Who follows ehealth interventions as recommended? A study of participants' personal characteristics from the experimental arm of a randomized controlled trial

Journal of Medical Internet Research

Volumn 17, Issue 5, 2015, Pages

  Reinwand, Dominique A ^a,b   Schulz, Daniela N ^a   Crutzen, Rik ^a   Kremers, Stef Pj ^c   De Vries, Hein ^a  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b JACOBS UNIVERSITY BREMEN   (Germany)

^c MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Computer tailoring; eHealth; Health lifestyle; Intervention adherence; Intervention use; Multiple health behaviors; Personal characteristics; Socioeconomic status; Web based intervention

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; COHORT ANALYSIS; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DRINKING BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; FRUIT; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HUMAN; INTERNET; LIFESTYLE; MALE; MARRIAGE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTOR ACTIVITY; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUALITY OF LIFE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); RISK REDUCTION; SEX DIFFERENCE; SMOKING CESSATION; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; TELEMEDICINE; UNEMPLOYMENT; VEGETABLE;

ADULT; AGE FACTORS; ALCOHOL DRINKING; COHORT STUDIES; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; FEMALE; FRUIT; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HUMANS; INTERNET; LIFE STYLE; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MARITAL STATUS; MIDDLE AGED; MOTOR ACTIVITY; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUALITY OF LIFE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; RISK REDUCTION BEHAVIOR; SEX FACTORS; SMOKING CESSATION; TELEMEDICINE; UNEMPLOYMENT; VEGETABLES;

EID: 84930364373     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14388871     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2196/jmir.3932     Document Type: Article

References (103)

1. Noar SM, Haarington NG. In: Noar SM, Harrington NG, editors. eHealth Applications: Promising Strategies for Behavior Change (Routledge Communication Series). London: Routledge; Mar 10, 2010:-336.
2. Schulz DN, Kremers SP, Vandelanotte C, van Adrichem MJ, Schneider F, Candel MJ, et al. Effects of a web-based tailored multiple-lifestyle intervention for adults: a two-year randomized controlled trial comparing sequential and simultaneous delivery modes. J Med Internet Res 2014;16(1):e26 [FREE Full text] [10.2196/jmir.3094]
3. Brug J, Steenhuis I, van Assema P, de Vries H. The impact of a computer-tailored nutrition intervention. Prev Med 1996;25(3):236-242. [10.1006/pmed.1996.0052]
4. Kreuter MW, Farrell D, Olevitch L, Brennan L. Tailoring Health Messages: Customizing Communication with Computer Technology. Mahwah, NJ: Erlabum; 2000.
5. Krebs P, Prochaska JO, Rossi JS. A meta-Analysis of computer-tailored interventions for health behavior change. Prev Med 2010;51(3-4):214-221 [FREE Full text] [10.1016/j.ypmed.2010.06.004]
6. de Vries H, Brug J. Computer-tailored interventions motivating people to adopt health promoting behaviours: introduction to a new approach. Patient Educ Couns 1999 Feb;36(2):99-105.
7. Hawkins RP, Kreuter M, Resnicow K, Fishbein M, Dijkstra A. Understanding tailoring in communicating about health. Health Educ Res 2008 Jun;23(3):454-466 [FREE Full text] [10.1093/her/cyn004]
8. Noar SM, Benac CN, Harris MS. Does tailoring matter? Meta-Analytic review of tailored print health behavior change interventions. Psychol Bull 2007 Jul;133(4):673-693. [10.1037/0033-2909.133.4.673]
9. Lustria MLA, Noar SM, Cortese J, Van Stee SK, Glueckauf RL, Lee J. A meta-Analysis of web-delivered tailored health behavior change interventions. J Health Commun 2013;18(9):1039-1069. [10.1080/10810730.2013.768727]
10. Brug J, Oenema A, Campbell M. Past, present, and future of computer-tailored nutrition education. Am J Clin Nutr 2003 Apr;77(4 Suppl):1028S-1034S [FREE Full text]
11. Bennett GG, Glasgow RE. The delivery of public health interventions via the Internet: actualizing their potential. Annu Rev Public Health 2009;30:273-292. [10.1146/annurev.publhealth.031308.100235]
12. Griffiths F, Lindenmeyer A, Powell J, Lowe P, Thorogood M. Why are health care interventions delivered over the internet? A systematic review of the published literature. J Med Internet Res 2006;8(2):e10 [FREE Full text] [10.2196/jmir.8.2.e10]
13. Noar SM, Grant Harrington N, Van Stee SK, Shemanski Aldrich R. Tailored health communication to change lifestyle behaviors. American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine 2010 Nov 19;5(2):112-122. [10.1177/1559827610387255]
14. Krebs P, Prochaska JO, Rossi JS. A meta-Analysis of computer-tailored interventions for health behavior change. Prev Med 2010;51(3-4):214-221 [FREE Full text] [10.1016/j.ypmed.2010.06.004]
15. Kohl LFM, Crutzen R, de Vries NK. Online prevention aimed at lifestyle behaviors: a systematic review of reviews. J Med Internet Res 2013;15(7):e146 [FREE Full text] [10.2196/jmir.2665]
16. Ammann R, Vandelanotte C, de Vries H, Mummery WK. Can a website-delivered computer-tailored physical activity intervention be acceptable, usable, and effective for older people? Health Educ Behav 2013 Apr;40(2):160-170. [10.1177/1090198112461791]
17. van 't Riet J, Ruiter RAC, Werrij MQ, de Vries H. Investigating message-framing effects in the context of a tailored intervention promoting physical activity. Health Educ Res 2010 Apr;25(2):343-354 [FREE Full text] [10.1093/her/cyp061]
18. van Stralen MM, de Vries H, Mudde AN, Bolman C, Lechner L. The long-term efficacy of two computer-tailored physical activity interventions for older adults: main effects and mediators. Health Psychol 2011 Jul;30(4):442-452. [10.1037/a0023579]
19. Norman GJ, Zabinski MF, Adams MA, Rosenberg DE, Yaroch AL, Atienza AA. A review of eHealth interventions for physical activity and dietary behavior change. Am J Prev Med 2007 Oct;33(4):336-345 [FREE Full text] [10.1016/j.amepre.2007.05.007]
20. Broekhuizen K, Kroeze W, van Poppel MNM, Oenema A, Brug J. A systematic review of randomized controlled trials on the effectiveness of computer-tailored physical activity and dietary behavior promotion programs: an update. Ann Behav Med 2012 Oct;44(2):259-286 [FREE Full text] [10.1007/s12160-012-9384-3]
21. Brug J, Campbell M, van Assema P. The application and impact of computer-generated personalized nutrition education: a review of the literature. Patient Educ Couns 1999 Feb;36(2):145-156.
22. Hamel LM, Robbins LB. Computer- and web-based interventions to promote healthy eating among children and adolescents: a systematic review. J Adv Nurs 2013 Jan;69(1):16-30. [10.1111/j.1365-2648.2012.06086.x]
23. Broekhuizen K, Kroeze W, van Poppel MNM, Oenema A, Brug J. A systematic review of randomized controlled trials on the effectiveness of computer-tailored physical activity and dietary behavior promotion programs: an update. Ann Behav Med 2012 Oct;44(2):259-286 [FREE Full text] [10.1007/s12160-012-9384-3]
24. Neville LM, O'Hara B, Milat AJ. Computer-tailored dietary behaviour change interventions: a systematic review. Health Educ Res 2009 Aug;24(4):699-720 [FREE Full text] [10.1093/her/cyp006]
25. Elfeddali I, Bolman C, Candel MJ, Wiers RW, de Vries H. Preventing smoking relapse via Web-based computer-tailored feedback: a randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res 2012;14(4):e109 [FREE Full text] [10.2196/jmir.2057]
26. Smit ES, de Vries H, Hoving C. Effectiveness of a Web-based multiple tailored smoking cessation program: a randomized controlled trial among Dutch adult smokers. J Med Internet Res 2012;14(3):e82 [FREE Full text] [10.2196/jmir.1812]
27. McClure JB, Shortreed SM, Bogart A, Derry H, Riggs K, St John J, et al. The effect of program design on engagement with an internet-based smoking intervention: randomized factorial trial). J Med Internet Res 2013;15(3):e69 [FREE Full text] [10.2196/jmir.2508]
28. de Josselin de Jong S, Candel M, Segaar D, Cremers H, de Vries H. Efficacy of a Web-based computer-tailored smoking prevention intervention for Dutch adolescents: randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res 2014;16(3):e82 [FREE Full text] [10.2196/jmir.2469]
29. Riper H, Kramer J, Keuken M, Smit F, Schippers G, Cuijpers P. Predicting successful treatment outcome of web-based self-help for problem drinkers: secondary analysis from a randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res 2008;10(4):e46 [FREE Full text] [10.2196/jmir.1102]
30. Riper H, Spek V, Boon B, Conijn B, Kramer J, Martin-Abello K, et al. Effectiveness of E-self-help interventions for curbing adult problem drinking: a meta-Analysis. J Med Internet Res 2011;13(2):e42 [FREE Full text] [10.2196/jmir.1691]
31. Rooke S, Thorsteinsson E, Karpin A, Copeland J, Allsop D. Computer-delivered interventions for alcohol and tobacco use: a meta-Analysis. Addiction 2010 Aug;105(8):1381-1390. [10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.02975.x]
32. van Keulen HM, Mesters I, Ausems M, van Breukelen G, Campbell M, Resnicow K, et al. Tailored print communication and telephone motivational interviewing are equally successful in improving multiple lifestyle behaviors in a randomized controlled trial. Ann Behav Med 2011 Feb;41(1):104-118 [FREE Full text] [10.1007/s12160-010-9231-3]
33. Smeets T, Kremers SP, Brug J, de Vries H. Effects of tailored feedback on multiple health behaviors. Ann Behav Med 2007 Apr;33(2):117-123. [10.1080/08836610701307801]
34. Curioni CC, Loureno PM. Long-term weight loss after diet and exercise: a systematic review. Int J Obes (Lond) 2005 Oct;29(10):1168-1174. [10.1038/sj.ijo.0803015]
35. Vandelanotte C, Reeves MM, Brug J, De Bourdeaudhuij I. A randomized trial of sequential and simultaneous multiple behavior change interventions for physical activity and fat intake. Prev Med 2008 Mar;46(3):232-237. [10.1016/j.ypmed.2007.07.008]
36. van Keulen HM, Bosmans JE, van Tulder MW, Severens JL, de Vries H, Brug J, et al. Cost-effectiveness of tailored print communication, telephone motivational interviewing, and a combination of the two: results of an economic evaluation alongside the Vitalum randomized controlled trial. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2010;7:64 [FREE Full text] [10.1186/1479-5868-7-64]
37. Smit ES, Evers SM, de Vries H, Hoving C. Cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of Internet-based computer tailoring for smoking cessation. J Med Internet Res 2013;15(3):e57 [FREE Full text] [10.2196/jmir.2059]
38. Schulz DN, Smit ES, Stanczyk NE, Kremers SP, de Vries H, Evers SM. Economic evaluation of a web-based tailored lifestyle intervention for adults: findings regarding cost-effectiveness and cost-utility from a randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res 2014;16(3):e91 [FREE Full text] [10.2196/jmir.3159]
39. Mackenbach JP, Stirbu I, Roskam AR, Schaap MM, Menvielle G, Leinsalu M, European Union Working Group on Socioeconomic Inequalities in Health. Socioeconomic inequalities in health in 22 European countries. N Engl J Med 2008 Jun 5;358(23):2468-2481. [10.1056/NEJMsa0707519]
40. Lampert T, Kroll LE, von der Lippe E, Mters S, Stolzenberg H. [Socioeconomic status and health: results of the German Health Interview and Examination Survey for Adults (DEGS1)]. Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz 2013 May;56(5-6):814-821. [10.1007/s00103-013-1695-4]
41. Hulshof KF, Brussaard JH, Kruizinga AG, Telman J, Lwik MR. Socio-economic status, dietary intake and 10 y trends: the Dutch National Food Consumption Survey. Eur J Clin Nutr 2003 Jan;57(1):128-137. [10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601503]
42. Gidlow C, Johnston LH, Crone D, Ellis N, James D. A systematic review of the relationship between socio-economic position and physical activity. Health Education Journal 2006 Dec 01;65(4):338-367. [10.1177/0017896906069378]
43. Naimi TS, Brewer RD, Mokdad A, Denny C, Serdula MK, Marks JS. Binge drinking among US adults. JAMA 2003 Jan 1;289(1):70-75.
44. Hiscock R, Bauld L, Amos A, Fidler JA, Munaf M. Socioeconomic status and smoking: a review. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2012 Feb;1248:107-123. [10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06202.x]
45. Eysenbach G. The law of attrition. J Med Internet Res 2005;7(1):e11 [FREE Full text] [10.2196/jmir.7.1.e11]
46. Cuijpers P, van Straten A, Andersson G. Internet-Administered cognitive behavior therapy for health problems: a systematic review. J Behav Med 2008 Apr;31(2):169-177 [FREE Full text] [10.1007/s10865-007-9144-1]
47. Moroshko I, Brennan L, O'Brien P. Predictors of dropout in weight loss interventions: a systematic review of the literature. Obes Rev 2011 Nov;12(11):912-934. [10.1111/j.1467-789X.2011.00915.x]
48. Schulz DN, Schneider F, de Vries H, van Osch LA, van Nierop PW, Kremers SP. Program completion of a web-based tailored lifestyle intervention for adults: differences between a sequential and a simultaneous approach. J Med Internet Res 2012;14(2):e26 [FREE Full text] [10.2196/jmir.1968]
49. Wei K, Teo H, Chan HC, Tan BCY. Conceptualizing and testing a social cognitive model of the digital divide. Information Systems Research 2011 Mar;22(1):170-187. [10.1287/isre.1090.0273]
50. van Deursen A, van Dijk J. Internet skills and the digital divide. New Media & Society 2010 Dec 06;13(6):893-911. [10.1177/1461444810386774]
51. Brandtweiner R, Donat E, Kerschbaum J. How to become a sophisticated user: a two-dimensional approach to e-literacy. New Media & Society 2010 Jan 28;12(5):813-833. [10.1177/1461444809349577]
52. Warschauer M. Technology and Social Inclusion: Rethinking the Digital Divide. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2003.
53. Aerschot LV, Rodousakis N. The link between socio-economic background and Internet use: barriers faced by low socio-economic status groups and possible solutions. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research 2008 Dec;21(4):317-351. [10.1080/13511610802576927]
54. Akkermans MMP, Cleassen PJGM, Donselaar P, Heerschap NM, de Heij HN, Kuijpers AD. ICT, kennis en economie. Den Haag: Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek; 2012. URL: http://www.cbs.nl/NR/rdonlyres/130F8419-05C1-43AE-B5ED-4C373F34EC82/0/2012i78pub.pdf [accessed 2015-05-04] [WebCite Cache ID 6YHWDb4kN]
55. Statistics Netherlands. 2014 May 07. Dutch internet skills above EU average URL: http://www.cbs.nl/en-GB/menu/themas/vrije-tijd-cultuur/publicaties/artikelen/archief/2014/2014-4066-wm.htm [accessed 2015-05-04] [WebCite Cache ID 6YHWK2WfT]
56. Hargittai E. Digital na(t)ives? Variation in Internet skills and uses among members of the net generation. Sociological Inquiry 2010 Jan 10;80(1):92-113 [FREE Full text] [10.1111/j.1475-682X.2009.00317.x]
57. van Deursen AJ, van Dijk JA. The digital divide shifts to differences in usage. New Media & Society 2013 Jun 07;16(3):507-526 [FREE Full text] [10.1177/1461444813487959]
58. Dijk JA. The Deepening Divide: Inequality in the Information Society. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc; 2005.
59. Costa-Font J, Mossialos E, Rudisill C. When is the Internet a valued communication device for health information in Europe? Economics of Innovation and New Technology 2009 Jul;18(5):429-445. [10.1080/10438590802547159]
60. Howard P, Rainie L, Jones S. Days and nights on the Internet: the impact of a diffusing technology. American Behavioral Scientist 2001 Nov 01;45(3):383-404. [10.1177/0002764201045003003]
61. Hargittai E, Hinnant A. Digital inequality: differences in young adults' use of the Internet. Communication Research 2008 Aug 04;35(5):602-621. [10.1177/0093650208321782]
62. Wangberg SC, Andreassen HK, Prokosch H, Santana SM, Srensen T, Chronaki CE. Relations between Internet use, socio-economic status (SES), social support and subjective health. Health Promot Int 2008 Mar;23(1):70-77 [FREE Full text] [10.1093/heapro/dam039]
63. Zarcadoolas C, Blanco M, Boyer JF, Pleasant A. Unweaving the Web: an exploratory study of low-literate adults' navigation skills on the World Wide Web. J Health Commun 2002 Jul;7(4):309-324. [10.1080/10810730290088157]
64. Brodie M, Flournoy RE, Altman DE, Blendon RJ, Benson JM, Rosenbaum MD. Health information, the Internet, and the digital divide. Health Affairs 2000 Nov 01;19(6):255-265. [10.1377/hlthaff.19.6.255]
65. Močnik D, Širec K. The determinants of Internet use controlling for income level: Cross-country empirical evidence. Information Economics and Policy 2010 Jul;22(3):243-256. [10.1016/j.infoecopol.2010.01.002]
66. Martin SP, Robinson JP. The income digital divide: trends and predictions for levels of Internet use. Social Problems 2007 Feb;54(1):1-22. [10.1525/sp.2007.54.1.1]
67. Statistics Netherlands. 2013 Dec 13. Rapid increase internet usage among older people URL: http://www.cbs.nl/nl-NL/menu/themas/vrije-tijd-cultuur/publicaties/artikelen/archief/2013/2013-4005-wm.htm [accessed 2015-05-04] [WebCite Cache ID 6YHWU9bky]
68. Olphert W, Damodaran L. Older people and digital disengagement: a fourth digital divide? Gerontology 2013;59(6):564-570. [10.1159/000353630]
69. Jones S, Fox S. Generations online in 2009. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project; 2009 Jan 28. URL: http://www.pewinternet.org/2009/01/28/generations-online-in-2009/ [accessed 2015-05-04] [WebCite Cache ID 6YHWbiEZA]
70. Dutton WH, Blank G. The emergence of next generation internet users. Int Econ Econ Policy 2013 Aug 29;11(1-2):29-47. [10.1007/s10368-013-0245-8]
71. Cooper J. The digital divide: the special case of gender. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 2006 Oct;22(5):320-334 [FREE Full text] [10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00185.x]
72. Hargittai E, Shafer S. Differences in actual and perceived online skills: the role of gender. Social Science Q 2006 Jun;87(2):432-448. [10.1111/j.1540-6237.2006.00389.x]
73. Leung L, Lee PS. Multiple determinants of life quality: the roles of Internet activities, use of new media, social support, and leisure activities. Telematics and Informatics 2005 Aug;22(3):161-180. [10.1016/j.tele.2004.04.003]
74. Mitchell M, Lebow J, Uribe R, Grathouse H, Shoger W. Internet use, happiness, social support and introversion: A more fine grained analysis of person variables and internet activity. Computers in Human Behavior 2011 Sep;27(5):1857-1861. [10.1016/j.chb.2011.04.008]
75. Nie NH, Hillygus DS, Erbring L. Internet Uuse, interpersonal relations, and sociability: a time diary study. In: The Internet in Everyday. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers Ltd; Dec 05, 2002.
76. Elder JP, Ayala GX, Harris S. Theories and intervention approaches to health-behavior change in primary care. Am J Prev Med 1999 Nov;17(4):275-284.
77. Vlismas K, Stavrinos V, Panagiotakos DB. Socio-economic status, dietary habits and health-related outcomes in various parts of the world: a review. Cent Eur J Public Health 2009 Jun;17(2):55-63.
78. Cowell AJ. The relationship between education and health behavior: some empirical evidence. Health Econ 2006 Feb;15(2):125-146. [10.1002/hec.1019]
79. Margolis R. Educational differences in healthy behavior changes and adherence among middle-Aged Americans. J Health Soc Behav 2013;54(3):353-368 [FREE Full text] [10.1177/0022146513489312]
80. Schulz DN, Kremers SP, van Osch LA, Schneider F, van Adrichem MJ, de Vries H. Testing a Dutch web-based tailored lifestyle programme among adults: a study protocol. BMC Public Health 2011;11:108 [FREE Full text] [10.1186/1471-2458-11-108]
81. de Vries H, Mesters I, van de Steeg H, Honing C. The general public's information needs and perceptions regarding hereditary cancer: an application of the Integrated Change Model. Patient Educ Couns 2005 Feb;56(2):154-165. [10.1016/j.pec.2004.01.002]
82. Verweij A. RIVM. 2008 Sep 22. Sociaaleconomische status Beschrijving opleidingscategorien Onderwijsdeelname: Indeling opleidingsniveau URL: http://www.nationaalkompas.nl/bevolking/scholing-en-opleiding/indeling-opleidingsniveau/[accessed 2015-05-04] [WebCite Cache ID 6YHX5fvpI]
83. Ware J, Kosinski M, Keller S. A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care 1996 Mar;34(3):220-233
84. Gandek B, Ware JE, Aaronson NK, Apolone G, Bjorner JB, Brazier JE, et al. Cross-validation of item selection and scoring for the SF-12 Health Survey in nine countries: results from the IQOLA Project. International Quality of Life Assessment. J Clin Epidemiol 1998 Nov;51(11):1171-1178
85. Ware J, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care 1996 Mar;34(3):220-233
86. Wendel-Vos GC, Schuit AJ, Saris WJ, Kromhout D. Reproducibility and relative validity of the short questionnaire to assess health-enhancing physical activity. J Clin Epidemiol 2003 Dec;56(12):1163-1169.
87. RIVM. Lokale en Nationale Monitor Volksgezondheid. 2005. Wat is de lokale en nationale Monitor gezondheid? URL: https://www.monitorgezondheid.nl/LNMV.xml [accessed 2015-05-04] [WebCite Cache ID 6YHXMguZ4]
88. Lemmens P, Tan ES, Knibbe RA. Measuring quantity and frequency of drinking in a general population survey: a comparison of five indices. J Stud Alcohol 1992 Sep;53(5):476-486
89. Mudde A, Willemsen M, Kremers S, de Vries H. The Hague: STIVORO. Den Haag: STIVORO; 2006. Measuring instruments for research regarding smoking and smoking cessation Meetinstrumenten voor onderzoek naar roken en stoppen met roken URL: http://stivoro.nl/wp-content/uploads/2012/docs/rapporten/diversen/meetinstrumenten-3.pdf [accessed 2015-05-04] [WebCite Cache ID 6YHXTfW20]
90. Cotten SR, Gupta SS. Characteristics of online and offline health information seekers and factors that discriminate between them. Soc Sci Med 2004 Nov;59(9):1795-1806. [10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.02.020]
91. Fox S, Fallows D. Internet Health Resources. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project; 2003 Jul 16. URL: http://www.pewinternet.org/2003/07/16/internet-health-resources/ [accessed 2015-05-04] [WebCite Cache ID 6YHXYvxSq]
92. Cline RJ, Haynes KM. Consumer health information seeking on the Internet: the state of the art. Health Educ Res 2001 Dec;16(6):671-692 [FREE Full text]
93. Bell AV. I think about Oprah: social class differences in sources of health information. Qual Health Res 2014 Apr;24(4):506-516. [10.1177/1049732314524637]
94. Umberson D, Montez JK. Social relationships and health: a flashpoint for health policy. J Health Soc Behav 2010;51 Suppl:S54-S66 [FREE Full text] [10.1177/0022146510383501]
95. Jensen JD, King AJ, Davis LA, Guntzviller LM. Utilization of internet technology by low-income adults: the role of health literacy, health numeracy, and computer assistance. J Aging Health 2010 Sep;22(6):804-826. [10.1177/0898264310366161]
96. Bundorf MK, Baker L, Singer S, Wagner T. Consumer demand for health information on the Internet: National Bureau of Economic Research.: National Bureau of Economic Research; 2004 Mar. URL: http://www.nber.org/papers/w10386.pdf [accessed 2015-05-04] [WebCite Cache ID 6YHXm4ly7]
97. Brashers DE, Goldsmith DJ, Hsieh E. Information seeking and avoiding in health contexts. Human Comm Res 2002 Apr;28(2):258-271. [10.1111/j.1468-2958.2002.tb00807.x]
98. Baumeister RF, Heatherton TF, Tice D. Losing control: how and why people fail at self-regulation. San Diego: Academic Press; 1994:-307.
99. Baumeister RF, Muraven M, Tice DM. Ego depletion: a resource model of volition, self-regulation, and controlled processing. Social Cognition 2000 Jun;18(2):130-150. [10.1521/soco.2000.18.2.130]
100. Crutzen R, de Nooijer J, Brouwer W, Oenema A, Brug J, de Vries NK. Strategies to facilitate exposure to internet-delivered health behavior change interventions aimed at adolescents or young adults: a systematic review. Health Educ Behav 2011 Feb;38(1):49-62. [10.1177/1090198110372878]
101. Brouwer W, Kroeze W, Crutzen R, de Nooijer J, de Vries NK, Brug J, et al. Which intervention characteristics are related to more exposure to internet-delivered healthy lifestyle promotion interventions? A systematic review. J Med Internet Res 2011;13(1):e2 [FREE Full text] [10.2196/jmir.1639]
102. Csikszentmihalyi M. Finding Flow: The Psychology of Engagement with Everyday Life. New York: Basic Books; 1997.
103. Webster J, Trevino LK, Ryan L. The dimensionality and correlates of flow in human-computer interactions. Computers in Human Behavior 1993 Dec;9(4):411-426. [10.1016/0747-5632(93)90032-N]