Cognitive biases in the assimilation of scientific information on global warming and genetically modified food

Food Policy

Volumn 54, Issue , 2015, Pages 35-43

  McFadden, Brandon R ^a   Lusk, Jayson L ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^b OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Bayesian updating; Beliefs; Biotechnology; Climate change

Indexed keywords

BAYESIAN ANALYSIS; BIOTECHNOLOGY; CLIMATE CHANGE; COGNITION; FOOD; GLOBAL WARMING;

EID: 84929358866     PISSN: 03069192     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2015.04.010     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. American Association for the Advancement of Science, 2007. AAAS Board Statement on Climate Change, Washington DC, February.
2. American Association for the Advancement of Science, 2012. AAAS Board of Directors: Legally Mandating GM Food Labels Could "Mislead and Falsely Alarm Consumers", Washington, DC, October.
3. American Medical Association, 2012. Report 2 of the Council on Science and Public Health: Labeling of Bioengineered Foods, Washington, DC, October.
4. Ball L.J., Quayle J.D. Alternative task construals, computational escape hatches, and dualsystem theories of reasoning. Behav. Brain Sci. 2000, 23:667-668.
5. Banquet A.E., Halter A.M., Conklin F.S. The value of frost forecasting: a bayesian approach. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 1976, 58:511-520.
6. Byerlee D., Anderson J.R. Risk, utility and the value of information in farmer decision making. Rev. Market. Agric. Econ. 1982, 50:231-246.
7. Chapman L.J. Illusory correlation in observational report. J. Verb. Learn. Verb. Behav. 1967, 6:151-155.
8. Charness G., Levin D. When optimal choices feel wrong: a laboratory study of bayesian updating, complexity, and affect. Am. Econ. Rev. 2005, 95:1300-1309.
9. Charness G., Karni E., Levin D. Individual and Group decision making under risk: an experimental study of bayesian updating and violations of first-order stochastic dominance. J. Risk Uncertainty 2007, 35:129-148.
10. Deryugina T. How do people update? the effects of local weather fluctuations on beliefs about global warming. Climatic Change 2013, 118:397-416.
11. Doll J.P. Obtaining preliminary Bayesian estimates of the value of a weather forecast. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 1971, 53:651-655.
12. El-Gamal M.A., Grether D.M. Are people bayesian? Uncovering behavioral strategies. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 1995, 90:1137-1145.
13. Food and Agriculture Organization of the U.N., 2000. FAO Statement on Biotechnology, Japan, March.
14. Frederick S. Cognitive reflection and decision making. J. Econ. Perspect. 2005, 19:25-42.
15. Gaskell, G., Bauer, M.W., Durant, J., Allum, N.C., 1999. Worlds Apart? The Reception of Genetically Modified Foods in Europe and the U.S. Science, July, pp. 384-387.
16. Grether D.M. Bayes rule as a descriptive model: the representativeness heuristic. Q. J. Econ. 1980, 95:537-557.
17. Hamilton L.C., Cutler M.J., Schaefer A. Public knowledge and concern about polar-region warming. Polar Geogr. 2012, 35:155-168.
18. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2007. Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report, Geneva.
19. Jang S.M. Seeking congruency or incongruency online? examining selective exposure to four controversial science issues. Sci. Commun. 2014, 36:143-167.
20. Kahan D.M., Jenkins-Smith H., Braman D. Cultural cognition of scientific consensus. J. Risk Res. 2011, 14:147-174.
21. Kahan D.M. Ideology, motivated reasoning, and cognitive reflection. Judgment Decis. Making 2013, 8:407-424.
22. Kahneman D. Maps of bounded rationality: psychology for behavioral economics. Am. Econ. Rev. 2003, 95:1149-1475.
23. Kahneman D., Tversky A. Subjective probability: a judgment of representativeness. Cogn. Psychol. 1972, 3:430-454.
24. Krause J. A Bayesian approach to german agricultural yield expectations. Agri. Finance Rev. 2008, 68:9-23.
25. Lord C.G., Ross L., Lepper M.R. Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: the effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 1979, 37:2098-2109.
26. Marshall G.R., Parton K.A., Hammer G.L. Risk attitude, planting conditions and the value of seasonal forecasts to a dryland wheat grower. Aust. J. Agri. Econ. 1996, 40:211-233.
27. McCright A.M., Dentzman K., Charters M., Dietz T. The influence of political ideology on trust in science. Environ. Res. Lett. 2013, 8:044029.
28. Mooney C. The Republican Brain: The Science of Why They Deny Science - and Reality 2012, Wiley, New Jersey.
29. Mooney C. The Republican War on Science 2005, Basic Books, New York.
30. Myerson R.B. Game Theory: Analysis of Conflict 1991, Harvard University Press, Massachusetts.
31. National Research Council Climate Change Science: An Analysis of Some Key Questions 2001, The National Academic Press, Washington, DC.
32. National Research Council Safety of Genetically Engineered Foods: Approaches to Assessing Unintended Health Effects 2004, The National Academic Press, Washington, DC.
33. Pautsch G.R., Babcock B.A., Breidt F.J. Optimal information acquisition under a geostatistical model. J. Agri. Resour. Econ. 1999, 24:342-366.
34. Phillips L.D., Hays W.L., Edwards W. Conservatism in complex probabilistic inference. IEEE Transac. Human Factors Electr. 1966, 7:7-18.
35. Phillips L.D., Edwards W. Conservatism in a simple probability inference task. J. Exp. Psychol. 1966, 72:346-354.
36. Pitz G.F., Downing L., Reinhold H. Sequential effects in the revision of subjective probabilities. Can. J. Psychol. 1967, 21:381-393.
37. Plous S. Biases in the assimilation of technological breakdowns: do accidents make us safer?. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 1991, 21:1058-1082.
38. Rabin M., Schrag J.L. First impressions matter: a model of confimatory bias. Q. J. Econ. 1999, 114:37-82.
39. Royal Society, 2010. Climate Change: A Summary of the Science, London, September.
40. Savage L.J. The Foundations of Statistics 1954, Wiley, New York.
41. Stanovich K.E., West R.F. Individual differences in reasoning: implications for the rationality debate?. Behav. Brain Sci. 2000, 23:645-665.
42. Tversky A., Kahneman D. Judgement under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science 1974, 185:1124-1131.
43. Tversky A., Kahneman D. Availability: a heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cogn. Psychol. 1973, 5:207-232.
44. Tversky A., Kahneman D. Belief in the law of small numbers. Psychol. Bull. 1971, 76(2):105-110.
45. Zizzo D.J., Stolarz-Fantino S., Wen J., Fantino E. A violation of the monotonicity axiom: experimental evidence on the conjunction fallacy. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 2000, 41:263-276.