Erratum: Age-dependent speciation can explain the shape of empirical phylogenies (Systematic Biology (2016) 64 (432-440) DOI: 10.1093/sysbio/syv001);Age-dependent speciation can explain the shape of empirical phylogenies

Systematic Biology

Volumn 64, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 432-440

  Hagen, Oskar ^a   Hartmann, Klaas ^b   Steel, Mike ^c   Stadler, Tanja ^a  

^a ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TASMANIA   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CANTERBURY   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Birth death process; diversification; macroevolution; Stochastic models

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; PHYLOGENY; SPECIES DIFFERENTIATION; TIME;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; GENETIC SPECIATION; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PHYLOGENY; TIME;

EID: 84929578577     PISSN: 10635157     EISSN: 1076836X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/sysbio/syw091     Document Type: Erratum

References (28)

1. Aldous D.J. 1996. Probability distributions on cladograms. In: Aldous D.J., Pemantle R., editors. Random discrete structures. New York: Springer. p. 1-18.
2. Aldous D.J. 2001. Stochastic models and descriptive statistics for phylogenetic trees, from Yule to Today. Stat. Sci. 16:23-34.
3. Blum M.G.B., François O. 2006. Which random processes describe the tree of life? A large-scale study of phylogenetic tree imbalance. Syst. Biol. 55:685-691.
4. Boettiger C.,Temple Lang D. 2012.Treebase: anRpackage for discovery, access and manipulation of online phylogenies. Methods Ecol. Evol. 3:1060-1066.
5. Colless D.H. 1982. Review of phylogenetics: the theory and practice of phylogenetic systematics. Syst. Zool. 31:100-104.
6. Edwards A.W.F. 1970. Estimation of the branch points of a branching diffusion process. J. R. Stat. Soc. B. 32:155-174.
7. Etienne R.S., Rosindell J. 2012. Prolonging the past counteracts the pull of the present: protracted speciation can explain observed slowdowns in diversification. Syst. Biol. 61:204-213.
8. Fisher R.A., Tippett L.H.C. 1928. Limiting forms of the frequency distribution of the largest or smallest member of a sample. Math. Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc. 24:180-190.
9. Hartmann K., Wong D., Stadler T. 2010. Sampling trees from evolutionary models. Syst. Biol. 59:465-476.
10. Heard S.B. 1996. Patterns in phylogenetic tree balance with variable and evolving speciation rates. Evolution 50:2141-2148.
11. Heard S.B., Mooers A.O. 2002. Signatures of random and selective mass extinctions in phylogenetic tree balance. Syst. Biol. 51: 889-897.
12. Hey J. 1992. Usingphylogenetic trees to study speciation and extinction. Evolution 46:627-640.
13. Jones G. 2011. Calculations for multi-type age-dependent binary branching processes. J. Math. Biol. 63:33-56.
14. Lambert A. 2010. The contour of splitting trees is a Levy process. Ann. Prob. 38:348-395.
15. Losos J.B.,Adler F.R. 1995. Stumped by trees?Ageneralized null model for patterns of organismal diversity. Amer. Nat. 145:329-342.
16. McFadden D. 1978. Modeling the choice of residual location. In: Karlqvist A., Lundqvist L., Snickars F.,Weibull J.W., editors. Spacial interaction theory and planning models. Amsterdam: Studies in Regional Science and Urban Economics. p. 75-96.
17. Mooers A.O., Heard S.B. 1997. Inferring evolutionary process from phylogenetic tree shape. Q. Rev. Bio. 72:31-54.
18. Nee S., Holmes E.C., May R.M., Harvey P.H. 1994. Extinction rates can be estimated from molecular phylogenies. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. 344:77-82.
19. Pinelis I. 2003. Evolutionarymodels of phylogenetic trees. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 270:1425-1431.
20. Pybus O.G., Harvey P.H. 2000. Testing macro-evolutionary models using incomplete molecular phylogenies. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 267:2267-2272.
21. Sackin M.J. 1972. Good and bad phenograms. Syst. Zool. 21:225-226.
22. Sanderson M.J., Donoghue M.J., PielW.H., Eriksson T. 1994. TreeBASE: aprototype database ofphylogenetic analyses and an interactive tool for browsing the phylogeny of life. Am. J. Bot. 81:183.
23. Semple C., Steel M. 2003. Phylogenetics. New York: Oxford University Press.
24. Shao K.T., Sokal R.R. 1990. Tree balance. Syst. Zool. 39:266-276.
25. Stadler T. 2013. Recovering speciation and extinction dynamics based on phylogenies. J. Evolution. Biol. 6:1203-1219.
26. Steel M.,McKenzie A. 2001. Properties of phylogenetic trees generated by Yule-type speciation models. Math. Biosci. 170:91-112.
27. Venditti C., Meade A., Pagel M. 2010. Phylogenies reveal new interpretation of speciation and theRed Queen.Nature 463:349-352.
28. Yule G.U. 1924. A Mathematical theory of evolution, based on the conclusions of Dr. J.C. Willis, F.R.S. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. 213:21-87.