A Case for Using Online Discussion Forums in Critical Psychological Research

Qualitative Research in Psychology

Volumn 12, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 287-297

  Jowett, Adam ^a  

^a Faculty of Engineering and Computing   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

discourse analysis; flaming; heterosexism; Internet ethics; Internet research; online discussion forums; trolling

Indexed keywords

EID: 84929513994     PISSN: 14780887     EISSN: 14780895     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14780887.2015.1008906     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. C.Antaki,, E.Ardèvol,, F.Núñez, & A.Vayreda 2006, ‘“For she who knows who she is”: managing accountability in online forum messages’, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 114–32.
2. I.Arminen, 2004, ‘Second stories: the salience of interpersonal communication for mutual help in Alcoholics Anonymous’, Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 36, pp. 319–47.
3. E.Bennett, & B.Gough, 2013, ‘In pursuit of leanness: the management of appearance, affect and masculinities within a men’s weight loss forum’, Health, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 284–99.
4. M.Billig, 1991, Ideology and opinions: studies in rhetorical psychology, Sage, London.
5. British Psychological Society 2007, Report of the working party on conducting research on the Internet: guidelines for ethical practice in psychological research online, British Psychological Society, Leicester.
6. British Psychological Society 2009, Code of human research ethics, British Psychological Society, Leicester.
7. British Psychological Society 2013, Ethics guidelines for Internet-mediated research, British Psychological Society, Leicester.
8. S.Burke, & S.Goodman, 2012, ‘Bring back Hitler’s gas chambers: asylum seeking, Nazis and Facebook – a discursive analysis’, Discourse & Society, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 19–33.
9. J.Callaghan, & L.Lazard, 2012, ‘Please don’t put the whole dang thing out there!: a discursive analysis of Internet discussions around infant feeding’, Psychology & Health, vol. 27, no. 8, pp. 938–55.
10. N.S.Coulson, 2012, ‘Research using the Internet: methodological choices’, in N.Rmsey & D.Hardcourt (eds.), The handbook of the psychology of appearance, Oxford University Press, Croydon, pp. 636–44.
11. D.Elgesem, 2002, ‘What is special about the ethical issues in online research?’, Ethics and Information Technology, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 195–203.
12. D.Every, & M.Augoustinos, 2007, ‘Constructions of racism in the Australian parliamentary debates on asylum seekers’, Discourse & Society, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 411–36.
13. G.Eysenbach, & J.E.Till, 2001, ‘Ethical issues in qualitative research on Internet communities’, British Medical Journal, vol. 323, pp. 1103–5.
14. S.Goodman, & L.Rowe, 2014, ‘Maybe it is prejudice … but it is NOT racism: negotiating racism in discussion forums about Gypsies’, Discourse & Society, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 32–46.
15. B.Gough,, M.McFadden, & M.McDonald, 2013, Critical social psychology: an introduction, Palgrave McMillan, Basingstoke.
16. D.Herman, 1998, The antigay agenda: orthodox vision and the Christian right, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
17. S.C.Herring, 1996, ‘Linguistic and critical research on computer-mediated communication: some ethical and scholarly considerations’, The Information Society, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 153–68.
18. S.Herring,, K.Sluder,, R.Scheckler, & S.Barab, 2002, ‘Searching for safety online: managing ‘trolling’ on a feminist forum’, The Information Society, vol. 18, pp. 371–84.
19. Holtz, P, N.Kronberger, & W.Wagner, 2012, ‘Analyzing Internet forums: a practical guide’, Journal of Media Psychology, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 55–66.
20. J.Horne, & S.Wiggins, 2009, ‘Doing being “on the edge”: managing the dilemma of being authentically suicidal in an online forum’, Sociology of Health & Illness, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 170–184.
21. A.Jowett, 2011, ‘Chronic illness in non-heterosexual contexts: towards a critical lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans and queer psychology’, PhD thesis, Aston University, Birmingham, UK.
22. A.Jowett, 2014, ‘But if you legalise same-sex marriage …: arguments against equal marriage in the British press’, Feminism & Psychology, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 37–55.
23. A.Jowett,, E.Peel, & R.Shaw, 2011, ‘Online interviewing in psychology: reflections on the process’, Qualitative Research in Psychology, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 354–69.
24. S.A.King, 1996, ‘Researching Internet communities: proposed ethical guidelines for the reporting of results’, The Information Society, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 119–27.
25. C.Kitzinger, 2000, ‘Doing feminist conversation analysis’, Feminism & Psychology, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 163–93.
26. J.Lamerichs, & H.F.M.te Molder, 2003, ‘Computer-mediated communication: from a cognitive to a discursive model’, New Media & Society, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 451–73.
27. I.Parker, 1994, ‘Discourse analysis’, in P.Banister, E.Burman, I.Parker, M.Taylor & C.Tindall (eds.), Qualitative methods in psychology: a research practical guide, Open University Press, Buckingham, pp. 92–107.
28. V.Pitts, 2004, ‘Illness and Internet empowerment: writing and reading breast cancer in cyberspace’, Health, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 33–59.
29. J.Potter, 2012, ‘Discourse analysis and discursive psychology’, in H.Cooper (ed.), APA handbook of research methods in psychology: vol. 2. Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological, American Psychological Association Press, Washington, DC, pp. 111–30.
30. J.Potter, & A.Hepburn, 2005, ‘Qualitative interviews in psychology: problems and possibilities’, Qualitative Research in Psychology, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 281–307.
31. K.Robinson, 2001, ‘Unsolicited narratives from the Internet: a rich source of qualitative data’, Qualitative Health Research, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 706–14.
32. K.Rodham, & J.Gavin, 2006, ‘The ethics of using the Internet to collect qualitative research data’, Research Ethics Review, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 92–7.
33. Seale, C, Charteris-Black, J, A.MacFarlane, & McPherson, A 2010, ‘Interviews and Internet forums: a comparison of two sources of qualitative data’, Qualitative Health Research, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 595–606.
34. P.Sneijder, & H.F.M.te Molder 2004, ‘Health should not have to be a problem: talking health and accountability in an Internet forum on veganism’, Journal of Health Psychology, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 599–616.
35. W.Stainton Rogers, 2009, Research methodology’, in D.Fox, I.Prilleltensky & S.Austin (eds.), Critical psychology: an introduction, Sage, London, pp. 335–54.
36. K.Stewart, & M.Williams, 2005, ‘Researching online populations: the use of online focus groups for social research’, Qualitative Research, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 395–416.
37. M.Veen,, H.F.M.te Molder,, B.Gremmen, & C.van Woerkum, 2010, ‘Quitting is not an option: an analysis of online diet talk between celiac disease patients’, Health, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 23–40.
38. J.B.Walther, 2002, ‘Research ethics in Internet-enabled research: human subjects issues and methodological myopia’, Ethics and Information Technology, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 205–16.
39. L.C.Whitehead, 2007, ‘Methodological and ethical issues in Internet-mediated research in the field of health: an integrated review of the literature’, Social Science & Medicine, vol. 65, no. 4, pp. 782–91.