What is the potential of spread in invasive bryophytes?

Ecography

Volumn 38, Issue 5, 2015, Pages 480-487

  Mateo, Rubén G ^a,b   Broennimann, Olivier ^b   Petitpierre, Blaise ^b   Muñoz, Jesús ^c   van Rooy, Jacques ^d   Laenen, Benjamin ^a   Guisan, Antoine ^b   Vanderpoorten, Alain ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIÈGE   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LAUSANNE   (Switzerland)

^c CSIC   (Spain)

^d SOUTH AFRICAN NATIONAL BIODIVERSITY INSTITUTE   (South Africa)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLIMATE CONDITIONS; CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT; INVASIVE SPECIES; MOSS; NICHE PARTITIONING;

EUROPE; NORTH AMERICA;

BRYOPHYTES; CAMPYLOPUS INTROFLEXUS; EMBRYOPHYTA; LOPHOCOLEA; ORTHODONTIUM LINEARE;

EID: 84929118760     PISSN: 09067590     EISSN: 16000587     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/ecog.01014     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Acevedo, P. et al. 2012. Delimiting the geographical background in species distribution modelling. - J. Biogeogr. 39: 1383-1390.
2. Alexander, J. M. et al. 2012. Different genetic clines in response to temperature across the native and introduced ranges of a global plant invader. - J. Ecol. 100: 771-781.
3. Anderson, R. P. and Raza, A. 2010. The effect of the extent of the study region on GIS models of species geographic distributions and estimates of niche evolution: preliminary tests with montane rodents (genus Nephelomys) in Venezuela. - J. Biogeogr. 37: 1378-1393.
4. Araújo, M. B. and New, M. 2007. Ensemble forecasting of species distributions. - Trends Ecol. Evol. 22: 42-47.
5. Barve, N. et al. 2011. The crucial role of the accessible area in ecological niche modeling and species distribution modeling. - Ecol. Model. 222: 1810-1819.
6. Breiman, L. 2001. "Random Forests". - Mach. Learn. 45: 5-32.
7. Broennimann, O. and Guisan, A. 2008. Predicting current and future biological invasions: both native and invaded ranges matter. - Biol. Lett. 4: 585-589.
8. Broennimann, O. et al. 2012. Measuring ecological niche overlap from occurrence and spatial environmental data. - Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 21: 481-497.
9. Busby, J. R. 1991. BIOCLIM - a bioclimatic analysis and prediction system. - In: Margules, C. R. and Austin, M. P. (eds), Nature conservation: cost effective biological surveys and data analysis. CSIRO, pp. 64-68.
10. Colautti, R. I. et al. 2012. Variation of self-incompatibility within invasive populations of purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria L.) from eastern north America. - Int. J. Plant Sci. 171: 158-166.
11. Didham, R. K. et al. 2007. Interactive effects of habitat modification and species invasion on native species decline. - Trends Ecol. Evol. 22: 489-496.
12. Elith, J. et al. 2010. The art of modelling range-shifting species. - Methods Ecol. Evol. 1: 330-342.
13. Elith, J. et al. 2011. A statistical explanation of MaxEnt for ecologists. - Divers. Distrib. 17: 43-57.
14. Elton, C. S. 1958. The ecology of invasions by animals and plants. - Chicago Univ. Press.
15. Equihua, M. and Usher, M. B. 1993. Impact of carpets of the invasive moss Campylopus introflexus on Calluna vulgaris regeneration. - J. Ecol. 81: 359-365.
16. Essl, F. et al. 2013. Little, but increasing evidence of impacts by alien bryophytes. - Biol. Invasions doi: 10.1007/s10530-013-0572-2
17. Fitzpatrick, M. C. and Hargrove, W. W. 2009. The projection of species distribution models and the problem of non-analog climate. - Biodivers. Conserv. 18: 2255-2261.
18. Frahm, J.-P. and Vitt, D. H. 1993. A comparison of the mossfloras of Europe and North America. - Nova Hedwigia 56: 307-333.
19. Friedman, J. H. 2001. Greedy function approximation: a gradient boosting machine. - Ann. Stat. 29: 1189-1232.
20. Gallagher, R. V. et al. 2010. Evidence for climatic niche and biome shifts between native and novel ranges in plant species introduced to Australia. - J. Ecol. 98: 790-799.
21. Gallien, L. et al. 2010. Predicting potential distributions of invasive species: where to go from here? - Divers. Distrib. 16: 331-342.
22. Gallien, L. et al. 2012. Invasive species distribution models - how violating the equilibrium assumption can create new insights. - Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 21: 1126-1136.
23. Guisan, A. et al. 2013. Predicting species distributions for conservation decisions. - Ecol. Lett. 16: 1424-1435.
24. Hassel, K. and Söderström, L. 2005. The expansion of the alien mosses Orthodontium lineare and Campylopus introflexus in Britain and continental Europe. - J. Hattori Bot. Lab. 97: 183-193.
25. Hassel, K. et al. 2005a. Changes in life-history traits in an expanding moss species: phenotypic plasticity or genetic differentiation? A reciprocal transplantation experiment with Pogonatum dentatum. - Ecography 28: 71-80.
26. Hassel, K. et al. 2005b. Genetic variation and structure in the expanding moss Pogonatum dentatum (Polytrichaceae) in its area of origin and in a recently colonized area. - Am. J. Bot. 92: 1684-1690.
27. Hedenäs, L. et al. 1989. Ecology of the invading moss species Orthodontium lineare in Sweden: spatial distribution and population structure. - Ecography 12: 163-172.
28. Hill, M. P. et al. 2013. A predicted niche shift corresponds with increased thermal resistance in an invasive mite, Halotydeus destructor. - Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 22: 942-951.
29. Hirzel, A. H. et al. 2006. Evaluating the ability of habitat suitability models to predict species presences. - Ecol. Model. 199: 142-152.
30. Hulme, P. E. and Barrett, S. C. H. 2013. Integrating trait- and niche-based approaches to assess contemporary evolution in alien plant species. - J. Ecol. 101: 68-77.
31. Hutsemekers, V. et al. 2010. Macroecological patterns of genetic structure and diversity in the aquatic moss Platyhypnidium riparioides. - New Phytol. 185: 852-864.
32. Karlin, E. F. et al. 2011. One haploid parent contributes 100% of the gene pool for a widespread species in northwest North America. - Mol. Ecol. 20: 753-767.
33. Klinck, J. 2010. NOBANIS - invasive alien species fact sheet - Campylopus introflexus. - Online Database of the European Network on Invasive Alien Species - NOBANIS accessed 1 September 2013.
34. Kriticos, D. J. et al. 2012. CliMond: global high resolution historical and future scenario climate surfaces for bioclimatic modelling. - Methods Ecol. Evol. 3: 53-64.
35. Lodge, D. M. 1993. Biological invasions: lessons for ecology. - Trends Ecol. Evol. 8: 133-137.
36. Lönnell, N. et al. 2012. The fate of the missing spores - patterns of realized dispersal beyond the closest vicinity of a sporulating moss. - PLoS One 7: e41987.
37. Lönnell, N. et al. 2014. Production of diaspores at the landscape level regulates local colonization: an experiment with a spore-dispersed moss. - Ecography 37: 591-598.
38. Mateo, R. G. et al. 2010. Profile or group discriminative techniques? Generating reliable species distribution models using pseudo-absences and target-group absences from natural history collections. - Divers. Distrib. 16: 84-94.
39. McCullagh, P. and Nelder, J. A. 1989. Generalized linear models. - Chapman and Hall.
40. Medley, K. A. 2010. Niche shifts during the global invasion of the Asian tiger mosquito, Aedes albopictus Skuse (Culicidae), revealed by reciprocal distribution models. - Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 19: 122-133.
41. Olson, D. M. et al. 2001. Terrestrial ecoregions of the world: a new map of life on Earth. - Bioscience 51: 933-938.
42. Pearman, P. B. et al. 2008. Prediction of plant species distributions across six millennia. - Ecol. Lett. 11: 357-369.
43. Petersen, M. 2013. Evidence of a climatic niche shift following North American introductions of two crane flies (Diptera; genus Tipula). - Biol. Invasions 15: 885-897.
44. Peterson, A. T. 2003. Predicting the geography of species' invasions via ecological niche modeling. - Q. Rev. Biol. 78: 419-433.
45. Petitpierre, B. et al. 2012. Climatic niche shifts are rare among terrestrial plant invaders. - Science 335: 1344-1348.
46. Phillips, S. J. et al. 2006. Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. - Ecol. Model. 190: 231-259.
47. Piñeiro, R. et al. 2012. Circumarctic dispersal and long-distance colonization of South America: the moss genus Cinclidium. - J. Biogeogr. 39: 2041-2051.
48. Pisa, S. et al. 2013. Altitudinal genetic differentiation of the cosmopolitan moss Bryum argenteum in the mountains of Sierra Nevada (Spain, SW Europe). - Am. J. Bot. 100: 2000-2008.
49. Qian, H. 1999. Spatial pattern of vascular plant diversity in North America north of Mexico and its floristic relationship with Eurasia. - Ann. Bot. 83: 271-283.
50. Saupe, E. E. et al. 2012. Variation in niche and distribution model performance: the need for a priori assessment of key causal factors. - Ecol. Model. 237-238: 11-22.
51. Schirmel, J. and Buchholz, S. 2013. Invasive moss alters patterns in life-history traits and functional diversity of spiders and carabids. - Biol. Invasions 15: 1089-1100.
52. Schirmel, J. et al. 2011. Impact of the invasive moss Campylopus introflexus on carabid beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) and spiders (Araneae) in acidic coastal dunes at the southern Baltic Sea. - Biol. Invasions 13: 605-620.
53. Shaw, A. J. and Goffinet, B. 2000. Bryophyte biology. - Cambridge Univ. Press.
54. Simberloff, D. et al. 2013. Impacts of biological invasions: what's what and the way forward. - Trends Ecol. Evol. 28: 58-66.
55. Stieperaere, H. 1994. Lophocolea semiteres (Lehm.) Mitt. in Belgium and the Netherlands, another antipodal bryophyte spreading on the European continent. - Lindbergia 19: 29-36.
56. Sundberg, S. 2013. Spore rain in relation to regional sources and beyond. - Ecography 36: 364-373.
57. Syfert, M. M. et al. 2013. The effects of sampling bias and model complexity on the predictive performance of maxent species distribution models. - PLoS One 8: e55158.
58. Szövényi, P. et al. 2012. Long-distance dispersal and genetic structure of natural populations: an assessment of the inverse isolation hypothesis in peat mosses. - Mol. Ecol. 21: 5461-5472.
59. Thuiller, W. et al. 2004. Effects of restricting environmental range of data to project current and future species distributions. - Ecography 27: 165-172.
60. Thuiller, W. et al. 2009. BIOMOD - a platform for ensemble forecasting of species distributions. - Ecography 32: 369-373.
61. Vanderpoorten, A. 1997. A bryological survey of the Brussels Capital Region. - Scripta Bot. Belgica 14: 1-83.
62. Vanderpoorten, A. et al. 2010. The ghosts of Gondwana and Laurasia in modern liverwort distributions. - Biol. Rev. Camb. Phil. Soc. 85: 471-487.
63. VanDerWal, J. et al. 2009. Selecting pseudo-absence data for presence-only distribution modeling: how far should you stray from what you know? - Ecol. Model. 220: 589-594.
64. Veloz, S. D. et al. 2012. No-analog climates and shifting realized niches during the late quaternary: implications for 21st-century predictions by species distribution models. - Global Change Biol. 18: 1698-1713.
65. Vitousek, P. M. et al. 1996. Biological invasions as global environmental change. - Am. Sci. 84: 468.
66. Ward, M. et al. 2012. Modes of reproduction in three invasive milkweeds are consistent with Baker's rule. - Biol. Invasions 14: 1237-1250.
67. Wilkinson, D. M. et al. 2012. Modelling the effect of size on the aerial dispersal of microorganisms. - J. Biogeogr. 39: 89-97.
68. Zamfir, M. 2000. Effects of bryophytes and lichens on seedling emergence of alvar plants: evidence from greenhouse experiments. - Oikos 88: 603-611.
69. Zomer, R. J. et al. 2008. Climate change mitigation: a spatial analysis of global land suitability for clean development mechanism afforestation and reforestation. - Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 126: 67-80.