Detecting local ligand-binding site similarity in nonhomologous proteins by surface patch comparison

Proteins: Structure, Function and Bioinformatics

Volumn 80, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 1177-1195

  Sael, Lee ^a,b   Kihara, Daisuke ^a,b  

^a Purdue University   (United States)

^b PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

3D Zernike descriptors; Ligand binding pocket; Pocket comparison; Protein surface shape; Structure based function prediction

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BINDING SITE; ELECTROSTATIC PRECIPITATION; GEOMETRY; HYDROPHOBICITY; LIGAND BINDING; MOLECULE; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; SURFACE PROPERTY;

ALGORITHMS; BINDING SITES; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DATABASES, PROTEIN; HYDROPHOBIC AND HYDROPHILIC INTERACTIONS; LIGANDS; PHYSICOCHEMICAL PROCESSES; PROTEINS; SOFTWARE; STATIC ELECTRICITY; STRUCTURAL HOMOLOGY, PROTEIN; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84857794078     PISSN: 08873585     EISSN: 10970134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/prot.24018     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Hawkins T, Kihara D. Function prediction of uncharacterized proteins. J Bioinform Comput Biol 2007; 5: 1-30.
2. Hawkins T, Chitale M. New paradigm in protein function prediction for large scale omics analysis. Mol Biosyst 2008; 4: 223-231.
3. Watson JD, Laskowski RA, Thornton JM. Predicting protein function from sequence and structural data. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2005; 15: 275-284.
4. Valencia A. Automatic annotation of protein function. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2005; 15: 267-274.
5. Chikhi R, Sael L, Kihara D. Protein binding ligand prediction using moment-based methods. In: Protein function prediction for omics era. Springer; 2011. pp 145-163.
6. Chitale M, Kihara D. Computational protein function prediction: framework and challenges. In: Protein function prediction for omics era. Springer; 2011. pp 1-17.
7. Chandonia J-M, Brenner SE. The impact of structural genomics: expectations and outcomes. Science 2006; 311: 347-351.
8. Berman HM, Westbrook J, Feng Z, Gilliland G, Bhat TN, Weissig H, Shindyalov IN, Bourne PE. The protein data bank. Nucleic Acids Res 2000; 28: 235-242.
9. Wild DL, Saqi MAS. Structural proteomics: inferring function from protein structure. Curr Proteomics 2004; 1: 59-65.
10. Roberts RJ. Identifying protein function-a call for community action. PLoS Biol 2004; 2: e42.
11. Roberts RJ. COMBREX: computational bridge to experiments. Biochem Soc Trans 2011; 39: 581-583.
12. Gene Ontology Consortium. The gene ontology in 2010: extensions and refinements. Nucleic Acids Res 2010; 38: D331-D335.
13. Rosenberg M, Goldblum A. Computational protein design: a novel path to future protein drugs. Curr Pharm Des 2006; 12: 3973-3997.
14. Samish I, Macdermaid CM. Perez-Aguilar JM, Saven JG. Theoretical and computational protein design. Annu Rev Phys Chem 2010; 62: 129-149.
15. Skolnick J, Brylinski M. FINDSITE: a combined evolution/structure-based approach to protein function prediction. Brief Bioinform 2009; 10: 378-391.
16. Creighton T. Proteins: structures and molecular properties. W.H. Freeman: New York; 1993.
17. Porter CT, Bartlett GJ, Thornton JM. The catalytic site atlas: a resource of catalytic sites and residues identified in enzymes using structural data. Nucleic Acids Res 2004; 32: D129-D133.
18. Arakaki AK, Zhang Y, Skolnick J. Large-scale assessment of the utility of low-resolution protein structures for biochemical function assignment. Bioinformatics 2004; 20: 1087-1096.
19. Ferrè F, Ausiello G, Zanzoni A, Helmer-Citterich M. SURFACE: a database of protein surface regions for functional annotation. Nucleic Acids Res 2004; 32: D240-D244.
20. Gold ND, Jackson RM. Fold independent structural comparisons of protein-ligand binding sites for exploring functional relationships. J Mol Biol 2006; 355: 1112-1124.
21. Shatsky M, Shulman-Peleg A, Nussinov R, Wolfson HJ. The multiple common point set problem and its application to molecule binding pattern detection. J Comput Biol 2006; 13: 407-428.
22. Hoffmann B, Zaslavskiy M, Vert J-P, Stoven V. A new protein binding pocket similarity measure based on comparison of clouds of atoms in 3D: application to ligand prediction. BMC Bioinformatics 2010; 11: 99.
23. Sael L, Kihara D. Protein surface representation and comparison: new approaches in structural proteomics. In: Chen J, Lonardi S. editors. Biological data mining. Chapman & Hall/CRC Press; 2009. pp 89-109.
24. Kinoshita K, Murakami Y, Nakamura H. eF-seek: prediction of the functional sites of proteins by searching for similar electrostatic potential and molecular surface shape. Nucleic Acids Res 2007; 35: W398-W402.
25. Morris RJ, Najmanovich RJ, Kahraman A, Thornton JM. Real spherical harmonic expansion coefficients as 3D shape descriptors for protein binding pocket and ligand comparisons. Bioinformatics 2005; 21: 2347-2355.
26. Kahraman A, Morris RJ, Laskowski RA, Favia AD, Thornton JM. On the diversity of physicochemical environments experienced by identical ligands in binding pockets of unrelated proteins. Proteins 2010; 78: 1120-1136.
27. Das S, Kokardekar A, Breneman CM. Rapid comparison of protein binding site surfaces with property encoded shape distributions. J Chem Inf Model 2009; 49: 2863-2872.
28. Osada R, Funkhouser T, Chazelle B, Dobkin D. Shape distributions. ACM Trans Graphics 2002; 21: 807-832.
29. Chikhi R, Sael L, Kihara D. Real-time ligand binding pocket database search using local surface descriptors. Proteins 2010; 78: 2007-2028.
30. Kobayashi N, Go N. A method to search for similar protein local structures at ligand binding sites and its application to adenine recognition. Eur Biophys J 1997; 26: 135-144.
31. Li B, Turuvekere S, Agrawal M, La D, Ramani K, Kihara D. Characterization of local geometry of protein surfaces with the visibility criterion. Proteins 2008; 71: 670-683.
32. Canterakis N. 3D Zernike moments and Zernike affine invariants for 3D image analysis and recognition. In: Proceedings of the 11th Scandinavian conference on image analysis, Kangerlussuaq, Greenland; 1999. pp 85-93.
33. Kahraman A, Morris RJ, Laskowski RA, Thornton JM. Shape variation in protein binding pockets and their ligands. J Mol Biol 2007; 368: 283-301.
34. Huang B, Schroeder M. LIGSITEcsc: predicting ligand binding sites using the Connolly surface and degree of conservation. BMC Struct Biol 2006; 6: 19.
35. Baker NA, Sept D, Joseph S, Holst MJ, McCammon JA. Electrostatics of nanosystems: application to microtubules and the ribosome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001; 98: 10037-10041.
36. Kyte J, Doolittle RF. A simple method for displaying the hydropathic character of a protein. J Mol Biol 1982; 157: 105-132.
37. Novotni M, Klein R. 3D Zernike descriptors for content based shape retrieval. In: Proceedings of the eighth ACM symposium on solid modeling and applications; 2003. pp 216-225.
38. Venkatraman V, Sael L, Kihara D. Potential for protein surface shape analysis using spherical harmonics and 3D Zernike descriptors. Cell Biochem Biophys 2009; 54: 23-32.
39. Kihara D, Sael L, Chikhi R, Esquivel-Rodriguez J. Molecular surface representation using 3D Zernike descriptors for protein shape comparison and docking. Curr Protein Pept Sci 2011; 12: 520-530.
40. Sael L, Li B, La D, Fang Y, Ramani K, Rustamov R, Kihara D. Fast protein tertiary structure retrieval based on global surface shape similarity. Proteins 2008; 72: 1259-1273.
41. La D, Esquivel-Rodriguez J, Venkatraman V, Li B, Sael L, Ueng S, Ahrendt S, Kihara D. 3D-SURFER: software for high-throughput protein surface comparison and analysis. Bioinformatics 2009; 25: 2843-2844.
42. Sael L, La D, Li B, Rustamov R, Kihara D. Rapid comparison of properties on protein surface. Proteins 2008; 73: 1-10.
43. Venkatraman V, Chakravarthy PR. Application of 3D Zernike descriptors to shape-based ligand similarity searching. J Cheminform 2009; 1: 1-19.
44. Venkatraman V, Yang YD, Sael L, Kihara D. Protein-protein docking using region-based 3D Zernike descriptors. BMC Bioinform 2009; 10: 407.
45. Sael L, Kihara D. Protein surface representation for application to comparing low-resolution protein structure data. BMC Bioinform 2010; 11: S2.
46. Yin S, Dokholyan NV. Fingerprint-based structure retrieval using electron density. Proteins 2010; 79: 1002-1009.
47. Sael L, Kihara D. Characterization and classification of local protein surfaces using self-organizing map. Int J Knowl Discov Bioinformatics 2010; 1: 32-47.
48. Sael L, Kihara D. Binding ligand prediction for proteins using partial matching of local surface patches. Int J Mol Sci 2010; 11: 5009-5026.
49. Demange G, Gale D, Sotomayor M. Multi-item auctions. J Polit Econ 1986; 94: 863-872.
50. Gold ND, Jackson RM. Fold independent structural comparisons of protein-ligand binding sites for exploring functional relationships. J Mol Biol 2006; 355: 1112-1124.
51. Minai R, Matsuo Y, Onuki H, Hirota H. Method for comparing the structures of protein ligand-binding sites and application for predicting protein-drug interactions. Proteins 2008; 72: 367-381.
52. Xiong B, Wu J, Burk D, Xue M, Jiang H, Shen J. BSSF: a fingerprint based ultrafast binding site similarity search and function analysis server. BMC Bioinformatics 2010; 11: 47.
53. Shindyalov IN, Bourne PE. Protein structure alignment by incremental combinatorial extension (CE) of the optimal path. Protein Eng 1998; 11: 739-747.
54. Brylinski M, Skolnick J. What is the relationship between the global structures of apo and holo proteins? Proteins 2007; 70: 363-377.
55. Wallach I, Lilien R. The protein-small-molecule database, a non-redundant structural resource for the analysis of protein-ligand binding. Bioinformatics 2009; 25: 615-620.
56. Li YY, Hou TJ, Goddard WA, III. Computational modeling of structure-function of G protein-coupled receptors with applications for drug design. Curr Med Chem 2010; 17: 1167-1180.
57. Sael L, Kihara D. Constructing patch-based ligand-binding pocket database for predicting function of proteins. BMC Bioinformatics 2012, in press.