Discourse architecture, ideology, and democratic norms in online political discussion

New Media and Society

Volumn 17, Issue 5, 2015, Pages 772-791

  Freelon, Deen ^a  

^a AMERICAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Comments; content analysis; deliberation; newspaper; normative; Twitter

Indexed keywords

EID: 84930518338     PISSN: 14614448     EISSN: 14617315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1461444813513259     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Ackerman BA,Fishkin JSDeliberation Day. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press; 2004:
2. Althaus SSage Handbook of Political Communication. Semetko HScammell M, ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE; 2012:97-112.
3. Anderson BImagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. New York: Verso Books; 2006:
4. Bennett WL.What’s wrong with incivility? Civility as the new censorship in American politics.In the name of democracy: leadership, civility, and governing in a polarized media environment (The 2011 John Breaux Symposium); 2011Baton Rouge, LA; 2011.
5. Bennett WL,Iyengar S.A new era of minimal effects? The changing foundations of political communication.Journal of Communication. 2008;58 (4): 707-731
6. Bennett WL,Lawrence RG,Livingston SWhen the Press Fails: Political Power and the News Media from Iraq to Katrina. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 2007:
7. Burnett G,Bonnici L.Beyond the FAQ: explicit and implicit norms in Usenet newsgroups.Library & Information Science Research. 2003;25 (3): 333-351
8. Carmines EG,Stimson JA.The two faces of issue voting.American Political Science Review. 1980;74 (1): 78-91
9. Chambers S.Deliberative democratic theory.Annual Review of Political Science. 2003;6 (1): 307-326
10. Cizmar A.Measuring ‘easy’ issues.Southern Political Science Association; 2010Atlanta, GA; 2010.
11. Coleman S,Blumler JGThe Internet and Democratic Citizenship: Theory, Practice and Policy. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2009:
12. Conover MD,Ratkiewicz J,Francisco M, et al.Political polarization on Twitter.Proceedings of the 5th international conference on weblogs and social media; 2011Barcelona, Spain; 2011.
13. Dahlberg L.Democracy via cyberspace: Mapping the rhetorics and practices of three prominent camps.New Media & Society. 2001a;3 (2): 157-177
14. Dahlberg L.The Internet and democratic discourse: exploring the prospects of online deliberative forums extending the public sphere.Information, Communication & Society. 2001b;4 (4): 615-633
15. Davies T,Gangadharan SPOnline Deliberation: Design, Research, and Practice. Palo Alto, CA: Center for the Study of Language and Information; 2009:
16. Davis RThe Web of Politics: The Internet’s Impact on the American Political System. New York: Oxford University Press; 1999:
17. Downs A.An economic theory of political action in a democracy.Journal of Political Economy. 1957;65 (2): 135-150
18. Dryzek JSDeliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics, Contestations. New York: Oxford University Press; 2000:
19. Etzioni AThe Spirit of Community: The Reinvention of American Society. New York: Touchstone Publishing; 1994:
20. Fraser N.Rethinking the public sphere: a contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy.Social Text. 1990;25/26:56-80
21. Freelon D.Analyzing online political discussion using three models of democratic communication.New Media & Society. 2010;12 (7): 1172-1190
22. Garrett RK.Echo chambers online? Politically motivated selective exposure among Internet news users.Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. 2009;14 (2): 265-285
23. Gentzkow M,Shapiro JM.Ideological segregation online and offline.Quarterly Journal of Economics. 2011;126 (4): 1799-1839
24. Graham T,Wright S.Discursive equality and everyday talk online: the impact of ‘Superparticipants’.Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. in press;:
25. Gutmann A,Thompson DFWhy Deliberative Democracy?. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 2004:
26. Habermas JThe Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1989:
27. Habermas J.Political communication in media society: does democracy still enjoy an epistemic dimension? The impact of normative theory on empirical research.Communication Theory. 2006;16 (4): 411-426
28. Hirzalla F,Van Zoonen L,De Ridder J.Internet use and political participation: reflections on the mobilization/normalization controversy.Information Society. 2010;27 (1): 1-15
29. Iyengar S,Hahn KS.Red media, blue media: evidence of ideological selectivity in media use.Journal of Communication. 2009;59 (1): 19-39
30. Iyengar S,Luskin RC,Fishkin AJ.Deliberative public opinion in presidential primaries: Evidence from the online deliberative poll.Voice and citizenship conference; 2004Seattle, Washington; 2004.
31. Jankowski NW,Van Os RDemocracy Online: The Prospect for Political Renewal through the Internet. Shane P, ed. London: Routledge; 2004:181-194.
32. Janssen D,Kies R.Online forums and deliberative democracy.Acta Politica. 2005;40 (3): 317-335
33. Jennings BCensorship: The Threat to Silence Talk Radio. New York: Threshold Editions; 2009:
34. Jensen JL.Public spheres on the Internet: anarchic or government-sponsored – a comparison.Scandinavian Political Studies. 2003;26 (4): 349-374
35. Johnson TJ,Bichard SL,Zhang W.Communication communities or ‘cyberghettos?’ A path analysis model examining factors that explain selective exposure to blogs.Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication. 2009;15 (1): 60-82
36. Jones Q,Rafaeli S.Time to split, virtually: ‘Discourse Architecture’ and ‘Community Building’ create vibrant virtual publics.Electronic Markets. 2000;10 (4): 214-223
37. Karpf DThe MoveOn Effect: The Unexpected Transformation of American Political Advocacy. New York: Oxford University Press; 2012:
38. Kerbel MRNetroots: Online Progressives and the Transformation of American Politics. St. Paul, MN: Paradigm Publishing; 2009:
39. Knobloch-Westerwick S,Meng J.Looking the other way: Selective exposure to attitude-consistent and counterattitudinal political information.Communication Research. 2009;36 (3): 426-448
40. Kobayashi T,Ikeda K.Selective exposure in political web browsing.Information, Communication & Society. 2009;12 (6): 929-953
41. Lawrence E,Sides J,Farrell H.Self-segregation or deliberation? Blog readership, participation, and polarization in American politics.Perspectives on Politics. 2010;8 (1): 141-157
42. Lazarsfeld PF.Public opinion and the classical tradition.Public Opinion Quarterly. 1957;21 (1): 39-53
43. Mansbridge JJBeyond Adversary Democracy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1983:
44. Mouffe C.Deliberative democracy or agonistic pluralism?.Social Research. 1999;66 (3): 745-758
45. Muhlberger P.Human agency and the revitalization of the public sphere.Political Communication. 2005;22 (2): 163-178
46. Munson SA,Resnick P.Presenting diverse political opinions: how and how much.Proceedings of the 28th international conference on Human factors in computing systems; 2010Atlanta, GA; 2010. 1457.
47. Papacharissi Z.Democracy online: civility, politeness, and the democratic potential of online political discussion groups.New Media & Society. 2004;6 (2): 259-283
48. Papacharissi Z.The virtual geographies of social networks: a comparative analysis of Facebook, LinkedIn and ASmallWorld.New Media & Society. 2009;11 (1–2): 199-220
49. Pasek J,More E,Romer D.Realizing the social Internet? Online social networking meets offline civic engagement.Journal of Information Technology & Politics. 2009;6 (3–4): 197-215
50. Posner R.Smooth sailing.Legal Affairs. 2004;41:40-42
51. Price V,Cappella JN.Online deliberation and its influence: the electronic dialogue project in campaign 2000.IT & Society. 2002;1 (1): 303-329
52. Rozin P,Royzman EB.Negativity bias, negativity dominance, and contagion.Personality and Social Psychology Review. 2001;5 (4): 296-320
53. Sack WDigital Formations: IT and New Architectures in the Global Realm. Latham RSassen S, ed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 2005:242-282.
54. Shaw A,Benkler Y.A tale of two blogospheres: discursive practices on the left and right.American Behavioral Scientist. 2012;56 (4): 459-487
55. Simon HA.A behavioral model of rational choice.Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1955;69 (1): 99-118
56. Singer JB.Separate spaces discourse about the 2007 Scottish Elections on a National Newspaper Web Site.International Journal of Press/Politics. 2009;14 (4): 477-496
57. Stromer-Galley J.Measuring deliberation’s content: a coding scheme.Journal of Public Deliberation. 2007;3 (1): 12
58. Sunstein CRRepublic. com 2.0. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 2007:
59. Trice MThe Ethics of Emerging Media: Information, Social Norms, and New Media Technology. Drushel BGerman K, ed. New York: Continuum; 2011:235-250.
60. Vromen A.Building virtual spaces: young people, participation and the Internet.Australian Journal of Political Science. 2008;43 (1): 79-97
61. Wahl-Jorgensen K.Letters to the editor as a forum for public deliberation: modes of publicity and democratic debate.Critical Studies in Media Communication. 2001;18 (3): 303-320
62. Wilhelm AGDemocracy in the Digital Age: Challenges to Political Life in Cyberspace. New York: Routledge; 2000:
63. Wojcieszak ME,Mutz DC.Online groups and political discourse: do online discussion spaces facilitate exposure to political disagreement?.Journal of Communication. 2009;59 (1): 40-56
64. Wright S.Politics as usual? Revolution, normalization and a new agenda for online deliberation.New Media & Society. 2012;14 (2): 244-261
65. Wright S,Street J.Democracy, deliberation and design: the case of online discussion forums.New Media & Society. 2007;9 (5): 849-869