Strategic Numeracy: Self-Serving Reasoning About Health Statistics

Basic and Applied Social Psychology

Volumn 37, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 165-173

  Mata, André ^a   Sherman, Steven J ^b   Ferreira, Mário B ^c   Mendonça, Cristina ^c  

^a ISPA   (Portugal)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LISBON   (Portugal)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84930897017     PISSN: 01973533     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01973533.2015.1018991     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. D.Alonso, & P.Fernández-Berrocal, (2003). Irrational decisions: Attending to numbers rather than ratios. Personality and Individual Differences, 35, 1537–1547. doi:10.1016/s0191-8869(02)00368-9
2. E.Dawson,, T.Gilovich, & D.T.Regan, (2002). Motivated reasoning and the Wason selection task. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1379–1387.
3. V.Denes-Raj, & S.Epstein, (1994). Conflict between intuitive and rational processing: When people behave against their better judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 819–829. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.66.5.819
4. P.H.Ditto, & D.F.Lopez, (1992). Motivated skepticism: Use of differential decision criteria for preferred and nonpreferred conclusions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 568–584. doi:10.1037//0022–3514.63.4.568
5. P.H.Ditto,, J.A.Scepansky,, G.D.Munro,, A.M.Apanovitch, & L.K.Lockhart, (1998). Motivated sensitivity to preference-inconsistent information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 53–69. doi:10.1037//0022–3514.75.1.53
6. M.A.Freeman,, E.V.Hennessy, & D.M.Marzullo, (2001). Defensive evaluation of antismoking messages among college-age smokers: The role of possible selves. Health Psychology, 20, 424–433. doi:10.1037//0278–6133.20.6.424
7. G.Gigerenzer,, W.Gaissmaier,, E.Kurz-Milcke,, L.M.Schwartz, & S.Woloshin, (2007). Helping doctors and patients make sense of health statistics. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 8, 53–96.
8. J.H.Hibbard,, E.Peters,, A.Dixon, & M.Tusler, (2007). Consumer competencies and the use of comparative quality information: It isn't just about literacy. Medical Care Research and Review, 64, 379–394. doi:10.1177/1077558707301630
9. I.Kirsch,, A.Jungeblut,, L.Jenkins, & A.Kolstad, (1993). Adult literacy in America: A first look at the results of the national adult literacy survey. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education.
10. W.M.P.Klein, & M.E.Stefanek, (2007). Cancer risk elicitation and communication: Lessons from the psychology of risk perception. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 57, 147–167. doi:10.3322/canjclin.57.3.147
11. A.W.Kruglanski, (1996). Motivated social cognition: Principles of the interface. In E.T.Higgins & A.W.Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 493–519). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
12. Z.Kunda, (1987). Motivated inference: Self-serving generation and evaluation of causal theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 636–647. doi:10.1037/0022–3514.53.4.636
13. Z.Kunda, (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 480–498. doi:10.1037/0033–2909.108.3.480
14. M.Kutner,, E.Greenberg,, Y.Jin, & C.Paulsen, (2006). The health literacy of America's adults: Results from the 2003 National Assessment of Adult Literacy (NCES 2006–483). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
15. A.Liberman, & S.Chaiken, (1992). Defensive processing of personally relevant health messages. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 669–679. doi:10.1177/0146167292186002
16. I.M.Lipkus, & E.Peters, (2009). Understanding the role of numeracy in health: Proposed theoretical framework and practical insights. Health Education & Behavior, 36, 1065–1081. doi:10.1177/1090198109341533
17. I.M.Lipkus,, G.Samsa, & B.K.Rimer, (2001). General performance on a numeracy scale among highly educated samples. Medical Decision Making, 21, 37–44.
18. C.G.Lord,, L.Ross, & M.R.Lepper, (1979). Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 2098–2109. doi:10.1037/0022–3514.37.11.2098
19. A.Mata,, M.B.Ferreira, & S.J.Sherman, (2013). Flexibility in motivated reasoning: Strategic shifts of reasoning modes in covariation judgment. Social Cognition, 31, 465–481. doi:10.1521/soco_2012_1004
20. W.Nelson,, V.F.Reyna,, A.Fagerlin,, I.Lipkus, & E.Peters, (2008). Clinical implications of numeracy: Theory and practice. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 35, 261–274. doi:10.1007/s12160–008-9037–8
21. J.A.Paulos, (1988). Innumeracy: Mathematical illiteracy and its consequences. New York, NY: Hill and Wang.
22. E.Peters,, D.Vastfjall,, P.Slovic,, C.K.Mertz,, K.Mazzocco, & S.Dickert, (2006). Numeracy and decision making. Psychological Science, 17, 407–413. doi:10.1111/j.1467–9280.2006.01720.x
23. R.E.Petty, & J.T.Cacioppo, (1979). Issue involvement can increase or decrease persuasion by enhancing message-relevant cognitive responses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1915–1926. doi:10.1037/0022–3514.37.10.1915
24. R.E.Petty, & J.T.Cacioppo, (1990). Involvement and persuasion: Tradition versus integration. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 367–374. doi:10.1037/0033–2909.107.3.367
25. V.F.Reyna, & C.J.Brainerd, (2007). The importance of mathematics in health and human judgment: Numeracy, risk communication, and medical decision making. Learning and Individual Differences, 17, 147–159. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2007.03.010
26. V.F.Reyna, & C.J.Brainerd, (2008). Numeracy, ratio bias, and denominator neglect in judgments of risk and probability. Learning and Individual Differences, 18, 89–107. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2007.03.011
27. V.F.Reyna,, W.L.Nelson,, P.K.Han, & N.F.Dieckmann, (2009). How numeracy influences risk comprehension and medical decision making. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 943–973. doi:10.1037/a0017327
28. A.J.Rothman, & M.Kiviniemi, (1999). Treating people with health information: An analysis and review of approaches to communicating health risk information. Journal of the National Cancer Institute Monographs, 25, 44–51.
29. L.M.Schwartz,, S.Woloshin,, W.C.Black, & H.G.Welch, (1997). The role of numeracy in understanding the benefit of screening mammography. Annals of Internal Medicine, 127, 966–972. doi:10.7326/0003–4819-127–11-199712010–00003
30. H.Shaklee, & D.Tucker, (1980). A rule analysis of judgments of covariation between events. Memory & Cognition, 8, 459–467. doi:10.3758/bf03211142
31. S.L.Sheridan,, M.P.Pignone, & C.L.Lewis, (2003). A randomized comparison of patients’ understanding of number needed to treat and other common risk reduction formats. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 18, 884–892. doi:10.1046/j.1525–1497.2003.21102.x
32. K.Witte, & M.Allen, (2000). A meta-analysis of fear appeals: Implications for effective public health campaigns. Health Education & Behavior, 27, 591–615. doi:10.1177/109019810002700506
33. K.Yamagishi, (1997). When a 12.86% mortality is more dangerous than 24.14%: Implications for risk communication. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 11, 495–506. doi:10.1002/(sici)1099–0720(199712)11:6<495::aid-acp481 > 3.0.co;2-j