Quitting is not an option: An analysis of online diet talk between celiac disease patients

Health

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 23-40

  Veen, Mario ^a   te Molder, Hedwig ^a   Gremmen, Bart ^a   van Woerkum, Cees ^a  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Celiac disease; Coping; Diet; Discourse analysis; Discursive psychology

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CELIAC DISEASE; DIET THERAPY; GLUTEN FREE DIET; HUMAN; INTERNET; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; SELF HELP;

ADAPTATION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; CELIAC DISEASE; DIET, GLUTEN-FREE; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; INTERNET; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; SELF-HELP GROUPS;

EID: 73549098483     PISSN: 13634593     EISSN: 14617196     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1363459309347478     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Antaki, C., Ardevol, E., Nunez, F. and Vayreda, A. (2005). 'For she who knows who she is': Managing accountability in online forum messages. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(1), 114-32.
2. Arminen, I. (1998). Organization of participation in meetings of Alcoholics Anonymous. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 9(2), 59-98.
3. Arminen, I. (2001). Closings of turns in the meetings of Alcoholics Anonymous. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 34(2), 211-52.
4. Arminen, I. (2004). Second stories: The salience of interpersonal communication for mutual help in Alcoholics Anonymous. Journal of Pragmatics, 36(2), 319-47.
5. Balfe, M. (2005). Diets and discipline: The narratives of practice of university students with type 1 diabetes. Sociology of Health and Illness, 29(1), 136-53.
6. Celiac Disease Consortium. (2008). http://www.celiac-disease-consortium.nl/ (accessed 1 June 2008).
7. Ciacci, C., Iavarone, A., Sinisicalchi, M., Romano, R. and de Rosa, A. (2002). Psychological dimensions of celiac disease: Toward an integrated approach. Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 47(9), 2082-7.
8. Clayman, S. and Heritage, J. (2002). The news interview: Journalists and public figures on the air. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9. Danoff-Burg, S., Ayala, J. and Revenson, T.A. (2000). Researcher knows best? Toward a closer match between the concept and measurement of coping. Journal of Health Psychology, 5(2), 183-94.
10. Davidson, K.P., Pennebaker, J.W. and Dickerson, S.S. (2000). Who talks? The social psychology of illness support groups. American Psychologist, 55(2), 205-17.
11. Dunn-Galvin, A., de BlokFlokstra, B.M., Burks, A.W., Dubois, A.E. and Hourihane, J.O. (2008). Food allergy QoL questionnaire for children aged 0-12 years: Content, construct, and cross-cultural validity. Clinical and Experimental Allergy, 38(6), 977-86.
12. Edwards, D. (1994). Two to tango: Script formulations, dispositions, and rhetorical symmetry in relationship troubles talk. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 28(4), 319-50.
13. Edwards, D. (1997). Discourse and cognition. London: SAGE.
14. Edwards, D. and Potter, J. (1992). Discursive psychology. London: SAGE.
15. Edwards, D. and Potter, J. (2005). Discursive psychology, mental states and descriptions. In H. te Molder and J. Potter (Eds.), Conversation and cognition, pp. 241-59. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16. Garcia, A.C. and Jacobs, J.B. (1999). The eyes of the beholder: Understanding the turn-taking system in quasi-synchronous computer-mediated communication. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 32(4), 337-67.
17. Gavin, J., Rodham, K. and Poyer, H. (2008). The presentation of 'pro-anorexia' in online group interactions. Qualitative Health Research, 18(3), 325-33.
18. Guise, J., Widdicombe, S. and McKinlay, A. (2007). 'What is it like to have ME?': The discursive construction of ME in computer-mediated communication and face-to-face interaction. health:, 11(1), 87-108.
19. Hallert, C., Grännö, C., Hulten, S., Midhagen, G., Ström, M., Svensson, H. and Valdimarsson, T. (2002). Living with coeliac disease: Controlled study of the burden of illness. Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology, 37(1), 39-42.
20. Herring, S.C. (2004). Computer-mediated discourse analysis: An approach to researching online behavior. In S.A. Barab, R. Kling and J.H. Gray (Eds.), Designing for virtual communities in the service of learning, pp. 338-76. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21. Horton-Salway, M. (2001). Narrative identities and the management of personal accountability in talk about ME: A discursive psychology approach to illness narrative. Journal of Health Psychology, 6(2), 247-59.
22. Horton-Salway, M. (2002). Bio-psycho-social reasoning in GPs' case narratives: The discursive construction of ME patients' identities. health:, 6(4), 401-21.
23. Horton-Salway, M. (2004). The 'ME bandwagon' and other labels: Constructing the genuine case in talk about a controversial illness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 46(4), 895-914.
24. Hutchby, I. (2001). Conversation and technology: From the telephone to the internet. Cambridge: Polity Press.
25. Lamerichs, J. (2003). Discourse of support: Exploring online discussions on depression. PhD thesis, Wageningen University, the Netherlands.
26. Lamerichs, J. and te Molder, H.F.M. (2003). Computer-mediated communication: From a cognitive to a discursive model. New Media and Society, 5(4), 451-73.
27. Lawson, V.L., Lyne, P.A., Harvey, J.N. and Bundy, C. (2005). Understanding why people with type 1 diabetes do not attend for specialist advice: A qualitative analysis of the views of people with insulin-dependent diabetes who do not attend diabetes clinic. Journal of Health Psychology, 10(3), 409-23.
28. Lazarus, R.S. (2005). Emotions and interpersonal relationships: Toward a person-centered conceptualization of emotions and coping. Journal of Personality, 74(1), 9-46.
29. Lee, A. and Newman, J.M. (2003). Celiac diet: Its impact on quality of life. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 103(11), 1533-5.
30. Maclean, H.M. (1991). Patterns of diet related self-care in diabetes. Social Science and Medicine, 32(6), 689-96.
31. Peel, E., Parry, O., Douglas, M. and Lawton, J. (2005). Taking the biscuit? A discursive approach to managing diet in type 2 diabetes. Journal of Health Psychology, 10(6), 779-91.
32. Potter, J. (1996). Representing reality: Discourse, rhetoric and social construction. London: SAGE.
33. Potter, J. (2002). Two kinds of natural. Discourse Studies, 4(4), 539-42.
34. Reed, D. (2001). 'Making conversation': Sequential integrity and the local management of interaction on Internet newsgroups. Proceedings of the 34th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. http://csdl.computer.org/comp/proceedings/hicss/2001/0981/04/09814035abs.htm (accessed 1 June 2008).
35. Robinson, J.D. (2007). The role of numbers and statistics within conversation analysis. Communication Methods and Measures, 1(1), 65-75.
36. Sacks, H. (1984). On doing 'being ordinary'. In J.M. Atkinson and J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis, pp. 413-29. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
37. Sandaunet, A. (2008). The challenge of fitting in: Non-participation and withdrawal from an online self-help group for breast cancer patients. Sociology of Health & Illness, 30(1), 131-44.
38. Schönfeldt, J. and Golato, A. (2003). Repair in chats: A conversation analytic approach. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 36(3), 241-84.
39. Sneijder, P. and te Molder, H.F.M. (2005). Moral logic and logical morality: Attributions of responsibility and blame in online discourse on veganism. Discourse and Society, 16(5), 675-96.
40. Svenker, A., Hensing, G. and Hallert, C. (2005). 'Controlled by food': Lived experiences of coeliac disease. Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics, 18(6), 171-80.
41. te Molder, H. and Potter, J., Eds. (2005). Conversation and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
42. te Molder, H., Bovenhoff, M., Gremmen, B. and van Woerkum, C. (Forthcoming). Talking future technologies: How celiac disease patients accept nor reject 'a simple pill'.
43. Wiggins, S. and Hepburn, A., Eds. (2007). Discursive research in practice: New approaches to psychology and interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
44. Wilkinson, S. and Kitzinger, C. (2000). Thinking differently about thinking positive: A discursive approach to cancer patients' talk. Social Science and Medicine, 50(6), 797-811.