The status-legitimacy hypothesis revisited: Ethnic-group differences in general and dimension-specific legitimacy

British Journal of Social Psychology

Volumn 54, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 324-340

  Sengupta, Nikhil K ^a   Osborne, Danny ^a   Sibley, Chris G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Ethnic group differences; Fairness perceptions; Ideological dissonance; Status legitimacy hypothesis; System justification

Indexed keywords

ADULT; CAUCASIAN; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEW ZEALAND; OCEANIC ANCESTRY GROUP; POLITICS; SOCIOECONOMICS;

ADULT; EUROPEAN CONTINENTAL ANCESTRY GROUP; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEW ZEALAND; OCEANIC ANCESTRY GROUP; POLITICS; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS;

EID: 84930591636     PISSN: 01446665     EISSN: 20448309     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/bjso.12080     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Ajwani, S., Blakely, T., Robson, B., Tobias, M., & Bonne, M. (2003). Decades of disparity: Ethnic mortality trends in New Zealand 1980-1999. Wellington, New Zealand: Ministry of Health and University of Otago.
2. Altemeyer, B. (1996). The authoritarian specter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
3. Aronson, E., & Mills, J. (1959). The effect of severity of initiation on liking for a group. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 59, 177-181. doi:10.1037/h0047195
4. Brandt, M. J. (2013). Do the disadvantaged legitimize the social system? A large-scale test of the status-legitimacy hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 765-785. doi:10.1037/a0031751
5. Brandt, M. J., & Henry, P. (2012). Gender inequality and gender differences in authoritarianism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 1301-1315. doi:10.1177/0146167212449871
6. Brandt, M., & Reyna, C. (2012). Social dominance or system justification? The acceptance of inequality and resistance to social change as unique system-relevant motivations. SSRN. Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2165690
7. Cooper, J., & Fazio, R. H. (1984). A new look at dissonance. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 17, 229-268.
8. Costa-Lopes, R., Dovidio, J. F., Pereira, C. R., & Jost, J. T. (2013). Social psychological perspectives on the legitimation of social inequality: Past, present and future. European Journal of Social Psychology, 43, 229-237. doi:10.1002/ejsp.1966
9. EIU (2012). Democracy in 2012: Democracy at a standstill. Author. Retrieved from https://www.eiu.com/public/topical_report.aspx?campaignid=DemocracyIndex12
10. Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson.
11. Festinger, L., Riecken, H. W., & Schachter, S. (1956). When prophecy fails. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
12. Furnham, A. (1982). The Protestant Work Ethic and attitudes towards unemployment. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 55, 277-285. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8325.1982.tb00101.x
13. Gerard, H. B., & Mathewson, G. C. (1966). The effects of severity of initiation on liking for a group: A replication. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2, 278-287. doi:10.1016/0022-1031(66)90084-9
14. Haines, E. L., & Jost, J. T. (2000). Placating the powerless: Effects of legitimate and illegitimate explanation on affect, memory, and stereotyping. Social Justice Research, 13, 219-236. doi:10.1023/A:1026481205719
15. Harmon-Jones, E., & Mills, J. (Eds.). (1999). Cognitive dissonance theory: Progress on a pivotal theory in social psychology. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
16. Henry, P. (2011). The role of stigma in understanding ethnicity differences in authoritarianism. Political Psychology, 32, 419-438. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2010.00816.x
17. Henry, P. J., & Saul, A. (2006). The development of system justification in the developing world. Social Justice Research, 19, 365-378. doi:10.1007/s11211-006-0012-x
18. Houkamau, C. A., & Sibley, C. G. (2010). The multi-dimensional model of Māori identity and cultural engagement. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 39, 8-28. doi:10.1037/a0031113
19. Jackman, M. R. (1994). The velvet glove. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
20. Jost, J. T., & Banaji, M. J. (1994). The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 1-27. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.1994.tb01008.x
21. Jost, J. T., Banaji, M. R., & Nosek, B. A. (2004). A decade of System Justification Theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political Psychology, 25, 881-919. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00402.x
22. Jost, J. T., & Burgess, D. (2000). Attitudinal ambivalence and the conflict between group and system justification motives in low status groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 293-305. doi:10.1177/0146167200265003
23. Jost, J. T., Burgess, D., & Mosso, C. (2001). Conflicts of legitimation among self, group, and system: The integrative potential of system justification theory. In J. T. Jost & B. Major (Eds.), The psychology of legitimacy: Emerging perspectives on ideology, justice, and intergroup relations (pp. 363-388). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
24. Jost, J. T., & Hunyady, O. (2002). The psychology of system justification and the palliative function of ideology. European Review of Social Psychology, 13, 111-153. doi:10.1080/10463280240000046
25. Jost, J. T., & Hunyady, O. (2005). Antecedents and consequences of system-justifying ideologies. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 260-265. doi:10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00377.x
26. Jost, J. T., & Kay, A. C. (2005). Exposure to benevolent sexism and complementary gender stereotypes: Consequences for specific and diffuse forms of system justification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 498-509. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.88.3.498
27. Jost, J. T., Pelham, B. W., Sheldon, O., & Sullivan, B. N. (2003). Social inequality and the reduction of ideological dissonance on behalf of the system: Evidence of enhanced system justification among the disadvantaged. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 13-36. doi:10.1002/ejsp.127
28. Jost, J. T., & Thompson, E. P. (2000). Group-based dominance and opposition to equality as independent predictors of self-esteem, ethnocentrism, and social policy attitudes among African Americans and European Americans. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 209-232. doi:10.1006/jesp.1999.1403
29. Jost, J. T., Wakslak, C. J., & Tyler, T. R. (2008). System Justification Theory and the alleviation of emotional distress: Palliative effects of ideology in an arbitrary social hierarchy and in society. Advances in Group Processes, 25, 181-211. doi:10.1016/S0882-6145(08)25012-5
30. Kay, A. C., & Jost, J. T. (2003). Complementary justice: Effects of "poor but happy" and "poor but honest" stereotype exemplars on system justification and implicit activation of the justice motive. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 823-837. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.85.5.823
31. Kay, A. C., Whitson, J. A., Gaucher, D., & Galinsky, A. D. (2009). Compensatory control: Achieving order through the mind, our institutions, and the heavens. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 264-268. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01649.x
32. Ledgerwood, A., Mandisodza, A. N., Jost, J. T., & Pohl, M. J. (2011). Working for the system: Motivated defence of meritocratic beliefs. Social Cognition, 29, 322-340. doi:10.1521/soco.2011.29.3.322
33. Lee, I. C., Pratto, F., & Johnson, B. T. (2011). Intergroup consensus/disagreement in support of group-based hierarchy: An examination of socio-structural and psycho-cultural Factors. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 1029-1064. doi:10.1037/a0025410
34. Lerner, M. J. (1980). The belief in a just world: A fundamental delusion. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
35. Manuela, S., & Sibley, C. G. (2013). The Pacific Identity and Wellbeing Scale (PIWBS): A culturally-appropriate self-report measure for Pacific peoples in New Zealand. Social Indicators Research, 112, 1-21. doi:10.1007/s11205-012-0041-9
36. McCoy, S. K., & Major, B. (2007). Priming meritocracy and the psychological justification of inequality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 341-351. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2006.04.009
37. McCoy, S. K., Wellman, J. D., Cosley, B., Saslow, L., & Epel, E. (2013). Is the belief in meritocracy palliative for members of low status groups? Evidence for a benefit for self-esteem and physical health via perceived control. European Journal of Social Psychology, 43, 307-318. doi:10.1002/ejsp.1959
38. McMahon, F. (2012). Towards a worldwide index of human freedom. Fraser Institute.
39. Molina, G. G. (2007). Ethnic politics in Bolivia: Harmony of inequalities, 1900-2000. Queen Elizabeth House, The University of Oxford: The Centre for Research on Inequality Human Security and Ethnicity.
40. Napier, J. L., & Jost, J. T. (2008). The "antidemocratic personality" revisited: A cross-national investigation of working-class authoritarianism. Journal of Social Issues, 64, 595-617. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.2008.00579.x
41. OECD (2011). Divided we stand: Why inequality keeps rising. Author. doi:10.1787/9789264119536-en
42. Osborne, D., & Sibley, C. G. (2013). Through rose-colored glasses: System-justifying beliefs dampen the effects of relative deprivation on well-being and political mobilization. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 991-1004. doi:10.1177/0146167213487997
43. Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M., & Malle, B. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 741-763. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.67.4.741
44. Reicher, S. (2004). The context of social identity: Domination, resistance, and change. Political Psychology, 25, 921-945. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00403.x
45. Reicher, S. (2011). Psychology, domination and resistance. Europe's Journal of Psychology, 7, 204-217. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00403.x
46. Rubin, M., & Hewstone, M. (2004). Social identity, system justification, and social dominance: Commentary on Reicher, Jost et al., and Sidanius et al. Political Psychology, 25, 823-844. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2004.00400.x
47. Sengupta, N. K., & Sibley, C. G. (2014). Feeling better about a bad situation: The palliative effect of meritocratic beliefs for low-status groups in neighborhoods with high inequality. Unpublished manuscript.
48. Sibley, C. G. (2010). The dark duo of post-colonial ideology: A model of symbolic exclusion and historical negation. International Journal of Conflict and Violence, 4, 106-123.
49. Sibley, C. G., & Wilson, M. S. (2007). Political attitudes and the ideology of equality: Differentiating support for liberal and conservative political parties in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 36, 72-84.
50. Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
51. Simon, H. A. (1957). Administrative behaviour: A study of decision-making processes in administrative organization. New York, NY: MacMillan.
52. Simon, B., & Klandermans, B. (2001). Politicized collective identity: A social psychological analysis. American Psychologist, 56, 319-331. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.56.4.319
53. Stenner, K. (2009). Three kinds of "conservatism". Psychological Inquiry, 20, 142-159. doi:10.1080/10478400903028615
54. The Social Report (2010). Wellington, NZ: Ministry of Social Development. Retrieved from http://socialreport.msd.govt.nz/
55. Thomas, E. F., & Louis, W. R. (2013). Doing democracy: The social psychological mobilization and consequences of collective action. Social Issues and Policy Review, 7, 173-200. doi:10.1111/j.1751-2409.2012.01047.x
56. Thomas, E. F., McGarty, C., & Mavor, K. I. (2009). Aligning identities, emotions, and beliefs to create commitment to sustainable social and political action. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13, 194-218. doi:10.1177/1088868309341563
57. Tyler, T. R. (2006). Psychological perspectives on legitimacy and legitimation. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 375-400. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190038
58. van Zomeren, M., Postmes, T., & Spears, R. (2008). Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: A quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 504-535. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.504
59. Wakslak, C. J., Jost, J. T., Tyler, T. R., & Chen, E. S. (2007). Moral outrage mediates the dampening effect of system justification on support for redistributive social policies. Psychological Science, 18, 267-274. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01887.x