A randomized, multicenter, multivendor study of myocardial perfusion imaging with regadenoson CT perfusion vs single photon emission CT

Journal of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography

Volumn 9, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 103-112.e2

  Cury, Ricardo C ^a,b   Kitt, Therese M ^c   Feaheny, Kathleen ^c   Blankstein, Ron ^d,e   Ghoshhajra, Brian B ^e,f   Budoff, Matthew J ^g   Leipsic, Jonathon ^h   Min, James K ⁱ   Akin, Jamie ^c   George, Richard T ^j  

^a BAPTIST HOSPITAL OF MIAMI   (United States)

^b BAPTIST CARDIAC AND VASCULAR INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c ASTELLAS PHARMA GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT   (United States)

^d BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^e HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^f MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^g HARBOR UCLA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^h ST PAUL S HOSPITAL   (Canada)

ⁱ NEW YORK PRESBYTERIAN HOSPITAL   (United States)

^j JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

CT perfusion; Myocardial ischemia; Regadenoson; Single photon emission CT

Indexed keywords

AMINOPHYLLINE; METHOXY ISOBUTYL ISONITRILE TECHNETIUM TC 99M; REGADENOSON; TETROFOSMIN TC 99M; PURINE DERIVATIVE; PYRAZOLE DERIVATIVE;

ADULT; ANGINA PECTORIS; ARTICLE; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SCANNER; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY PERFUSION; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; CORONARY ARTERY OCCLUSION; DEVICE COMPARISON; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DISEASE SEVERITY; DYSPNEA; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; FEMALE; GASTRITIS; HEART MUSCLE ISCHEMIA; HEART VENTRICLE TACHYCARDIA; HUMAN; HYPERGLYCEMIA; HYPERLIPIDEMIA; HYPERTENSION; HYPOTENSION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; JAW PAIN; MALE; MEDICAL HISTORY; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDY; MYOCARDIAL PERFUSION IMAGING; OPEN STUDY; PATIENT SAFETY; PHASE 2 CLINICAL TRIAL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIATION DOSE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SCORING SYSTEM; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SINGLE PHOTON EMISSION COMPUTER TOMOGRAPHY; SPECT SCANNER; STRESS ASSESMENT; VOMITING; AGED; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; HEART INFARCTION; OBSERVER VARIATION; PROCEDURES; RADIOGRAPHY; SCINTISCANNING;

AGED; CONFIDENCE INTERVALS; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY STENOSIS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; MYOCARDIAL ISCHEMIA; MYOCARDIAL PERFUSION IMAGING; OBSERVER VARIATION; PURINES; PYRAZOLES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY, EMISSION-COMPUTED, SINGLE-PHOTON; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 84930927308     PISSN: 19345925     EISSN: 1876861X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcct.2015.01.002     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Hachamovitch R., Berman D.S., Kiat H., et al. Exercise myocardial perfusion SPECT in patients without known coronary artery disease: incremental prognostic value and use in risk stratification. Circulation 1996, 93:905-914.
2. Hachamovitch R., Berman D.S., Shaw L.J., et al. Incremental prognostic value of myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography for the prediction of cardiac death: differential stratification for risk of cardiac death and myocardial infarction. Circulation 1998, 97:535-543.
3. Hachamovitch R., Hayes S.W., Friedman J.D., Cohen I., Berman D.S. Comparison of the short-term survival benefit associated with revascularization compared with medical therapy in patients with no prior coronary artery disease undergoing stress myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography. Circulation 2003, 107:2900-2907.
4. Hachamovitch R., Rozanski A., Shaw L.J., et al. Impact of ischaemia and scar on the therapeutic benefit derived from myocardial revascularization vs. medical therapy among patients undergoing stress-rest myocardial perfusion scintigraphy. Eur Heart J 2011, 32:1012-1024.
5. Iskandrian A.S., Chae S.C., Heo J., Stanberry C.D., Wasserleben V., Cave V. Independent and incremental prognostic value of exercise single-photon emission computed tomographic (SPECT) thallium imaging in coronary artery disease. JAm Coll Cardiol 1993, 22:665-670.
6. San Roman J.A., Vilacosta I., Castillo J.A., et al. Selection of the optimal stress test for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. Heart 1998, 80:370-376.
7. Budoff M.J., Dowe D., Jollis J.G., et al. Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Individuals Undergoing Invasive Coronary Angiography) trial. JAm Coll Cardiol 2008, 52:1724-1732.
8. Meijboom W.B., Meijs M.F., Schuijf J.D., et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography: a prospective, multicenter, multivendor study. JAm Coll Cardiol 2008, 52:2135-2144.
9. Miller J.M., Rochitte C.E., Dewey M., et al. Diagnostic performance of coronary angiography by 64-row CT. NEngl J Med 2008, 359:2324-2336.
10. Raff G.L., Gallagher M.J., O'Neill W.W., Goldstein J.A. Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography. JAm Coll Cardiol 2005, 46:552-557.
11. Di Carli M.F., Dorbala S., Curillova Z., et al. Relationship between CT coronary angiography and stress perfusion imaging in patients with suspected ischemic heart disease assessed by integrated PET-CT imaging. JNucl Cardiol 2007, 14:799-809.
12. Hacker M., Jakobs T., Matthiesen F., et al. Comparison of spiral multidetector CT angiography and myocardial perfusion imaging in the noninvasive detection of functionally relevant coronary artery lesions: first clinical experiences. JNucl Med 2005, 46:1294-1300.
13. Schuijf J.D., Wijns W., Jukema J.W., et al. Relationship between noninvasive coronary angiography with multi-slice computed tomography and myocardial perfusion imaging. JAm Coll Cardiol 2006, 48:2508-2514.
14. Blankstein R., Di Carli M.F. Integration of coronary anatomy and myocardial perfusion imaging. Nat Rev Cardiol 2010, 7:226-236.
15. Blankstein R., Shturman L.D., Rogers I.S., et al. Adenosine-induced stress myocardial perfusion imaging using dual-source cardiac computed tomography. JAm Coll Cardiol 2009, 54:1072-1084.
16. Feuchtner G., Goetti R., Plass A., et al. Adenosine stress high-pitch 128-slice dual-source myocardial computed tomography perfusion for imaging of reversible myocardial ischemia: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2011, 4:540-549.
17. Feuchtner G.M., Plank F., Pena C., et al. Evaluation of myocardial CT perfusion in patients presenting with acute chest pain to the emergency department: comparison with SPECT-myocardial perfusion imaging. Heart 2012, 98:1510-1517.
18. George R.T., Arbab-Zadeh A., Miller J.M., et al. Adenosine stress 64- and 256-row detector computed tomography angiography and perfusion imaging: a pilot study evaluating the transmural extent of perfusion abnormalities to predict atherosclerosis causing myocardial ischemia. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2009, 2:174-182.
19. George R.T., Arbab-Zadeh A., Miller J.M., et al. Computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging with 320-row detector computed tomography accurately detects myocardial ischemia in patients with obstructive coronary artery disease. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2012, 5:333-340.
20. Ko B.S., Cameron J.D., Meredith I.T., et al. Computed tomography stress myocardial perfusion imaging in patients considered for revascularization: a comparison with fractional flow reserve. Eur Heart J 2012, 33:67-77.
21. Rocha-Filho J.A., Blankstein R., Shturman L.D., et al. Incremental value of adenosine-induced stress myocardial perfusion imaging with dual-source CT at cardiac CT angiography. Radiology 2010, 254:410-419.
22. Kurata A., Mochizuki T., Koyama Y., et al. Myocardial perfusion imaging using adenosine triphosphate stress multi-slice spiral computed tomography: alternative to stress myocardial perfusion scintigraphy. Circ J 2005, 69:550-557.
23. Cury R.C., Kitt T.M., Feaheny K., Akin J., George R.T. Regadenoson-stress myocardial CT perfusion and single-photon emission CT: rationale, design, and acquisition methods of a prospective, multicenter, multivendor comparison. JCardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2014, 8:2-12.
24. Holly T.A., Abbott B.G., Al-Mallah M., et al. Single photon-emission computed tomography. JNucl Cardiol 2010, 17:941-973.
25. Cerqueira M.D., Weissman N.J., Dilsizian V., et al. Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart: a statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. JNucl Cardiol 2002, 9:240-245.
26. Raff G.L., Abidov A., Achenbach S., et al. SCCT guidelines for the interpretation and reporting of coronary computed tomographic angiography. JCardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2009, 3:122-136.
27. Austen W.G., Edwards J.E., Frye R.L., et al. Areporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association. Circulation 1975, 51:5-40.
28. Einstein A.J., Moser K.W., Thompson R.C., Cerqueira M.D., Henzlova M.J. Radiation dose to patients from cardiac diagnostic imaging. Circulation 2007, 116:1290-1305.
29. 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection (Users Edition). ICRP publication 103 (Users Edition). Ann ICRP 2007, 37:1-332. International Commission on Radiological Protection.
30. Cerqueira M.D., Nguyen P., Staehr P., Underwood S.R., Iskandrian A.E. Effects of age, gender, obesity, and diabetes on the efficacy and safety of the selective A2A agonist regadenoson versus adenosine in myocardial perfusion imaging integrated ADVANCE-MPI trial results. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2008, 1:307-316.
31. Iskandrian A.E., Bateman T.M., Belardinelli L., et al. Adenosine versus regadenoson comparative evaluation in myocardial perfusion imaging: results of the ADVANCE phase 3 multicenter international trial. JNucl Cardiol 2007, 14:645-658.
32. Hawass N.E. Comparing the sensitivities and specificities of two diagnostic procedures performed on the same group of patients. Br J Radiol 1997, 70:360-366.
33. Rochitte C.E., George R.T., Chen Y.M., et al. Computed tomography angiography and perfusion to assess coronary artery stenosis causing perfusion defects by SPECT: the CORE320 study. Eur Heart J 2014, 35:1120-1130.
34. Roobottom C.A., Mitchell G., Morgan-Hughes G. Radiation-reduction strategies in cardiac computed tomographic angiography. Clin Radiol 2010, 65:859-867.
35. 2O PET. Eur Radiol 2014, 24:1547-1556.