Residue-Specific Force Field (RSFF2) improves the modeling of conformational behavior of peptides and proteins

Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters

Volumn 6, Issue 11, 2015, Pages 2127-2133

  Li, Shuxiang ^a   Elcock, Adrian H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

Author keywords

J coupling constants; Karplus equation; MD simulation; NMR

Indexed keywords

BIOINFORMATICS; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; PEPTIDES;

CONFORMATIONAL BEHAVIOR; COUPLING CONSTANTS; J COUPLING; KARPLUS EQUATION; MD SIMULATION; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS SIMULATIONS; NONBONDED INTERACTION; SCALAR COUPLING;

PROTEINS;

PEPTIDE; PROTEIN;

ANIMAL; BACTERIUM; CHEMISTRY; CHICKEN; CLASSIFICATION; HUMAN; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; ORYZA; PROTEIN CONFORMATION;

ANIMALS; BACTERIA; CHICKENS; HUMANS; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS SIMULATION; ORYZA; PEPTIDES; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEINS;

EID: 84930674361     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19487185     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b00654     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Dror, R. O.; Dirks, R. M.; Grossman, J. P.; Xu, H. F.; Shaw, D. E. Biomolecular Simulation: A Computational Microscope for Molecular Biology Annu. Rev. Biophys. 2012, 41, 429-452
2. Piana, S.; Klepeis, J. L.; Shaw, D. E. Assessing the Accuracy of Physical Models Used in Protein-Folding Simulations: Quantitative Evidence from Long Molecular Dynamics Simulations Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2014, 24, 98-105
3. Wang, T.; Wade, R. C. Force Field Effects on a Beta-Sheet Protein Domain Structure in Thermal Unfolding Simulations J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2006, 2, 140-148
4. Freddolino, P. L.; Park, S.; Roux, B.; Schulten, K. Force Field Bias in Protein Folding Simulations Biophys. J. 2009, 96, 3772-3780
5. Best, R. B.; Buchete, N. V.; Hummer, G. Are Current Molecular Dynamics Force Fields Too Helical? Biophys. J. 2008, 95, L7-L9
6. Nerenberg, P. S.; Head-Gordon, T. Optimizing Protein-Solvent Force Fields to Reproduce Intrinsic Conformational Preferences of Model Peptides J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2011, 7, 1220-1230
7. Lindorff-Larsen, K.; Piana, S.; Palmo, K.; Maragakis, P.; Klepeis, J. L.; Dror, R. O.; Shaw, D. E. Improved Side-Chain Torsion Potentials for the Amber ff99SB Protein Force Field Proteins 2010, 78, 1950-1958
8. Li, D. W.; Bruschweiler, R. NMR-Based Protein Potentials Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 6778-6780
9. Best, R. B.; Hummer, G. Optimized Molecular Dynamics Force Fields Applied to the Helix-Coil Transition of Polypeptides J. Phys. Chem. B 2009, 113, 9004-9015
10. Raval, A.; Piana, S.; Eastwood, M. P.; Dror, R. O.; Shaw, D. E. Refinement of Protein Structure Homology Models via Long, All-Atom Molecular Dynamics Simulations Proteins 2012, 80, 2071-2079
11. Li, S.; Andrews, C. T.; Frembgen-Kesner, T.; Miller, M. S.; Siemonsma, S. L.; Collingsworth, T. D.; Rockafellow, I. T.; Ngo, N. A.; Campbell, B. A.; Brown, R. F.; Guo, C.; Schrodt, M.; Liu, Y.-T.; Elcock, A. H. Molecular Dynamics Simulations of 441 Two-Residue Peptides in Aqueous Solution: Conformational Preferences and Neighboring Residue Effects with the Amber ff99SB-ildn-NMR Force Field J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2015, 11, 1315-1329
12. Graf, J.; Nguyen, P. H.; Stock, G.; Schwalbe, H. Structure and Dynamics of the Homologous Series of Alanine Peptides: A Joint Molecular Dynamics/NMR Study J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 1179-1189
13. Jung, Y. S.; Oh, K. I.; Hwang, G. S.; Cho, M. Neighboring Residue Effects in Terminally Blocked Dipeptides: Implications for Residual Secondary Structures in Intrinsically Unfolded/Disordered Proteins Chirality 2014, 26, 443-452
14. Beauchamp, K. A.; Lin, Y.-S.; Das, R.; Pande, V. S. Are Protein Force Fields Getting Better? A Systematic Benchmark on 524 Diverse NMR Measurements J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2012, 8, 1409-1414
15. Hornak, V.; Abel, R.; Okur, A.; Strockbine, B.; Roitberg, A.; Simmerling, C. Comparison of Multiple Amber Force Fields and Development of Improved Protein Backbone Parameters Proteins 2006, 65, 712-725
16. Zhou, C.-Y.; Jiang, F.; Wu, Y.-D. Residue-Specific Force Field Based on Protein Coil Library. RSFF2: Modification of AMBER ff99SB J. Phys. Chem. B 2015, 119, 1035-1047
17. Jorgensen, W. L.; Chandrasekhar, J.; Madura, J. D.; Impey, R. W.; Klein, M. L. Comparison of Simple Potential Functions for Simulating Liquid Water J. Chem. Phys. 1983, 79, 926-935
18. Karplus, M. Contact Electron-Spin Coupling of Nuclear Magnetic Moments J. Chem. Phys. 1959, 30, 11-15
19. Vogeli, B.; Ying, J. F.; Grishaev, A.; Bax, A. Limits on Variations in Protein Backbone Dynamics from Precise Measurements of Scalar Couplings J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 9377-9385
20. Hu, J. S.; Bax, A. Determination of Phi and Chi(1) Angles in Proteins from 13C-13C Three-Bond J Couplings Measured by Three-Dimensional Heteronuclear NMR. How Planar Is the Peptide Bond? J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 6360-6368
21. Lindorff-Larsen, K.; Maragakis, P.; Piana, S.; Eastwood, M. P.; Dror, R. O.; Shaw, D. E. Systematic Validation of Protein Force Fields against Experimental Data PLoS One 2012, 7, e32131
22. Jiang, F.; Zhou, C. Y.; Wu, Y. D. Residue-Specific Force Field Based on the Protein Coil Library. RSFF1: Modification of OPLS-AA/L J. Phys. Chem. B 2014, 118, 6983-6998
23. Petrov, D.; Zagrovic, B. Are Current Atomistic Force Fields Accurate Enough to Study Proteins in Crowded Environments? PLoS Comput. Biol. 2014, 10, e1003638
24. Hess, B.; Kutzner, C.; van der Spoel, D.; Lindahl, E. GROMACS 4: Algorithms for Highly Efficient, Load-Balanced, and Scalable Molecular Simulation J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2008, 4, 435-447
25. Van der Spoel, D.; Lindahl, E.; Hess, B.; Groenhof, G.; Mark, A. E.; Berendsen, H. J. C. GROMACS: Fast, Flexible, and Free J. Comput. Chem. 2005, 26, 1701-1718
26. Vardar, D.; Buckley, D. A.; Frank, B. S.; McKnight, C. J. NMR Structure of an F-Actin-Binding Headpiece Motif from Villin J. Mol. Biol. 1999, 294, 1299-1310
27. Wang, A. C.; Bax, A. Determination of the Backbone Dihedral Angles Phi in Human Ubiquitin from Reparametrized Empirical Karplus Equations J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 2483-2494
28. Poznanski, J.; Sodano, P.; Suh, S. W.; Lee, J. Y.; Ptak, M.; Vovelle, F. Solution Structure of a Lipid Transfer Protein Extracted from Rice Seeds - Comparison with Homologous Proteins Eur. J. Biochem. 1999, 259, 692-708
29. Parac, T. N.; Vogtherr, M.; Maurer, M.; Pahl, A.; Ruterjans, H.; Griesinger, C.; Fiebig, K. Assignment of the 1H, 13C and 15N Resonances of the PPIase Domain of the Trigger Factor from Mycoplasma Genitalium J. Biomol. NMR 2001, 20, 193-194
30. Vuister, G. W.; Bax, A. Quantitative J Correlation - A New Approach for Measuring Homonuclear 3-Bond J(H(N)H(Alpha) Coupling-Constants in 15N-Enriched Proteins J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 7772-7777
31. Essmann, U.; Perera, L.; Berkowitz, M. L.; Darden, T.; Lee, H.; Pedersen, L. G. A Smooth Particle Mesh Ewald Method J. Chem. Phys. 1995, 103, 8577-8593
32. Hess, B.; Bekker, H.; Berendsen, H. J. C.; Fraaije, J. G. E. M. LINCS: A Linear Constraint Solver for Molecular Simulations J. Comput. Chem. 1997, 18, 1463-1472