Sampling trees from evolutionary models

Systematic Biology

Volumn 59, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 465-476

  Hartmann, Klaas ^a   Wong, Dennis ^b   Stadler, Tanja ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TASMANIA   (Australia)

^b DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Algorithms; Distribution; Evolutionary models; Phylogenetic trees; Sampling; Simulating

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EPIDEMIOLOGY; EVOLUTION; SPECIES DIFFERENTIATION; SELECTION BIAS;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; EVOLUTION; GENETIC SPECIATION; MODELS, GENETIC; SELECTION BIAS; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION;

PHYLO;

EID: 77953743320     PISSN: 10635157     EISSN: 1076836X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/sysbio/syq026     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Agapow P.-M., Bininda-Edmonds O.R., Crandall K.A., Gittleman J.L., Mace G.M., Marshall J.C., Purvis A. 2004. The impact of species concept on biodiversity studies. Q. Rev. Biol. 79:161-179.
2. Aldous D., Popovic L. 2005. A critical branching process model for biodiversity. Adv. Appl. Probab. 37:1094-1115.
3. Alroy J. 1996. Constant extinction, constrained diversifcation, and uncoordinated stasis in North American mammals. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 127:285-311.
4. Alroy J. 2008. Dynamics of origination and extinction in the marine fossil record. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 105:11536.
5. Bininda-Edmonds O.R.P., Cardillo M., Jones K.E., MacPhee R.D.E., Beck R.M.D., Grenyer R., Price S.A., Vos R.A., Gittleman J.L., Purvis A. 2007. The delayed rise of present-day mammals. Nature. 446:507-512.
6. Blum M., Francois O. 2006. Which random processes describe the tree of life? A large-scale study of phylogenetic tree imbalance. Syst. Biol. 55:685.
7. Chan K.M.A., Moore B.R. 1999. Accounting for mode of speciation increases power and realism of tests of phylogenetic asymmetry. Am. Nat. 153:332-346.
8. Chan K.M.A., Moore B.R. 2002. Whole-tree methods for detecting differential diversifcation rates. Syst. Biol. 51:855-865.
9. Gernhard T. 2008. The conditioned reconstructed process. J. Theor. Biol. 253:769-778.
10. Hahn M., De Bie T., Stajich J., Nguyen C., Cristianini N. 2005. Estimating the tempo and modeof gene family evolution from comparative genomic data. Genome Res. 15:1153.
11. Harding E.F. 1971. The probabilities of rooted tree-shapes generated by random bifurcation. Adv. Appl. Probab. 3:44-77.
12. Hartmann K. 2010. Tree sample. Hobart, Australia: Tasmanian Aqua-culture and Fisheries Institute, University of Tasmania. Available from: http://treesample.googlecode.com.
13. Harvey P.H., May R.M., Nee S. 1994. Phylogenies without fossils. Evolution. 48:523-529.
14. Heard S.B. 1996. Patterns in phylogenetic tree balance with variable and evolving speciation rates. Evolution. 50:2141-2148.
15. Hey J. 1992. Using phylogenetic trees to study speciation and extinction. Evolution. 46:627-640.
16. Hohl M., Ragan M.A. 2007. Is multiple-sequence alignment required for accurate inference of phylogeny? Syst. Biol. 56:206-221.
17. Karev G.P., Wolf Y.I., Koonin E.V. 2003. Simple stochastic birth and death models of genome evolution: was there enough time for us to evolve? Bioinformatics. 19:1889-1900.
18. Kingman J.F.C. 1982a. Exchangeability and the evolution of large populations. In: Koch G., Spizzichino F., editors. Exchangeability in probability and statistics. Amsterdam-New York: North-Holland. p. 97-112.
19. Kingman J.F.C. 1982b. On the genealogy of large populations. J. Appl. Probab. 19A:27-43.
20. Kingman J.F.C. 1982c. The coalescent. Stoch. Processes Appl. 13: 235-248.
21. Magallón S., Sanderson M. 2001. Absolute diversifcation rates in an-giosperm clades. Evolution. 55:1762-1780
22. Mooers A.Ø., Harmon L., Blum M., Wong D., Heard S. 2007. Some models of phylogenetic tree shape. In: Gascuel O., Steel M., editors. Reconstructing evolution\new mathematical and computational advances. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press
23. Mooers A.Ø., Heard S.B. 1997. Inferring evolutionary process from phylogenetic tree shape. Q. Rev. Biol. 72:31-54.
24. Moran P. 1958. A general theory of the distribution of gene frequencies. I. Overlapping generations. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 149:102-112.
25. Nee S., Holmes E., May R., Harvey P. 1994. Extinction rates can be estimated from molecular phylogenies. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Biol. Sci. 344:77-82.
26. Oakley T., Ostman B., Wilson A. 2006. Repression and loss of gene expression outpaces activation and gain in recently duplicated fy genes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 103:11637.
27. Patzkowsky M. 1995. A hierarchical branching model of evolutionary radiations. Paleobiology. 21:440-460. (Pubitemid 3025383)
28. Popovic L. 2004. Asymptotic genealogy of a critical branching process. Ann. Appl. Probab. 14:2120-2148.
29. Przeworski M., Wall J. 1998. An evaluation of a hierarchical branching process as a model for species diversifcation. Paleobiology. 24: 498-511.
30. Purvis A. 2004. Evolution: how do characters evolve? Nature. 432:7014.
31. Pybus O., Harvey P. 2000. Testing macro-evolutionary models using incomplete molecular phylogenies. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 267: 2267-2272.
32. Rambaut A. 2002. PhyloGen: phylogenetic tree simulator package. Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. Available from: http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/phylogen/.
33. Raup D. 1991. A kill curve for phanerozoic marine species. Paleobiol-ogy. 17:37-48.
34. Ricklefs R. 2003. Global diversifcation rates of passerine birds. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 270:2285-2291.
35. Ricklefs R. 2004. Cladogenesis and morphological diversifcation in passerine birds. Nature. 430:338-341.
36. Sepkoski J.J. 1982. Mass extinctions in the Phanerozoic oceans: a review. Geol. Soc. Am. Spec. Pap. 190:281-289.
37. Shaw A., Cox C., Goffnet B., Buck W., Boles S. 2003. Phylogenetic evidence of a rapid radiation of pleurocarpous mosses (bryophyta). Evolution. 57:2226-2241.
38. Stadler T. 2008. Lineages-through-time plots of neutral models for spe-ciation. Math. Biosci. 216:163-171.
39. Stadler T. 2010. Treesim. Institute of Integrative Biology, Eid-genössische Technische Hochschule Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland. Available from: http://www.tb.ethz.ch/people/tstadler.
40. Stanley S.M., Signor P.W. III, Lidgard S., Karr A. F. 1981. Natural clades differ from "random" clades: simulations and analyses. Paleobiol-ogy. 7:115-127.
41. Tanaka M., Francis A., Luciani F., Sisson S. 2006. Using approximate Bayesian computation to estimate tuberculosis transmission parameters from genotype data. Genetics. 173:1511.
42. Venditti C., Meade A., Pagel M. 2006. Detecting the node-density artifact in phylogeny reconstruction. Syst. Biol. 55:637-643.
43. Weir J.T. 2006. Divergent timing and patterns of species accumulation in lowland and highland neotropical birds. Evolution. 60:842-855.
44. Yang Z., Rannala B. 1997. Bayesian phylogenetic inference using DNA sequences: a Markov chain Monte Carlo method. Mol. Biol. Evol. 17:717-724.
45. Yule G.U. 1924. A mathematical theory of evolution, based on the conclusions of Dr. J. C. Willis, F.R.S. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. 213:21-87.
46. Zwickl D.J., Hillis D.M. 2002. Increased taxon sampling greatly reduces phylogenetic error. Syst. Biol. 51:588-598.