitative Inquiry

Volumn 14, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 1070-1092

  Subedi, Binaya ^a   Rhee, Jeong Eun ^b  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b LONG ISLAND UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Collaboration; Cultural identities; Differences; Ethical research; Ethnicity; Language; Reflexivity

Indexed keywords

EID: 49449086628     PISSN: 10778004     EISSN: 15527565     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1077800408318420     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Acheta, A.N. (1998). Race, rights and the Asian American experience. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
2. Alexander, M. J., & Mohanty, C. T. (Eds.). (1997). Feminist genealogies, colonial legacies, democratic futures. New York: Routledge.
3. Anderson, B. (1983). Imagined communities: Reflection on the origin and spread of nationalism. New York: Verso.
4. Anderson, M. (1993). Studying across race, class, and gender: Epistemological considerations. In J. H. Stanfield, II & R. M. Dennis (Eds.), Race and ethnicity in research methods (pp. 39-52). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
5. Appadurai, A. (1988). Putting hierarchy in its place. Cultural Anthropology, 3(1), 36-49.
6. Asher, N. (2001). Beyond "cool" and "hip": Engaging the question of research and writing as academic Self-woman of color Other. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 14(1), 1-12.
7. Banks, J.A. (1998). The lives and values of researchers: Implications for educating citizens in a multicultural society. Educational Researcher, 27(7), 4-17.
8. Brayboy, B. (2000). The Indian and the researcher: Tales from the field. Qualitative Studies in Education, 13(4), 415-426.
9. Clifford, J. (1986). Introduction: Partial truths. In J. Clifford & G. E. Marcus (Eds.), Writing culture: The poetics and politics of ethnography (pp 1-26). Berkeley: University of California Press.
10. Coloma, R.S. (2006). Disorienting race and education: Changing paradigms on the schooling of Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders. Race, Ethnicity and Education, 9(1), 1-15.
11. Daza, S.L. (2008). Decolonizing researcher authenticity. Race, Ethnicity and Education, 11(1), 71-85.
12. Delgado Bernal, D. (1998). Using a Chicano feminist epistemology in educational research. Harvard Education Research, 68, 555-582.
13. Denzin, N.K. (2001). The reflexive interview and a performative social science. Qualitative Research, 1, 23-46.
14. Denzin, N.K., & Lincoln, Y.S. (2000). The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2 nd ed., pp. 1-28). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15. Dillard, C.B. (2000). The substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen: Examining endarkened feminist epistemology in educational research and leadership. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 13(6), 661-681.
16. Dixson, A.D., Chapman, T.K., & Hill, D.A. (2005). Research as an aesthetic process: Extending the portraiture methodology. Qualitative Inquiry, 11(1), 16-26.
17. Ellis, C., & Bochner, A. (2000). Autoethnography, personal narrative, reflexivity. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook on qualitative research (2 nd ed., pp. 733-768). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18. Fine, M. (1996). Writings the "wrongs" of fieldwork. Qualitative Inquiry, 2, 251-274.
19. Fontana, A., & Frey, J. (2000). The interview: The art of science. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2 nd ed., pp. 361-376). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20. Foster, M. (1994). The power to know one thing is never the power to know all things: Methodological notes on two studies of Black American teachers. In A. Gitlin (Ed.), Power and method: Political activism and educational research (pp. 129-146). London: Routledge.
21. Gwaltney, J.L. (1981). Common sense and science: Urban core Black observations. In D. L. Messerschmidt (Ed.), Anthropologists at home in North America: Methods and issues in the study of one's own society (pp. 46-61). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
22. Harrison, F. D. (Ed.). (1991). Decolonizing anthropology: Moving further toward an anthropology of liberation. Washington, DC: American Anthropological Association.
23. Hermes, M. (1998). Research methods as situated response: Towards a First Nation's methodology. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 11(1), 155-168.
24. Jacobs-Huey, L. (2002). The natives are grazing and talking back: Reviewing the problematics of positionality, voice, and accountability among 'native' anthropologists. American Anthropologist, 104(3), 791-804.
25. Kang, M. (2000). Researching one's own: Negotiating co-ethnicity in the field. In M. F. Manalansan, IV (Ed.), Cultural compass: Ethnographic explorations of Asian America (pp. 38-48). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
26. Kondo, D. (1986). Dissolution and reconstitution of the self: Implications for anthropological epistemology. Cultural Anthropology, 1, 74-96.
27. Ladson-Billings, G. (2000). Racialized discourses and ethnic epistemologies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2 nd ed., pp. 257-278). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
28. Lather, P. (1991). Getting smart: Feminist research and pedagogy within the post-modern. New York: Routledge.
29. Lather, P. (1996). Troubling clarity: The politics of accessible language. Harvard Education Review, 56(3), 525-545.
30. Lippi-Green, R. (1997). English with an accent: Language, ideology, and discrimination in the United States. New York: Routledge.
31. Lowe, L. (1996). Immigrant acts: On Asian American cultural politics. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
32. Macedo, D. (2000). The colonialism of the English only movement. Educational Researcher, 29(3), 15-24.
33. May, R.A.B., & Pattillo-McCoy, M. (2000). Do you see what I see? Examining a collaborative ethnography. Qualitative Inquiry, 6(1), 65-87.
34. McWhorter, J. (2000). Spreading the word: Language and dialect in America. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
35. Medicine, B. (2001). Learning to be an anthropologist and remaining 'native.' Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
36. Mihesauh, D.A. (1988). Natives and academics: Researching and writing about American Indians. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
37. Mitchell, J. (1982). Reflections of a Black social scientist: Some struggles, some doubts, some hopes. Harvard Education Review, 52(1), 27-44.
38. Narayan, K. (1993). How native is a "native" anthropologist ? American Anthropologist, 95, 671-685.
39. Niranjana, T. (1992). Sitting translation: History, post-structuralism, and the colonial context. Berkeley: University of California Press.
40. Omi, M., " Winant, H. (1994). Racial formation in the United States: From the 1960s to the 1980s. New York: Routledge.
41. Palumbo-Liu, D. (1999). Asian/American: Historical crossings of a racial frontier. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
42. Pang, V.O. (1995). Asian Pacific American students: A diverse and complex population. In J. A. Banks & C. M. Banks (Eds.), Handbook of research on multicultural education (pp. 412-424). New York: Simon & Schuster.
43. Reed-Danahay, D. (1997). Autho/ethnography: Rewriting the self and the social. Oxford, UK: Berg.
44. Rhee, J. (2003). Traveling through our stuck places: Race, gender, and cultural citizenship. Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Discipline, 22(2), 45-56.
45. Richardson, L. (1997). Fields of play: Constructing an academic life. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
46. Said, E. (1989). Representing the colonized: Anthropology's interlocutors. Critical Inquiry, 14, 205-225.
47. Sanjek, R. (Ed.). (1990). Fieldnotes: The making of anthropology. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
48. Scheurich, J.J. (1997). Research method in the postmodern. Washington, DC: Falmer.
49. Scheurich, J.J., & Young, M. (1997). Coloring epistemologies: Are our research racially biased ? Educational Researcher, 26(4), 4-16.
50. Schniedewind, N., & Davidson, E. (2000). Linguicism. In A. Maurianne, P. L. Madeline, & Z. Ximena (Eds.), Readings for diversity and social justice (pp. 129-130). New York: Routledge.
51. Smith, L.T. (1999). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous people. London: Zed.
52. Spivak, G.C. (1988). Can the subaltern speak? In C. Nelson & L. Grossberg (Eds.), Marxism and the interpretation of culture (pp. 271-313). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
53. Spivak, G.C. (1992). The politics of translation. In M. Barrett & A. Phillips (Eds.), Destabilizing theory: Contemporary feminist debate (pp 177-200). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
54. Stanfield, J.H., II. (1993). Epistemological considerations. In J. H. Stanfield, II & R. M. Dennis (Eds.), Race and ethnicity in research methods (pp. 16-36). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
55. Subreenduth, S. (2008). Deconstructing the politics of a differently colored transnational identity. Race, Ethnicity and Education, 11(1), 41-55.
56. Thiong'o, N.W. (1986). Decolonising the mind: The politics of language in African literature. London: James Curry.
57. Trask, H. (1999). From a Native daughter: Colonialism and sovereignty in Hawai'i. Honolulu: University of Hawaii.
58. Trinh, T.M. (1989). Women, native, other. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
59. Van Mannen, J. (1988). Tales of the field: On writing ethnography. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
60. Villenas, S. (1996). The colonizer/colonized Chicana ethnographer: Identity, marginalization and co-option in the field. Harvard Education Review, 66(4), 711-731.
61. Vo, L.T. (2000). Performing ethnography in Asian American communities: Beyond the insider-versus-outsider perspective. In M. F. Manalansan, IV (Ed.), Cultural compass: Ethnographic explorations of Asian America (pp. 17- 37). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.