Consensus Genotyper for Exome Sequencing (CGES): Improving the quality of exome variant genotypes

Bioinformatics

Volumn 31, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 187-193

  Trubetskoy, Vassily ^a   Rodriguez, Alex ^b   Dave, Uptal ^b   Campbell, Nicholas ^c   Crawford, Emily L ^c   Cook, Edwin H ^d   Sutcliffe, James S ^c   Foster, Ian ^b   Madduri, Ravi ^b   Cox, Nancy J ^a   Davis, Lea K ^a  

^a Section of Emergency Medicine   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^c VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; AUTISM; CONSENSUS SEQUENCE; EXOME; GENETIC SCREENING; GENETICS; GENOTYPE; HIGH THROUGHPUT SEQUENCING; HUMAN; PROCEDURES; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; SOFTWARE; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

ALGORITHMS; AUTISTIC DISORDER; CONSENSUS SEQUENCE; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; EXOME; GENETIC TESTING; GENOTYPE; HIGH-THROUGHPUT NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCING; HUMANS; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; SOFTWARE;

EID: 84928999736     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 14602059     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu591     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Albers, C.A. et al. (2011) Dindel: accurate indel calls from short-read data. Genome Res., 21, 961-973.
2. Berument, S.K. et al. (1999) Autism screening questionnaire: diagnostic validity. Br. J. Psychiatry, 175, 444-451.
3. Blankenberg, D. et al. (2010) Galaxy: a web-based genome analysis tool for experimentalists. Curr. Protoc. Mol. Biol., Chapter 19, Unit 19.10.1-21.
4. Challis, D. et al. (2012) An integrative variant analysis suite for whole exome next-generation sequencing data. BMC Bioinformatics, 13, 8.
5. Danecek, P. et al. (2011) The variant call format and VCFtools. Bioinformatics, 27, 2156-2158.
6. DePristo, M.A. et al. (2011) A framework for variation discovery and genotyping using next-generation DNA sequencing data. Nat. Genet., 43, 491-498.
7. Garrison, E. and Marth, G. (2012) Haplotype-based variant detection from short-read sequencing. arXiv preprint arXiv:1207.3907, 1-9.
8. Giardine, B. et al. (2005) Galaxy: a platform for interactive large-scale genome analysis. Genome Res., 15, 1451-1455.
9. Goecks, J. et al. (2010) Galaxy: a comprehensive approach for supporting accessible, reproducible, and transparent computational research in the life sciences. Genome Biol., 11, R86.
10. Koboldt, D.C. et al. (2012) VarScan 2: Somatic mutation and copy number alteration discovery in cancer by exome sequencing. Genome Res., 22, 568-576.
11. Le Couteur, A. et al. (1989) Autism diagnostic interview: a standardized investigator-based instrument. J. Autism Dev. Disord., 19, 363-387.
12. Li, H. et al. (2009a) The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics, 25, 2078-2079.
13. Li, R. et al. (2009b) SNP detection for massively parallel whole-genome resequen-cing. Genome Res., 19, 1124-1132.
14. Liu, L. et al. (2013) Analysis of rare, exonic variation amongst subjects with autism spectrum disorders and population controls. PLoS Genet., 9, e1003443.
15. Madduri, R.K. et al. (2013) Experiences in building a next-generation sequencing analysis service using galaxy, globus online and Amazon web service. In Proceedings of the Conference on Extreme Science and Engineering Discovery Environment: Gateway to Discovery. p. 34. ACM.
16. Martin, E.R. et al. (2010) SeqEM: an adaptive genotype-calling approach for next-generation sequencing studies. Bioinformatics, 26, 2803-2810.
17. McKenna, A. et al. (2010) The genome analysis toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res., 20, 1297-1303.
18. Neale, B.M. et al. (2012) Patterns and rates of exonic de novo mutations in autism spectrum disorders. Nature, 485, 242-245.
19. O'Rawe, J. et al. (2013) Low concordance of multiple variant-calling pipelines: practical implications for exome and genome sequencing. Genome Med., 5, 28.
20. Purcell, S. et al. (2007) PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. Am. J. Hum. Genet., 81, 559-575.
21. Wilde, M. et al. (2011) Swift: A language for distributed parallel scripting. Parallel Computing, 39, 633-652.
22. Yu, X. and Sun, S. (2013) Comparing a few SNP calling algorithms using low-coverage sequencing data. BMC Bioinformatics, 14, 274.
23. Zook, J.M. et al. (2014) Integrating human sequence data sets provides a resource of benchmark SNP and indel genotype calls. Nature biotechnology, 32, 246-251.