Building life-cycle cost analysis due to mainshock and aftershock occurrences

Structural Safety

Volumn 31, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 396-408

  Liek Yeo, Gee ^a   Allin Cornell, C ^a  

^a Stanford University   (United States)

Author keywords

Aftershocks; Life cycle cost; Mainshocks; Markov; Poisson; Renewal

Indexed keywords

AFTERSHOCKS; LIFE-CYCLE COST; MAINSHOCKS; MARKOV; POISSON; RENEWAL;

BUILDINGS; COST ACCOUNTING; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; COSTS; EARTHQUAKE EFFECTS; LIFE CYCLE; LOSSES; OCEAN STRUCTURES; POISSON EQUATION; STOCHASTIC MODELS;

POISSON DISTRIBUTION;

EID: 67349094539     PISSN: 01674730     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.strusafe.2009.01.002     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Moehle J, Deierlein GG. A framework methodology for performance-based earthquake engineering. In: Fajfar P, Krawinkler H, editors. International workshop on performance-based seismic design concepts and implementation. Bled, Slovenia; 2004.
2. Porter K. An overview of PEER's performance-based earthquake engineering methodology. In: Der Kiureghian A, Madanat S, Pestana J, editors. Ninth international conference on applications of statistics and probability in civil engineering (ICASP9). San Francisco, CA, USA; 2003.
3. Wen Y.K., and Kang Y.J. Minimum building life-cycle cost design criteria. I: Methodology. ASCE J Struct Eng 127 3 (2001) 330-337
4. Takahashi Y., Der Kiureghian A., and Ang A.H.-S. Life-cycle cost analysis based on a renewal model of earthquake occurrences. Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn 33 (2004) 859-880
5. Reasenberg P.A., and Jones L.M. Earthquake hazard after a mainshock in California. Science 243 (1989) 1173-1175
6. Reasenberg P.A., and Jones L.M. Earthquake aftershocks: update. Science 265 (1994) 1251-1252
7. Comartin CD. Applications of performance-based engineering to risk management decisions. In: Fajfar P, Krawinkler H, editors. International workshop on performance-based seismic design concepts and implementation. Bled, Slovenia; 2004.
8. Comerio MC. The economic benefits of a disaster resistant university: Earthquake loss estimation for UC Berkeley. Institute of Urban and Regional Development (IURD) Working Paper Series 2000-02, UC Berkeley; 2000.
9. Ross S.M. Introduction to probability models (2000), Academic Press
10. Rosenblueth E. Optimum design for infrequent disturbances. ASCE J Struct Eng 102 9 (1976) 1807-1825
11. Yeo GL. Stochastic characterization and decision bases under time-dependent aftershock risk in performance-based earthquake engineering. Ph.D. thesis, Stanford University; 2005.
12. Yeo GL, Cornell CA. Stochastic characterization and decision bases under time-dependent aftershock risk in performance-based earthquake engineering. Technical report 2005/13, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center (PEER); 2005. .
13. Yeo G.L., and Cornell C.A. Post-quake decision analysis using dynamic programming. Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn 38 (2009) 79-93
14. Delbaen F., and Haezendonck J. Classical risk theory in an economic environment. Insur: Math Econom 6 2 (1987) 85-116
15. Parzen E. Stochastic processes (1962), Holden-Day
16. Vanmarcke EH, Diaz-Padilla J. Markov decision models in seismic design. Research Report R71-20. Massachusetts Institute of Technology; 1971.
17. Howard R.A. Dynamic probabilistic systems volume II: semi-Markov and decision processes (1971), John Wiley and Sons
18. USGS. Probabilities of large earthquakes in the San Francisco Bay Region. Open File Report 90-1053; 1990.
19. USGS. Earthquake probabilities in the San Francisco Bay Region: 2002-2031. Open File Report 03-214; 2003.
20. Cornell C.A., and Winterstein S. Temporal and magnitude dependence in earthquake recurrence models. Bull Seismol Soc Am 78 4 (1988) 1522-1537
21. Kiremidjian A., and Anagnos T. Stochastic slip-predictable model for earthquake occurrences. Bull Seismol Soc Am 74 2 (1984) 739-755