Socio-psychological factors in the Expanded Health Belief Model and subsequent colorectal cancer screening

Patient Education and Counseling

Volumn 98, Issue 7, 2015, Pages 901-907

  Sohler, Nancy L ^a   Jerant, Anthony ^b   Franks, Peter ^b  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Colorectal cancer; Expanded Health Belief Model; Screening behavior; Socio psychological factors; Theoretical models

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER SCREENING; COLORECTAL CANCER; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXPANDED HEALTH BELIEF MODEL; FEMALE; HEALTH BELIEF MODEL; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HUMAN; INTERVENTION STUDY; MALE; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; SELF CONCEPT; SOCIAL ASPECT; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; EARLY CANCER DIAGNOSIS; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PSYCHOLOGY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; THEORETICAL MODEL; UNITED STATES;

AGED; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; FEMALE; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; MALE; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, THEORETICAL; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; SELF EFFICACY; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84929043573     PISSN: 07383991     EISSN: 18735134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2015.03.023     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. U.S.Preventive Services Task Force Screening for colorectal cancer, U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 2008, 149:627-637.
2. Klabunde C.N., Frame P.S., Meadow A., et al. A national survey of primary care physicians' colorectal cancer screening recommendations and practices. Prev Med 2003, 36:352-362.
3. Rosenstock I.M., Strecher V.J., Becker M.H. Social learning theory and the health belief model. Health Educ Q 1988, 15:175-183.
4. Sabatino S.A., Lawrence B., Elder R., et al. Effectiveness of interventions to increase screening for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancers: nine updated systematic reviews for the guide to community preventive services. Am J Prev Med 2012, 43:97-118.
5. Mosher C.E., Fuemmeler B.F., Sloane R., et al. Change in self-efficacy partially mediates the effects of the FRESH START intervention on cancer survivors' dietary outcomes. Psycho-Oncology 2008, 17:1014-1023.
6. Napolitano M.A., Papandonatos G.D., Lewis B.A., et al. Mediators of physical activity behavior change: a multivariate approach. Health Psychol 2008, 27:409-418.
7. Ruffin M.T., Fetters M.D., Jimbo M.M. Preference-based electronic decision aid to promote colorectal cancer screening: results of a randomized controlled trial. Prev Med 2007, 45:267-273.
8. Rawl S.M., Champion V.L., Scott L.L., et al. A randomized trial of two print interventions to increase colon cancer screening among first-degree relatives. Patient Educ Couns 2008, 71:215-227.
9. Krebs P., Prochaska J.O., Rossi J.S. A meta-analysis of computer-tailored interventions for health behavior change. Prev Med 2010, 51:214-221.
10. Noar S.M., Benac C.N., Harris M.S. Does tailoring matter? Meta-analytic review of tailored print health behavior change interventions. Psychol Bull 2007, 133:673-693.
11. Walsh J.M., Salazar R., Nguyen T.T., et al. Healthy colon, healthy life: a novel colorectal cancer screening intervention. Am J Prev Med 2010, 39:1-14.
12. Vernon S.W., Bartholomew L.K., McQueen A., et al. A randomized controlled trial of a tailored interactive computer-delivered intervention to promote colorectal cancer screening: sometimes more is just the same. Ann Behav Med 2011, 41:284-299.
13. Myers R.E., Sifri R., Hyslop T., et al. A randomized controlled trial of the impact of targeted and tailored interventions on colorectal cancer screening. Cancer 2007, 110:2083-2091.
14. Manne S.L., Coups E.J., Markowitz A., et al. A randomized trial of generic versus tailored interventions to increase colorectal cancer screening among intermediate risk siblings. Ann Behav Med 2009, 37:207-217.
15. Marcus A.C., Mason M., Wolfe P., et al. The efficacy of tailored print materials in promoting colorectal cancer screening: results from a randomized trial involving callers to the National Cancer Institute's Cancer Information Service. J Health Comm 2005, 10:83-104.
16. Weinberg D.S., Keenan E., Ruth K., et al. A randomized comparison of print and web communication on colorectal cancer screening. J Amer Med Assoc 2013, 173:122-129.
17. Neville L.M., O'Hara B., Milat A.J. Computer-tailored dietary behaviour change interventions: a systematic review. Health Ed Res 2009, 24:699-720.
18. Rimer B.K., Conaway M., Lyna P., et al. The impact of tailored interventions on a community health center population. Pat Educ Couns 1999, 37:125-140.
19. Kiviniemi M.T., Bennett A., Zaiter M., et al. Individual-level factors in colorectal cancer screening: a review of the literature on the relation of individual level health behavior constructs and screening behavior. Psycho-Oncology 2001, 20:1023-1033.
20. Burack R.C., Liang J. The early detection of cancer in the primary-care setting: factors associated with the acceptance and completion of recommended procedures. Prev Med 1987, 16:739-751.
21. Brenes G.A., Paskett E.D. Predictors of stage of adoption for colorectal cancer screening. Prev Med 2000, 31:410-416.
22. Brawarsky P., Brooks D.R., Mucci L.A. Correlates of colorectal cancer testing in Massachusetts men and women. Prev Med 2003, 36:659-668.
23. Carpenter C.J. A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of the health belief model variables in predicting behavior. Health Comm 2010, 25:661-669.
24. Tanner Smith E. Evaluating the health belief model: a critical review of studies predicting mammographic and pap screening. Social Theory Health 2010, 8:95-125.
25. National Cancer Institute Theory at a glance: a guide for health promotion practice 2005, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD. 2nd ed.
26. Maxwell A.E., Bastani R., Crespi C.M., et al. Behavioral mediators of colorectal cancer screening in a randomized controlled intervention trial. Prev Med 2011, 52:167-173.
27. Jerant A., Kravitz R.L., Sohler N., et al. Sociopsychological tailoring to address colorectal cancer screening disparities: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Fam Med 2014, 12:204-214.
28. Rawl S., Champion V., Menon U., et al. Validation of scales to measure benefits of and barriers to colorectal cancer screening. J Psychosoc Oncol 2001, 19:47-63.
29. Prochaska J.O., Goldstein M.G. Process of smoking cessation. Clin Chest Med 1991, 12:727-735.
30. Skinner C.S., Arfken C.L., Sykes R.K. Knowledge, perceptions, and stage of adoption among older urban women. Am J Prev Med 1998, 14:54-63.
31. Ajzen I. Perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior. J Appl Social Psychol 2002, 32:665-683.
32. Strecher V.J., et al. The role of self-efficacy in achieving health behavior change. Health Educ Behav 1986, 13:73-92.
33. Christy S.M., Perkins S.M., Tonh Y., et al. Promoting colorectal cancer screening discussion: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Prev Med 2013, 44:325-329.
34. Janz N.K., Wren P.A., Schottenfeld D., et al. Colorectal cancer screening attitudes and behavior: a population-based study. Prev Med 2003, 37:627-634.
35. Zapka J.G., Puleo E., Vickers-Lahti M., et al. Healthcare system factors and colorectal cancer screening. Am J Prev Med 2002, 23:28-35.
36. Freudenberg N., Eng E., Flay B., et al. Strengthening individual and community capacity to prevent disease and promote health: in search of relevant theories and principles. Health Educ Q 1995, 22:290-306.
37. Getrich C.M., Sussman A.L., Helitzer D.L., et al. Expressions of machismo in colorectal cancer screening among New Mexico Hispanic subpopulations. Qual Health Res 2012, 22:546-559. RIOS Net Clinicians.
38. Champion V.L., Skinner C.S. The health belief model. Health behavior and health education 2008, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA. 4th ed. K. Glanz (Ed.).