Evaluating the efficiency performance of airports using an integrated AHP/DEA-AR technique

Transport Policy

Volumn 42, Issue , 2015, Pages 75-85

  Lai, Po Lin ^a   Potter, Andrew ^b   Beynon, Malcolm ^b   Beresford, Anthony ^b  

^a Chung Ang University   (South Korea)

^b CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Airport efficiency; Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP); Assurance Region DEA (DEA AR model); Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA)

Indexed keywords

AIRLINE INDUSTRY; AIRPORT; ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS; DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS; DECISION MAKING; MULTICRITERIA ANALYSIS; POLICY MAKING; TRANSPORTATION PLANNING; TRANSPORTATION POLICY;

EID: 84929575157     PISSN: 0967070X     EISSN: 1879-310X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2015.04.008     Document Type: Article

References (80)

1. Airport Council International ACI Airport Economics Survey 2010 2011, ACI, Geneva.
2. Ali I., Charnes A., Cooper W., Divine D., Klopp G.A., Stutz J. An application of Data Envelopment Analysis to US Army recruitment districts. Applications of Management Science 1987, JAI press, New York. R.L. Schultz (Ed.).
3. Assaf A., Gillen D. Measuring the joint impact of governance form and economic regulation on airport efficiency. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2012, 220(1):187-198.
4. Assaf A., Gillen D., Barros C. Performance assessment of UK airports: Evidence from a Bayesian dynamic frontier model. Transp. Res. Part E: Logist. Transp. Rev. 2012, 48(3):603-615.
5. Air Transport Research Society Airport Benchmarking Report 2011, ATRS, Vancouver.
6. Azadeh A., Ghaderi S.F., Izadbakhsh H. Integration of DEA and AHP with computer simulation for railway system improvement and optimization. Appl. Math. Comput. 2008, 195:775-785.
7. Banae Costa C., Vansnick J. A critical analysis of the eigenvalue method used to derive priorities in AHP. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2008, 187:1422-1428.
8. Barros C.P. Technical efficiency of UK airports. J. Air Transp. Manag. 2008, 14(4):175-178.
9. Beynon M.J. An analysis of distributions of priority values from alternative comparison scales within AHP. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2002, 140(1):104-117.
10. Bowlin W. Evaluating the efficiency of US Air Force real-property maintenance activities. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 1987, 38(2):127-136.
11. Carmone F.J., Kara A., Zanakis S.H. A Monte Carlo investigation of incomplete pairwise comparison matrices in AHP. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 1997, 102(3):538-553.
12. Chao C.-C., Yu P.-C. Quantitative evaluation model of air cargo competitiveness and comparative analysis of major Asia-Pacific airports. Transp. Policy 2013, 30:318-326.
13. Charnes A., Cooper W.W., Rhodes E. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 1978, 2:429-444.
14. Charnes A., Cooper W., Golany B., Seiford I., Stutz J. Foundations of data envelopment analysis for Pareto-Koopmans efficient empirical production functions. J. Econom. 1985, 30:91-107.
15. Chen H.H. Stock selection using data envelopment analysis. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 2008, 108(9):1255-1268.
16. Chen T.Y., Chen L.H. DEA performance evaluation based on BSC indicators incorporated: the case of semiconductors industry. Int. J. Product. Perform. Manag. 2007, 56(4):335-357.
17. Coelli T.J., Prasada Rao D.S., O'Donnell C.J., Battese G.E. An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis 2005, Springer, New York. 2nd ed.
18. Competition Commission, 2008. Working paper on benchmarking the operating performance of BAA airports. [Online] London: Competition Commission. Available at: (accessed 11.11.13). http://www.competition-commission.org.uk/assets/competitioncommission/docs/pdf/inquiry/ref2007/airports/pdf/working_paper_benchmarking.pdf.
19. Cooper W.W., Seiford L.M., Tone K. Introduction to Data Envelopment Analysis and Its Uses 2006, Springer, New York.
20. Correia A.R., Wirasinghe S.C., de Barros A.G. A global index for level of service evaluation at airport passenger terminals. Transp. Res. Part E: Logist. Transp. Rev. 2008, 44(4):607-620.
21. Curi C., Gitto S., Mancuso P. New evidence on the efficiency of Italian airports: a bootstrapped DEA analysis. Socio-Econ. Plan. Sci. 2011, 45:84-93.
22. Doganis R. The Airport Business 1992, Routledge, London.
23. Ertay T., Ruan D., Tuzkaya U.R. Integrating data envelopment analysis and analytic hierarchy for the facility layout design in manufacturing systems. Inf. Sci. 2006, 176(3):237-262.
24. Escobar M.T., Aguarón J., Moreno-Jiménez J.M. A note on AHP group consistency for the row geometric mean priorization procedure. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2004, 153(2):318-322.
25. Feng Y.J., Lu H., Bi K. An AHP/DEA method for measurement of the efficiency of R&D management activities in university. Int. Trans. Oper. Res. 2004, 11:181-191.
26. Forman E.H. Random indices for incomplete pairwise comparison matrices. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 1990, 48:153-155.
27. Francis G., Humphreys I., Fry J. The benchmarking of airport performance. J. Air Transp. Manag. 2002, 8(4):239-247.
28. Friedman L., Sinuany-Stern Z. Combining ranking scales and selecting variables in the DEA context: the case of industrial branches. Comput. Oper. Res. 1998, 25(9):781-791.
29. Gillen D. The evolution of airport ownership and governance. J. Air Transp. Manag. 2011, 17(1):3-13.
30. Gillen D., Lall A. Developing measures of airport productivity and performance: an application of Data Envelopment Analysis. Transp. Res. Part E: Logist. Transp. Rev. 1997, 33(4):261-273.
31. Gong S.X.H., Cullinane K., Firth M. The impact of airport and seaport privatization on efficiency and performance: a review of the international evidence and implications for developing countries. Transp. Policy 2012, 24:37-47.
32. Graham A. Airport benchmarking: a review of the current situation. Benchmarking: Int. J. 2005, 12(2):99-111.
33. Graham A. The objectives and outcomes of airport privatisation. Res. Transp. Bus. Manag. 2011, 1(1):3-14.
34. Heathrow Airport, 2013. Heathrow Airport-Conditions of Use. Available at (accessed 27.03.13). http://www.heathrowairport.com/about-us/partners-and-suppliers/conditions-of-use.
35. Ho W. Integrated analytical hierarchy process and its applications: a literature review. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2008, 186(1):211-228.
36. Hooper P.G., Hensher D.A. Measuring total factor productivity of airports: an index number approach. Transp. Res. Part E: Logist. Transp. Rev. 1997, 33(4):249-259.
37. Hsu K.H. Using balanced scorecard and fuzzy data envelopment analysis for multinational R&D project performance assessment. J. Am. Acad. Bus. 2005, 7(1):189-196.
38. Humphreys I., Francis G. Performance measurement: A review of airports. Int. J. Transp. Manag. 2002, 1:79-85.
39. Ison S., Francis G., Humphreys I., Page R. UK regional airport commercialisation and privatisation: 25 years on. J. Transp. Geogr. 2011, 19(6):1341-1349.
40. Kong W., Fu T. Assessing the performance of business colleges in Taiwan using data envelopment analysis and student based value-added performance indictors. Omega 2012, 40(5):541-549.
41. Korpela J., Lehmusvaara A., Nisonen J. Warehouse operator selection by combining AHP and DEA methodologies. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2007, 108:135-142.
42. Kwiesielewicz M., van Uden E. Inconsistent and Contradictory Judgements in Pairwise Comparison Method in AHP. Comput. Oper. Res. 2004, 31:713-719.
43. Lai P.-L., Potter A., Beynon M. The development of benchmarking techniques in airport performance evaluation research. Transp. J. 2012, 51(3):305-337.
44. Lee T.Z., Tseng Y.F. Explore the optimal Allocation Problem with AHP/DEA. Asia Pac. Manag. Rev. 2006, 11(6):389-392.
45. Lin L.C., Hong C.H. Operational performance evaluation of international major airports: an application of data envelopment analysis. J. Air Transp. Manag. 2006, 12(6):342-351.
46. Ma, J., Zheng, X., 1991. 9/9-9/1 scale method of AHP. In: Proceedings of the Second International Symposium of the AHP. pp.197-202.
47. Martin J.C., Roman C. A benchmarking analysis of Spanish commercial airports: A comparison between SMOP and DEA ranking methods. Netw. Spat. Econ. 2006, 6(2):111-134.
48. Önü S., Soner S. Transhipment site selection using AHP and TOPSIS approaches under fuzzy environment. Waste Manag. 2008, 28(9):1552-1559.
49. Otamendi J., Pastor J.M., Garcia A. Selection of the simulation software for the management of the operations at an international airport. Simul. Model. Pract. Theory 2008, 16(8):1103-1112.
50. Oum T.H., Adler N., Yu C. Privatization, corporatization, ownership forms and their effect on the performance of the world's major airports. J. Air Transp. Manag. 2006, 12(3):109-121.
51. Oum, T.H., Choo, Y., Yu, C., 2012. Key Findings of 2012 ATRS Global Airport Performance Benchmarking project. Available at (accessed 26.3.13). http://www.atrsworld.org/docs/KeyFindings2012ATRSBenchmarkingReport-June22.pdf.
52. Oum T.H., Yan J., Yu C. Ownership forms matter for airport efficiency: a stochastic frontier investigation of worldwide airports. J. Urban Econ. 2008, 64(2):422-435.
53. Oum T.H., Yu C. Measuring airports' operating efficiency: a summary of the 2003 ATRS Global Airport Benchmarking Report. Transp. Res. Part E: Logist. Transp. Rev. 2004, 40(6):515-532.
54. Pels E., Nijkamp P., Rietveld P. Relative efficiency of European airports. Transp. Policy 2001, 8(3):183-192.
55. Pöyhönen M.A., Hämäläinen R.P., Salo A.A. An experiment on the numerical modelling of verbal ratio statement. J. Multi-Criteria Decis. Anal. 1997, 6(1):1-10.
56. Saaty T.L. The Analytic Hierarchy Process 1980, McGraw-Hill, New York.
57. Saaty T.L. Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. J. Serv. Sci. 2008, 1(1):83-98.
58. Saen R.F., Memariani A., Lotfi F.H. Determining relative efficiency of slightly non-homogeneous decision making units by data envelopment analysis: a case study in IROST. Appl. Math. Comput. 2005, 165(2):313-328.
59. Sarkis J., Talluri S. Performance based clustering for benchmarking of US airports. Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Pract. 2004, 38(5):329-346.
60. Seifert L.M., Zhu J. Identifying excesses and deficits in Chinese industrial productivity (1953-1990): a weighted data envelopment analysis approach. Omega 1998, 26(2):279-296.
61. Sinuany-Stern Z., Mehrez A., Hadad Y. An AHP/DEA methodology for ranking decision making units. Int. Trans. Oper. Res. 2000, 7(2):109-124.
62. Takamura Y., Tone K.A. Comparative site evaluation study for relocating Japanese government agencies out of Tokyo. Socio-Econ. Plan. Sci. 2003, 37(2):85-102.
63. Thompson R.G., Singleton F.D., Thrall R.M., Smith B.A. Comparative site evaluations for locating a high-energy physics lab in Texas. Interfaces 1986, 16:35-49.
64. Tovar B., Martin-Cejas R.R. Technical efficiency and productivity changes in Spanish airports: A parametric distance function approach. Transp. Res. Part E: Logist. Transp. Rev. 2010, 46(2):249-260.
65. Tsai W.-H., Hsu W., Chou W.-C. A gap analysis model for improving airport service quality. Total Qual. Manag. Bus. Excell. 2011, 22(10):1025-1040.
66. Tsai M.C., Su Y.S. Political risk assessment on air logistics hub developments in Taiwan. J. Air Transp. Manag. 2002, 8(6):373-380.
67. Vasigh B., Gorjidooz J. Productivity analysis of public and private airports: a causal investigation. J. Air Transp. 2006, 11(3):144-163.
68. Vreeker R., Nijkamp P., ter Welle C. A multicriteria decision support methodology for evaluating airport expansion plans. Transp. Res. Part D: Transp. Environ. 2002, 7(1):27-47.
69. Warnock-Smith D., Potter A. An exploratory study into airport choice factors for European low-cost airlines. J. Air Transp. Manag. 2005, 11(6):388-392.
70. Wang R.T., Ho C.T., Feng C.M., Yang Y.K. A comparative analysis of the operational performance of Taiwan's major airports. J. Air Transp. Manag. 2004, 10(5):353-360.
71. Wang Y.M., Chin K.S., Poon G.K.K. A data envelopment analysis method with assurance region for weight generation in the analytic hierarchy process. Decis. Support Syst. 2008, 45:913-921.
72. Wang Y.M., Liu J., Elhag T.M.S. An integrated AHP-DEA methodology for bridge risk assessment. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2008, 54:513-525.
73. Weber M., Eisenführ F., von Winterfeldt D. The effects of spitting attributes on weights in multiattribute utility measurement. Manag. Sci. 1988, 34:431-445.
74. Woo S., Pettit S., Kwak D.W., Beresford A. Seaport research: A structured literature review on methodological issues since the 1980s. Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Pract. 2011, 45(7):667-685.
75. Yang H.H. Measuring the efficiencies of Asia-Pacific international airports - Parametric and non-parametric evidence. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2010, 59(4):697-702.
76. Yang X., Tok S.K., Su F. The privatization and commercialization of China's airpor. J. Air Transp. Manag. 2008, 14(5):243-251.
77. Yang T., Kuo C. A hierarchical AHP/DEA methodology for the facilities layout design problem. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2003, 147(1):128-136.
78. Yoo K.E., Choi Y.C. Analytic hierarchy process approach for identifying relative importance of factors to improve passenger security checks at airports. J. Air Transp. Manag. 2006, 12(3):135-142.
79. Zhu J. Quantitative Models for Performance Evaluation and Benchmarking 2009, Springer, New York. 2nd ed.
80. Zietsman D., Vanderschuren M. Analytic Hierarchy Process assessment for potential multi-airport systems - The case of Cape Town. J. Air Transp. Manag. 2014, 36:41-49.