Polyphyly of nuclear lamin genes indicates an early eukaryotic origin of the metazoan-type intermediate filament proteins

Scientific Reports

Volumn 5, Issue , 2015, Pages

  Kollmar, Martin ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR BIOPHYSICAL CHEMISTRY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INTERMEDIATE FILAMENT PROTEIN; LAMIN;

ANIMAL; BIOLOGY; CHEMISTRY; CLASSIFICATION; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; EUKARYOTE; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENETICS; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; PROCEDURES; PROTEIN DOMAIN;

ANIMALS; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; EUKARYOTA; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; INTERMEDIATE FILAMENT PROTEINS; LAMINS; PROTEIN INTERACTION DOMAINS AND MOTIFS;

EID: 84930668603     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20452322     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/srep10652     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Stewart, C. L., Roux, K. J., & Burke, B. Blurring the boundary: the nuclear envelope extends its reach. Science 318, 1408-1412 (2007).
2. Cavalier-Smith, T. Origin of the cell nucleus, mitosis and sex: roles of intracellular coevolution. Biol. Direct 5, 7 (2010).
3. Burke, B., & Stewart, C. L. The laminopathies: the functional architecture of the nucleus and its contribution to disease. Annu. Rev. Genomics Hum. Genet. 7, 369-405 (2006).
4. Worman, H. J., & Bonne, G. 'Laminopathies': a wide spectrum of human diseases. Exp. Cell Res. 313, 2121-2133 (2007).
5. Schreiber, K. H., & Kennedy, B. K. When lamins go bad: nuclear structure and disease. Cell 152, 1365-1375 (2013).
6. Davidson, P. M., & Lammerding, J. Broken nuclei-lamins, nuclear mechanics, and disease. Trends Cell Biol. 24, 247-256 (2014).
7. Prokocimer, M. et al. Nuclear lamins: key regulators of nuclear structure and activities. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 13, 1059-1085 (2009).
8. Dahl, K. N., & Kalinowski, A. Nucleoskeleton mechanics at a glance. J. Cell Sci. 124, 675-678 (2011).
9. Burke, B., & Stewart, C. L. The nuclear lamins: flexibility in function. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 14, 13-24 (2013).
10. Dittmer, T. A., & Misteli, T. The lamin protein family. Genome Biol. 12, 222 (2011).
11. Ho, C. Y., & Lammerding, J. Lamins at a glance. J. Cell Sci. 125, 2087-2093 (2012).
12. Pappas, G. D. The fine structure of the nuclear envelope of Amoeba proteus. J. Biophys. Biochem. Cytol. 2, 431-434 (1956).
13. Wen, J., & Li, J. Nuclear matrix of the most primitive eukaryote Archezoa. Sci. China Ser. C Life Sci. Chin. Acad. Sci. 41, 479-487 (1998).
14. Beams, H. W., Tahmisian, T. N., Devine, R., & Anderson, E. Ultrastructure of the nuclear membrane of a gregarine parasitic in grasshoppers. Exp. Cell Res. 13, 200-204 (1957).
15. Wen, J. The nuclear matrix of Euglena gracilis (euglenophyta): a stage of nuclear matrix evolution Biol. Cell Auspices Eur. Cell Biol. Organ. 92, 125-131 (2000).
16. Krüger, A. et al. Characterization of NE81, the first lamin-like nucleoskeleton protein in a unicellular organism. Mol. Biol. Cell 23, 360-370 (2012).
17. Fuchs, E., & Weber, K. Intermediate filaments: structure, dynamics, function, and disease. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 63, 345-382 (1994).
18. Guérette, D., Khan, P. A., Savard, P. E., & Vincent, M. Molecular evolution of type VI intermediate filament proteins. BMC Evol. Biol. 7, 164 (2007).
19. Melcer, S., Gruenbaum, Y., & Krohne, G. Invertebrate lamins. Exp. Cell Res. 313, 2157-2166 (2007).
20. Hwang, J. S. et al. Cilium evolution: identification of a novel protein, nematocilin, in the mechanosensory cilium of Hydra nematocytes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 25, 2009-2017 (2008).
21. Marrs, J. A., & Bouck, G. B. The two major membrane skeletal proteins (articulins) of Euglena gracilis define a novel class of cytoskeletal proteins. J. Cell Biol. 118, 1465-1475 (1992).
22. Honts, J. E., & Williams, N. E. Tetrins: polypeptides that form bundled filaments in Tetrahymena. J. Cell Sci. 96 ( Pt 2), 293-302 (1990).
23. Brimmer, A., & Weber, K. The cDNA sequences of three tetrins, the structural proteins of the Tetrahymena oral filaments, show that they are novel cytoskeletal proteins. Protist 151, 171-180 (2000).
24. Huttenlauch, I., Peck, R. K., & Stick, R. Articulins and epiplasmins: two distinct classes of cytoskeletal proteins of the membrane skeleton in protists. J. Cell Sci. 111, 3367-3378 (1998).
25. Mann, T., & Beckers, C. Characterization of the subpellicular network, a filamentous membrane skeletal component in the parasite Toxoplasma gondii. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 115, 257-268 (2001).
26. Gould, S. B., Tham, W.-H., Cowman, A. F., McFadden, G. I., & Waller, R. F. Alveolins, a new family of cortical proteins that define the protist infrakingdom Alveolata. Mol. Biol. Evol. 25, 1219-1230 (2008).
27. Hammesfahr, B., Odronitz, F., Hellkamp, M., & Kollmar, M. diArk 2.0 provides detailed analyses of the ever increasing eukaryotic genome sequencing data. BMC Res. Notes 4, 338 (2011).
28. Mühlhausen, S., & Kollmar, M. Whole genome duplication events in plant evolution reconstructed and predicted using myosin motor proteins. BMC Evol. Biol. 13, 202 (2013).
29. Findeisen, P. et al. Six subgroups and extensive recent duplications characterize the evolution of the eukaryotic tubulin protein family. Genome Biol. Evol. 6, 2274-2288 (2014).
30. Zimek, A., Thiering, S., Weber, K., & Magin, T. M. Genes encoding cytoplasmic intermediate filament proteins of vertebrates revisited: identification of a cytoplasmic intermediate filament protein in the sea anemone Nematostella. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 91, 809-817 (2012).
31. Riemer, D., Wang, J., Zimek, A., Swalla, B. J., & Weber, K. Tunicates have unusual nuclear lamins with a large deletion in the carboxyterminal tail domain. Gene 255, 317-325 (2000).
32. Bossie, C. A., & Sanders, M. M. A cDNA from Drosophila melanogaster encodes a lamin C-like intermediate filament protein. J. Cell Sci. 104 ( Pt 4), 1263-1272 (1993).
33. Eckert, C., Hammesfahr, B., & Kollmar, M. A holistic phylogeny of the coronin gene family reveals an ancient origin of the tandem-coronin, defines a new subfamily, and predicts protein function. BMC Evol. Biol. 11, 268 (2011).
34. Odronitz, F., & Kollmar, M. Drawing the tree of eukaryotic life based on the analysis of 2, 269 manually annotated myosins from 328 species. Genome Biol. 8, R196 (2007).
35. Hirokawa, N., Noda, Y., Tanaka, Y., & Niwa, S. Kinesin superfamily motor proteins and intracellular transport. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 10, 682-696 (2009).
36. Kollmar, M., Lbik, D., & Enge, S. Evolution of the eukaryotic ARP2/3 activators of the WASP family: WASP, WAVE, WASH, and WHAMM, and the proposed new family members WAWH and WAML. BMC Res. Notes 5, 88 (2012).
37. Dodemont, H., Riemer, D., & Weber, K. Structure of an invertebrate gene encoding cytoplasmic intermediate filament (IF) proteins: implications for the origin and the diversification of IF proteins. EMBO J. 9, 4083-4094 (1990).
38. Döring, V., & Stick, R. Gene structure of nuclear lamin LIII of Xenopus laevis; a model for the evolution of IF proteins from a lamin-like ancestor. EMBO J. 9, 4073-4081 (1990).
39. Masaki, S., & Quinlan, R. A. Gene structure and sequence comparisons of the eye lens specific protein, filensin, from rat and mouse: implications for protein classification and assembly. Gene 201, 11-20 (1997).
40. Peter, A., & Stick, R. Evolution of the lamin protein family: what introns can tell. Nucl. Austin Tex 3, 44-59 (2012).
41. Zimek, A., & Weber, K. In contrast to the nematode and fruit fly all 9 intron positions of the sea anemone lamin gene are conserved in human lamin genes. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 87, 305-309 (2008).
42. Rogozin, I. B., Wolf, Y. I., Sorokin, A. V., Mirkin, B. G., & Koonin, E. V. Remarkable Interkingdom Conservation of Intron Positions and Massive, Lineage-Specific Intron Loss and Gain in Eukaryotic Evolution. Curr. Biol. 13, 1512-1517 (2003).
43. Roy, S. W., & Gilbert, W. Rates of intron loss and gain: implications for early eukaryotic evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102, 5773-5778 (2005).
44. Peter, A., & Stick, R. Evolutionary aspects in intermediate filament proteins. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 32C, 48-55 (2015).
45. Ryan, J. F. et al. The genome of the ctenophore Mnemiopsis leidyi and its implications for cell type evolution. Science 342, 1242592 (2013).
46. Van de Peer, Y., Maere, S., & Meyer, A. 2R or not 2R is not the question anymore. Nat Rev Genet 11, 166 (2010).
47. Katz, L. A., Grant, J. R., Parfrey, L. W., & Burleigh, J. G. Turning the crown upside down: gene tree parsimony roots the eukaryotic tree of life. Syst. Biol. 61, 653-660 (2012).
48. Adl, S. M. et al. The revised classification of eukaryotes. J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 59, 429-493 (2012).
49. Rogozin, I. B., Basu, M. K., Csürös, M., & Koonin, E. V. Analysis of rare genomic changes does not support the unikont-bikont phylogeny and suggests cyanobacterial symbiosis as the point of primary radiation of eukaryotes. Genome Biol. Evol. 1, 99-113 (2009).
50. Archibald, J. M. The puzzle of plastid evolution. Curr. Biol. CB 19, R81-88 (2009).
51. Cavalier-Smith, T. Kingdoms Protozoa and Chromista and the eozoan root of the eukaryotic tree. Biol. Lett. 6, 342-345 (2010).
52. Cavalier-Smith, T. The phagotrophic origin of eukaryotes and phylogenetic classification of Protozoa. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 52, 297-354 (2002).
53. Derelle, R., & Lang, B. F. Rooting the eukaryotic tree with mitochondrial and bacterial proteins. Mol. Biol. Evol. 29 1277-1289 (2012).
54. Hammesfahr, B., & Kollmar, M. Evolution of the eukaryotic dynactin complex, the activator of cytoplasmic dynein. BMC Evol. Biol. 12, 95 (2012).
55. Pruss, R. M. et al. All classes of intermediate filaments share a common antigenic determinant defined by a monoclonal antibody. Cell 27, 419-428 (1981).
56. Georgatos, S. D., Gounari, F., Goulielmos, G., & Aebi, U. To bead or not to bead? Lens-specific intermediate filaments revisited. J. Cell Sci. 110, 2629-2634 (1997).
57. Dahlstrand, J., Zimmerman, L. B., McKay, R. D., & Lendahl, U. Characterization of the human nestin gene reveals a close evolutionary relationship to neurofilaments. J. Cell Sci. 103, 589-597 (1992).
58. Herrmann, H., & Strelkov, S. V. History and phylogeny of intermediate filaments: now in insects. BMC Biol. 9, 16 (2011).
59. Ausmees, N., Kuhn, J. R., & Jacobs-Wagner, C. The bacterial cytoskeleton: an intermediate filament-like function in cell shape. Cell 115, 705-713 (2003).
60. Tyler, B. M. et al. Phytophthora genome sequences uncover evolutionary origins and mechanisms of pathogenesis. Science 313, 1261-1266 (2006).
61. Stanke, M., Steinkamp, R., Waack, S., & Morgenstern, B. AUGUSTUS: a web server for gene finding in eukaryotes. Nucleic Acids Res. 32, W309-312 (2004).
62. Hatje, K. et al. Cross-species protein sequence and gene structure prediction with fine-tuned Webscipio 2.0 and Scipio. BMC Res. Notes 4, 265 (2011).
63. Hatje, K., Hammesfahr, B., & Kollmar, M. WebScipio: Reconstructing alternative splice variants of eukaryotic proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, W504-509 (2013).
64. Odronitz, F., & Kollmar, M. Pfarao: a web application for protein family analysis customized for cytoskeletal and motor proteins (CyMoBase). BMC Genomics 7, 300 (2006).
65. Chenna, R. et al. Multiple sequence alignment with the Clustal series of programs. Nucleic Acids Res 31, 3497-500 (2003).
66. Li, W., & Godzik, A. Cd-hit: a fast program for clustering and comparing large sets of protein or nucleotide sequences. Bioinformatics 22, 1658-1659 (2006).
67. Talavera, G., & Castresana, J. Improvement of phylogenies after removing divergent and ambiguously aligned blocks from protein sequence alignments. Syst. Biol. 56, 564-577 (2007).
68. Price, M. N., Dehal, P. S., & Arkin, A. P. FastTree 2-Approximately maximum-likelihood trees for large alignments. PloS One 5, -9490 (2010).
69. Jones, D. T., Taylor, W. R., & Thornton, J. M. The rapid generation of mutation data matrices from protein sequences. Comput Appl Biosci 8, 275-82 (1992).
70. Whelan, S., & Goldman, N. A general empirical model of protein evolution derived from multiple protein families using a maximum-likelihood approach. Mol. Biol. Evol. 18, 691-699 (2001).
71. Darriba, D., Taboada, G. L., Doallo, R., & Posada, D. ProtTest 3: fast selection of best-fit models of protein evolution. Bioinformatics 27, 1164-1165 (2011).