Assessment of damage risks to residential buildings and cost-benefit of mitigation strategies considering hurricane and earthquake hazards

Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 7-16

  Li, Yue ^a  

^a Michigan Technological University   (United States)

Author keywords

Cost benefit; Decision making; Earthquake; Economic; Fragility; Hurricane; Life cycle; Residential buildings; Risk assessment; Uncertainty

Indexed keywords

BUILDING PERFORMANCE; CONDITIONAL PROBABILITIES; COST-BENEFIT; DAMAGE RISKS; DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION PRACTICE; DIFFERENT SERVICES; EARTHQUAKE HAZARD; ECONOMIC LOSS; EXPECTED COSTS; FRAGILITY; HAZARD MITIGATIONS; MITIGATION STRATEGY; MULTIPLE HAZARDS; NATURAL EVENTS; NATURAL HAZARD; PLANNING COMMUNITY; PROBABILISTIC MODELING; RESIDENTIAL BUILDING; STRUCTURAL SYSTEMS; UNCERTAINTY;

BUILDINGS; COST EFFECTIVENESS; DAMAGE DETECTION; DECISION MAKING; EARTHQUAKES; ECONOMICS; HAZARDS; HURRICANES; LIFE CYCLE; LOSSES; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK PERCEPTION;

COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS;

EID: 84863341057     PISSN: 08873828     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000204     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. ASCE. (2005). Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures. 7-05, Reston, VA
2. ASCE. (2006). Seismic rehabilitation of existing buildings. ASCE/SEI 41-06, Reston, VA
3. Applied Technology Council (ATC). (2010). NEHRP Workshop on Meeting the Challenges of Existing Buildings-Part 1: Workshop Proc., ATC-71, Redwood City, CA.
4. Cornell, C. A., Jalayer, F., Hamburger, R. O., and Foutch, D. A. (2002). Probabilistic basis for the 2000 SAC federal emergency management agency steel moment frame guidelines., J. Struct. Eng. 0733-9445, 128 (4), 526-533. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:4(526) (Pubitemid 34491013)
5. CUREE. (2000). CUREE-Caltech Woodframe Project. http://www.curee.org/ projects/woodframe (Aug. 18, 2000).
6. Duthinh, D., and Simiu, E. (2010). Safety of structures in strong winds and earthquakes: Multihazard considerations. J. Struct. Eng. 0733-9445, 136 (3), 330-333. 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000108
7. Ellingwood, B. R., and Wen, Y. K. (2005). Risk-benefit-based design decisions for low probability/high consequence earthquake events in Mid-America. Prog. Struct. Eng. Mater. 0272-4332, 16 (1), 81-91. 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1996. tb01438.x
8. FEMA. (1997). NEHRP guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings, FEMA-273, Washington, DC
9. FEMA. (2000). HAZUS 99 estimated annualized earthquake losses for the United States, FEMA-366, Washington, DC
10. Galambos, T. V., and Ellingwood, B. R. (1986). Serviceability limit states: Deflection. J. Struct. Eng. 0733-9445, 112 (1), 67-84. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1986)112:1(67)
11. Goodnough, A. (2006). As hurricane season looms, state aim to scare. New York Times, May 31, 2.
12. Harper, B. A. (1999). Tropical cyclone winds and storm tide. Local government disaster mitigation project-Cairns, Hervey Bay and Mackay, Queensland Dept. of Emergency Services, Brisbane, and Systems Engineering Australia, Queensland, Australia.
13. Hsee, C., and Weber, E. U. (1999). Cross-national differences in risk preference and lay predictions. J. Behav. Decis. Making 0894-3257, 12 (2), 165-179. 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0771(199906)12:2<165::AID-BDM316>3.0.CO;2-N
14. Insurance Research Council (IRC) and Insurance Institute for Property Loss Reduction (IIPLR). (1995). Coastal exposure and community protection: Hurricane Andrew's legacy, IRC; IIPLR, Wheaton, IL; Boston.
15. IBHS. (2001). The ten most wanted: A search for solutions to reduce recurring losses from natural hazards, IBHS, Tampa, FL.
16. Katz, R. W. (2002). Stochastic modeling of hurricane damage. J. Appl. Meteorol. 0894-8763, 41 (7), 754-762. 10.1175/1520-0450(2002)041<0754: SMOHD>2.0.CO;2 (Pubitemid 34870031)
17. Kunreuther, H. (2000). Decision making for protective measures. Workshop on extreme events: Developing a research agenda for the 21st century. http://www.isse.ucar.edu/extremes/index.html
18. Kunreuther, H. (2007). Assessing, managing and benefiting from global interdependent risks: The case of terrorism and natural disasters. 2007 CREATE Symp., Wharton Risk Management and Decision Processes Center, Univ. of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
19. Kunreuther, H., and Michel-Kerjan, E. (2009). Managing catastrophes through insurance: Challenges and opportunities for reducing future risks. Risk Management and Decision Processes Center, Univ. of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
20. Li, Y., and Ellingwood, B. R. (2006). Hurricane damage to residential construction in the US: Importance of uncertainty modeling in risk assessment. Eng. Struct. 0141-0296, 28 (7), 1009-1018. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.11.005
21. Li, Y., and Ellingwood, B. R. (2007). Reliability of woodframe residential construction subjected to earthquakes. Struct. Saf. 0733-9445, 135 (2), 159-168. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2009)135:2(159)
22. Li, Y., and Ellingwood, B. R. (2009 b). Risk-based decision making for multi-hazard mitigation for wood-frame residential construction. Aust. J. Struct. Eng. 0141-0296, in press.
23. Li, Y., Yin, Y. J., Ellingwood, B. R., and Bulleit, W. M. (2010). Uniform hazard vs. uniform risk bases for performance-based earthquake engineering of light-frame wood construction. Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn. 0098-8847, 39 (11), 1199-1217. 10.1002/eqe.989
24. Loewenstein, G., and Prelec, D. (1992). Anomalies in intertemporal choice. Q. J. Econ. 0033-5533, 107 (2), 573-597. 10.2307/2118482
25. McCullough, M., and Kareem, A. (2009). Anatomy of damage to coastal construction: A multi-hazard perspective. 2009 Structures Congress, ASCE, Reston, VA.
26. Meyer, R., and Hutchinson, W. (2001). Bumbling geniuses: The power of everyday reasoning in multistage decision making. Wharton on making decisions, S. Hoch, H. Kunreuther, and, R. Gunther, eds., Wiley, New York.
27. NAHB. (1993). Assessment of damage to single-family homes caused by Hurricane Andrew and Iniki. NAHB Research Center Rep., Upper Marlboro, MD.
28. NAHB. (1996). Assessment of damage to homes caused by Hurricane Opal, prepared for the Florida State Home Builders Association. NAHB Research Center Rep., Upper Marlboro, MD.
29. NAHB. (1999). Reliability of conventional residential construction: An assessment of roof component performance in Hurricane Andrew and typical wind regions of the United States. NAHB Research Center Rep., Upper Marlboro, MD.
30. National Institute of Buildings Sciences (NIBS). (2000). HAZUS wind loss estimation methodology. Draft Technical Manual, Washington, DC
31. Padgett, J. E., Dennemann, K., and Ghosh, J. (2010). Risk-based seismic life-cycle cost-benefit (LCC-B) analysis for bridge retrofit assessment. Struct. Saf. 0733-9445, 135 (3), 262-271. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2009)135:3(262)
32. Pinelli, J. P., Torkian, B. B., Gurley, K., Subramanian, C., and Hamid, S. (2009). Cost effectiveness of hurricane mitigation measures for residential buildings. 11th Americas Conf. on Wind Engineering (ACWE), American Association for Wind Engineering, Fort Collins, CO.
33. Reardon, G. F., and Henderson, D. (1988). Cyclone risk assessment of houses in North Queensland. Australasian Structural Engineering Conf. 1988, Vol. 2, J. Butterworth, ed., Structural Engineering Society of New Zealand, Auckland, New Zealand, 1007-1014.
34. Stewart, M. G., Rosowsky, D. V., and Huang, Z. (2000). Hurricane damage risk-cost-benefit analysis and the economic viability of strengthening new and existing residential construction. Wood Engineering and Mechanics Research Rep. No. WEM-00-001, Depts. of Forest Products and Civil Engineering, Oregon State Univ., Corvallis, OR.
35. Smyth, A. W., (2004). Probabilistic benefit-cost analysis for earthquake damage mitigation: evaluating measures for apartment houses in Turkey. Earthquake Spectra 8755-2930, 20 (1), 171-203. 10.1193/1.1649937
36. Van de Lindt, J., Li, Y., Bulleit, W., Gupta, R., and Morris, P. (2009). The next step for AF&PA/ASCE 16: Performance-based design of wood structures. J. Struct. Eng. 0733-9445, 135 (6), 611-618. 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943- 541X.0000038
37. van de Lindt, J. W., Graettinger, A., Gupta, R., Skaggs, Pryor S., and Fridley, K. (2007). Performance of woodframe structures during Hurricane Katrina. J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 0887-3828, 21 (2), 108-116. 10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2007)21:2(108) (Pubitemid 46447990)
38. van de Lindt, J. W., Pei, S., Pryor, S. E., Shimizu, H., and Isoda, H. (2010). Experimental seismic response of a full-scale six-story light-frame wood building. J. Struct. Eng. 0733-9445, 136 (10), 1262-1272. 10.1061/(ASCE)ST. 1943-541X.0000222
39. Vickery, P. J., Skerlj, P. F., Steckley, A. C., and Twisdale, L. A. (2000). Hurricane wind field model for use in hurricane simulations. J. Struct. Eng. 0733-9445, 126 (10), 1203-1222. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2000)126:10(1203)
40. Walker, G. R., and Musulin, R. (2010). Incentives for mitigation-Who pays, who benefits? 2010 New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering (NZSEE) Conf., Wellington, New Zealand.
41. Wen, Y. K., and Kang, Y. J. (2001). Minimum building life-cycle cost design criteria I: Methodology. J. Struct. Eng. 0733-9445, 127 (3), 330-337. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2001)127:3(330) (Pubitemid 32873568)
42. Wood Frame Construction Manual (WFCM). (2004). Design of wood frame buildings for high wind, snow and seismic loadings. American Forest & Paper Association, Wood Frame Construction Manual (WFCM), American Wood Council and International Code Council, Leesburg, VA