cTBS delivered to the left somatosensory cortex changes its functional connectivity during rest

NeuroImage

Volumn 114, Issue , 2015, Pages 386-397

  Valchev, Nikola ^a   Curčić Blake, Branislava ^a   Renken, Remco J ^a   Avenanti, Alessio ^b   Keysers, Christian ^a,c   Gazzola, Valeria ^a,c   Maurits, Natasha M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BOLOGNA   (Italy)

^c NETHERLANDS INSTITUTE FOR NEUROSCIENCE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Connectivity; CTBS; Primary somatosensory cortex; Resting state

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AMYGDALOID NUCLEUS; ANTERIOR CINGULATE; ARTICLE; BASAL GANGLION; CEREBELLUM; CONTINUOUS THETA BURST STIMULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DORSAL PREMOTOR CORTEX; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INDEPENDENT COMPONENT ANALYSIS; LEFT HEMISPHERE; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PARTIAL CORRELATION ANALYSIS; PREMOTOR CORTEX; PRIMARY SOMATOSENSORY CORTEX; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RESTING STATE NETWORK; SECONDARY SOMATOSENSORY CORTEX; SPATIAL INDEPENDENT COMPONENT ANALYSIS; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; WHOLE BRAIN REGRESSION ANALYSIS; ADOLESCENT; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; NERVE TRACT; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; SOMATOSENSORY CORTEX; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; NEURAL PATHWAYS; SOMATOSENSORY CORTEX; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84929709973     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: 10959572     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.04.017     Document Type: Article

References (93)

1. Ainsworth M., Lee S., Cunningham M.O., Traub R.D., Kopell N.J., Whittington M.A. Rates and rhythms: a synergistic view of frequency and temporal coding in neuronal networks. Neuron 2012, 75(4):572-583.
2. Albert N.B., Robertson E.M., Miall R.C. The resting human brain and motor learning. Curr. Biol. 2009, 19(12):1023.
3. Antal A., Brepohl N., Poreisz C., Boros K., Csifcsak G., Paulus W. Transcranial direct current stimulation over somatosensory cortex decreases experimentally induced acute pain perception. Clin. J. Pain 2008, 24(1):56-63.
4. Avenanti A., Bolognini N., Maravita A., Aglioti S.M. Somatic and motor components of action simulation. Curr. Biol. 2007, 17(24):2129-2135.
5. Avenanti A., Annella L., Candidi M., Urgesi C., Aglioti S.M. Compensatory plasticity in the action observation network: virtual lesions of STS enhance anticipatory simulation of seen actions. Cereb. Cortex 2013, 23:570-580.
6. Azañón E., Haggard P. Somatosensory processing and body representation. Cortex 2009, 45(9):1078-1084.
7. Barnes A., Bullmore E.T., Suckling J. Endogenous human brain dynamics recover slowly following cognitive effort. PLoS One 2009, 4(8):e6626.
8. Bell A.J., Sejnowski T.J. An information-maximization approach to blind separation and blind deconvolution. Neural Comput. 1995, 7(6):1129-1159.
9. Benali A., Trippe J., Weiler E., Mix A., Petrasch-Parwez E., Girzalsky W., Eysel U.T., Erdmann R., Funke K. Theta-burst transcranial magnetic stimulation alters cortical inhibition. J. Neurosci. Off. J. Soc. Neurosci. 2011, 31(4):1193-1203.
10. Bertini C., Leo F., Avenanti A., Ladavas E. Independent mechanisms for ventriloquism and multisensory integration as revealed by theta-burst stimulation. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2010, 31(10):1791-1799.
11. Brett M., Anton J.L., Valabregue R., Poline J.B. Region of interest analysis using an SPM toolbox [abstract] presented at the 8th International Conference on Functional Mapping of the Human Brain, June 2-6, 2002, Sendai, Japan. NeuroImage 2002, 16(2).
12. Brusa L., Ponzo V., Mastropasqua C., Picazio S., Bonnì S., Di Lorenzo F., Iani C., Stefani A., Stanzione P., Caltagirone C. Theta burst stimulation modulates cerebellar-cortical connectivity in patients with progressive supranuclear palsy. Brain Stimul. 2014, 7(1):29-35.
13. Calhoun V., Adali T., Pearlson G., Pekar J. A method for making group inferences from functional MRI data using independent component analysis. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2001, 14(3):140-151.
14. Calhoun V.D., Liu J., Adal T. A review of group ICA for fMRI data and ICA for joint inference of imaging, genetic, and ERP data. NeuroImage 2009, 45(1):S163-S172.
15. Cardoso J. Dependence, correlation and Gaussianity in independent component analysis. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2003, 4:1177-1203.
16. Casile A. Mirror neurons (and beyond) in the macaque brain: an overview of 20years of research. Neurosci. Lett. 2013, 540:3-14.
17. Caspers S., Zilles K., Laird A.R., Eickhoff S.B. ALE meta-analysis of action observation and imitation in the human brain. NeuroImage 2010, 50(3):1148-1167.
18. Conte A., Rocchi L., Nardella A., Dispenza S., Scontrini A., Khan N., Berardelli A. Theta-burst stimulation-induced plasticity over primary somatosensory cortex changes somatosensory temporal discrimination in healthy humans. PLoS One 2012, 7(3):e32979.
19. Cui F., Arnstein D., Thomas R.M., Maurits N.M., Keysers C., Gazzola V. Functional magnetic resonance imaging connectivity analyses reveal efference-copy to primary somatosensory area, BA2. PLoS One 2014, 9(1):e84367.
20. Deblieck C., Thompson B., Iacoboni M., Wu A.D. Correlation between motor and phosphene thresholds: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2008, 29(6):662-670.
21. Doria V., Beckmann C.F., Arichi T., Merchant N., Groppo M., Turkheimer F.E., Counsell S.J., Murgasova M., Aljabar P., Nunes R.G. Emergence of resting state networks in the preterm human brain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2010, 107(46):20015-20020.
22. Duerden E.G., Albanese M. Localization of pain related brain activation: a meta analysis of neuroimaging data. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2013, 34(1):109-149.
23. Eickhoff S.B., Stephan K.E., Mohlberg H., Grefkes C., Fink G.R., Amunts K., Zilles K. A new SPM toolbox for combining probabilistic cytoarchitectonic maps and functional imaging data. NeuroImage 2005, 25(4):1325-1335.
24. Eickhoff S.B., Heim S., Zilles K., Amunts K. Testing anatomically specified hypotheses in functional imaging using cytoarchitectonic maps. NeuroImage 2006, 32(2):570-582.
25. Eickhoff S.B., Paus T., Caspers S., Grosbras M.H., Evans A.C., Zilles K., Amunts K. Assignment of functional activations to probabilistic cytoarchitectonic areas revisited. NeuroImage 2007, 36(3):511-521.
26. Eldaief M.C., Halko M.A., Buckner R.L., Pascual-Leone A. Transcranial magnetic stimulation modulates the brain's intrinsic activity in a frequency-dependent manner. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2011, 108(52):21229-21234.
27. Evers E.A., Klaassen E.B., Rombouts S.A., Backes W.H., Jolles J. The effects of sustained cognitive task performance on subsequent resting state functional connectivity in healthy young and middle-aged male schoolteachers. Brain Connect. 2012, 2(2):102-112.
28. Fox M.D., Halko M.A., Eldaief M.C., Pascual-Leone A. Measuring and manipulating brain connectivity with resting state functional connectivity magnetic resonance imaging (fcMRI) and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). NeuroImage 2012, 62(4):2232-2243.
29. Franca M., Koch G., Mochizuki H., Huang Y.Z., Rothwell J.C. Effects of theta burst stimulation protocols on phosphene threshold. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2006, 117(8):1808-1813.
30. Funke K., Benali A. Modulation of cortical inhibition by rTMS-findings obtained from animal models. J. Physiol. 2011, 589(18):4423-4435.
31. Gazzola V., Keysers C. The observation and execution of actions share motor and somatosensory voxels in all tested subjects: single-subject analyses of unsmoothed fMRI data. Cereb. Cortex 2009, 19(6):1239-1255.
32. Geerligs L., Maurits N.M., Renken R.J., Lorist M.M. Reduced specificity of functional connectivity in the aging brain during task performance. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2012, 35(1):319-330.
33. Ghosh S., Gattera R. A comparison of the ipsilateral cortical projections to the dorsal and ventral subdivisions of the macaque premotor cortex. Somatosens. Mot. Res. 1995, 12(3-4):359-378.
34. Goldsworthy M.R., Pitcher J.B., Ridding M.C. A comparison of two different continuous theta burst stimulation paradigms applied to the human primary motor cortex. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2012, 123(11):2256-2263.
35. Gratton C., Lee T.G., Nomura E.M., D'Esposito M. The effect of theta-burst TMS on cognitive control networks measured with resting state fMRI. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 2013, 7.
36. Hamada M., Murase N., Hasan A., Balaratnam M., Rothwell J.C. The role of interneuron networks in driving human motor cortical plasticity. Cereb. Cortex 2012, 23(7):1593-1605.
37. Harris J.A., Clifford C.W., Miniussi C. The functional effect of transcranial magnetic stimulation: signal suppression or neural noise generation?. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2008, 20(4):734-740.
38. Huang Y.Z., Edwards M.J., Rounis E., Bhatia K.P., Rothwell J.C. Theta burst stimulation of the human motor cortex. Neuron 2005, 45(2):201-206.
39. Huang Y.Z., Rothwell J.C., Edwards M.J., Chen R.S. Effect of physiological activity on an NMDA-dependent form of cortical plasticity in human. Cereb. Cortex (New York, N.Y.) 2008, 18(3):563-570.
40. Huang Y., Sommer M., Thickbroom G., Hamada M., Pascual-Leonne A., Paulus W., Classen J., Peterchev A.V., Zangen A., Ugawa Y. Consensus: new methodologies for brain stimulation. Brain Stimul. 2009, 2(1):2-13.
41. Huang Y.Z., Rothwell J.C., Lu C.S., Wang J., Weng Y.H., Lai S.C., Chuang W.L., Hung J., Chen R.S. The effect of continuous theta burst stimulation over premotor cortex on circuits in primary motor cortex and spinal cord. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2009, 120(4):796-801.
42. Huang Y.Z., Rothwell J.C., Chen R.S., Lu C.S., Chuang W.L. The theoretical model of theta burst form of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2011, 122(5):1011-1018.
43. Iezzi E., Conte A., Suppa A., Agostino R., Dinapoli L., Scontrini A., Berardelli A. Phasic voluntary movements reverse the aftereffects of subsequent theta-burst stimulation in humans. J. Neurophysiol. 2008, 100(4):2070-2076.
44. Iezzi E., Suppa A., Conte A., Voti P.L., Bologna M., Berardelli A. Short term and long term plasticity interaction in human primary motor cortex. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2011, 33(10):1908-1915.
45. Ishikawa S., Matsunaga K., Nakanishi R., Kawahira K., Murayama N., Tsuji S., Huang Y.Z., Rothwell J.C. Effect of theta burst stimulation over the human sensorimotor cortex on motor and somatosensory evoked potentials. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2007, 118(5):1033-1043.
46. Jacquet P.O., Avenanti A. Perturbing the action observation network during perception and categorization of actions' goals and grips: state-dependency and virtual lesion TMS effects. Cereb. Cortex 2015, 1-11.
47. Jolles D.D., Van Buchem M.A., Crone E.A., Rombouts S.A. Functional brain connectivity at rest changes after working memory training. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2013, 34(2):396-406.
48. Jones E.G. Connectivity of the primate sensory-motor cortex. Anonymous Sensory-motor Areas and Aspects of Cortical Connectivity 1986, 113-183. Springer.
49. Kandel E.R., Spencer W.A. Electrophysiology of hippocampal neurons. II. After-potentials and repetitive firing. J. Neurophysiol. 1961, 24:243-259.
50. Keysers C., Wicker B., Gazzola V., Anton J.L., Fogassi L., Gallese V. A touching sight: SII/PV activation during the observation and experience of touch. Neuron 2004, 42(2):335-346.
51. Keysers C., Kaas J.H., Gazzola V. Somatosensation in social perception. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2010, 11(6):417-428.
52. Knecht S., Ellger T., Breitenstein C., Ringelstein E.B., Henningsen H. Changing cortical excitability with low-frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation can induce sustained disruption of tactile perception. Biol. Psychiatry 2003, 53(2):175-179.
53. Lamm C., Decety J., Singer T. Meta-analytic evidence for common and distinct neural networks associated with directly experienced pain and empathy for pain. NeuroImage 2011, 54(3):2492-2502.
54. Lee K.G., Jacobs M.F., Asmussen M.J., Zapallow C.M., Tommerdahl M., Nelson A.J. Continuous theta-burst stimulation modulates tactile synchronization. BMC Neurosci. 2013, 14(1):1-9.
55. Lomber S.G. The advantages and limitations of permanent or reversible deactivation techniques in the assessment of neural function. J. Neurosci. Methods 1999, 86(2):109-117.
56. Martin P., Gandevia S., Taylor J. Theta burst stimulation does not reliably depress all regions of the human motor cortex. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2006, 117(12):2684-2690.
57. Mastropasqua C., Bozzali M., Ponzo V., Giulietti G., Caltagirone C., Cercignani M., Koch G. Network based statistical analysis detects changes induced by continuous theta-burst stimulation on brain activity at rest. Front. Psychol. 2014, 5.
58. Nettekoven C., Volz L.J., Kutscha M., Pool E., Rehme A.K., Eickhoff S.B., Fink G.R., Grefkes C. Dose-dependent effects of theta burst rTMS on cortical excitability and resting-state connectivity of the human motor system. J. Neurosci. 2014, 34(20):6849-6859.
59. Noh N.A., Fuggetta G., Manganotti P., Fiaschi A. Long lasting modulation of cortical oscillations after continuous theta burst transcranial magnetic stimulation. PLoS One 2012, 7(4):e35080.
60. Nyffeler T., Wurtz P., Lüscher H., Hess C.W., Senn W., Pflugshaupt T., von Wartburg R., Lüthi M., Müri R.M. Repetitive TMS over the human oculomotor cortex: comparison of 1-hz and theta burst stimulation. Neurosci. Lett. 2006, 409(1):57-60.
61. Oldfield R.C. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 1971, 9(1):97-113.
62. Oliveri M., Rossini P.M., Pasqualetti P., Traversa R., Cicinelli P., Palmieri M.G., Tomaiuolo F., Caltagirone C. Interhemispheric asymmetries in the perception of unimanual and bimanual cutaneous stimuli. A study using transcranial magnetic stimulation. Brain J. Neurol. 1999, 122:1721-1729.
63. Pandya D.N., Vignolo L.A. Intra- and interhemispheric projections of the precentral, premotor and arcuate areas in the rhesus monkey. Brain Res. 1971, 26(2):217-233.
64. Paus T. Inferring causality in brain images: a perturbation approach. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2005, 360(1457):1109-1114.
65. Ploner M., Gross J., Timmermann L., Schnitzler A. Cortical representation of first and second pain sensation in humans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2002, 99(19):12444-12448.
66. Poreisz C., Antal A., Boros K., Brepohl N., Csifcsák G., Paulus W. Attenuation of N2 amplitude of laser-evoked potentials by theta burst stimulation of primary somatosensory cortex. Exp. Brain Res. 2008, 185(4):611-621.
67. Ragert P., Franzkowiak S., Schwenkreis P., Tegenthoff M., Dinse H.R. Improvement of tactile perception and enhancement of cortical excitability through intermittent theta burst rTMS over human primary somatosensory cortex. Exp. Brain Res. 2008, 184(1):1-11.
68. Rahnev D., Kok P., Munneke M., Bahdo L., de Lange F.P., Lau H. Continuous theta burst transcranial magnetic stimulation reduces resting state connectivity between visual areas. J. Neurophysiol. 2013, 110(8):1811-1821.
69. Rai N., Premji A., Tommerdahl M., Nelson A. Continuous theta-burst rTMS over primary somatosensory cortex modulates tactile perception on the hand. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2012, 123(6):1226-1233.
70. Ridding M.C., Ziemann U. Determinants of the induction of cortical plasticity by non invasive brain stimulation in healthy subjects. J. Physiol. 2010, 588(13):2291-2304.
71. Rizzolatti G., Sinigaglia C. The functional role of the parieto-frontal mirror circuit: interpretations and misinterpretations. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2010, 11(4):264-274.
72. Rizzolatti G., Fadiga L., Matelli M., Bettinardi V., Paulesu E., Perani D., Fazio F. Localization of grasp representations in humans by PET: 1. Observation versus execution. Exp. Brain Res. 1996, 111(2):246-252.
73. Rossini P., Barker A., Berardelli A., Caramia M., Caruso G., Cracco R., Dimitrijevic M., Hallett M., Katayama Y., Lucking C. Non-invasive electrical and magnetic stimulation of the brain, spinal cord and roots: Basic principles and procedures for routine clinical application. report of an IFCN committee. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol 1994, 91(2):79-92.
74. Ruff C.C., Driver J., Bestmann S. Combining TMS and fMRI: from 'virtual lesions' to functional-network accounts of cognition. Cortex 2009, 45(9):1043-1049.
75. Schindler K., Nyffeler T., Wiest R., Hauf M., Mathis J., Hess C.W., Müri R. Theta burst transcranial magnetic stimulation is associated with increased EEG synchronization in the stimulated relative to unstimulated cerebral hemisphere. Neurosci. Lett. 2008, 436(1):31-34.
76. Schmithorst V.J., Holland S.K. Comparison of three methods for generating group statistical inferences from independent component analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging data. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2004, 19(3):365-368.
77. Shanks M., Pearson R., Powell T. The callosal connexions of the primary somatic sensory cortex in the monkey. Brain Res. Rev. 1985, 9(1):43-65.
78. Siebner H.R., Bergmann T.O., Bestmann S., Massimini M., Johansen-Berg H., Mochizuki H., Bohning D.E., Boorman E.D., Groppa S., Miniussi C. Consensus paper: combining transcranial stimulation with neuroimaging. Brain Stimul. 2009, 2(2):58-80.
79. Silvanto J., Pascual-Leone A. Why the assessment of causality in brain-behavior relations requires brain stimulation. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2012, 24(4):775-777.
80. Song S., Sandrini M., Cohen L.G. Modifying somatosensory processing with non-invasive brain stimulation. Restor. Neurol. Neurosci. 2011, 29(6):427-437.
81. Song X.W., Dong Z.Y., Long X.Y., Li S.F., Zuo X.N., Zhu C.Z., He Y., Yan C.G., Zang Y.F. REST: a toolkit for resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging data processing. PLoS One 2011, 6(9):1-12.
82. Staines W.R., Bolton D.A. Transcranial magnetic stimulation techniques to study the somatosensory system: research applications. Handb. Clin. Neurol. 2013, 116:671-679.
83. Tanné-Gariépy J., Rouiller E.M., Boussaoud D. Parietal inputs to dorsal versus ventral premotor areas in the macaque monkey: evidence for largely segregated visuomotor pathways. Exp. Brain Res. 2002, 145(1):91-103.
84. Todd G., Flavel S.C., Ridding M.C. Priming theta-burst repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation with low- and high-frequency stimulation. Exp. Brain Res. 2009, 195(2):307-315.
85. Tomassini V., Jbabdi S., Klein J.C., Behrens T.E., Pozzilli C., Matthews P.M., Rushworth M.F., Johansen-Berg H. Diffusion-weighted imaging tractography-based parcellation of the human lateral premotor cortex identifies dorsal and ventral subregions with anatomical and functional specializations. J. Neurosci. 2007, 27(38):10259-10269.
86. Valchev N., Gazzola V., Avenanti A., Keysers C. Somatosensory contribution to action observation brain activity - a combined fMRI and cTBS study (in preparation). 2015.
87. Van Den Heuvel M., Hulshoff Pol H. Exploring the brain network: a review on resting-state fMRI functional connectivity. Eur. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2010, 20(8):519-534.
88. van der Werf Y., Sanz-Arigita E., Menning S., van den Heuvel O. Modulating spontaneous brain activity using repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. BMC Neurosci. 2010, 11(1):145.
89. Van Dijk K.R.A., Hedden T., Venkataraman A., Evans K.C., Lazar S.W., Buckner R.L. Intrinsic functional connectivity as a tool for human connectomics: theory, properties, and optimization. J. Neurophysiol. 2010, 103(1):297-321.
90. Vercammen A., Knegtering H., Liemburg E.J., Boer J.Ad., Aleman A. Functional connectivity of the temporo-parietal region in schizophrenia: effects of rTMS treatment of auditory hallucinations. J. Psychiatr. Res. 2010, 44(11):725-731.
91. Vernet M., Bashir S., Yoo W., Perez J.M., Najib U., Pascual-Leone A. Insights on the neural basis of motor plasticity induced by theta burst stimulation from TMS-EEG. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2013, 37(4):598-606.
92. Wise S.P., Boussaoud D., Johnson P.B., Caminiti R. Premotor and parietal cortex: corticocortical connectivity and combinatorial computations 1. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 1997, 20(1):25-42.
93. Yeo B.T., Krienen F.M., Sepulcre J., Sabuncu M.R., Lashkari D., Hollinshead M., Roffman J.L., Smoller J.W., Zollei L., Polimeni J.R., et al. The organization of the human cerebral cortex estimated by intrinsic functional connectivity. J. Neurophysiol. 2011, 106(3):1125-1165.