Metabolomic analysis of perfusate during hypothermic machine perfusion of human cadaveric kidneys

Transplantation

Volumn 99, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 754-759

  Guy, Alison J ^a   Nath, Jay ^a   Cobbold, Mark ^a   Ludwig, Christian ^a   Tennant, Daniel A ^a   Inston, Nicholas G ^a   Ready, Andrew R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GLUCONIC ACID; INOSINE; LEUCINE; PRESERVATION SOLUTION;

ARTICLE; CADAVER KIDNEY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DELAYED GRAFT FUNCTION; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; HYPOTHERMIC MACHINE PERFUSION; KIDNEY METABOLISM; KIDNEY PERFUSION; KIDNEY PRESERVATION; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; MEDICAL DEVICE; METABOLOMICS; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PERFUSATE; PERFUSION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTON NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; ADVERSE EFFECTS; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; CADAVER; COLD ISCHEMIA; DEVICES; DONOR; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; INDUCED HYPOTHERMIA; KIDNEY; METABOLISM; ORGAN PRESERVATION; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PROCEDURES; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; RISK FACTOR; SURGERY; TIME; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VASCULARIZATION;

AREA UNDER CURVE; CADAVER; COLD ISCHEMIA; DELAYED GRAFT FUNCTION; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HUMANS; HYPOTHERMIA, INDUCED; KIDNEY; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; METABOLOMICS; ORGAN PRESERVATION; ORGAN PRESERVATION SOLUTIONS; PERFUSION; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; ROC CURVE; TIME FACTORS; TISSUE DONORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84930181348     PISSN: 00411337     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/TP.0000000000000398     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Henry SD, Guarrera JV. Protective effects of hypothermic ex vivo perfusion on ischemia/reperfusion injury and transplant outcomes. Transplant Rev (Orlando). 2012;26:163.
2. Moers C, Smits JM, Maathuis M-HJ, et al. Machine perfusion or cold storage in deceased-donor kidney transplantation. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:7.
3. Machine Preservation Trial Group. Machine Perfusion or cold storage in deceased-donor transplantation. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:770.
4. Lodhi SA, Lamb KE, Uddin I, et al. Pulsatile pump decreases risk of delayed graft function in kidneys donated after cardiac death. Am J Transplant. 2012;12:2774.
5. Cannon RM, Brock GN, Garrison RN, et al. To pump or not to pump: a comparison of machine perfusion vs cold storage for deceased donor kidney transplantation. J AmColl Surg. 2013;216:625; discussion 633-4.
6. Audard V, Matignon M, Dahan K, et al. Renal transplantation from extended criteria cadaveric donors: problems and perspectives overview. Transpl Int. 2008;21:11.
7. Metzger RA, Delmonico FL, Feng S, et al. Expanded criteria donors for kidney transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2003;3(Suppl 4):114.
8. Ojo AO, Hanson JA, Meier-Kriesche H, et al. Survival in recipients of marginal cadaveric donor kidneys compared with other recipients and wait-listed transplant candidates. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2001;12:589.
9. Port FK, Bragg-Gresham JL, Metzger RA, et al. Donor characteristics associated with reduced graft survival: an approach to expanding the pool of kidney donors. Transplantation. 2002;74:1281.
10. Fuller BJ, Lee CY. Hypothermic perfusion preservation: the future of organ preservation revisited? Cryobiology. 2007;54:129.
11. Serkova N, Fuller TF, Klawitter J, et al. H-NMR-basedmetabolic signatures of mild and severe ischemia/reperfusion injury in rat kidney transplants. Kidney Int. 2005;67:1142.
12. Hauet T, Gibelin H, Godart C, et al. Kidney retrieval conditions influence damage to renal medulla: evaluation by proton nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) pectroscopy. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2000;38:1085.
13. Gibelin H, Eugene M, Hebrard W, et al. Comparison of Euro-Collins and University of Wisconsin solutions in the isolated perfused rat liver model: evaluation by proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy.Transplant Proc. 2000;32:2792.
14. Bon D, Claire B, Thuillier R, et al. Analysis of perfusates during hypothermic machine perfusion by NMR spectroscopy: a potential tool for predicting kidney graft outcome. Transplantation. 2014;97:810.
15. Jochmans I, Pirenne J. Graft quality assessment in kidney transplantation: not an exact science yet!. Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2011;16:174.
16. Louvar DW, Li N, Snyder J, et al. "Nature versus nurture" study of deceased-donor pairs in kidney transplantation. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009;20:1351.
17. Jochmans I, Moers C, Smits JM, et al. The prognostic value of renal resistance during hypothermic machine perfusion of deceased donor kidneys. Am J Transplant. 2011;11:2214.
18. de Vries EE, Hoogland ER, Winkens B, et al. Renovascular resistance of machine-perfused DCD kidneys is associated with primary nonfunction. Am J Transplant. 2011;11:2685.
19. Sonnenday CJ, Cooper M, Kraus E, et al. The hazards of basing acceptance of cadaveric renal allografts on pulsatile perfusion parameters alone. Transplantation. 2003;75:2029.
20. Bhangoo RS, Hall IE, Reese PP, et al. Deceased-donor kidney perfusate and urine biomarkers for kidney allograft outcomes: a systematic review. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2012;27:3305.
21. Nicholson JK, Lindon JC, Holmes E. 'Metabonomics': understanding the metabolic responses of living systems to pathophysiological stimuli via multivariate statistical analysis of biological NMR spectroscopic data. Xenobiotica. 1999;29:1181.
22. Seto K, Ikehira H, Obata T, et al. Long-term assessment of posttransplant renal prognosis with 31 Pmagnetic resonance spectroscopy. Transplantation. 2001;72:627.
23. Hauet T, Gibelin H, Richer JP, et al. Influence of retrieval conditions on renal medulla injury: evaluation by proton NMR spectroscopy in an isolated perfused pig kidney model. J Surg Res. 2000;93:1.
24. Richer JP, Baumer TH, Gibelin H, et al. Evaluation of renal medulla injury after cold preservation and transplantation: noninvasive determination of medullar damage by proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy of urine and plasma. Transplant Proc. 2000;32:47.
25. Hoogland ERP, de Vries EE, Christiaans MH, et al. The value of machine perfusion biomarker concentration in DCD kidney transplantations. Transplantation. 2013;95:603.
26. Ayala-GarciáM, HernándezM, Ramírez-Barba É, et al. Preservation of Renal Allografts for Transplantation. In: Long L, ed. Renal Transplantation-Updates and Advances. Rijeka, Croatia: Intech Europe; 2012. ISBN: 978-953-51-0173-4. Available from: http://www.intechopen.com/books/renal-transplantation-updates-and-advances/preservation-of-renalallograft-for-transplantation.
27. Watson CJ, Wells AC, Roberts RJ, et al. Cold machine perfusion versus static cold storage of kidneys donated after cardiac death: a UK multicenter randomized controlled trial. Am J Transplant. 2010;10:1991.
28. Hwang T-L, Shaka AJ. Water suppression that works. Excitation sculpting using arbitrary waveforms and pulsed field gradients. J Magn Reson. 1995;112:275.
29. Ludwig C, Günther UL. MetaboLab-advanced NMR data processing and analysis for metabolomics. BMC Bioinformatics. 2011;12:366.
30. Savorani F, Tomasi G, Engelsen SB. Icoshift: a versatile tool for the rapid alignment of 1D NMR spectra. J Magn Reson. 2010;202:190.