Impact of aftershocks and uncertainties on the seismic evaluation of non-ductile reinforced concrete frame buildings

Engineering Structures

Volumn 100, Issue , 2015, Pages 149-163

  Han, Ruilong ^a   Li, Yue ^a   van de Lindt, John ^b  

^a Michigan Technological University   (United States)

^b Engineering Research Center and Hydraulics Laboratory   (United States)

Author keywords

Aftershock; Downtime; Fatality; Performance based engineering; Post quake decision; RC frame building; Seismic loss

Indexed keywords

CONCRETES; DUCTILITY; MAINTENANCE; REINFORCED CONCRETE; SEISMIC DESIGN; SEISMIC WAVES; SEISMOLOGY;

AFTERSHOCK; DOWNTIME; FATALITY; PERFORMANCE-BASED ENGINEERING; POST-QUAKE DECISION; RC FRAMES; SEISMIC LOSS;

EARTHQUAKES;

AFTERSHOCK; BUILDING; CONCRETE STRUCTURE; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; REINFORCED CONCRETE; SEISMIC DESIGN; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; STRUCTURAL COMPONENT;

EID: 84929239217     PISSN: 01410296     EISSN: 1873-7323     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.05.039     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Hauksson E., Jones L.M., Hutton K. The 1994 Northridge earthquake sequence in California: seismological and tectonic aspects. J Geophys Res: Solid Earth (1978-2012) 1995, 100:12335-12355.
2. Kao H., Chen W.-P. The Chi-Chi earthquake sequence: active, out-of-sequence thrust faulting in Taiwan. Science 2000, 288:2346-2349.
3. Asano Y., Saito T., Ito Y., Shiomi K., Hirose H., Matsumoto T., et al. Spatial distribution and focal mechanisms of aftershocks of the 2011 off the Pacific coast of Tohoku earthquake. Earth Planets Space 2011, 63:669-673.
4. Smyrou E, Tasiopoulou P, Bal I, Gazetas G, Vintzileou E. Structural and geotechnical aspects of the Christchurch (2011) and Darfield (2010) earthquakes in N. Zealand. In: Proceedings of the seventh nat conf on earthquake engineering; 2011.
5. USGS. USGS Circular 1193: implications for earthquake risk reduction in the United States from the Kocaeli, Turkey, earthquake of August 17, 1999; 2000.
6. Lew M., Naeim F., Huang S.C., Lam H.K., Carpenter L.D. Geotechnical and geological effects of the 21 September 1999 Chi-Chi earthquake, Taiwan. Struct Des Tall Buil 2000, 9:89-106.
7. Yeo GL, Cornell CA. Stochastic characterization and decision bases under time-dependent aftershock risk in performance-based earthquake engineering. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center; 2005.
8. Nazari N., van de Lindt J., Li Y. Effect of mainshock-aftershock sequences on woodframe building damage fragilities 1. J Perform Constr Facil 2015, 29(1).
9. Liek Yeo G., Allin Cornell C. Building life-cycle cost analysis due to mainshock and aftershock occurrences. Struct Saf 2009, 31:396-408.
10. Yin Y.-J., Li Y. Loss estimation of light-frame wood construction subjected to mainshock-aftershock sequences. J Perform Constr Facil 2011, 25:504-513.
11. Han R., Li Y., van de Lindt J. Seismic risk of base isolated non-ductile reinforced concrete buildings considering uncertainties and mainshock-aftershock sequences. Struct Saf 2014, 50:39-56.
12. FEMA. Next-generation methodology for seismic performance assessment of buildings. Report no FEMA P-58. Washington (DC): prepared by the Applied Technology Council for the Federal Emergency Management Agency; 2012.
13. Mitrani-Reiser J. An ounce of prevention: probabilistic loss estimation for performance-based earthquake engineering. California Institute of Technology; 2007.
14. Ramirez CM, Miranda E. Building-specific loss estimation methods & tools for simplified performance-based earthquake engineering. Stanford University; 2009.
15. Council AT. ATC-20-1 field manual: postearthquake safety evaluation of building. Redwood City (California): ATC; 2005.
16. Liel AB. Assessing the collapse risk of California's existing reinforced concrete frame structures: metrics for seismic safety decisions. Stanford University; 2008.
17. Celik O.C., Ellingwood B.R. Seismic risk assessment of gravity load designed reinforced concrete frames subjected to Mid-America ground motions. J Struct Eng 2009, 135:414-424.
18. Liel A.B., Haselton C.B., Deierlein G.G. Seismic collapse safety of reinforced concrete buildings. II: Comparative assessment of nonductile and ductile moment frames. J Struct Eng 2010, 137:492-502.
19. Bracci JM, Reinhorn AM, Mander JB. Seismic resistance of reinforced concrete frame structures designed only for gravity loads: Part I - Design and properties of a one-third scale model structure. Technical rep no NCEER-92, 27; 1992.
20. Celik O.C., Ellingwood B.R. Seismic fragilities for non-ductile reinforced concrete frames - role of aleatoric and epistemic uncertainties. Struct Saf 2010, 32:1-12.
21. Kwon O.-S., Elnashai A. The effect of material and ground motion uncertainty on the seismic vulnerability curves of RC structure. Eng Struct 2006, 28:289-303.
22. Jeon J, DesRoches R, Brilakis I, Lowes L. Aftershock fragility curves for damaged non-ductile reinforced concrete buildings. In: Proceedings of the 15th World conf on earthquake engineering, international association for earthquake engineering (IAEE). Tokyo (Japan); 2012.
23. Han R., Li Y., van de Lindt J. Assessment of seismic performance of buildings with incorporation of aftershocks. J Perform Constr Facil 2015, 29(3).
24. Mazzoni S, McKenna F, Scott MH, Fenves GL. OpenSees command language manual. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research (PEER) Center; 2006.
25. Park R., Priestley M., Gill W.D. Ductility of square-confined concrete columns. J. Struct Div 1982, 108:929-950.
26. Celik O.C., Ellingwood B.R. Modeling beam-column joints in fragility assessment of gravity load designed reinforced concrete frames. J Earthquake Eng 2008, 12:357-381.
27. Waier PR. RS Means building construction cost data 2009. RS Means Company; 2008.
28. Aslani H, Miranda E. Probabilistic earthquake loss estimation and loss disaggregation in buildings. Stanford University; 2005.
29. Pagni C.A., Lowes L.N. Fragility functions for older reinforced concrete beam-column joints. Earthquake Spectra 2006, 22:215-238.
30. Porter K.A., Kiremidjian A.S., LeGrue J.S. Assembly-based vulnerability of buildings and its use in performance evaluation. Earthquake Spectra 2001, 17:291-312.
31. Porter K. Fragility of hydraulic elevators for use in performance-based earthquake engineering. Earthquake Spectra 2007, 23:459-469.
32. Ruiz-García J., Negrete-Manriquez J.C. Evaluation of drift demands in existing steel frames under as-recorded far-field and near-fault mainshock-aftershock seismic sequences. Eng Struct 2011, 33:621-634.
33. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center NGA database. http://peer.berkeley.edu/nga/index.html.
34. National Research Institute for Earth Science and Disaster Prevention. Strong-motion seismograph networks (K-NET, KiK-net). http://www.kyoshin.bosai.go.jp/.
35. Vamvatsikos D., Cornell C.A. Incremental dynamic analysis. Earthquake Eng Struct Dynam 2002, 31:491-514.
36. Comerio M.C., Blecher H.E. Estimating downtime from data on residential buildings after the Northridge and Loma Prieta earthquakes. Earthquake Spectra 2010, 26:951-965.
37. Comerio M.C. Estimating downtime in loss modeling. Earthquake Spectra 2006, 22:349-365.
38. Coburm A, Spence R, Pomonis A. Factors determining human casualty levels in earthquakes: mortality prediction in building collapse. In: Proceedings of the tenth world conference on earthquake engineering, vol. 10; 1992. p. 5989-94.
39. Yeo G, Cornell C. Building-specific seismic fatality estimation methodology. In: Proceedings, ninth international conference on applications of statistics and probability in civil engineering (ICASP9); 2003.
40. Krawinkler H. Van Nuys hotel building testbed report: exercising seismic performance assessment: Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, College of Engineering. University of California, Berkeley; 2005.
41. Rojahn C, Sharpe RL. Earthquake damage evaluation data for California. Applied Technology Council; 1985.
42. Han R, Li Y, Van de Lindt J. Seismic loss estimation with consideration of aftershock hazard and post-quake decisions. J Risk Uncert Eng Syst, Part A: Civil Eng; 2015 (submitted for publication).
43. Li Y. Assessment of damage risks to residential buildings and cost-benefit of mitigation strategies considering hurricane and earthquake hazards. J Perform Constr Facil 2010, 26:7-16.
44. Mrozek J.R., Taylor L.O. What determines the value of life? A meta-analysis. J Policy Anal Manage 2002, 21:253-270.
45. Haselton C.B., Baker J.W., Liel A.B., Deierlein G.G. Accounting for ground-motion spectral shape characteristics in structural collapse assessment through an adjustment for epsilon. J Struct Eng 2011, 137:332-344.
46. Porter K.A., Beck J.L., Shaikhutdinov R.V. Sensitivity of building loss estimates to major uncertain variables. Earthquake Spectra 2002, 18:719-743.
47. Lamprou A., Jia G., Taflanidis A.A. Life-cycle seismic loss estimation and global sensitivity analysis based on stochastic ground motion modeling. Eng Struct 2013, 54:192-206.
48. USGS. Hazard Curve Application. http://geohazards.usgs.gov/hazardtool/.