Erratum: The prognostic value of renal resistance during hypothermic machine perfusion of deceased donor kidneys (American Journal of Transplantation (2011) 11 (2214-2220) DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2011.03685.x);The prognostic value of renal resistance during hypothermic machine perfusion of deceased donor kidneys

American Journal of Transplantation

Volumn 11, Issue 10, 2011, Pages 2214-2220

  Jochmans, I ^a   Moers, C ^b   Smits, J M ^c   Leuvenink, H G D ^b   Treckmann, J ^d   Paul, A ^d   Rahmel, A ^c   Squifflet, J P ^e   Van Heurn, E ^f   Monbaliu, D ^a   Ploeg, R J ^b   Pirenne, J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^c EUROTRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION   (Netherlands)

^d UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL ESSEN   (Germany)

^e UNIVERSITY OF LIÈGE   (Belgium)

^f MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Deceased donor kidneys; delayed graft function; hypothermic machine perfusion; kidney transplantation; quality assessment; renal resistance; viability testing

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CANCER SURVIVAL; DELAYED GRAFT FUNCTION; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; HYPOTHERMIA; KIDNEY DONOR; KIDNEY FUNCTION; KIDNEY GRAFT REJECTION; KIDNEY PERFUSION; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; RENAL RESISTANCE; RISK FACTOR;

EID: 80053327103     PISSN: 16006135     EISSN: 16006143     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2011.03940.x     Document Type: Erratum

References (19)

1. Moers C, Smits JM, Maathuis MH, et al,. Machine perfusion or cold storage in deceased donor kidney transplantation. N Engl J Med 2009; 360: 7-19.
2. Wight J, Chilcott J, Holmes M, Brewer N,. The clinical and cost-effectiveness of pulsatile machine perfusion versus cold storage of kidneys for transplantation retrieved from heart-beating and non-heart-beating donors. Health Technol Assess 2003; 7: 1-94.
3. Henry ML, Sommer BG, Ferguson RM,. Renal blood flow and intrarenal resistance predict immediate renal allograft function. Transplant Proc 1986; 18: 557-558. (Pubitemid 16088420)
4. Sampson D, Jun HM, Walczak P,. Flow and function in machine-preserved kidneys. Br J Surg 1978; 65: 37-40. (Pubitemid 8348069)
5. Moers C, Leuvenink HG, Ploeg RJ,. Non-heartbeating organ donation: Overview and future perspectives. Transpl Int 2007; 20: 567-575. (Pubitemid 46872745)
6. Metzger RA, Delmonico FL, Feng S, Port FK, Wynn JJ, Merion RM,. Expanded criteria donors for kidney transplantation. Am J Transplant 2003; 3 (Suppl 4): 114-125. (Pubitemid 36612389)
7. Kootstra G, Daemen JH, Oomen AP,. Categories of non-heart-beating donors. Transplant Proc 1995; 27: 2893-2894.
8. Belzer FO, Glass NR, Sollinger HW, Hoffmann RM, Southard JH,. A new perfusate for kidney preservation. Transplantation 1982; 33: 322-323. (Pubitemid 12192445)
9. Perico N, Cattaneo D, Sayegh MH, Remuzzi G,. Delayed graft function in kidney transplantation. Lancet 2004; 364: 1814-1827. (Pubitemid 39488068)
10. Sonnenday CJ, Cooper M, Kraus E, Gage F, Handley C, Montgomery RA,. The hazards of basing acceptance of cadaveric renal allografts on pulsatile perfusion parameters alone. Transplantation 2003; 75: 2029-2033. (Pubitemid 36793287)
11. Mozes MF, Skolek RB, Korf BC,. Use of perfusion parameters in predicting outcomes of machine-preserved kidneys. Transplant Proc 2005; 37: 350-351. (Pubitemid 40459782)
12. Guarrera JV, Goldstein MJ, Samstein B, et al,. 'When good kidneys pump badly': Outcomes of deceased donor renal allografts with poor pulsatile perfusion characteristics. Transpl Int 2010; 23: 444-446.
13. Yushkov YY, Alvarez-Casas J, Dikman S, et al,. Machine measured renal resistance (MMRR) is the most sensitive tool for prediction of early renal allograft survival. Transplantation 2010; 90: 290.
14. Mancini GB, Dahlof B, Diez J,. Surrogate markers for cardiovascular disease: Structural markers. Circulation 2004; 109: IV22-30.
15. Irish WD, McCollum DA, Tesi RJ, et al,. Nomogram for predicting the likelihood of delayed graft function in adult cadaveric renal transplant recipients. J Am Soc Nephrol 2003; 14: 2967-2974. (Pubitemid 37305660)
16. Irish WD, Ilsley JN, Schnitzler MA, Feng S, Brennan DC,. A risk prediction model for delayed graft function in the current era of deceased donor renal transplantation. Am J Transplant 2010; 10: 2279-2286.
17. Rao PS, Schaubel DE, Guidinger MK, et al,. A comprehensive risk quantification score for deceased donor kidneys: The kidney donor risk index. Transplantation 2009; 88: 231-236.
18. Moers C, Varnav OC, van Heurn E, et al,. The value of machine perfusion perfusate biomarkers for predicting kidney transplant outcome. Transplantation 2010; 90: 966-973.
19. Gok MA, Asher JF, Shenton BK, et al,. Graft function after kidney transplantation from non-heartbeating donors according to Maastricht category. J Urol 2004; 172: 2331-2334. (Pubitemid 39507520)