Effect of coil orientation on strength-duration time constant and I-wave activation with controllable pulse parameter transcranial magnetic stimulation

Clinical Neurophysiology

Volumn 127, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 675-683

  D'Ostilio, Kevin ^a,b   Goetz, Stefan M ^c,d   Hannah, Ricci ^a   Ciocca, Matteo ^a,e   Chieffo, Raffaella ^a,f   Chen, Jui Cheng A ^a,g,h   Peterchev, Angel V ^c,i   Rothwell, John C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LIÈGE   (Belgium)

^c DUKE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^e UNIVERSITY OF MILAN   (Italy)

^f SAN RAFFAELE HOSPITAL   (Italy)

^g CHINA MEDICAL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

^h CHINA MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

ⁱ USA   (United States)

Author keywords

Current direction; Input output curve; Motor threshold; Pulse width; Strength duration time constant; Transcranial magnetic stimulation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AXON; BRAIN CORTEX; BRAIN NERVE CELL; CENTRAL SULCUS; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELBOW; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MOTOR CORTEX; MOTOR EVOKED POTENTIAL; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; ULNAR NERVE; DEVICES; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; MUSCLE STRENGTH; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; TIME FACTOR; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; BRAIN WAVES; EVOKED POTENTIALS, MOTOR; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MOTOR CORTEX; MUSCLE STRENGTH; TIME FACTORS; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84930792207     PISSN: 13882457     EISSN: 18728952     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2015.05.017     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Amassian V.E., Stewart M., Quirk G.J., Rosenthal J.L. Physiological basis of motor effects of a transient stimulus to cerebral cortex. Neurosurgery 1987, 20:74-93.
2. Arai N., Okabe S., Furubayashi T., Terao Y., Yuasa K., Ugawa Y. Comparison between short train, monophasic and biphasic repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of the human motor cortex. Clin Neurophysiol 2005, 116:605-613.
3. Barker A.T., Garnham C.W., Freeston I.L. Magnetic nerve stimulation: the effect of waveform on efficiency, determination of neural membrane time constants and the measurement of stimulator output. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl 1991, 43:227-237.
4. Boinagrov D., Loudin J., Palanker D. Strength-duration relationship for extracellular neural stimulation: numerical and analytical models. J Neurophysiol 2010, 104:2236-2248.
5. Bostock H. The strength-duration relationship for excitation of myelinated nerve: computed dependence on membrane parameters. J Physiol 1983, 341:59-74.
6. Bostock H., Rothwell J.C. Latent addition in motor and sensory fibres of human peripheral nerve. J Physiol 1997, 498:277-294.
7. Burke D., Bartley K., Woodforth I.J., Yakoubi A., Stephen J.P. The effects of a volatile anaesthetic on the excitability of human corticospinal axons. Brain 2000, 123:992-1000.
8. Day B.L., Dressler D., Maertens de N.A., Marsden C.D., Nakashima K., Rothwell J.C., et al. Electric and magnetic stimulation of human motor cortex: surface EMG and single motor unit responses. J Physiol 1989, 412:449-473.
9. Delvendahl I., Lindemann H., Jung N.H., Pechmann A., Siebner H.R., Mall V. Influence of waveform and current direction on short-interval intracortical facilitation: a paired-pulse TMS study. Brain Stimul 2014, 7:49-58.
10. Di Lazzaro V., Ziemann U. The contribution of transcranial magnetic stimulation in the functional evaluation of microcircuits in human motor cortex. Front Neural Circuits 2013, 7:18.
11. Di Lazzaro V., Oliviero A., Saturno E., Pilato F., Insola A., Mazzone P., et al. The effect on corticospinal volleys of reversing the direction of current induced in the motor cortex by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Exp Brain Res 2001, 138:268-273.
12. Geddes L.A. Accuracy limitations of chronaxie values. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2004, 51:176-181.
13. Goetz S.M., Peterchev A.V. A model of variability in brain stimulation evoked responses. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2012, 2012:6434-6437.
14. Goetz S.M., Truong C.N., Gerhofer M.G., Peterchev A.V., Herzog H.G., Weyh T. Analysis and optimization of pulse dynamics for magnetic stimulation. PLoS One 2013, 8:e55771.
15. Goetz S.M., Luber B., Lisanby S.H., Peterchev A.V. A novel model incorporating two variability sources for describing motor evoked potentials. Brain Stimul 2014, 7:541-552.
16. Goldstein H. Multilevel statistical models 2011, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester (UK).
17. Good I.J. The Bayes/Non-Bayes compromise: a brief review. J Am Stat Assoc 1992, 87:597-606.
18. Guyon I., Saffari A., Dror G., Cawley G. Model selection: beyond the Bayesian/Frequentist divide. J Mach Learn Res 2010, 11:61-87.
19. Hamada M., Murase N., Hasan A., Balaratnam M., Rothwell J.C. The role of interneuron networks in driving human motor cortical plasticity. Cereb Cortex 2013, 23:1593-1605.
20. Hursh J.B. Conduction velocity and diameter of nerve fibres. Am J Physiol 1939, 127:131-139.
21. Jeffreys H. Theory of probability 2003, Oxford University Press, Oxford (UK).
22. Jung N.H., Delvendahl I., Pechmann A., Gleich B., Gattinger N., Siebner H.R., et al. Transcranial magnetic stimulation with a half-sine wave pulse elicits direction-specific effects in human motor cortex. BMC Neurosci 2012, 13:139.
23. Kass R.E., Raftery A.E. Bayes factors. J Am Stat Assoc 1995, 40:773-795.
24. Koch G., Ponzo V., Di L.F., Caltagirone C., Veniero D. Hebbian and anti-Hebbian spike-timing-dependent plasticity of human cortico-cortical connections. J Neurosci 2013, 33:9725-9733.
25. Kuhn A., Keller T., Lawrence M., Morari M. A model for transcutaneous current stimulation: simulations and experiments. Med Biol Eng Comput 2009, 47:279-289.
26. Liewald D., Miller R., Logothetis N., Wagner H.J., Schüz A. Distribution of axon diameters in cortical white matter: an electron-microscopic study in three human brains and a macaque. Biol Cybern 2014, 108:541-557.
27. Lin C.S., Krishnan A.V., Park S.B., Kiernan M.C. Modulatory effects on axonal function after intravenous immunoglobulin therapy in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy. Arch Neurol 2011, 68:862-869.
28. Mehta P.D., Neale M.C. People are variables too: multilevel structural equations modeling. Psychol Methods 2005, 10:259-284.
29. Mogyoros I., Lin C., Dowla S., Grosskreutz J., Burke D. Strength-duration properties and their voltage dependence at different sites along the median nerve. Clin Neurophysiol 1999, 110:1618-1624.
30. Ni Z., Charab S., Gunraj C., Nelson A.J., Udupa K., Yeh I.J., et al. Transcranial magnetic stimulation in different current directions activates separate cortical circuits. J Neurophysiol 2011, 105:749-756.
31. Nielsen J.F. Logarithmic distribution of amplitudes of compound muscle action potentials evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation. J Clin Neurophysiol 1996, 13:423-434.
32. Peterchev A.V., Murphy D.L., Lisanby S.H. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulator with controllable pulse parameters. J Neural Eng 2011, 8:036016.
33. Peterchev A.V., Goetz S.M., Westin G.G., Luber B., Lisanby S.H. Pulse width dependence of motor threshold and input-output curve characterized with controllable pulse parameter transcranial magnetic stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol 2013, 124:1364-1372.
34. Peterchev A.V., D'Ostilio K., Rothwell J.C., Murphy D.L. Controllable pulse parameter transcranial magnetic stimulator with enhanced circuit topology and pulse shaping. J Neural Eng 2014, 11:056023.
35. Rattay F., Paredes L.P., Leao R.N. Strength-duration relationship for intra-versus extracellular stimulation with microelectrodes. Neuroscience 2012, 214:1-13.
36. Roberts J.K. An introductory primer on multilevel and hierarchical linear modeling. Learn Disabil 2004, 2:30-38.
37. Rothkegel H., Sommer M., Paulus W., Lang N. Impact of pulse duration in single pulse TMS. Clin Neurophysiol 2010, 121:1915-1921.
38. Rothwell J.C., Thompson P.D., Day B.L., Dick J.P., Kachi T., Cowan J.M., et al. Motor cortex stimulation in intact man. 1. General characteristics of EMG responses in different muscles. Brain 1987, 110:1173-1190.
39. Sakai K., Ugawa Y., Terao Y., Hanajima R., Furubayashi T., Kanazawa I. Preferential activation of different I waves by transcranial magnetic stimulation with a figure-of-eight-shaped coil. Exp Brain Res 1997, 113:24-32.
40. Schwarz G. Estimating the dimensions of a model. Ann Stat 1978, 6:461-464.
41. Shirota Y., Hanajima R., Hamada M., Terao Y., Matsumoto H., Tsutsumi R., et al. Inter-individual variation in the efficient stimulation site for magnetic brainstem stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol 2011, 122:2044-2048.
42. Swayne O.B., Rothwell J.C., Ward N.S., Greenwood R.J. Stages of motor output reorganization after hemispheric stroke suggested by longitudinal studies of cortical physiology. Cereb Cortex 2008, 18:1909-1922.
43. Thielscher A., Opitz A., Windhoff M. Impact of gyral geometry on the electric field induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neuroimage 2011, 54:234-243.
44. Vucic S., Kiernan M.C. Novel threshold tracking techniques suggest that cortical hyperexcitability is an early feature of motor neuron disease. Brain 2006, 129:2436-2446.
45. West D.C., Wolstencroft J.H. Strength-duration characteristics of myelinated and non-myelinated bulbospinal axons in the cat spinal cord. J Physiol 1983, 337:37-50.
46. Ziemann U. Pharmaco-transcranial magnetic stimulation studies of motor excitability. Brain stimulation. Handbook of clinical neurology 2013, Vol. 116:387-397. Elsevier, Chapter 32.