CD44+/CD24- breast cancer cells exhibit phenotypic reversion in three-dimensional self-assembling peptide RADA16 nanofiber scaffold

International Journal of Nanomedicine

Volumn 10, Issue , 2015, Pages 3043-3053

  Mi, Kun ^a   Xing, Zhihua ^b  

^a SICHUAN CANCER HOSPITAL   (China)

^b SICHUAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

3D culture; Phenotype; Reversion

Indexed keywords

ARGINYLALANYLASPARTYLALANYLARGINYLALANYLASPARTYLALANYLARGINYLALANYLASPARTYLALANYLARGINYLALANYLASPARTYLALANINE; BETA CATENIN; CD24 ANTIGEN; COLLAGEN TYPE 1; HERMES ANTIGEN; INTERCELLULAR ADHESION MOLECULE 1; MATRIGEL; PEPTIDE; PYRROLIDINE DITHIOCARBAMATE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; NANOFIBER; RADA16-I;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANTIGEN EXPRESSION; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER CELL LINE; CELL MIGRATION; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL STRUCTURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYTOSKELETON; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; IN VITRO STUDY; IN VIVO STUDY; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; REVERTANT; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; UPREGULATION; ANIMAL; BREAST TUMOR; CHEMISTRY; DRUG EFFECTS; FEMALE; METABOLISM; NUDE MOUSE; STEM CELL; TUMOR CELL LINE;

MUS MUSCULUS;

ANIMALS; ANTIGENS, CD24; ANTIGENS, CD44; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CELL LINE, TUMOR; CELL PROLIFERATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MICE; MICE, NUDE; NANOFIBERS; PEPTIDES; STEM CELLS;

EID: 84929431345     PISSN: 11769114     EISSN: 11782013     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2147/IJN.S66723     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Nguyen LV, Vanner R, Dirks P, Eaves CJ. Cancer stem cells: an evolving concept. Nat Rev Cancer. 2012;12(2):133–143.
2. Kreso A, Dick JE. Evolution of the cancer stem cell model. Cell Stem Cell. 2014;14(3):275–291.
3. Park CC, Bissell MJ, Barcellos-Hoff MH. The influence of the microenvironment on the malignant phenotype. Mol Med Today. 2000; 6(8):324–329.
4. Radisky D, Muschler J, Bissell MJ. Order and disorder: the role of extracellular matrix in epithelial cancer. Cancer Invest. 2002;20(1):139–153.
5. Postovit LM, Seftor EA, Seftor RE, Hendrix MJ. Infuence of the microenvironment on melanoma cell fate determination and phenotype. Cancer Res. 2006;66(16):7833–7836.
6. Tieu KS, Tieu RS, Martinez-Agosto JA, Sehl ME. Stem cell niche dynamics: from homeostasis to carcinogenesis. Stem Cells Int. 2012; 2012:367567.
7. Boral D, Nie D. Cancer stem cells and niche microenvironments. Front Biosci (Elite Ed). 2012;4:2502–2514.
8. Zhu X, Zhou X, Lewis MT, Xia L, Wong S. Cancer stem cell, niche and EGFR decide tumor development and treatment response: A bio-computational simulation study. J Theor Biol. 2011;269(1):138–149.
9. Shiozawa Y, Pedersen EA, Havens AM, et al. Human prostate cancer metastases target the hematopoietic stem cell niche to establish footholds in mouse bone marrow. J Clin Invest. 2011;121(4):1298–1312.
10. Pasquier J, Rafi A. Role of the microenvironment in ovarian cancer stem cell maintenance. Biomed Res Int. 2013;2013:630782.
11. Sottoriva A, Sloot PM, Medema JP, Vermeulen L. Exploring cancer stem cell niche directed tumor growth. Cell Cycle. 2010;9(8): 1472–1479.
12. Chen L, Xiao Z, Meng Y, et al. The enhancement of cancer stem cell properties of MCF-7 cells in 3D collagen scaffolds for modeling of cancer and anti-cancer drugs. Biomaterials. 2012;33(5):1437–1444.
13. Zhu TS, Costello MA, Talsma CE, et al. Endothelial cells create a stem cell niche in glioblastoma by providing NOTCH ligands that nurture self-renewal of cancer stem-like cells. Cancer Res. 2011; 71(18):6061–6072.
14. Smalley KS, Lioni M, Herlyn M. Life isn’t fat: taking cancer biology to the next dimension. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim. 2006;42(8–9):242–247.
15. Kim JB. Three-dimensional tissue culture models in cancer biology. Semin Cancer Biol. 2005;15(5):365–377.
16. Weaver VM, Petersen OW, Wang F, et al. Reversion of the malignant phenotype of human breast cells in three-dimensional culture and in vivo by integrin blocking antibodies. J Cell Biol. 1997;137(1):231–245.
17. Wang F, Weaver VM, Petersen OW, et al. Reciprocal interactions between beta1-integrin and epidermal growth factor receptor in three-dimensional basement membrane breast cultures: a different perspective in epithelial biology. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;95(25): 14821–14826.
18. Wang F, Hansen RK, Radisky D, et al. Phenotypic reversion or death of cancer cells by altering signaling pathways in three-dimensional contexts. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002;94(19):1494–1503.
19. Wolf K, Mazo I, Leung H, et al. Compensation mechanism in tumor cell migration: mesenchymal-amoeboid transition after blocking of pericellular proteolysis. J Cell Biol. 2003;160(2):267–277.
20. Anders M, Hansen R, Ding RX, Rauen KA, Bissell MJ, Korn WM. Disruption of 3D tissue integrity facilitates adenovirus infection by deregulating the coxsackievirus and adenovirus receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100(4):1943–1948.
21. Mi K, Feng Z, Liu Z, et al. Self-assembling peptide RADA16 nanof-ber scaffold for a cancer cell three-dimensional culture. Iran Polym J. 2009;18(10):801–810.
22. Zhang S. Fabrication of novel biomaterials through molecular self-assembly. Nat Biotechnol. 2003;21(10):1171–1178.
23. Gelain F, Bottai D, Vescovi A, Zhang S. Designer self-assembling pep-tide nanofiber scaffolds for adult mouse neural stem cell 3-dimensional cultures. PLoS One. 2006;1:e119.
24. Ellis-Behnke RG, Liang YX, Yo u SW, et al. Nano neuro knitting: peptide nanofiber scaffold for brain repair and axon regeneration with functional return of vision. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103(13): 5054–5059.
25. Yu DG, Zhu LM, Branford-White CJ, et al. Solid dispersions in the form of electrospun core-sheath nanofibers. Int J Nanomedicine. 2011; 6:3271–3280.
26. Yu DG, Yu JH, Chen L, Williams GR, Wang X. Modifed coaxial electrospinning for the preparation of high-quality ketoprofen-loaded cellulose acetate nanofibers. Carbohydr Polym. 2012;90(2): 1016–1023.
27. Yu DG, Zhou J, Chatterton NP, Li Y, Huang J, Wang X. Polyacrylonitrile nanofibers coated with silver nanoparticles using a modifed coaxial electrospinning process. Int J Nanomedicine. 2012;7:5725–5732.
28. Velasco-Velázquez MA, Homsi N, De La Fuente M, Pestell RG. Breast cancer stem cells. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2012;44(4):573–577.
29. Ponti D, Costa A, Zaffaroni N, et al. Isolation and in vitro propagation of tumorigenic breast cancer cells with stem/progenitor cell properties. Cancer Res. 2005;65(13):5506–5511.
30. Ricardo S, Vieira AF, Gerhard R, et al. Breast cancer stem cell markers CD44, CD24 and ALDH1: expression distribution within intrinsic molecular subtype. J Clin Pathol. 2011;64(11):937–946.
31. Lee GY, Kenny PA, Lee EH, Bissell MJ. Three-dimensional culture models of normal and malignant breast epithelial cells. Nat Methods. 2007;4(4):359–365.
32. Weaver VM, Lelièvre S, Lakins JN, et al. Beta4 integrin-dependent formation of polarized three-dimensional architecture confers resistance to apoptosis in normal and malignant mammary epithelium. Cancer Cell. 2002;2(3):205–216.
33. Mi K, Wang G, Liu Z, Feng Z, Huang B, Zhao X. Infuence of a self-assembling peptide, RADA16, compared with collagen I and Matrigel on the malignant phenotype of human breast-cancer cells in 3D cultures and in vivo. Macromol Biosci. 2009;9(5):437–443.
34. Ling PM, Cheung SW, Tay DK, Ellis-Behnke RG. Using self-assembled nanomaterials to inhibit the formation of metastatic cancer stem cell colonies in vitro. Cell Transplant. 2011;20(1):127–131.
35. Andarawewa KL, Erickson AC, Chou WS, et al. Ionizing radiation predisposes nonmalignant human mammary epithelial cells to undergo transforming growth factor beta induced epithelial to mesenchymal transition. Cancer Res. 2007;67(18):8662–8670.
36. Sheridan C, Kishimoto H, Fuchs RK, et al. CD44+/CD24- breast cancer cells exhibit enhanced invasive properties: an early step necessary for metastasis. Breast Cancer Res. 2006;8(5):R59.
37. Li Q, Liu BC, Lv LL, Ma KL, Zhang XL, Phillips AO. Monocytes induce proximal tubular epithelial-mesenchymal transition through NF-kappa B dependent upregulation of ICAM-1. J Cell Biochem. 2011; 112(6):1585–1592.
38. Rothlein R, Dustin ML, Marlin SD, Springer TA. A human intercellular adhesion molecule (ICAM-1) distinct from LFA-1. J Immunol. 1986; 137:1270–1274.
39. Christgen M, Lehmann U. MDA-MB-435: the questionable use of a melanoma cell line as a model for human breast cancer is ongoing. Cancer Biol Ther. 2007;6(9):1355–1357.
40. Rae JM, Creighton CJ, Meck JM, Haddad BR, Johnson MD. MDA-MB-435 cells are derived from M14 melanoma cells – a loss for breast cancer, but a boon for melanoma research. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2007;104(1):13–19.
41. Zhang Q, Fan H, Shen J, Hoffman RM, Xing HR. Human breast cancer cell lines co-express neuronal, epithelial, and melanocytic differentiation markers in vitro and in vivo. PLoS One. 2010;5(3):e9712.