Off-shell Higgs coupling measurements in BSM scenarios

Journal of High Energy Physics

Volumn 2015, Issue 5, 2015, Pages

  Englert, Christoph ^a   Soreq, Yotam ^b   Spannowsky, Michael ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

^b WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE   (Israel)

^c DURHAM UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Beyond Standard Model; Higgs Physics

Indexed keywords

EID: 84930193992     PISSN: 11266708     EISSN: 10298479     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP05(2015)145     Document Type: Article

References (118)

1. ATLAS collaboration, Observation of a new particle in the search for the standard model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC, Phys. Lett.B 716 (2012) 1 [arXiv:1207.7214] [INSPIRE].
2. CMS collaboration, Observation of a new boson at a mass of 125 GeV with the CMS experiment at the LHC, Phys. Lett.B 716 (2012) 30 [arXiv:1207.7235] [INSPIRE].
3. A. Azatov, R. Contino and J. Galloway, Model-independent bounds on a light Higgs, JHEP04 (2012) 127 [arXiv:1202.3415] [INSPIRE].
4. P.P. Giardino, K. Kannike, M. Raidal and A. Strumia, Is the resonance at 125 GeV the Higgs boson?, Phys. Lett.B 718 (2012) 469 [arXiv:1207.1347] [INSPIRE].
5. J. Ellis and T. You, Global analysis of the Higgs candidate with mass ∼ 125 GeV, JHEP09 (2012) 123 [arXiv:1207.1693] [INSPIRE].
6. J.R. Espinosa, C. Grojean, M. Muhlleitner and M. Trott, First glimpses at Higgs’ face, JHEP12 (2012) 045 [arXiv:1207.1717] [INSPIRE].
7. D. Carmi, A. Falkowski, E. Kuflik, T. Volansky and J. Zupan, Higgs after the discovery: a status report, JHEP10 (2012) 196 [arXiv:1207.1718] [INSPIRE].
8. T. Plehn and M. Rauch, Higgs couplings after the discovery, Europhys. Lett.100 (2012) 11002 [arXiv:1207.6108] [INSPIRE].
9. T. Corbett, O.J.P. Eboli, J. Gonzalez-Fraile and M.C. Gonzalez-Garcia, Robust determination of the Higgs couplings: power to the data, Phys. Rev.D 87 (2013) 015022 [arXiv:1211.4580] [INSPIRE].
10. E. Massó and V. Sanz, Limits on anomalous couplings of the Higgs boson to electroweak gauge bosons from LEP and the LHC, Phys. Rev.D 87 (2013) 033001 [arXiv:1211.1320] [INSPIRE].
11. A. Djouadi and G. Moreau, The couplings of the Higgs boson and its CP properties from fits of the signal strengths and their ratios at the 7 + 8 TeV LHC, Eur. Phys. J.C 73 (2013) 2512 [arXiv:1303.6591] [INSPIRE].
12. P. Bechtle et al., Probing the standard model with Higgs signal rates from the Tevatron, the LHC and a future ILC, JHEP11 (2014) 039 [arXiv:1403.1582] [INSPIRE].
13. CMS Collaboration, CMS Collaboration, CMS-PAS-HIG-14-009 (CMS Collaboration).
14. ATLAS collaboration, Updated coupling measurements of the Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector using up to 25 fb−1of proton-proton collision data, ATLAS-CONF-2014-009 (2014).
15. ATLAS collaboration, Updated coupling measurements of the Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector using up to 25 fb−1of proton-proton collision data, ATLAS-COM-CONF-2014-013 (2014).
16. K. Hagiwara, R.D. Peccei, D. Zeppenfeld and K. Hikasa, Probing the weak boson sector in e+e− → W+W−, Nucl. Phys.B 282 (1987) 253 [INSPIRE].
17. W. Buchmüller and D. Wyler, Effective lagrangian analysis of new interactions and flavor conservation, Nucl. Phys.B 268 (1986) 621 [INSPIRE].
18. B. Grzadkowski, M. Iskrzynski, M. Misiak and J. Rosiek, Dimension-six terms in the standard model lagrangian, JHEP10 (2010) 085 [arXiv:1008.4884] [INSPIRE].
19. G.F. Giudice, C. Grojean, A. Pomarol and R. Rattazzi, The strongly-interacting light Higgs, JHEP06 (2007) 045 [hep-ph/0703164] [INSPIRE].
20. R. Contino, M. Ghezzi, C. Grojean, M. Muhlleitner and M. Spira, Effective lagrangian for a light Higgs-like scalar, JHEP07 (2013) 035 [arXiv:1303.3876] [INSPIRE].
21. A. Pomarol and F. Riva, Towards the ultimate SM fit to close in on Higgs physics, JHEP01 (2014) 151 [arXiv:1308.2803] [INSPIRE].
22. T. Corbett, O.J.P. Eboli, J. Gonzalez-Fraile and M.C. Gonzalez-Garcia, Constraining anomalous Higgs interactions, Phys. Rev.D 86 (2012) 075013 [arXiv:1207.1344] [INSPIRE].
23. B. Dumont, S. Fichet and G. von Gersdorff, A bayesian view of the Higgs sector with higher dimensional operators, JHEP07 (2013) 065 [arXiv:1304.3369] [INSPIRE].
24. F. Caola and K. Melnikov, Constraining the Higgs boson width with ZZ production at the LHC, Phys. Rev.D 88 (2013) 054024 [arXiv:1307.4935] [INSPIRE].
25. LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group collaboration, S. Heinemeyer et al., Handbook of LHC Higgs cross sections: 3. Higgs properties, arXiv:1307.1347 [INSPIRE].
26. N. Kauer and G. Passarino, Inadequacy of zero-width approximation for a light Higgs boson signal, JHEP08 (2012) 116 [arXiv:1206.4803] [INSPIRE].
27. N. Kauer, Interference effects forH→WW/ZZ→ℓν¯ℓℓ¯νℓsearches in gluon fusion at the LHC, JHEP12 (2013) 082 [arXiv:1310.7011] [INSPIRE].
28. N. Kauer, Inadequacy of zero-width approximation for a light Higgs boson signal, Mod. Phys. Lett.A 28 (2013) 1330015 [arXiv:1305.2092] [INSPIRE].
29. J.M. Campbell, R.K. Ellis and C. Williams, Bounding the Higgs width at the LHC using full analytic results for gg → e−e+μ−μ+, JHEP04 (2014) 060 [arXiv:1311.3589] [INSPIRE].
30. J.M. Campbell, R.K. Ellis and C. Williams, Bounding the Higgs width at the LHC: complementary results from H → WW, Phys. Rev.D 89 (2014) 053011 [arXiv:1312.1628] [INSPIRE].
31. J.M. Campbell, R.K. Ellis, E. Furlan and R. Röntsch, Interference effects for Higgs boson mediated Z-pair plus jet production, Phys. Rev.D 90 (2014) 093008 [arXiv:1409.1897] [INSPIRE].
32. I. Moult and I.W. Stewart, Jet vetoes interfering with H → WW, JHEP09 (2014) 129 [arXiv:1405.5534] [INSPIRE].
33. L.J. Dixon and Y. Li, Bounding the Higgs boson width through interferometry, Phys. Rev. Lett.111 (2013) 111802 [arXiv:1305.3854] [INSPIRE].
34. L.J. Dixon and M.S. Siu, Resonance continuum interference in the diphoton Higgs signal at the LHC, Phys. Rev. Lett.90 (2003) 252001 [hep-ph/0302233] [INSPIRE].
35. S.P. Martin, Interference of Higgs diphoton signal and background in production with a jet at the LHC, Phys. Rev.D 88 (2013) 013004 [arXiv:1303.3342] [INSPIRE].
36. S.P. Martin, Shift in the LHC Higgs diphoton mass peak from interference with background, Phys. Rev.D 86 (2012) 073016 [arXiv:1208.1533] [INSPIRE].
37. C. Englert and M. Spannowsky, Limitations and opportunities of off-shell coupling measurements, Phys. Rev.D 90 (2014) 053003 [arXiv:1405.0285] [INSPIRE].
38. M.S. Chanowitz, M.A. Furman and I. Hinchliffe, Weak interactions of ultraheavy fermions, Phys. Lett.B 78 (1978) 285 [INSPIRE].
39. M.S. Chanowitz, M.A. Furman and I. Hinchliffe, Weak interactions of ultraheavy fermions. 2, Nucl. Phys.B 153 (1979) 402 [INSPIRE].
40. A. Biekötter, A. Knochel, M. Krämer, D. Liu and F. Riva, Vices and virtues of Higgs effective field theories at large energy, Phys. Rev.D 91 (2015) 055029 [arXiv:1406.7320] [INSPIRE].
41. CMS collaboration, Constraints on the Higgs boson width from off-shell production and decay to Z-boson pairs, Phys. Lett.B 736 (2014) 64 [arXiv:1405.3455] [INSPIRE].
42. ATLAS collaboration, Determination of the off-shell Higgs boson signal strength in the high-mass ZZ final state with the ATLAS detector, ATLAS-CONF-2014-042 (2014).
43. B. Coleppa, T. Mandal and S. Mitra, Coupling extraction from off-shell cross-sections, Phys. Rev.D 90 (2014) 055019 [arXiv:1401.4039] [INSPIRE].
44. J.S. Gainer, J. Lykken, K.T. Matchev, S. Mrenna and M. Park, Beyond geolocating: constraining higher dimensional operators in H → 4ℓ with off-shell production and more, Phys. Rev.D 91 (2015) 035011 [arXiv:1403.4951] [INSPIRE].
45. B. Grinstein, C.W. Murphy and D. Pirtskhalava, Searching for new physics in the three-body decays of the Higgs-like particle, JHEP10 (2013) 077 [arXiv:1305.6938] [INSPIRE].
46. Y. Chen, R. Harnik and R. Vega-Morales, Probing the Higgs couplings to photons in h → 4ℓ at the LHC, Phys. Rev. Lett.113 (2014) 191801 [arXiv:1404.1336] [INSPIRE].
47. M. Ghezzi, G. Passarino and S. Uccirati, Bounding the Higgs width using effective field theory, PoS(LL2014)072 [arXiv:1405.1925] [INSPIRE].
48. I. Brivio et al., Higgs ultraviolet softening, JHEP12 (2014) 004 [arXiv:1405.5412] [INSPIRE].
49. G. Cacciapaglia, A. Deandrea, G. Drieu La Rochelle and J.-B. Flament, Higgs couplings: disentangling New Physics with off-shell measurements, Phys. Rev. Lett.113 (2014) 201802 [arXiv:1406.1757] [INSPIRE].
50. A. Azatov, C. Grojean, A. Paul and E. Salvioni, Taming the off-shell Higgs boson, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.147 (2015) 410 [arXiv:1406.6338] [INSPIRE].
51. W.-Y. Keung, I. Low and J. Shu, Landau-Yang theorem and decays of a Z′boson into two Z bosons, Phys. Rev. Lett.101 (2008) 091802 [arXiv:0806.2864] [INSPIRE].
52. Y. Gao et al., Spin determination of single-produced resonances at hadron colliders, Phys. Rev.D 81 (2010) 075022 [arXiv:1001.3396] [INSPIRE].
53. C. Englert, C. Hackstein and M. Spannowsky, Measuring spin and CP from semi-hadronic ZZ decays using jet substructure, Phys. Rev.D 82 (2010) 114024 [arXiv:1010.0676] [INSPIRE].
54. S. Bolognesi et al., On the spin and parity of a single-produced resonance at the LHC, Phys. Rev.D 86 (2012) 095031 [arXiv:1208.4018] [INSPIRE].
55. P. Artoisenet et al., A framework for Higgs characterisation, JHEP11 (2013) 043 [arXiv:1306.6464] [INSPIRE].
56. H.E. Logan, Hiding a Higgs width enhancement from off-shell gg(→ h*) → ZZ measurements, arXiv:1412.7577 [INSPIRE].
57. E. Maina, Interference effects in heavy Higgs production via gluon fusion in the singlet extension of the standard model, arXiv:1501.02139 [INSPIRE].
58. N. Kauer and C. O’Brien, Heavy Higgs signal-background interference in gg → VV in the standard model plus real singlet, arXiv:1502.04113 [INSPIRE].
59. C. Englert, I. Low and M. Spannowsky, On-shell interference effects in Higgs boson final states, Phys. Rev.D 91 (2015) 074029 [arXiv:1502.04678] [INSPIRE].
60. K. Arnold et al., VBFNLO: a parton level Monte Carlo for processes with electroweak bosons, Comput. Phys. Commun.180 (2009) 1661 [arXiv:0811.4559] [INSPIRE].
61. J. Baglio et al., Release Note — VBFNLO 2.7.0, arXiv:1404.3940 [INSPIRE].
62. T. Hahn and M. Pérez-Victoria, Automatized one loop calculations in four-dimensions and D-dimensions, Comput. Phys. Commun.118 (1999) 153 [hep-ph/9807565] [INSPIRE].
63. T. Hahn, Generating Feynman diagrams and amplitudes with FeynArts 3, Comput. Phys. Commun.140 (2001) 418 [hep-ph/0012260] [INSPIRE].
64. T. Hahn, Feynman Diagram Calculations with FeynArts, FormCalc and LoopTools, PoS(ACAT2010)078 [arXiv:1006.2231] [INSPIRE].
65. A. Alloul, B. Fuks and V. Sanz, Phenomenology of the Higgs Effective Lagrangian via FEYNRULES, JHEP04 (2014) 110 [arXiv:1310.5150] [INSPIRE].
66. A. Alloul, N.D. Christensen, C. Degrande, C. Duhr and B. Fuks, FeynRules 2.0 — A complete toolbox for tree-level phenomenology, Comput. Phys. Commun.185 (2014) 2250 [arXiv:1310.1921] [INSPIRE].
67. A. Djouadi, The anatomy of electro-weak symmetry breaking. II. The Higgs bosons in the minimal supersymmetric model, Phys. Rept.459 (2008) 1 [hep-ph/0503173] [INSPIRE].
68. M. Muhlleitner and M. Spira, Higgs boson production via gluon fusion: squark loops at NLO QCD, Nucl. Phys.B 790 (2008) 1 [hep-ph/0612254] [INSPIRE].
69. ATLAS collaboration, Search for direct pair production of the top squark in all-hadronic final states in proton-proton collisions ats=8TeV with the ATLAS detector, JHEP09 (2014) 015 [arXiv:1406.1122] [INSPIRE].
70. ATLAS collaboration, Search for top squark pair production in final states with one isolated lepton, jets and missing transverse momentum ins=8TeV pp collisions with the ATLAS detector, JHEP11 (2014) 118 [arXiv:1407.0583] [INSPIRE].
71. ATLAS collaboration, Search for pair-produced third-generation squarks decaying via charm quarks or in compressed supersymmetric scenarios in pp collisions ats=8TeV with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev.D 90 (2014) 052008 [arXiv:1407.0608] [INSPIRE].
72. CMS collaboration, Search for top-squark pair production in the single-lepton final state in pp collisions ats=8TeV, Eur. Phys. J.C 73 (2013) 2677 [arXiv:1308.1586] [INSPIRE].
73. CMS collaboration, Search for top squarks decaying to a charm quark and a neutralino in events with a jet and missing transverse momentum, CMS-PAS-SUS-13-009 (2013).
74. M. Reece, Vacuum instabilities with a wrong-sign Higgs-gluon-gluon amplitude, New J. Phys.15 (2013) 043003 [arXiv:1208.1765] [INSPIRE].
75. M. Maniatis, The next-to-minimal supersymmetric extension of the standard model reviewed, Int. J. Mod. Phys.A 25 (2010) 3505 [arXiv:0906.0777] [INSPIRE].
76. U. Ellwanger, C. Hugonie and A.M. Teixeira, The next-to-minimal supersymmetric standard model, Phys. Rept.496 (2010) 1 [arXiv:0910.1785] [INSPIRE].
77. M.E. Peskin and T. Takeuchi, A new constraint on a strongly interacting Higgs sector, Phys. Rev. Lett.65 (1990) 964 [INSPIRE].
78. M.E. Peskin and T. Takeuchi, Estimation of oblique electroweak corrections, Phys. Rev.D 46 (1992) 381 [INSPIRE].
79. E.E. Jenkins, A.V. Manohar and M. Trott, Renormalization group evolution of the standard model dimension six operators I: formalism and λ dependence, JHEP10 (2013) 087 [arXiv:1308.2627] [INSPIRE].
80. E.E. Jenkins, A.V. Manohar and M. Trott, Renormalization group evolution of the standard model dimension six operators II: Yukawa dependence, JHEP01 (2014) 035 [arXiv:1310.4838] [INSPIRE].
81. R. Alonso, E.E. Jenkins, A.V. Manohar and M. Trott, Renormalization group evolution of the standard model dimension six operators III: gauge coupling dependence and phenomenology, JHEP04 (2014) 159 [arXiv:1312.2014] [INSPIRE].
82. J. Elias-Miro, J.R. Espinosa, E. Masso and A. Pomarol, Higgs windows to new physics through D = 6 operators: constraints and one-loop anomalous dimensions, JHEP11 (2013) 066 [arXiv:1308.1879] [INSPIRE].
83. C. Grojean, E.E. Jenkins, A.V. Manohar and M. Trott, Renormalization group scaling of Higgs operators and Γ(h → γγ), JHEP04 (2013) 016 [arXiv:1301.2588] [INSPIRE].
84. C. Englert and M. Spannowsky, Effective theories and measurements at colliders, Phys. Lett.B 740 (2015) 8 [arXiv:1408.5147] [INSPIRE].
85. J.M. Butterworth, A.R. Davison, M. Rubin and G.P. Salam, Jet substructure as a new Higgs search channel at the LHC, Phys. Rev. Lett.100 (2008) 242001 [arXiv:0802.2470] [INSPIRE].
86. C. Englert, M. McCullough and M. Spannowsky, Gluon-initiated associated production boosts Higgs physics, Phys. Rev.D 89 (2014) 013013 [arXiv:1310.4828] [INSPIRE].
87. R.V. Harlander and T. Neumann, Probing the nature of the Higgs-gluon coupling, Phys. Rev.D 88 (2013) 074015 [arXiv:1308.2225] [INSPIRE].
88. A. Banfi, A. Martin and V. Sanz, Probing top-partners in Higgs+jets, JHEP08 (2014) 053 [arXiv:1308.4771] [INSPIRE].
89. C. Grojean, E. Salvioni, M. Schlaffer and A. Weiler, Very boosted Higgs in gluon fusion, JHEP05 (2014) 022 [arXiv:1312.3317] [INSPIRE].
90. M. Schlaffer, M. Spannowsky, M. Takeuchi, A. Weiler and C. Wymant, Boosted Higgs shapes, Eur. Phys. J.C 74 (2014) 3120 [arXiv:1405.4295] [INSPIRE].
91. M. Buschmann, C. Englert, D. Goncalves, T. Plehn and M. Spannowsky, Resolving the Higgs-gluon coupling with jets, Phys. Rev.D 90 (2014) 013010 [arXiv:1405.7651] [INSPIRE].
92. M. Buschmann et al., Mass effects in the Higgs-gluon coupling: boosted vs. off-shell production, JHEP02 (2015) 038 [arXiv:1410.5806] [INSPIRE].
93. T. Binoth and J.J. van der Bij, Influence of strongly coupled, hidden scalars on Higgs signals, Z. Phys.C 75 (1997) 17 [hep-ph/9608245] [INSPIRE].
94. R. Schabinger and J.D. Wells, A minimal spontaneously broken hidden sector and its impact on Higgs boson physics at the large hadron collider, Phys. Rev.D 72 (2005) 093007 [hep-ph/0509209] [INSPIRE].
95. B. Patt and F. Wilczek, Higgs-field portal into hidden sectors, hep-ph/0605188 [INSPIRE].
96. M. Bowen, Y. Cui and J.D. Wells, Narrow trans-TeV Higgs bosons and H → hh decays: two LHC search paths for a hidden sector Higgs boson, JHEP03 (2007) 036 [hep-ph/0701035] [INSPIRE].
97. C. Englert, J. Jaeckel, E. Re and M. Spannowsky, Evasive Higgs maneuvers at the LHC, Phys. Rev.D 85 (2012) 035008 [arXiv:1111.1719] [INSPIRE].
98. M.J. Dolan, C. Englert and M. Spannowsky, New physics in LHC Higgs boson pair production, Phys. Rev.D 87 (2013) 055002 [arXiv:1210.8166] [INSPIRE].
99. C. Englert, J. Jaeckel, V.V. Khoze and M. Spannowsky, Emergence of the electroweak scale through the Higgs portal, JHEP04 (2013) 060 [arXiv:1301.4224] [INSPIRE].
100. M. Heikinheimo, A. Racioppi, M. Raidal, C. Spethmann and K. Tuominen, Physical naturalness and dynamical breaking of classical scale invariance, Mod. Phys. Lett.A 29 (2014) 1450077 [arXiv:1304.7006] [INSPIRE].
101. S.Y. Choi, C. Englert and P.M. Zerwas, Multiple Higgs-portal and gauge-kinetic mixings, Eur. Phys. J.C 73 (2013) 2643 [arXiv:1308.5784] [INSPIRE].
102. V.V. Khoze, C. McCabe and G. Ro, Higgs vacuum stability from the dark matter portal, JHEP08 (2014) 026 [arXiv:1403.4953] [INSPIRE].
103. C. Englert, T. Plehn, D. Zerwas and P.M. Zerwas, Exploring the Higgs portal, Phys. Lett.B 703 (2011) 298 [arXiv:1106.3097] [INSPIRE].
104. E. Weihs and J. Zurita, Dark Higgs models at the 7 TeV LHC, JHEP02 (2012) 041 [arXiv:1110.5909] [INSPIRE].
105. D. Bertolini and M. McCullough, The social Higgs, JHEP12 (2012) 118 [arXiv:1207.4209] [INSPIRE].
106. G.M. Pruna and T. Robens, Higgs singlet extension parameter space in the light of the LHC discovery, Phys. Rev.D 88 (2013) 115012 [arXiv:1303.1150] [INSPIRE].
107. R. Foot, A. Kobakhidze and R.R. Volkas, ATLAS and CMS hints for a mirror Higgs boson, Phys. Rev.D 84 (2011) 095032 [arXiv:1109.0919] [INSPIRE].
108. CMS collaboration, Search for a standard-model-like Higgs boson with a mass in the range 145 to 1000 GeV at the LHC, Eur. Phys. J.C 73 (2013) 2469 [arXiv:1304.0213] [INSPIRE].
109. A. Falkowski, C. Gross and O. Lebedev, A second Higgs from the Higgs portal, JHEP05 (2015) 057 [arXiv:1502.01361] [INSPIRE].
110. M.H. Seymour, The Higgs boson line shape and perturbative unitarity, Phys. Lett.B 354 (1995) 409 [hep-ph/9505211] [INSPIRE].
111. S. Goria, G. Passarino and D. Rosco, The Higgs boson lineshape, Nucl. Phys.B 864 (2012) 530 [arXiv:1112.5517] [INSPIRE].
112. Y. Bai and W.-Y. Keung, Dips at colliders, arXiv:1407.6355 [INSPIRE].
113. S. Willenbrock and G. Valencia, On the definition of the Z boson mass, Phys. Lett.B 259 (1991) 373 [INSPIRE].
114. R.G. Stuart, Gauge invariance, analyticity and physical observables at the Z0 resonance, Phys. Lett.B 262 (1991) 113 [INSPIRE].
115. U. Baur and D. Zeppenfeld, Finite width effects and gauge invariance in radiative W productions and decay, Phys. Rev. Lett.75 (1995) 1002 [hep-ph/9503344] [INSPIRE].
116. Gfitter Group collaboration, M. Baak et al., The global electroweak fit at NNLO and prospects for the LHC and ILC, Eur. Phys. J.C 74 (2014) 3046 [arXiv:1407.3792] [INSPIRE].
117. J.F. Gunion and H.E. Haber, The CP conserving two Higgs doublet model: the approach to the decoupling limit, Phys. Rev.D 67 (2003) 075019 [hep-ph/0207010] [INSPIRE].
118. Y. Grossman, Phenomenology of models with more than two Higgs doublets, Nucl. Phys.B 426 (1994) 355 [hep-ph/9401311] [INSPIRE].