Deception and simulation education: Issues, concepts, and commentary

Simulation in Healthcare

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 163-169

  Calhoun, Aaron W ^a   Pian Smith, May C M ^b   Truog, Robert D ^c   Gaba, David M ^b,d,e   Meyer, Elaine C ^b,c,f  

^a University of Louisville School of Medicine   (United States)

^b HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^c BOSTON CHILDREN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^d STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^e VA PALO ALTO HEALTH CARE SYSTEM   (United States)

^f Institute for Professionalism and Ethical Practice   (United States)

Author keywords

Conceptual framework; Deception; Ethics; Ethics in simulation; Interprofessional simulation; Medical education; Misdirection; Patient simulation; Psychological safety; Simulation pedagogy; Theoretical model

Indexed keywords

DECEPTION; EMOTION; ENVIRONMENT; ETHICS; HUMAN; MOTIVATION; PROCEDURES; SIMULATION TRAINING; TEACHING;

DECEPTION; EMOTIONS; ENVIRONMENT; GOALS; HUMANS; SIMULATION TRAINING; TEACHING;

EID: 84930832109     PISSN: 15592332     EISSN: 1559713X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000086     Document Type: Review

References (38)

1. Calhoun AW, Boone MC, Miller KH, Pian-Smith MC,. Case and commentary: using simulation to address hierarchy issues during medical crises. Simul Healthc 2013; 8 (1): 13-19.
2. Gaba DM,. Simulations that are challenging to the psyche of participants: how much should we worry and about what? Simul Healthc 2013; 8 (1): 4-7.
3. Truog RD, Meyer EC,. Deception and death in medical simulation. Simul Healthc 2013; 8 (1): 1-3.
4. Dailey JI,. Modeling manipulation in medical education. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2010; 15 (2): 291-295.
5. Haidet P, Stein HF,. The role of the student-teacher relationship in the formation of physicians. The hidden curriculum as process. J Gen Intern Med 2006; 21 (suppl 1): S16-S20.
6. Corvetto MA, Taekman JM,. To die or not to die? A review of simulated death. Simul Healthc 2013; 8 (1): 8-12.
7. Dysart-gale D,. Cultural sensitivity beyond ethnicity: a universal precautions model. The Internet Journal of Allied Health Sciences and Practices 2006; 4 (1): 1-5.
8. Stern DT,. Practicing what we preach? An analysis of the curriculum of values in medical education. Am J Med 1998; 104 (6): 569-575.
9. Dieckmann P, Gaba D, Rall M,. Deepening the theoretical foundations of patient simulation as social practice. Simul Healthc 2007; 2 (3): 183-193.
10. Munch R,. Sociological Theory: From the 1920's to the 1960's. Vol 2. Chicago, IL: Nelson Hall Publishers; 1994.
11. Dror I,. A novel approach to minimize error in the medical domain: cognitive neuroscientific insights into training. Med Teach 33 (1): 34-38.
12. Dror I,. The paradox of human expertise: why experts can get it wrong. In: Kapur N, Pascual-Leone A, Ramachandran V, eds. The Paradoxical Braine. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2011: 177-188.
13. Rudolph JW, Raemer DB, Simon R,. Establishing a safe container for learning in simulation: the role of the presimulation briefing. Simul Healthc 2014; 9 (6): 339-349.
14. Holmes DS,. Debriefing After Psychological Experiments I. Effectiveness of Postdeception Dehoaxing. Am Psychol 1976; 31 (12): 858-867.
15. Smith SS, Richardson D,. Amelioration of deception and harm in psychological research: the important role of debriefing. J Pers Soc Psychol 1983; 44 (5): 1075-1082.
16. Rogers G, de Rooy N, Bowe P,. Simulated death can be an appropriate training tool for medical students. Med Educ 2011; 45: 1061-1063.
17. Arafeh JM, Hansen SS, Nichols A,. Debriefing in simulated-based learning: facilitating a reflective discussion. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs 2010; 24 (4): 302-309.
18. Nestel D, Mobley BL, Hunt EA, Eppich WJ,. Confederates in health care simulations: not as simple as it seems. Clin Simul Nurs 2014; 10 (12): 611-616.
19. Christensen L,. Deception in Psychological Research, When is its Use Justified? Pers Soc Psychol Bull 1988; 14 (4): 664-675.
20. Kelman HC,. Human use of human subjects: the problem of deception in social psychological experiments. Psychol Bull 1967; 67 (1): 1-11.
21. Milgram S,. Behavioral study of obedience. J Abnorm Psychol 1963; 67: 371-378.
22. Milgram S,. Obedience to Authority: An Experimental View. HarperCollins: New York, NY: 1974.
23. Milgram S,. Issues in the study of obedience: a reply to Baumrind. Am Psychol 1964; 19: 848-852.
24. Pihl RO, Zacchia CZ, Zeichner A,. Follow-up analysis of the use of deception and aversive contingencies in psychological experiments. Psychol Rep 1981; 48 (3): 927-930.
25. Smith CP,. How (un)acceptable is research involving deception? IRB 1981; 3 (8): 1-4.
26. Perry G,. Behind the Shock Machine: The Untold Story of the Notorious Milgram Psychology Experiments. New York, NY: The New Press; 2012.
27. Calhoun AW, Meyer EC, Pian-Smith M, Truog RD, Gaba D,. Debating the ethics of simulation: is the use of death and deception appropriate? San Francisco, CA: International Meeting on Simulation in Healthcare; 2014.
28. Gaba DM,. The future vision of simulation in healthcare. Simul Healthc 2007; 2 (2): 126-135.
29. Sutcliffe KM, Lewton E, Rosenthal MM,. Communication failures: an insidious contributor to medical mishaps. Acad Med 2004; 79 (2): 186-194.
30. Joels M, Pu Z, Wiegert O, Oitzl MS, Krugers HJ,. Learning under stress: how does it work? Trends Cogn Sci 2006; 10 (4): 152-158.
31. Sargeant J,. Qualitative research part II: participants, analysis, and quality assurance. J Grad Med Educ 2012; 4 (1): 1-3.
32. Sullivan GM, Sargeant J,. Qualities of qualitative research: part I. J Grad Med Educ 2011; 3 (4): 449-452.
33. Kuper A, Lingard L, Levinson W,. Critically appraising qualitative research. BMJ 2008; 337: a1035.
34. Kuper A, Reeves S, Levinson W,. An introduction to reading and appraising qualitative research. BMJ 2008; 337: a288.
35. Lingard L, Albert M, Levinson W,. Grounded theory, mixed methods, and action research. BMJ 2008; 337: a567.
36. Reeves S, Albert M, Kuper A, Hodges BD,. Why use theories in qualitative research? BMJ 2008; 337: a949.
37. Reeves S, Kuper A, Hodges BD,. Qualitative research methodologies: ethnography. BMJ 2008; 337: a1020.
38. Ziv A, Wolpe PR, Small SD, Glick S,. Simulation-based medical education: an ethical imperative. Acad Med 2003; 78 (8): 783-788.