Large-scale binding ligand prediction by improved patch-based method Patch-Surfer2.0

Bioinformatics

Volumn 31, Issue 5, 2015, Pages 707-713

  Zhu, Xiaolei ^a   Xiong, Yi ^a   Kihara, Daisuke ^a,b  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Purdue University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LIGAND; PROTEIN;

ALGORITHM; BINDING SITE; CHEMISTRY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMAN; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; METABOLISM; PROTEIN CONFORMATION;

ALGORITHMS; BINDING SITES; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMANS; LIGANDS; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEINS;

EID: 84928989421     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 14602059     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu724     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Arakaki, A.K. et al. (2004) Large-scale assessment of the utility of low-resolution protein structures for biochemical function assignment. Bioinformatics, 20, 1087-1096.
2. Brylinski, M. and Skolnick, J. (2009) FINDSITE: a threading-based approach to ligand homology modeling. PLoS Comput. Biol., 5, e1000405.
3. Canterakis, N. (1999) 3D Zernike moments and Zernike affine invariants for 3D image analysis and recognition. Proceedings of 11th Scandinavian Conference on Image Analysis, pp. 85-93.
4. Capra, J.A. et al. (2009) Predicting protein ligand binding sites by combining evolutionary sequence conservation and 3D structure. PLoS Comput. Biol., 5, e1000585.
5. Chikhi, R. et al. (2010) Real-time ligand binding pocket database search using local surface descriptors. Proteins, 78, 2007-2028.
6. Das, S. et al. (2009) Rapid comparison of protein binding site surfaces with property encoded shape distributions. J. Chem. Inform. Model., 49, 2863-2872.
7. Denessiouk, K.A. et al. (2001) Adenine recognition: a motif present in ATP-, CoA-, NAD-, NADP-, and FAD-dependent proteins. Proteins, 44, 282-291.
8. Gao, M. and Skolnick, J. (2013) APoc: large-scale identification of similar protein pockets. Bioinformatics, 29, 597-604.
9. Gold, N.D. and Jackson, R.M. (2006) Fold independent structural comparisons of protein-ligand binding sites for exploring functional relationships. J. Mol. Biol., 355, 1112-1124.
10. Hattori, M. et al. (2003) Development of a chemical structure comparison method for integrated analysis of chemical and genomic information in the metabolic pathways. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 125, 11853-11865.
11. Heo, L. et al. (2014) GalaxySite: ligand-binding-site prediction by using molecular docking. Nucleic Acids Res., 42, W210-W214.
12. Hoffmann, B. et al. (2010) A new protein binding pocket similarity measure based on comparison of clouds of atoms in 3D: application to ligand prediction. BMC Bioinformatics, 11, 99.
13. Hu, G. et al. (2012) Finding protein targets for small biologically relevant lig-ands across fold space using inverse ligand binding predictions, Structure, 20, 1815-1822.
14. Kahraman, A. et al. (2007) Shape variation in protein binding pockets and their ligands. J. Mol. Biol., 368, 283-301.
15. Kawabata, T. (2010) Detection of multiscale pockets on protein surfaces using mathematical morphology. Proteins, 78, 1195-1211.
16. Kihara, D. et al. (2011) Molecular surface representation using 3D Zernike descriptors for protein shape comparison and docking. Curr. Protein Pept. Sci. 12, 520-530.
17. Kinoshita, K. and Nakamura, H. (2005) Identification of the ligand binding sites on the molecular surface of proteins. Protein Sci., 14, 711.
18. Li, B. et al. (2008) Characterization of local geometry of protein surfaces with the visibility criterion. Proteins, 71, 670-683.
19. Liang, J. et al. (1998) Anatomy of protein pockets and cavities: measurement of binding site geometry and implications for ligand design. Protein Sci., 7, 1884.
20. Liu, P.F. et al. (2011) Energetics-based discovery of protein-ligand interactions on a proteomic scale. J. Mol. Biol., 408, 147-162.
21. Moodie, S.L. et al. (1996) Protein recognition of adenylate: an example of a fuzzy recognition template. J. Mol. Biol., 263, 486-500.
22. Morris, R.J. et al. (2005) Real spherical harmonic expansion coefficients as 3D shape descriptors for protein binding pocket and ligand comparisons. Bioinformatics, 21, 2347-2355.
23. Nagano, N. et al. (2002) One fold with many functions: the evolutionary relationships between TIM barrel families based on their sequences, structures and functions. J. Mol. Biol., 321, 741-765.
24. Porter, C.T. et al. (2004) The Catalytic Site Atlas: a resource of catalytic sites and residues identified in enzymes using structural data. Nucleic Acids Res., 32, D129-D133.
25. Sael, L. and Kihara, D. (2010) Binding ligand prediction for proteins using partial matching of local surface patches. Int. J. Mol. Sci., 11, 5009-5026.
26. Sael, L. and Kihara, D. (2012) Detecting local ligand-binding site similarity in nonhomologous proteins by surface patch comparison. Proteins, 80, 1177-1195.
27. Shatsky, M. et al. (2006) The multiple common point set problem and its application to molecule binding pattern detection. J. Comput. Biol., 13, 407-428.
28. Wallach, I. and Lilien, R. (2009) The protein-small-molecule database, a non-redundant structural resource for the analysis of protein-ligand binding. Bioinformatics, 25, 615-620.
29. Xie, L. and Bourne, P.E. (2008) Detecting evolutionary relationships across existing fold space, using sequence order-independent profile-profile alignments. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. US A., 105, 5441-5446.
30. Xie, Z.R. and Hwang, M.J. (2012) Ligand-binding site prediction using ligand-interacting and binding site-enriched protein triangles. Bioinformatics, 28, 1579-1585.
31. Yang, J. et al. (2013) Protein-ligand binding site recognition using complementary binding-specific substructure comparison and sequence profile alignment. Bioinformatics, 29, 2588-2595.
32. Zhang, Y. and Skolnick, J. (2005) TM-align: a protein structure alignment algorithm based on the TM-score. Nucleic Acids Res., 33, 2302.