Biodiversity in cities needs space: A meta-analysis of factors determining intra-urban biodiversity variation

Ecology Letters

Volumn 18, Issue 6, 2015, Pages 581-592

  Beninde, Joscha ^a   Veith, Michael ^a   Hochkirch, Axel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TRIER   (Germany)

Author keywords

Area; Biological diversity; Connectivity; Conservation; Corridor; Landscape; Urban ecology

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; CONNECTIVITY; GLOBAL CHANGE; HABITAT CONSERVATION; HABITAT CORRIDOR; META-ANALYSIS; PATCH SIZE; URBAN ECOSYSTEM; URBAN REGION; URBAN-RURAL MIGRATION; URBANIZATION;

BIODIVERSITY; CITY; ECOLOGY; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; META ANALYSIS; PROCEDURES; URBANIZATION;

BIODIVERSITY; CITIES; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; ECOLOGY; ECOSYSTEM; URBANIZATION;

EID: 84929129253     PISSN: 1461023X     EISSN: 14610248     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/ele.12427     Document Type: Review

References (92)

1. Adams, C.E. & Lindsey, K.J. (2011). Anthropogenic ecosystems: the influence of people on urban wildlife populations. In: Urban Ecology. Patterns, Processes, and Applications (ed. Niemelä, J.). Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 116-128.
2. Andrén, H. (1994). Effects of habitat fragmentation on birds and mammals in landscapes with different proportions of suitable habitat: a review. Oikos, 71, 355-366.
3. Arca, E., Battisti, C. & Fraticelli, F. (2012). Area-effect in breeding bird communities occurring in an archipelago of urban holm oak fragments (Rome, Central Italy). Vie Milieu, 62, 159-164.
4. Aronson, M.F.J., La Sorte, F.A., Nilon, C.H., Katti, M., Goddard, M.A., Lepczyk, C.A. et al. (2014). A global analysis of the impacts of urbanization on bird and plant diversity reveals key anthropogenic drivers. Proc. Biol. Sci., 281, 20133330.
5. Aronson, M.F.J., Handel, S.N., La Puma, I.P. & Clemants, S.E. (2015). Urbanization promotes non-native woody species and diverse plant assemblages in the New York metropolitan region. Urban Ecosys., 18, 31-45.
6. Arrhenius, O. (1921). Species and area. J. Ecol., 9, 95-99.
7. Basham, R., Law, B. & Banks, P. (2010). Microbats in a 'leafy' urban landscape are they persisting, and what factors influence their presence? Austral Ecol., 36, 663-678.
8. Bates, A.J., Sadler, J.P., Fairbrass, A.J., Falk, S.J., Hale, J.D. & Matthews, T.J. (2011). Changing bee and hoverfly pollinator assemblages along an urban-rural gradient. PLoS ONE, 6, e23459.
9. Bazelet, C.S. & Samways, M.J. (2011). Relative importance of management vs. design for implementation of large-scale ecological networks. Landscape Ecol., 26, 341-353.
10. Benton, M.J. (2009). The Red Queen and the Court Jester: species diversity and the role of biotic and abiotic factors through time. Science, 323, 728-732.
11. Bickford, D., Ng, T.H., Qie, L., Kudavidanage, E.P. & Bradshaw, C.J.A. (2010). Forest fragment and breeding habitat characteristics explain frog diversity and abundance in Singapore. Biotropica, 42, 119-125.
12. Bolund, P. & Hunhammar, S. (1999). Ecosystem services in urban areas. Ecol. Econ., 29, 293-301.
13. Borenstein, M., Hedges, L., Higgins, J. & Rothstein, H. (2009). Introduction to Meta-Analysis. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, West Sussex, UK.
14. Chace, J.F. & Walsh, J.J. (2006). Urban effects on native avifauna. A review. Landscape Urban Plann., 74, 46-69.
15. Clark, N.E., Lovell, R., Wheeler, B.W., Higgins, S.L., Depledge, M.H. & Norris, K. (2014). Biodiversity, cultural pathways, and human health: a framework. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 29, 198-204.
16. Clarke, K.M., Fisher, B.L. & LeBuhn, G. (2008). The influence of urban park characteristics on ant (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) communities. Urban Ecosyst., 11, 317-334.
17. Cornelis, J. & Hermy, M. (2004). Biodiversity relationships in urban and suburban parks in Flanders. Landscape Urban Plann., 69, 385-401.
18. Cushman, S.A. (2006). Effects of habitat loss and fragmentation on amphibians: a review and prospectus. Biol. Conserv., 128, 231-240.
19. Debinski, D.M. & Holt, R.D. (2000). A survey and overview of habitat fragmentation experiments. Conserv. Biol., 14, 342-355.
20. Dickman, C.R. (1987). Habitat fragmentation and vertebrate species richness in an urban-environment. J. Appl. Ecol., 24, 337-351.
21. Donnelly, R. & Marzluff, J.M. (2004). Importance of reserve size and landscape context to urban bird conservation. Conserv. Biol., 18, 733-745.
22. Drinnan, I.N. (2005). The search for fragmentation thresholds in a Southern Sydney Suburb. Biol. Conserv., 124, 339-349.
23. Dunn, C.P. & Heneghan, L. (2011). Composition and diversity of urban vegetation. In: Urban Ecology. Patterns, Processes, and Applications (ed. Niemelä, J.). Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 103-115.
24. Dunning, J.B., Danielson, B.J. & Pulliam, H.R. (1992). Ecological processes that affect populations in complex landscapes. Oikos, 65, 169-175.
25. Ehrenfeld, J.G. (2008). Exotic invasive species in urban wetlands environmental correlates and implications for wetland management. J. Appl. Ecol., 45, 1160-1169.
26. Faeth, S.H. & Kane, T.C. (1978). Urban biogeography. Oecologia, 32, 127-133.
27. Faeth, S.H., Bang, C. & Saari, S. (2011). Urban biodiversity: patterns and mechanisms. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci., 1223, 69-81.
28. Fahrig, L. (2003). Effects of Habitat Fragmentation on Biodiversity. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst., 34, 487-515.
29. Felton, A., Knight, E., Wood, J., Zammit, C. & Lindenmayer, D. (2010). A meta-analysis of fauna and flora species richness and abundance in plantations and pasture lands. Biol. Conserv., 143, 545-554.
30. Fischer, J. & Lindenmayer, D.B. (2007). Landscape modification and habitat fragmentation: a synthesis. Global Ecol. Biogeogr., 16, 265-280.
31. Fontana, C.S., Burger, M.I. & Magnusson, W.E. (2011). Bird diversity in a subtropical South-American City effects of noise levels, arborisation and human population density. Urban Ecosyst., 14, 341-360.
32. Fuller, R.A. & Gaston, K.J. (2009). The scaling of green space coverage in European cities. Biol. Lett., 5, 352-355.
33. Fuller, R.A., Irvine, K.N., Devine-Wright, P., Warren, P.H. & Gaston, K.J. (2007). Psychological benefits of greenspace increase with biodiversity. Biol. Lett., 3, 390-394.
34. Germaine, S.S., Rosenstock, S.S., Schweinsburg, R.E. & Richardson, W.S. (1998). Relationships among breeding birds, habitat, and residential development in Greater Tucson, Arizona. Ecol. Appl., 8, 680-691.
35. Goertzen, D. & Suhling, F. (2013). Promoting dragonfly diversity in cities: major determinants and implications for urban pond design. J. Insect Conserv., 17, 399-409.
36. Grimm, N.B., Faeth, S.H., Golubiewski, N.E., Redman, C.L., Wu, J., Bai, X. et al. (2008). Global change and the ecology of cities. Science, 319, 756-760.
37. Güneralp, B. & Seto, K.C. (2013). Futures of global urban expansion: uncertainties and implications for biodiversity conservation. Environ. Res. Lett., 8, 014025.
38. Haddad, N.M., Brudvig, L.A., Damschen, E.I., Evans, D.M., Johnson, B.L., Levey, D.J. et al. (2014). Potential negative ecological effects of corridors. Conserv. Biol., 28, 1178-1187.
39. Hamer, A.J. & McDonnell, M.J. (2008). Amphibian ecology and conservation in the urbanising world. A review. Biol. Conserv., 141, 2432-2449.
40. Hedblom, M. & Soderstrom, B. (2010). Landscape effects on birds in urban woodlands an analysis of 34 Swedish cities. J. Biogeogr., 37, 1302-1316.
41. Hedges, L. & Vevea, J.L. (1998). Fixed- and random-effects models in meta-analysis. Psychol. Methods, 3, 486-504.
42. Hinners, S.J., Kearns, C.A. & Wessman, C.A. (2012). Roles of scale, matrix, and native habitat in supporting a diverse suburban pollinator assemblage. Ecol. Appl., 22, 1923-1935.
43. Hobbs, E.R. (1988). Species richness of urban forest patches and implications for urban landscape diversity. Landscape Ecol., 1, 141-152.
44. Hooper, D.U., Chapin, F.S. III, Ewel, J.J., Hector, A., Inchausti, P., Lavorel, S. et al. (2005). Effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning: a consensus of current knowledge. Ecol. Monogr., 75, 3-35.
45. Jackson, D.A., Peres-Neto, P.R. & Olden, J.D. (2011). What controls who is where in freshwater fish communities: the roles of biotic, abiotic, and spatial factors. Can. J. Fish Aquat. Sci., 58, 157-170.
46. Kappes, H., Katzschner, L. & Nowak, C. (2012). Urban summer heat load: meteorological data as a proxy for metropolitan biodiversity. Meteorol. Z., 21, 525-528.
47. Kareiva, P., Watts, S., McDonald, R. & Boucher, T. (2007). Domesticated nature. Shaping landscapes and ecosystems for human welfare. Science, 316, 1866-1869.
48. Kotze, J., Venn, S., Niemelä, J. & Spence, J. (2011). Effects of urbanization on the ecology and evolution of arthropods. In: Urban Ecology. Patterns, Processes, and Applications (ed. Niemelä, J.). Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 159-166.
49. Lizee, M.-H., Manel, S., Mauffrey, J.-F., Tatoni, T. & Deschamps-Cottin, M. (2012). Matrix configuration and patch isolation influences override the species-area relationship for urban butterfly communities. Landscape Ecol., 27, 159-169.
50. Loram, A., Thompson, K., Warren, P.H. & Gaston, K.J. (2008). Urban domestic gardens (XII) The richness and composition of the flora in five UK cities. J. Veg. Sci., 19, 321-367.
51. Loss, S.R., Ruiz, M.O. & Brawn, J.D. (2009). Relationships between avian diversity, neighborhood age, income, and environmental characteristics of an urban landscape. Biol. Conserv., 142, 2578-2585.
52. Luck, G.W., Davidson, P., Boxall, D. & Smallbone, L. (2011). Relations between urban bird and plant communities and human well-being and connection to nature. Conserv. Biol., 25, 816-826.
53. Lumley, T. (2012). rmeta: Meta-analysis. R package version 2.16. http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/rmeta/index.html.
54. MacArthur, R.H. & Wilson, E.O. (1963). An equilibrium theory of insular zoogeography. Evol. Ecol. Res., 17, 373-387.
55. MacArthur, R.H. & Wilson, E.O. (1967). The Theory of Island Biogeography. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
56. Magle, S.B., Hunt, V.M., Vernon, M. & Crooks, K.R. (2012). Urban wildlife research: past, present, and future. Biol. Conserv., 155, 23-32.
57. Martinson, H.M. & Raupp, M.J. (2013). A meta-analysis of the effects of urbanization on ground beetle communities. Ecosphere, 4, 60.
58. McDonnell, M.J. (2011). The history of urban ecology. An ecologist's perspective. In: Urban Ecology. Patterns, Processes, and Applications (ed. Niemelä, J.). Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 5-13.
59. McDonnell, M.J. & Hahs, A.K. (2008). The use of gradient analysis studies in advancing our understanding of the ecology of urbanizing landscapes: current status and future directions. Landscape Ecol., 23, 1143-1155.
60. McKinney, M.L. (2008). Effects of urbanization on species richness: a review of plants and animals. Urban Ecosyst., 11, 161-176.
61. Natuhara, Y. & Imai, C. (1999). Prediction of species richness of breeding birds by landscape-level factors of urban woods in Osaka Prefecture, Japan. Biodivers. Conserv., 8, 239-253.
62. Niemela, J. (1999). Ecology and urban planning. Biodivers. Conserv., 8, 119-131.
63. Niemela, J. & Kotze, D.J. (2009). Carabid beetle assemblages along urban to rural gradients. A review. Landscape Urban Plann., 92, 65-71.
64. Norton, M.R., Hannon, S.J. & Schmiegelow, F.K.A. (2000). Fragments are not islands: patch vs landscape perspectives on songbird presence and abundance in a harvested boreal forest. Ecography, 23, 209-223.
65. Ockinger, E., Dannestam, A. & Smith, H.G. (2009). The importance of fragmentation and habitat quality of urban grasslands for butterfly diversity. Landscape Urban Plann., 93, 31-37.
66. Pacheco, R. & Vasconcelos, H.L. (2007). Invertebrate conservation in urban areas Ants in the Brazilian Cerrado. Landscape Urban Plann., 81, 193-199.
67. R Core Team (2013). R: A language and Environment. R Foundation, Vienna, Austria.
68. Radford, J.Q., Bennett, A.F. & Cheers, G.J. (2005). Landscape-level thresholds of habitat cover for woodland-dependent birds. Biol. Conserv., 124, 317-337.
69. Ricketts, T.H. (2001). The matrix matters: effective isolation in fragmented landscapes. Am. Nat., 158, 87-99.
70. Ricketts, T.H. & Imhoff, M. (2003). Biodiversity, urban areas, and agriculture: locating priority ecoregions for conservation. Conserv. Ecol., 8, 1.
71. Ries, L., Fletcher, R.J. Jr, Battin, J. & Sisk, T.D. (2004). Ecological responses to habitat edges: mechanisms, models, and variability explained. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst., 35, 491-522.
72. Rook, G.A. (2013). Regulation of the immune system by biodiversity from the natural environment: an ecosystem service essential to health. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 110, 18360-18367.
73. Sadler, J.P., Small, E.C., Fiszpan, H., Telfer, M.G. & Niemela, J. (2006). Investigating environmental variation and landscape characteristics of an urban-rural gradient using woodland carabid assemblages. J. Biogeogr., 33, 1126-1138.
74. Sattler, T., Borcard, D., Arlettaz, R., Bontadina, F., Legendre, P., Obrist, M.K. et al. (2010). Spider, bee, and bird communities in cities are shaped by environmental control and high stochasticity. Ecology, 91, 3343-3353.
75. Saura, S., Bodin, Ö. & Fortin, M.J. (2014). Stepping stones are crucial for species' long-distance dispersal and range expansion through habitat networks through habitat networks. J. Appl. Ecol., 51, 171-182.
76. Seto, K.C., Fragkias, M., Güneralp, B. & Reilly, M.K. (2011). A Meta-Analysis of Global Urban Land Expansion. PLoS ONE, 6, e23777.
77. Sewell, S.R. & Catterall, C.P. (1998). Bushland modification and styles of urban development their effects on birds in south-east Queensland. Wildl. Res., 25, 41-63.
78. Shanahan, D.F., Miller, C., Possingham, H.P. & Fuller, R.A. (2011). The influence of patch area and connectivity on avian communities in urban revegetation. Biol. Conserv., 144, 722-729.
79. Shwartz, A., Muratet, A., Simon, L. & Julliard, R. (2013). Local and management variables outweigh landscape effects in enhancing the diversity of different taxa in a big metropolis. Biol. Conserv., 157, 285-292.
80. Smith, P.G.R. (2007). Characteristics of urban natural areas influencing winter bird use in southern Ontario, Canada. Environ. Manage., 39, 338-352.
81. Son, J.-Y., Lee, J.-T., Anderson, G.B. & Bell, M.L. (2012). The impact of heat waves on mortality in seven major cities in Korea. Environ. Health Perspect., 120, 566-571.
82. Stein, A., Gerstner, K., Kreft, H. & Arita, H. (2014). Environmental heterogeneity as a universal driver of species richness across taxa, biomes and spatial scales. Ecol. Lett., 17, 866-880.
83. Su, Z.M., Zhang, R.Z. & Qiu, J.X. (2011). Decline in the diversity of willow trunk-dwelling weevils (Coleoptera Curculionoidea) as a result of urban expansion in Beijing, China. J. Insect. Conserv., 15, 367-377.
84. Sushinsky, J.R., Rhodes, J.R., Possingham, H.P., Gill, T.K. & Fuller, R.A. (2013). How should we grow cities to minimize their biodiversity impacts? Glob. Change Biol., 19, 401-410.
85. Sutton, A.J., Duval, S.J., Tweedie, R.L., Abrams, K.R. & Jones, D.R. (2000). Empirical assessment of effect of publication bias on meta-analyses. Br. Med. J., 320, 1574-1577.
86. Tewksbury, J.J., Levey, D.J., Haddad, N.M., Sargent, S., Orrock, J.L., Weldon, A. et al. (2002). Corridors affect plants, animals, and their interactions in fragmented landscapes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 99, 12923-12926.
87. Tilghman, N.G. (1987). Characteristics of urban woodlands affecting breeding bird diversity and abundance. Landscape Urban Plann., 14, 481-495.
88. United Nations (2012). World Ubranization Prospects: The 2011 Revision. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, New York.
89. Viechtbauer, W. (2010). Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package. J. Stat. Softw., 36, 1-48.
90. Vignoli, L., Mocaer, I., Luiselli, L. & Bologna, M.A. (2009). Can a large metropolis sustain complex herpetofauna communities? An analysis of the suitability of green space fragments in Rome. Anim. Conserv., 12, 456-466.
91. Watson, J.E.M., Whittaker, R.J. & Freudenberger, D. (2005). Bird community responses to habitat fragmentation how consistent are they across landscapes? J. Biogeogr., 32, 1353-1370.
92. Weller, B. & Ganzhorn, J.U. (2004). Carabid beetle community composition, body size, and fluctuating asymmetry along an urban-rural gradient. Basic Appl. Ecol., 5, 193-201.