Pro-angiogenic character of endothelial cells and gingival fibroblasts cocultures in perfused degradable polyurethane scaffolds

Tissue Engineering - Part A

Volumn 21, Issue 9-10, 2015, Pages 1587-1599

  Cheung, Jane W C ^a   Jain, Devika ^a   McCulloch, Christopher A G ^b   Santerre, J Paul ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOREACTORS; BLOOD VESSELS; CELL CULTURE; CELL ENGINEERING; CELLS; CYTOLOGY; ENDOTHELIAL CELLS; FIBROBLASTS; POLYURETHANES; SELF ASSEMBLY; TISSUE; TISSUE ENGINEERING; TISSUE REGENERATION;

FIBROBLAST GROWTH FACTOR; GINGIVAL FIBROBLASTS; HUMAN GINGIVAL FIBROBLASTS; HUMAN UMBILICAL VEIN ENDOTHELIAL CELLS; POLYURETHANE SCAFFOLDS; TISSUE ENGINEERED CONSTRUCTS; TRANSFORMING GROWTH FACTORS; VASCULAR ENDOTHELIAL GROWTH FACTOR;

SCAFFOLDS (BIOLOGY);

FIBROBLAST GROWTH FACTOR 2; POLYURETHAN; TRANSFORMING GROWTH FACTOR BETA1; VASCULOTROPIN; CULTURE MEDIUM; DNA; VASCULOTROPIN A;

ANGIOGENESIS; ARTICLE; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL GROWTH; CELL PROLIFERATION; COCULTURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FIBROBLAST; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; HUMAN GINGIVAL FIBROBLAST; MYOFIBROBLAST; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TISSUE ENGINEERING; TISSUE REGENERATION; UMBILICAL VEIN ENDOTHELIAL CELL; VASCULARIZATION; BIOSYNTHESIS; CELL COUNT; CELL CULTURE; CHEMICAL PHENOMENA; CHEMISTRY; CULTURE MEDIUM; CYTOLOGY; DRUG EFFECTS; FLUORESCENT ANTIBODY TECHNIQUE; GINGIVA; METABOLISM; PERFUSION; PHARMACOLOGY; TISSUE SCAFFOLD;

CELL COUNT; CELLS, CULTURED; COCULTURE TECHNIQUES; CULTURE MEDIA; DNA; FIBROBLAST GROWTH FACTOR 2; FIBROBLASTS; FLUORESCENT ANTIBODY TECHNIQUE; GINGIVA; HUMAN UMBILICAL VEIN ENDOTHELIAL CELLS; HUMANS; HYDROPHOBIC AND HYDROPHILIC INTERACTIONS; NEOVASCULARIZATION, PHYSIOLOGIC; PERFUSION; POLYURETHANES; TISSUE SCAFFOLDS; TRANSFORMING GROWTH FACTOR BETA1; VASCULAR ENDOTHELIAL GROWTH FACTOR A;

EID: 84929497918     PISSN: 19373341     EISSN: 1937335X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/ten.tea.2014.0548     Document Type: Article

References (77)

1. Sarfati, A., Bourgeois, D., Katsahian, S., Mora, F., and Bouchard, P. Risk assessment for buccal gingival recession defects in an adult population. J Periodontol 81, 1419, 2010.
2. Susin, C., Haas, A.N., Oppermann, R.V., Haugejorden, O., and Albandar, J.M. Gingival recession: epidemiology and risk indicators in a representative urban Brazilian population. J Periodontol 75, 1377, 2004.
3. Kassab, M.M., and Cohen, R.E. The etiology and prevalence of gingival recession. J Am Dent Assoc 134, 220, 2003.
4. Albandar, J.M., and Kingman, A. Gingival recession, gingival bleeding, and dental calculus in adults 30 years of age and older in the United States, 1988-1994. J Periodontol 70, 30, 1999.
5. Chambrone, L., Sukekava, F., Araújo, M.G., Pustiglioni, F.E., Chambrone, L.A., and Lima, L.A. Root-coverage procedures for the treatment of localized recession-type defects: A cochrane systematic review. J Periodontol 81, 452, 2010.
6. Graziani, F., Gennai, S., Roldan, S., Discepoli, N., Buti, J., Madianos, P., and Herrera, D. Efficacy of periodontal plastic procedures in the treatment of multiple gingival recessions. J Clin Periodontol 41 (Suppl 15), S63, 2014.
7. Wennström, J.L. Increased gingival dimensions. A significant factor for successful outcome of root coverage procedures? A 2-year prospective clinical study. J Clin Periodontol 23, 770, 1996.
8. Camargo, P.M., Melnick, P.R., and Kenney, E.B. The use of free gingival grafts for aesthetic purposes. Periodontol 2000 27, 72, 2001.
9. Tonetti, M.S., Jepsen, S., and Working Group 2 of the European Workshop on Periodontology. Clinical efficacy of periodontal plastic surgery procedures: consensus report of Group 2 of the 10th European Workshop on Periodontology. J Clin Periodontol 41 (Suppl 15), S36, 2014.
10. Harris, R.J. The connective tissue and partial thickness double pedicle graft: A predictable method of obtaining root coverage. J Periodontol 63, 477, 1992.
11. Tözüm, T.F., Keçeli, H.G., Güncü, G.N., Hatipoglu, H., and Sengün, D. Treatment of gingival recession: comparison of two techniques of subepithelial connective tissue graft. J Periodontol 76, 1842, 2005.
12. Moharamzadeh, K., Brook, I.M., Van Noort, R., Scutt, A.M., and Thornhill, M.H. Tissue-engineered oral mucosa: A review of the scientific literature. J Dent Res 86, 115, 2007.
13. Karring, T., Lang, N.P., and Loe, H. The role of gingival connective tissue in determining epithelial differentiation. J Periodontal Res 10, 1, 1975.
14. Paolantonio, M., Dolci, M., Esposito, P., D'Archivio, D., Lisanti, L., Di Luccio, A., and Perinetti, G. Subpedicle acellular dermal matrix graft and autogenous connective tissue graft in the treatment of gingival recessions: A comparative 1-year clinical study. J Periodontol 73, 1299, 2002.
15. Rastogi, S., Modi, M., and Sathian, B. The efficacy of collagen membrane as a biodegradable wound dressing material for surgical defects of oral mucosa: A prospective study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 67, 1600, 2009.
16. Blackwood, K.A., McKean, R., Canton, I., Freeman, C.O., Franklin, K.L., Cole, D., Brook, I., Farthing, P., Rimmer, S., Haycock, J.W., Ryan, A.J., and MacNeil, S. Development of biodegradable electrospun scaffolds for dermal replacement. Biomaterials 29, 3091, 2008.
17. Aframian, D.J., Redman, R.S., Yamano, S., Nikolovski, J., Cukierman, E., Yamada, K.M., Kriete, M.F., Swaim, W.D., Mooney, D.J., and Baum, B.J. Tissue compatibility of two biodegradable tubular scaffolds implanted adjacent to skin or buccal mucosa in mice. Tissue Eng 8, 649, 2002.
18. Buurma, B., Gu, K., and Rutherford, R.B. Transplantation of human pulpal and gingival fibroblasts attached to synthetic scaffolds. Eur J Oral Sci 107, 282, 1999.
19. Baümchen, F., Smeets, R., Koch, D., and Gräber, H.G. The impact of defined polyglycolide scaffold structure on the proliferation of gingival fibroblasts in vitro: A pilot study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 108, 505, 2009.
20. Dhandayuthapani, B., Yoshida, Y., Maekawa, T., and Kumar, D.S. Polymeric scaffolds in tissue engineering application: A review. Int J Poly Sci 2011, 290602, 2011.
21. Meretoja, V.V., Dahlin, R.L., Kasper, F.K., and Mikos, A.G. Enhanced chondrogenesis in co-cultures with articular chondrocytes and mesenchymal stem cells. Biomaterials 33, 6362, 2012.
22. Williams, J.M., Adewunmi, A., Schek, R.M., Flanagan, C.L., Krebsbach, P.H., Feinberg, S.E., Hollister, S.J., and Das, S. Bone tissue engineering using polycaprolactone scaffolds fabricated via selective laser sintering. Biomaterials 26, 4817, 2005.
23. Yang, L., Hong, J., Wang, J., Pilliar, R.M., and Santerre, J.P. Influence of anionic monomer content on the biodegradation and toxicity of polyvinyl-urethane carbonateceramic interpenetrating phase composites. Biomaterials 26, 5951, 2005.
24. Yang, S., Leong, K.F., Du, Z., and Chua, C.K. The design of scaffolds for use in tissue engineering. Part I. Traditional factors. Tissue Eng 7, 679, 2001.
25. McBane, J.E., Battiston, K.G., Wadhwani, A., Sharifpoor, S., Labow, R.S., and Santerre, J.P. The effect of degradable polymer surfaces on co-cultures of monocytes and smooth muscle cells. Biomaterials 32, 3584, 2011.
26. Sharifpoor, S., Simmons, C.A., Labow, R.S., and Santerre, J.P. Functional characterization of human coronary artery smooth muscle cells under cyclic mechanical strain in a degradable polyurethane scaffold. Biomaterials 32, 4816, 2011.
27. McBane, J.E., Sharifpoor, S., Cai, K., Labow, R.S., and Santerre, J.P. Biodegradation and in vivo biocompatibility of a degradable, polar/hydrophobic/ionic polyurethane for tissue engineering applications. Biomaterials 32, 6034, 2011.
28. McDonald, S.M., Matheson, L.A., McBane, J.E., Kuraitis, D., Suuronen, E., Santerre, J.P., and Labow, R.S. Use of monocyte/endothelial cell co-cultures (in vitro) and a subcutaneous implant mouse model (in vivo) to evaluate a degradable polar hydrophobic ionic polyurethane. J Cell Biochem 112, 3762, 2011.
29. Cheung, J.W.C., Rose, E.E., and Santerre, J.P. Perfused culture of gingival fibroblasts in a degradable/polar/hydrophobic/ionic polyurethane (D-PHI) scaffold leads to enhanced proliferation and metabolic activity. Acta Biomater 9, 6867, 2013.
30. Cheung, J.W.C., McCulloch, C.A.G., and Santerre, J.P. Establishing a gingival fibroblast phenotype in a perfused degradable polyurethane scaffold: mediation by TGFbeta1, FGF-2, beta1-integrin, and focal adhesion kinase. Biomaterials 35, 10025, 2014.
31. Awwad, H.K., El Naggar, M., Mocktar, N., and Barsoum, M. Intercapillary distance measurement as an indicator of hypoxia in carcinoma of the cervix uteri. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 12, 1329, 1986.
32. Ando, J., and Yamamoto, K. Vascular mechanobiology: endothelial cell responses to fluid shear stress. Circ J 73, 1983, 2009.
33. Davies, P.F. Flow-mediated endothelial mechanotransduction. Physiol Rev 75, 519, 1995.
34. Kaully, T., Kaufman-Francis, K., Lesman, A., and Levenberg, S. Vascularization-the conduit to viable engineered tissues. Tissue Eng Part B Rev 15, 159, 2009.
35. Sorrell, J.M., Baber, M.A., and Caplan, A.I. A selfassembled fibroblast-endothelial cell co-culture system that supports in vitro vasculogenesis by both human umbilical vein endothelial cells and human dermal microvascular endothelial cells. Cells Tissues Organs 186, 157, 2007.
36. Bae, H., Puranik, A.S., Gauvin, R., Edalat, F., Carrillo-Conde, B., Peppas, N.A., and Khademhosseini, A. Building vascular networks. Sci Trans Med 4, 160ps23, 2012.
37. Davis, G.E., Bayless, K.J., and Mavila, A. Molecular basis of endothelial cell morphogenesis in three-dimensional extracellular matrices. Anat Record 268, 252, 2002.
38. Yamada, K., Yamaura, J., Katoh, M., Hata, K., Okuda, K., and Yoshie, H. Fabrication of cultured oral gingiva by tissue engineering techniques without materials of animal origin. J Periodontol 77, 672, 2006.
39. Hughes, C.C.W. Endothelial-stromal interactions in angiogenesis. Curr Opin Hematol 15, 204, 2008.
40. Smith, P.C., and Martnez, J. Differential uPA expression by TGF-b1 in gingival fibroblasts. J Dent Res 85, 150, 2006.
41. Cornelini, R., Rubini, C., Fioroni, M., Favero, G.A., Strocchi, R., and Piatteli, A. Transforming growth factorbeta 1 expression in the peri-implant soft tissues of healthy and failing dental implants. J Periodontol 74, 446, 2003.
42. Taba, Jr., M., Jin, Q., Sugai, J.V., and Giannobile, W.V. Current concepts in periodontal bioengineering. Orthod Craniofac Res 8, 292, 2005.
43. Li, H., and Chang, J. Bioactive silicate materials stimulate angiogenesis in fibroblast and endothelial cell co-culture system through paracrine effect. Acta Biomater 9, 6981, 2013.
44. Baiguera, S., and Ribatti, D. Endothelialization approaches for viable engineered tissues. Angiogenesis 16, 1, 2013.
45. Sharifpoor, S., Labow, R.S., and Santerre, J.P. Synthesis and characterization of degradable polar hydrophobic ionic polyurethane scaffolds for vascular tissue engineering applications. Biomacromolecules 10, 2729, 2009.
46. Choong, C.S.N., Hutmacher, D.W., and Triffitt, J.T. Coculture of bone marrow fibroblasts and endothelial cells on modified polycaprolactone substrates for enhanced potentials in bone tissue engineering. Tissue Eng 12, 2521, 2006.
47. Salem, A.K., Stevens, R., Pearson, R.G., Davies, M.C., Tendler, S.J.B., Roberts, C.J., Williams, P.M., and Shakesheff, K.M. Interactions of 3T3 fibroblasts and endothelial cells with defined pore features. J Biomed Mater Res 61, 212, 2002.
48. Kainulainen, T., Pender, A., D'Addario, M., Feng, Y., Lekic, P., and McCulloch, C.A. Cell death and mechanoprotection by filamin A in connective tissues after challenge by applied tensile forces. J Biol Chem 277, 21998, 2002.
49. Hinz, B. Formation and function of the myofibroblast during tissue repair. J Invest Dermatol 127, 526, 2007.
50. Kunz-Schughart, L.A., Schroeder, J.A., Wondrak, M., Van Rey, F., Lehle, K., Hofstaedter, F., and Wheatley, D.N. Potential of fibroblasts to regulate the formation of threedimensional vessel-like structures from endothelial cells in vitro. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 290, C1385, 2006.
51. Ma, J., Van Den Beucken, J.J.J.P., Yang, F., Both, S.K., Cui, F.Z., Pan, J., and Jansen, J.A. Coculture of osteoblasts and endothelial cells: optimization of culture medium and cell ratio. Tissue Eng Part C Methods 17, 349, 2011.
52. Norman, G.R., and Streiner, D.L. Biostatistics-the Bare Essentials. Hamilton: B.C. Decker, Inc., 2008.
53. Blumbach, K., Zweers, M.C., Brunner, G., Peters, A.S., Schmitz, M., Schulz, J.-., Schild, A., Denton, C.P., Sakai, T., Fässler, R., Krieg, T., and Eckes, B. Defective granulation tissue formation in mice with specific ablation of integrin-linked kinase in fibroblasts-Role of TGFb1 levels and RhoA activity. J Cell Sci 123, 3872, 2010.
54. Battiston, K.G., Cheung, J.W., Jain, D., and Santerre, J.P. Biomaterials in co-culture systems: towards optimizing tissue integration and cell signaling within scaffolds. Biomaterials 35, 4465, 2014.
55. Sukmana, I., and Vermette, P. The effects of co-culture with fibroblasts and angiogenic growth factors on microvascular maturation and multi-cellular lumen formation in HUVEC-oriented polymer fibre constructs. Biomaterials 31, 5091, 2010.
56. Newman, A.C., Nakatsu, M.N., Chou, W., Gershon, P.D., and Hughes, C.C.W. The requirement for fibroblasts in angiogenesis: fibroblast-derived matrix proteins are essential for endothelial cell lumen formation. Mol Biol Cell 22, 3791, 2011.
57. Chiu, J.J., Chen, L.J., Chen, C.N., Lee, P.L., and Lee, C.I. A model for studying the effect of shear stress on interactions between vascular endothelial cells and smooth muscle cells. J Biomech 37, 531, 2004.
58. Bhatia, S.N., Balis, U.J., Yarmush, M.L., and Toner, M. Effect of cell-cell interactions in preservation of cellular phenotype: cocultivation of hepatocytes and nonparenchymal cells. FASEB J 13, 1883, 1999.
59. Chung, S., Sudo, R., MacK, P.J., Wan, C.R., Vickerman, V., and Kamm, R.D. Cell migration into scaffolds under coculture conditions in a microfluidic platform. Lab Chip 9, 269, 2009.
60. Kolbe, M., Xiang, Z., Dohle, E., Tonak, M., Kirkpatrick, C.J., and Fuchs, S. Paracrine effects influenced by cell culture medium and consequences on microvessel-like structures in cocultures of mesenchymal stem cells and outgrowth endothelial cells. Tissue Eng Part A 17, 2199, 2011.
61. Wipff, P.J., and Hinz, B. Myofibroblasts work best under stress. J Bodyw Mov Ther 13, 121, 2009.
62. Hinz, B. Masters and servants of the force: the role of matrix adhesions in myofibroblast force perception and transmission. Eur J Cell Biol 85, 175, 2006.
63. Tomasek, J.J., Gabbiani, G., Hinz, B., Chaponnier, C., and Brown, R.A. Myofibroblasts and mechano: regulation of connective tissue remodelling. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 3, 349, 2002.
64. Horan, G.S., Wood, S., Ona, V., Dan, J.L., Lukashev, M.E., Weinreb, P.H., Simon, K.J., Hahm, K., Allaire, N.E., Rinaldi, N.J., Goyal, J., Feghali-Bostwick, C.A., Matteson, E.L., O'Hara, C., Lafyatis, R., Davis, G.S., Huang, X., Sheppard, D., and Violette, S.M. Partial inhibition of integrin avb6 prevents pulmonary fibrosis without exacerbating inflammation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 177, 56, 2008.
65. Galie, P.A., Russell, M.W., Westfall, M.V., and Stegemann, J.P. Interstitial fluid flow and cyclic strain differentially regulate cardiac fibroblast activation via AT1R and TGF-b1. Exp Cell Res 318, 75, 2012.
66. Pepper, M.S., Ferrara, N., Orci, L., and Montesano, R. Potent synergism between vascular endothelial growth factor and basic fibroblast growth factor in the induction of angiogenesis in vitro. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 189, 824, 1992.
67. Goto, F., Goto, K., Weindel, K., and Folkman, J. Synergistic effects of vascular endothelial growth factor and basic fibroblast growth factor on the proliferation and cord formation of bovine capillary endothelial cells within collagen gels. Lab Invest 69, 508, 1993.
68. Asahara, T., Bauters, C., Zheng, L.P., Takeshita, S., Bunting, S., Ferrara, N., Symes, J.F., and Isner, J.M. Synergistic effect of vascular endothelial growth factor and basic fibroblast growth factor on angiogenesis in vivo. Circulation 92, II365, 1995.
69. Santos, M.I., and Reis, R.L. Vascularization in bone tissue engineering: physiology, current strategies, major hurdles and future challenges. Macromol Biosci 10, 12, 2010.
70. Ferrari, G., Cook, B.D., Terushkin, V., Pintucci, G., and Mignatti, P. Transforming growth factor-beta 1 (TGF-ß1) induces angiogenesis through vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-mediated apoptosis. J Cell Physiol 219, 449, 2009.
71. Liu, Z., Kobayashi, K., van Dinther, M., van Heiningen, S.H., Valdimarsdottir, G., van Laar, T., Scharpfenecker, M., Löwik, C.W.G.M., Goumans, M.J., ten Dijke, P., and Pardali, E. VEGF and inhibitors of TGFß type-I receptor kinase synergistically promote blood-vessel formation by inducing a5-integrin expression. J Cell Sci 122, 3294, 2009.
72. Dohle, E., Fuchs, S., Kolbe, M., Hofmann, A., Schmidt, H., and Kirkpatrick, C.J. Comparative study assessing effects of sonic hedgehog and VEGF in a human co-culture model for bone vascularisation strategies. Eur Cells Mater 21, 144, 2011.
73. Folkman, J., and D'Amore, P.A. Blood vessel formation: what is its molecular basis? Cell 87, 1153, 1996.
74. Iruela-Arispe, M.L., and Dvorak, H.F. Angiogenesis: A dynamic balance of stimulators and inhibitors. Thromb Haemost 78, 672, 1997.
75. Rao, R.R., Peterson, A.W., Ceccarelli, J., Putnam, A.J., and Stegemann, J.P. Matrix composition regulates threedimensional network formation by endothelial cells and mesenchymal stem cells in collagen/fibrin materials. Angiogenesis 15, 253, 2012.
76. Ingber, D.E., and Folkman, J. Mechanochemical switching between growth and differentiation during fibroblast growth factor-stimulated angiogenesis in vitro: role of extracellular matrix. J Cell Biol 109, 317, 1989.
77. Senger, D.R., and Davis, G.E. Angiogenesis. Cold Spring Harbor Perspect Biol 3, a005090, 2011.