Interviews and internet forums: A comparison of two sources of qualitative data

Qualitative Health Research

Volumn 20, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 595-606

  Seale, Clive ^a   Charteris Black, Jonathan ^b   MacFarlane, Aidan ^c   McPherson, Ann ^d  

^a QUEEN MARY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF THE WEST OF ENGLAND   (United Kingdom)

^c Independent Consultant   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cancer; Experiences; Illness and disease; Internet; Interviews; Keyword analysis; Nonparticipant; Observation; Sexual health

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BREAST TUMOR; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERNET; INTERVIEW; MALE; PROSTATE TUMOR;

BLOGGING; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERNET; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; MALE; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS;

EID: 77952392843     PISSN: 10497323     EISSN: 15527557     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1049732309354094     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Adair, C.E., Marcoux, G., Williams, A., & Reimer, M. (2006). The Internet as a source of data to support the development of a quality-of-life measure for eating disorders. Qualitative Health Research, 16, 538-546.
2. Andrews, M., Sclater, S.D., Squire, C., & Tamboukou, M. (2004). Narrative research. In C. Seale, G. Gobo, J. Gubrium, & D. Silverman (Eds.), Qualitative research practice (pp. 109-124). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
3. Atkinson, P., & Silverman, D. (1997). Kunderas immortality: The interview society and the invention of the self. Qualitative Inquiry, 3 (3). 304-325.
4. Baker, P. (2006). Using corpora in discourse analysis. London: Continuum.
5. Baron, N.S. (1998). Letters by phone or speech by other means: The linguistics of email. Language and Communication, 18, 133-170.
6. Bassett, E.H., & O Riordan, K. (2002). Ethics of Internet research: Contesting the human subjects research model. Ethics and Information Technology, 4 (3). 233-247.
7. Becker, H.S., & Geer, B. (1957). Participant observation and interviewing: A comparison. Human Organization, 16, 28-34.
8. Bury, M. (1982). Chronic illness as biographical disruption. Sociology of Health and Illness, 4 (2). 167-182.
9. Bylund, C.L. (2005). Mothers involvement in decision making during the birthing process: A quantitative analysis of womens online birth stories. Health Communication, 18 (1). 23-39.
10. Cain, M., & Finch, J. (1981). Towards a rehabilitation of data. In P. Abrams, R. Deem, J. Finch, & P. Rock (Eds.), Practice and progress: British sociology 1950-1980 (pp. 105-119). London: Allen and Unwin.
11. Charmaz, K. (1983). Loss of self: A fundamental form of suffering in the chronically ill. Sociology of Health and Illness, 5 (2). 168-195.
12. Couper, M.P., & Stinson, L.L. (1999). Completion of self-administered questionnaires in a sex survey. Journal of Sex Research, 36 (4). 321-330.
13. Ess, C., & AOIR Working Committee. (2002). Ethical decision-making and Internet research: Recommendations from the AOIR ethics working committee. Retrieved October 30, 2009 from http://www.aoir.org/reports/ethics.pdf
14. Fleitas, J. (1998). Spinning tales from the World Wide Web: Qualitative research in an electronic environment. Qualitative Health Research, 8, 283-292.
15. Flicker, S., Haans, D., & Skinner, H. (2004). Ethical dilemmas in research on Internet communities. Qualitative Health Research, 14, 124-134.
16. Fox, N., Ward, K., & ORourke, A. (2005). Pro-anorexia, weight-loss drugs and the Internet: An "anti-recovery" explanatory model of anorexia. Sociology of Health and Illness, 27 (7). 944-971.
17. Gavin, J., Rodham, K., & Poyer, H. (2007). The presentation of "pro-anorexia" in online group interactions. Qualitative Health Research, 18, 325-333.
18. Goffman, E. (1969). The presentation of self in everyday life. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.
19. Goldfarb, A., & Prince, J. (2008). Internet adoption and usage patterns are different: Implications for the digital divide. Information Economics and Policy, 20 (1). 2-15.
20. Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (2007). Ethnography: Principles in practice (3 rd ed.). London: Routledge.
21. Harvey, K.J., Brown, B., Crawford, P., MacFarlane, A., & McPherson, A. (2007). "Am I normal?" Teenagers, sexual health and the Internet. Social Science and Medicine, 65, 771-781.
22. Hine, C. (2000). Virtual ethnography. London: Sage.
23. Lee, R.M. (1993). Doing research on sensitive topics. London: Sage.
24. Mitchell, K., Wellings, K., Elam, G., Fenton, K., & Johnson, A. (2007). How can we facilitate reliable reporting in surveys of sexual behaviour? Evidence from qualitative research. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 9 (5). 519-531.
25. Orgad, S. (2005). Storytelling online: Talking breast cancer on the Internet. New York: Peter Lang.
26. Rier, D. (2007). Internet social support groups as moral agents: The ethical dynamics of HIV+ status disclosure. Sociology of Health and Illness, 29 (7). 1043-1058.
27. Riessman, C.K. (1993). Narrative analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
28. Robinson, K. (2001). Unsolicited narratives from the Internet: A rich source of qualitative data. Qualitative Health Research, 11, 706-714.
29. Scott, M. (2005). Wordsmith Tools 4.0 Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Retrieved October 30, 2009 from http://www.lexically.net/wordsmith/ version4/
30. Seale, C. (2006). Gender accommodation in online cancer support groups. Health, 10 (3). 345-360.
31. Seale, C. (2008). Mapping the field of medical sociology: A comparative analysis of journals. Sociology of Health and Illness, 30 (5). 677-695.
32. Seale, C., Boden, S., Lowe, P., Steinberg, D., & Williams, S. (2007). Media constructions of sleep and sleep disorders: A study of UK national newspapers. Social Science and Medicine, 65 (3). 418-430.
33. Seale, C., & Charteris-Black, J. (2008 a). The interaction of class and gender in illness narratives. Sociology, 42 (3). 453-469.
34. Seale, C., & Charteris-Black, J. (2008 b). The interaction of age and gender in illness narratives. Ageing and Society 28 (7). 1025-1043.
35. Seale, C., Charteris-Black, J., Dumelow, C., Locock, J., & Ziebland, S. (2008). The effect of joint interviewing on the performance of gender. Field Methods, 20, 107-128.
36. Seale, C., Charteris-Black, J., & Ziebland, S. (2006). Gender, cancer experience and Internet use: A comparative keyword analysis of interviews and online cancer support groups. Social Science and Medicine, 62 (10). 2577-2590.
37. Sharf, B. (1999). Beyond netiquette: The ethics of doing naturalistic discourse research on the Internet. In S. Jones (Ed.), Doing Internet research (pp. 243-256). London: Sage.
38. Sharf, B.F. (1997). Communicating breast cancer on-line: Support and empowerment on the Internet. Women and Health, 26 (1). 65-84.
39. Silverman, D. (1998). The quality of qualitative health research: The open-ended interview and its alternatives. Social Sciences in Health, 4 (2). 104-118.
40. Sixsmith, J., & Murray, C.D. (2001). Ethical issues in the documentary data analysis of Internet posts and archives. Qualitative Health Research, 11, 423-432.
41. Trow, M. (1957). Comment on "Participant observation and interviewing: A comparison." Human Organization, 16, 33-35.
42. Williams, G. (1984). The genesis of chronic illness: Narrative reconstruction. Sociology of Health and Illness, 6 (2). 175-200.
43. Wiszniewski, D., & Coyne, R. (2002). Mask and identity: The hermeneutics of self-construction in the information age. In K. A. Renninger & W. Shumar (Eds.), Building virtual communities (pp. 191-214). New York: Cambridge University Press.